https://archive.is/d9n7e
 
Right, okay. We need something with less predictive power because it can be totally nominal based on extreme edge cases which are unlikely to win out and become the norm.
 
Same with the "would you live near white muslims" argument. I mean, I probably would pick Bosnia over most of the third world but you act like it's just a choice that could happen even if the average temperament and outlook makes it unlikely, and more likely to come to be under different demographics.
 
It's just cuckservative signalling about our values overcoming all, even as they dont, based on romanticized ideals of them. You dont live near the people you have such fondness for. Something you are quick to criticize in others when you can counter-signal by citing fentanyl addiction.
 
Empty rhetoric even by our standards. Again, as we win on a social issue they want to relitigate the fight the Religious Right lost that our enemies actually can fight them on (religion was damaged badly by Hitchens, and Reps never won the NatCon nonwhites). Discarding your best weapon for this is silly, not even a question of packaging and compromise here
 
Right Wing Third Worldism and Liberation Theology. Like Common Filth. Socialism, Social Conservatism, and yes Racism tend to be views held by who again?
 
https://archive.is/0h3TR