Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)
Public Pastes

Trapwire Stratfor Email 20

By: theunpromisedone3 on Aug 9th, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 3.11 KB  |  hits: 81  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. Date    2010-09-23 17:36:35
  2. From    [email protected]
  3. To      [email protected]
  4. [email protected]
  5. Others  MessageId: <1839978412-1285256207-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1871190602-@bda512.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
  6. InReplyTo: 52D2EC48DB8E5948AF81E2C7BA04A28824EA0540A5@EVS-BLACK.coloflorida.com
  7. Text
  8. Dan,
  9.  
  10. Connected with LAPD. Good call. Horace suggested the security director for
  11. MGM Grand.
  12.  
  13. Regards, Fred
  14.  
  15. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  16.  
  17. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  18.  
  19. From: "R. Daniel Botsch"
  20. Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:34:50 -0400
  21. To: Michael Maness; Fred
  22. Burton
  23. Subject: RE: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]
  24.  
  25. Mike and Fred,
  26.  
  27. If I understand the question correctly, the answer is that the systems
  28. are connected. We have regional networks in which information sharing is
  29. limited to that network. If a network has 25 sites, those 25 sites match
  30. against each other's reports. They can also send reports to any other
  31. site on the network and they can post reports to a network-wide bulletin
  32. board. Sites cannot share information across networks.
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. However, we do cross-network matching here at the office. If we see
  37. cross-network matches, we will contact each affected site, explain that
  38. the individual(s) or vehicle they reported has been seen on another
  39. network, and then offer to put the affected sites into direct contact. We
  40. have not yet had a cross-network match. I think over time the different
  41. networks will begin to unite. I'm not exactly being prescient here, as
  42. there is already talk in Vegas and LA of combining their two networks.
  43. Same here in DC. Let me know if this helps or if you need further
  44. clarification.
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48. Thanks, Dan
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52. From: Michael Maness
  53. Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:11 PM
  54. To: Fred Burton
  55. Cc: R. Daniel Botsch
  56. Subject: RE: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60. Both: Some clients are already linked, and others can be if they choose.
  61.  
  62. With TrapWire all our clients feed a centralized database, so they are in
  63. affect linked.
  64.  
  65. Several of our clients have also agreed to share the entirety of their SAR
  66. reporting with certain other clients where it makes sense (i.e. all the
  67. casinos in Vegas share with each other; private and public sector clients
  68. in LA share with one another; etc.)
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72. Dan: Can you give some more examples of data sharing between clients?
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76. -----Original Message-----
  77. From: Fred Burton [mailto:[email protected]]
  78. Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:59 PM
  79. To: Michael Maness
  80. Subject: Re: [Fwd: [CT] NYC new surveillance cameras]
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84. Reasonable to say the systems are linked or can be linked? Which is more
  85. accurate? Thanks
  86.  
  87.  
  88.  
  89. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  90.  
  91. NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it are
  92. intended solely for the use of the addressees and may contain legally
  93. privileged, protected or confidential information. If you have received
  94. this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email reply
  95. and please delete this message from your computer and destroy any copies.
create a new version of this paste RAW Paste Data