He is one of those "muh esoterica" types who thibks it nakes him a wise adjudicator. And he is pretty partisan imo, often being not satisfied with people outside his niche based on spurious demands to satisfy him directly rather than anything truly wrong with their performance (which is significant and not just a detail)
 
No better example exists than suggesting people ise e michael jones' lengthy theological jq arguments in a live debate and sayibg a failure to do so is some kind of inherent failure