Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)

Trapwire Stratfor Email 30

By: theunpromisedone3 on Aug 10th, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 2.01 KB  |  hits: 52  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. Re: [alpha] Trapwire on Kabul Hotel Attack
  2.  
  3. Released on 2012-08-09 18:00 GMT
  4. Email-ID        83568
  5. Date    2011-06-29 16:14:18
  6. List-Name       [email protected]
  7. This makes sense, they don't know anymore than we do on the targetting.
  8. But the other thing is to compare their capabilities with available
  9. targets. They may simply have not thought they could exploit a
  10. vulnerability at the Serena, so chose the next most high profile target.
  11.  
  12. Did not see this before I sent out last Insight questions, but I had seen
  13. this earlier insight-
  14.  
  15. Stormed in force out of a vehicle after one perp detonated a vest at the
  16. gate. (That's preliminary -- not confirmed yet).
  17.  
  18. Can we confirm that? Once they got to the gate, which I assume is farther
  19. away from the hotel at the bottom of a hill, how did they get through the
  20. next checkpoints?
  21.  
  22. On 6/29/11 8:22 AM, Fred Burton wrote:
  23.  
  24. Two schools of thought on this at the moment:
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28. 1. Taliban expected the hotel to be full of westerners attending the
  29. transition talks. The hotel is used by westerners, but not nearly as
  30. much as the Serena Hotel downtown. The attackers allegedly communicated
  31. to their Taliban planners during the operation that they were going
  32. door-to-door and rounding up "many westerners." Whether or not this was
  33. Taliban hype, they clearly wanted to give the impression they were
  34. head-hunting foreigners.
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. 2. The Taliban targeted the hotel due to fact that clan/tribal chiefs
  39. were staying there ahead of the transition talks. (Which is true, there
  40. were some in the hotel at the time of the attack). This could have been
  41. the Taliban's attempt to send a mssg that they were still strong, and
  42. that no decisions on the future of Afghanistan can occur without them.
  43. In other words, a pure intimidation op.
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49. Mike, Who do you think the target was? Thanks
  50.  
  51. --
  52.  
  53. Sean Noonan
  54.  
  55. Tactical Analyst
  56.  
  57. Office: +1 512-279-9479
  58.  
  59. Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
  60.  
  61. Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
  62.  
  63. www.stratfor.com