https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116701
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0zzi8GKLEtSaXR1czM1TVNTSmc/view
https://archive.is/IJiib
https://archive.is/qelGX
https://archive.is/kx4ip
 
>takes Putnam's opinion as evidence
>not this
>this isnt causal at all.
>places with consistent porn WILL be more stable and less rapey in general (I bet)
>argument against race realism is essentially demanding causality be proven too, while he infers from stats
 
>like with Naked Ape (and his own subreddit), Steven doesnt actually present things honestly but tries to overwhelm. Very bad faith
 
at best a correlation between the availability of porn and lowered likelihood of rape.
 
Nothing causal and could easily be down to confounding factors. The authors caution against the conclusions he reached and the policy he proposed. Sometimes the opinion matters to him (putnam) as a way of wiggling out of conclusions he dislikes so it matters