Don't like ads? PRO users don't see any ads ;-)

STRATFOR E-Mail #7: Re: OBL take -- quick response needed

By: theunpromisedone3 on Feb 27th, 2012  |  syntax: None  |  size: 4.82 KB  |  hits: 75  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.
  2. Re: OBL take -- quick response needed
  3. Email-ID        1146487
  4. Date    2011-05-14 01:47:27
  5. ISI should know by now since they have the homeowner. There is much more
  6. to the story on The Courier which ISI doesn't know.
  7.  
  8. On 5/13/2011 6:18 PM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:
  9.  
  10. You know this reminds me of a discussion I had on NPR's Diane Rehm Show
  11. back in July '07. I was on with Peter Brookes (former deputy assistant
  12. secretary of defense for Asian and Pacific affairs in the second Bush
  13. administration) and the State Dept's current CT Coordinator, Daniel
  14. Benjamin. These two guys kept saying how ObL was in the tribal belt
  15. while I argued that he was much deeper in K-P province. God knows how
  16. many years were wasted chasing the sob in the tribal belt.
  17.  
  18. On 5/13/2011 7:04 PM, Fred Burton wrote:
  19.  
  20. The investigative key would be two prong to uncover the links to Paki
  21. ISI and Mil:
  22.  
  23. 1) The Homeowner
  24.  
  25. 2) The Courier
  26.  
  27. Both are known quantities.
  28.  
  29. On 5/13/2011 5:56 PM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:
  30.  
  31. Could be anyone of Lt. Col or below rank. Then again it could be a
  32. retired military officer still serving as a civie in the
  33. directorate. Or a consultant/contractor who work in the field. Or
  34. even a civilian official (60 percent are civilians in the ISI).
  35. Since most army officers including the chief are deputed to the ISI
  36. for a max of 3 years, we are really talking about people who are
  37. career intel officers. Then there is a large cadre of retired army
  38. personnel outside the security establishment. Good luck sifting
  39. through the jungle.
  40.  
  41. On 5/13/2011 5:29 PM, Fred Burton wrote:
  42.  
  43. Not further specified. But, it may help explain why the ISI chief
  44. has offered to resign, which is the noble way out. He can be the
  45. fall guy for domestic consumption. It would be best if he
  46. defected.
  47.  
  48. On 5/13/2011 4:23 PM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:
  49.  
  50. What does source mean by mid to senior level. As for retired, I
  51. can think of a number of them. So, that is not really
  52. surprising.
  53.  
  54. On 5/13/2011 2:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
  55.  
  56. Same response as before:
  57.  
  58. Mid to senior level ISI and Pak Mil with one retired Pak Mil
  59. General that had knowledge of the OBL arrangements and safe
  60. house.
  61.  
  62. Names unk to me and not provided.
  63.  
  64. Specific ranks unk to me and not provided.
  65.  
  66. But, I get a very clear sense we (US intel) know names and
  67. ranks.
  68.  
  69. I also do not know if we have passed this info to the GOP.
  70.  
  71. If I was in command, I would not pass the info to the GOP,
  72. because we can't trust them. I would piece meal the names off
  73. and bury in a list of other non-related names for internal ISI
  74. traces in a non-alerting fashion, to see what the Pakis tell
  75. us.
  76.  
  77. I may also trade one or two names for the captured tail
  78. rudder.
  79.  
  80. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  81.  
  82. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  83.  
  84. From: Fred Burton
  85. Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:22:31 -0500 (CDT)
  86. To: Kamran Bokhari
  87. Cc: Sean Noonan; Secure
  88. List
  89. Subject: Re: OBL take -- quick response needed
  90. I may be able to get that, let me ask.
  91.  
  92. On 5/13/2011 12:21 PM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:
  93.  
  94. No surprises here. We will never find out their departments
  95. but their ranks would be very telling.
  96.  
  97. On 5/13/2011 11:19 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
  98.  
  99. awesome. Please see what you can find out about what kind
  100. of department they are in, or area they cover.
  101.  
  102. On 5/13/11 9:58 AM, Fred Burton wrote:
  103.  
  104. More on # 3 --
  105.  
  106. Several w/in ISI and Pak Mil, less than 12.
  107.  
  108. More on this later.
  109.  
  110.  
  111. On 5/12/2011 3:26 PM, Sean Noonan wrote:
  112.  
  113. 1 specific operational plans
  114.  
  115. 2 communications with franchise groups (like AQAP)
  116.  
  117. 3 connections to anyone associated with the Pakistani state
  118.  
  119.  
  120. ------Original Message------
  121. From: Fred Burton
  122. To: Secure List
  123. Subject: OBL take -- quick response needed
  124. Sent: May 12, 2011 15:25
  125.  
  126. I can get access to the materials seized from the OBL safe house.
  127.  
  128. What are the top (not 45) questions we want addressed?
  129.  
  130.  
  131. --
  132.  
  133. Sean Noonan
  134.  
  135. Tactical Analyst
  136.  
  137. Office: +1 512-279-9479
  138.  
  139. Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
  140.  
  141. Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
  142.  
  143. www.stratfor.com
  144.  
  145. --
  146.  
  147. --
  148.  
  149. --
  150.  
  151. --