Talking principles to skirt around reality
 
>tactical ancapping
 
The French Revolution, Sargon likes Locke after all, is the apotheosis of this vulgar liberalism. "If we just knock down illiberal institutions we will have freedom." While our Founding Fathers knew that a culture and society had to exist around the individual for him to be actualized.
 
When Sargon debates lolbergs he asserts this, when he argues against us he demands we not do anything that could harm the individual even if it is resolving an unstable situation perpetuated on a lie to begin with.
 
>violating rights
 
Of course the use of fast breeding bloc voters to disenfranchise whites is not violating anything right? Fact is an unstable situation was thrust upon us based on a lie, your solution is some kind of cultural imperium which wont work because your leader masturbates to Britannia (and this is also how most immigrants from outside the EU come in, former colonies), and we will resolve it by political means. From incentives, to discouragement, to separation, to simply letting human nature and the assortive power of the market do its thing. All governments use force, especially your imperium, you can either argue against the state itself or you cant argue race is meaningless and therefore warrantless force. But you won't actually address this inherent instability or the lie so your own ideas are based on the same lie