HYPEREDPILL

 

 

WARNING: I am protected by the 3rd party information act of the US legal system and all other forms of legal retaliation may occur if/when necessary in case this document is compromised.

 

 

=REDPILL MATERIAL BEGINS LINE 1 SECTION 1=

 

REDPILLS OF ZION

By Anonymous

 

This is compilation of what fellow anons and I have dug up. Feel free to copy/paste and share however you like. Let's get started.

 

What was the Israeli involvement in collecting U.S. communications intel for NSA?

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/how-was-israel-involved-in-collecting-u-s-communications-intel-for-nsa-1.528529

 

Obama's Israeli adviser: Next White House chief of staff?

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3616306,00.html

 

Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100049072/jewish-hostility-to-christians-the-prejudice-no-one-ever-writes-about/

 

Biden Praises Jews, Goes Too Far, Accidentally Thrills Anti-Semites

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/05/biden-praises-jews-goes-too-far.html

 

How to build a second American century

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-04-26/opinions/38832741_1_20th-century-haass-gdp

 

Israel’s use of white phosphorus confirmed

http://www.amnesty.org.au/news/comments/20118/P20/

 

Israel: White Phosphorus Use Evidence of War Crimes

http://www.hrw.org/news/2009/03/25/israel-white-phosphorus-use-evidence-war-crimes

 

Jews and the Jewish Birthrate

http://www.aish.com/jw/s/48899452.html

 

Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/science/10jews.html?_r=1&

 

Hebrew Free Loan Society

http://www.hfls.org/

 

Ethiopian Controversy In Israel: It's Not Racism

http://archive.adl.org/presrele/IslME_62/2659_62.asp

 

Destination unknown: Israel to deport thousands of African migrants

http://rt.com/news/israel-migrants-africa-deportations-214/

 

Danny Danon: Send African migrants to Australia

http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Danny-Danon-Send-African-migrants-to-Australia

 

Israeli startup PrimeSense is Microsoft's new partner for a remote-free world

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/business/israeli-startup-primesense-is-microsoft-s-new-partner-for-a-remote-free-world-1.312417

 

PrimeSense, Microsoft announce 3D partnership

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/business/primesense-microsoft-announce-3d-partnership-1.283725

 

Intermarriage… Why Not?

http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/IntermarriageWhyNot/

 

New Genetic Study Reportedly Proves Khazar Ancestry For Ashkenazi Jews

http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2013/01/new-genetic-study-reportedly-proves-khazar-ancestry-for-ashkenazi-jews-567.html

 

Remembering When The Israel Lobby Admitted Its Influence Over American Politics

http://thebilzerianreport.com/remembering-when-the-israel-lobby-admitted-that-they-control-america/

 

(removed from FOX NEWS)

Israel Is Spying In And On The U.S.?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm

 

Israel targets US lad mag market

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6221714.stm

Israel has decided to reach out to young US men by publishing images of semi-clad female former soldiers in US men's magazine, Maxim.

 

FEINSTEIN STRIKES

Dianne Feinstein: Verizon court order 'is lawful.'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TLUZv1MUE0&playnext=1&list=TLzF5gFyr0Mk0

 

FEINSTEIN STRIKES AGAIN

PERFORM Act is Back--When "Reasonable Recording" is Anything But

http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/787

 

FEINSTEIN PULLS A HAT TRICK!!!!

Feinstein Resigns. Senator exits MILCON following Metro exposé, vet-care scandal

http://www.metroactive.com/metro/03.21.07/dianne-feinstein-resigns-0712.html

 

Mass grave uncovered containing dozens of Palestinians killed in 1948 war that founded Israel

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2334205/Mass-grave-uncovered-containing-dozens-Palestinians-killed-1948-war-founded-Israel.html#ixzz2UwCGrOxA

 

Esc and Ctrl: The Guardian investigates Israeli internet hasbara

http://mondoweiss.net/2011/10/esc-and-ctrl-the-guardian-investigates-israeli-internet-hasbara.html

 

Israel kicks out migrants – by changing their nationality and sending them to another country

http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/08/18/sudanese-asylum-seekers-issued-with-new-nationalities-allowing-removal-from-israel/

 

Jacky Friedman - Feminists not all that Impressed by Manginas

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/03/27/feminists-not-all-that-impressed-by-manginas/

 

Chilul Hashem from the Pulpit

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/chilul-hashem-from-the-pulpit

Israel-Mexico: Military Cooperation to Crush Zapatistas

http://bsnorrell.bl0gspot.com/2013/05/israel-mexico-military-cooperation-to.html

 

3rd state agrees to take Israel's Eritrean migrants

http://www.jpost.com/National-News/3rd-state-agrees-to-take-Israels-Eritrean-migrants-315161

 

The internet: Israel’s new PR battlefield

http://bl0gs.timesofisrael.com/the-rise-of-digital-diplomacy-could-be-changing-israels-media-image/

 

Vitriol Online for Cheerios Ad With Interracial Family

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/01/business/media/cheerios-ad-with-interracial-family-brings-out-internet-hate.html?_r=0

 

Cheerios Ad produced by Maurice Nathan Saatchi, Baron Saatchi, guess who!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Saatchi,_Baron_Saatchi

Twitterers paid to spread Israeli propaganda

http://www.globalresearch.ca/internet-warfare-team-unveiled/14465

 

With Israel's foreign ministry organizing volunteers to flood news websites with pro-Israeli comments, Propaganda 2.0 is here

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/09/israel-foreign-ministry-media

 

Rachel Corrie, U.S. activist killed by Israel bulldozer, brought it "upon herself," court says

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57501420/rachel-corrie-u.s-activist-killed-by-israel-bulldozer-brought-it-upon-herself-court-says/c

 

Rona Kuperboim slams Foreign Ministry’s plan to hire pro-Israel talk backers

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3744516,00.html

 

Lawmaker Is Said to Have Agreed to Aid Lobbyists

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/us/politics/21harman.html

 

Jane Harman denies CQ report she was heard on NSA wiretap lobbying for AIPAC officials

http://latimesbl0gs.latimes.com/washington/2009/04/jane-harman-denies-cq-report-she-was-caught-on-nsa-wiretap-lobbying-for-aipac-officials.html

 

Exclusive: Feds Probe a Top Democrat's Relationship with AIPAC

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1549069,00.html

Jane Harman's Wiretapped Conversations

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2009/04/jane_harmans_mysterious_conver.html

 

ADL gets $7.5 million to launch global anti-Semitism index

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/adl-gets-7-5-million-to-launch-global-anti-semitism-index-1.526932

 

Simon Schama: new curriculum proposal “too focused on the achievements of White men”

http://www.destroyzionism.com/2013/05/31/jew-simon-schama-new-curriculum-proposal-too-focused-on-the-achievements-of-white-men/

 

Secret US-Israeli Nuke Transfers Led To Fukushima Blasts

http://rense.com/general94/secbb.htm

 

Sex slaves in the Holy Land, then and now

http://bl0gs.timesofisrael.com/hookers-in-the-holy-land-an-uncomfortable-history-in-israel/

 

Neoconservative Think Tank Influence on US Policies

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=neoconinfluence&neoconinfluence_us_policy_areas=neoconinfluence_israel

 

Complete 911 Timeline

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=israel

 

Israel looking to mend ties with UN Rights Council, but says 'built-in discrimination' must end

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-looking-to-mend-ties-with-un-rights-council-but-says-built-in-discrimination-must-end.premium-1.526488

 

Kissinger, US intelligence community endorse “World Without Israel”

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/30/264323/kissinger-intel-community-accept-israels-end/

 

Advocacy group: Israel is a pedophile's paradise

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/advocacy-group-israel-is-a-pedophile-s-paradise-1.262570

 

Germany to pay Holocaust victims new compensation

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22707483

 

The Billionaire Pedophile's Sex Den

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/07/22/jeffrey-epstein-pedophile-billionaire-and-his-sex-den.html

JIDF in action

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jeffrey_Epstein#Jewish

 

Jewish professor Marian Radetzki wants to abolish the Swedish language

http://www.destroyzionism.com/2013/05/21/jewish-professor-marian-radetzki-wants-to-abolish-the-swedish-language/

 

Biden: 'Jewish heritage is American heritage'

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/biden-jewish-heritage-is-american-heritage-164525.html

 

Stan Fischer saved Israel’s economy. Can he save America’s?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/bl0gs/wonkbl0g/wp/2013/02/15/stan-fischer-saved-israels-economy-can-he-save-americas/

 

Paideia

http://www.paideia-eu.org/

 

Hugo Schwyzer. Trying to warm you up to the idea of who this guy actually is....

http://www.timesofisrael.com/writers/hugo-schwyzer/

 

Hugo Schwyzer; Exile in Gal-Ville: How a Male Feminist Alienated His Supporters

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/02/exile-in-gal-ville-how-a-male-feminist-alienated-his-supporters/252915/

 

Hugo Schwyzer; Why the 'End' of White Men Is Actually Good for White Men

http://jezebel.com/5960099/why-the-end-of-white-men-is-good-for-actually-good-for-white-men

 

Noel Ignatiev (Jew) argues for 'abolishing' white race.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2002/sep/04/20020904-084657-6385r/

 

Abolish the White Race

http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html

 

Current Editor of Harvard Magazine; John S. Rosenberg (take a guess)

http://harvardmagazine.com/donate/history-of-harvard-magazine

 

 

INVENTOR OF ADHD'S DEATHBED CONFESSION: "ADHD IS A FICTITIOUS DISEASE"

Protip; He's a Jew.

http://www.worldpublicunion.org/2013-03-27-NEWS-inventor-of-adhd-says-adhd-is-a-fictitious-disease.html

 

Security scare shuts Kings Bay

http://fpp.co.uk/online/04/05/Kings_Bay_220504.html

 

Ex-FBI Translator Claims Richard Perle & Douglas Feith Spying for Israel at DoD

http://qwstnevrythg.com/2009/10/ex-fbi-translator-claims-richard-perle-douglas-feith-spying-for-israel-at-dod/#.UZ6IZJx8uSq

 

Bryen/perle Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 13, Number 18, May 2, 1986

http://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1986/eirv13n18-19860502/eirv13n18-19860502.pdf

Congressional Staffer Offers Israeli Classified Material

http://historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=stephen_bryen

 

http://fpp.co.uk/BoD/Mossad/index.html

Everything Mossad, there's a ton of links here, and I'm still working through them

 

Israel celebrates successful 9/11 operation on Purim holiday

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/03/01/291462/israel-celebrates-successful-911attacks/

 

Israeli children deported to South Sudan succumb to malaria

http://972mag.com/israeli-children-deported-to-south-sudan-succumb-to-malaria/57287/

 

The Problem Is Palestinian Rejectionism

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/136588/yosef-kuperwasser-and-shalom-lipner/the-problem-is-palestinian-rejectionism

 

Survey: Most Israeli Jews wouldn't give Palestinians vote if West Bank was annexed

http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/survey-most-israeli-jews-wouldn-t-give-palestinians-vote-if-west-bank-was-annexed.premium-1.471644

 

Leading rabbi encourages IDF soldiers to use Palestinian human shields

http://haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/leading-rabbi-encourages-idf-soldiers-to-use-palestinian-human-shields-1.320311

 

U.S. Jewish NGOs to get 97% of Homeland Security's defense grant in 2012

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/u-s-jewish-ngos-to-get-97-of-homeland-security-s-defense-grant-in-2012-1.448373

 

Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel

http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-netanyahu-says-9-11-terror-attacks-good-for-israel-1.244044

 

U.S. Jews support gun control, but the political debate ignores it

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/u-s-jews-support-gun-control-but-the-political-debate-ignores-it-1.453018

 

Report: Pentagon requesting $395.9 million to buy Israel more Iron Dome batteries

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/report-pentagon-requesting-395-9-million-to-buy-israel-more-iron-dome-batteries.premium-1.515853

The full text is available for subscribers & registered users…..WHAT THE FUCK HAARETZ

 

U.S. Senate committee passes resolution to back Israel in conflict with Iran

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-senate-committee-passes-resolution-to-back-israel-in-conflict-with-iran-1.515967

 

Does Racism Run Rampant in the American Mainstream Media?

http://thebilzerianreport.com/racism-runs-rampant-in-the-american-mainstream-media/

 

After The Holocaust, One Would Think That American Jews Would Be Opposed To Gun Control

http://thebilzerianreport.com/after-the-holocaust-one-would-think-non-gentiles-would-be-libertarian/

 

The US-Israel Special Relationship Timeline That AIPAC Doesn’t Want You To See

http://thebilzerianreport.com/the-us-israel-special-relationship-timeline-that-aipac-doesnt-want-you-to-see/

 

Sometimes the Worst Cases of Racism are Found in the Least Likely Places…..

http://thebilzerianreport.com/sometimes-the-most-racist-people-on-the-planet-are-found-in-the-least-likely-places/

 

Why Are So Many Jewish Leaders Holocaust Deniers?

http://thebilzerianreport.com/why-are-so-many-jewish-people-holocaust-deniers/

 

AIPAC: The Most Powerful Lobby in America

http://thebilzerianreport.com/aipac-the-most-powerful-lobby-in-america/

 

The Anti-Defamation League: Covering Up Racism and Israeli War Crimes For Nearly A Century

http://thebilzerianreport.com/the-anti-defamation-league-covering-up-jewish-racism-and-israeli-war-crimes-for-almost-100-years/

 

The Day AIPAC Went On The Record About How It Operates

http://mjayrosenberg.com/2012/05/16/aipacs-congress/

 

North Korea Proves That The Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy

http://thebilzerianreport.com/does-the-israel-lobby-control-us-foreign-policy/

 

The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion

http://www.wrmea.org/wrmea-archives/251-washington-report-archives-2000-2005/june-2003/4641-the-costs-to-american-taxpayers-of-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict-3-trillion.html

 

Pedowood dudes, if you're in here, have a link;

http://www.prothink.org/2012/12/13/italian-russian-police-break-up-child-snuff-porn-ring/

 

Yeshiva teacher admits to sexually abusing boy

http://www.jta.org/2013/05/13/news-opinion/united-states/yeshiva-teacher-admits-to-sexually-abusing-boy

 

What's really going on in Syria? This might give you some clues;

On My Mind: The Golan Heights: Bought by Baron Rothschild 100 Years Ago

http://www.ourjerusalem.com/opinion/story/on-my-mind-the-golan-heights-bought-by-baron-rothschild-100-years-ago.html

 

Ever heard of Ashkenazi Jews?

The History of the House of Rothschild

http://iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

 

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976

http://antichristconspiracy.com/HTML%20Pages/Harold_Wallace_Rosenthal_Interview_1976.htm

 

Jewish groups push for action on gun control

http://www.jewishjournal.com/nation/article/jewish_groups_push_for_action_on_gun_control

 

Bloomberg suggests police go on strike in appeal for gun control, then backpedals

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/25/bloomberg-called-for-police-strike-for-gun-control-then-back-pedals/

 

You may remember David Sirota's (Jew) clever little article.

Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hope_the_boston_marathon_bomber_is_a_white_american/

 

Frank Lautenberg Introducing Legislation To Ban Gun Powder Sales. Just Like Predicted On Info Wars/reddit!!!

http://www.dailypaul.com/282529/frank-lautenberg-introducing-legislation-to-ban-gun-powder-sales-just-like-predicted-on-infowars-reddit

 

France's top rabbi takes leave amid scandal

http://boston.com/news/world/europe/2013/04/11/france-top-rabbi-takes-leave-amid-scandal/FItDT14B7vWjkO5bNv5RbP/story.html

 

How Jewish is Hollywood?

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

 

Organizations Funded Directly by George Soros and his Open Society Institute

http://discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

 

American Jewish community ends support of Turkish interests on Hill

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/8/jewish-community-ends-support-turkey-capitol-hill/?page=all

 

Harman flip-flops on Armenian genocide resolution

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2007/10/harman-flip-flo.html

 

The Jewish hand behind Internet

http://radioislam.org/islam/english/jewishp/internet/jews_behind_internet.htm

 

The Jewish origins of multiculturalism in Sweden

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/01/the-jewish-origins-of-multiculturalism-in-sweden/

 

THE THIRD TEMPLE'S HOLY OF HOLIES: ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR WEAPONS

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm

 

US Financial Aid To Israel - Figures, Facts And Impact

http://rense.com/general31/rege.htm

 

Israeli firm which secured Japan nuclear plant says workers there 'putting their lives on the line'

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israeli-firm-which-secured-japan-nuclear-plant-says-workers-there-putting-their-lives-on-the-line-1.349897

 

Operation Samson: Israel's Deployment of Nuclear Missiles on Subs from Germany

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/israel-deploys-nuclear-weapons-on-german-built-submarines-a-836784.html

 

Erdogan To Turkish Jews: I Will Protect You

http://www.ibtimes.com/erdogan-turkish-jews-i-will-protect-you-704000

 

The Jew As Ally of the Muslim: Medieval Roots of Anti-Semitism

http://www.danielpipes.org/33/the-jew-as-ally-of-the-muslim-medieval-roots-of-anti

 

'Islamization of Europe a good thing'

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4299673,00.html

 

UN rejects IDF claim Gaza militants operated from school

http://www.haaretz.com/news/un-rejects-idf-claim-gaza-militants-operated-from-bombed-out-school-1.267630

 

UNRWA condemns Israeli “creation” of footage, tweets falsely claiming Gaza schools used to launch rockets

http://unrwa.org/etemplate.php?id=1514

 

UNRWA: No rockets fired from schools in Gaza during the Gaza war of 2008-2009

http://unrwa.org/etemplate.php?id=1477

 

Christopher Columbus.....Jew?

http://jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=6

       

Israel secretly sells American nuclear weapons to China

http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=776

 

US up in arms over Sino-Israel ties

http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL21Ak01.html

 

US 'anger' at Israel weapons sale

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4101961.stm

 

No More Play Dates? Sex-Segregated Park Opens in New York

http://observer.com/2013/04/kiryas-joel-sex-segregated-park-opens-in-new-york/

 

Biden: Jewish leaders drove gay marriage changes

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/biden-jewish-leaders-drove-gay-marriage-changes

 

General George S. Patton

http://gatorpress.com/?p=1664

 

The Israel Lobby's extensive influence in the US and UK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_Kingdom

 

~+++What, you think the Jewish control of the media doesn't extend to porn?+++~

 

Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American Porn Industry

http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

 

Jewish Professor Boasts of Jewish Pornography used as a Weapon Against Gentiles

http://www.davidduke.com/?p=1811

 

The Jewish Mentality of Al Goldstein 'Pioneer Pornographer'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXXoQKJVZgc

 

>What's wrong with porn anyway?

The real question is, "what's right with porn?" The answer would be "nothing."

 

The Effects of Pornography

http://www.ccpa-accp.ca/blog/?p=2762

 

Porn Addiction Destroys Relationships, Lives

http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Porn-addiction-destroys-relationships-lives-3272230.php#ixzz2N3ZSi4o7

 

Pornography's Effect on the Brain - Part 1

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/09/pornographys-effect-on-the-brain-part-1/

 

Pornography's Effect on the Brain - Part 2

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/09/pornographys-effect-on-the-brain-part-2/

 

Pornography's Effects on Adult and Child

http://mentalhealthlibrary.info/library/porn/pornlds/pornldsauthor/links/victorcline/porneffect.htm

 

 

++++AIPAC's SHORT SUMMED HISTORY++++

 

May 14, 1948- Official Recognition- The United States of America becomes the first country to officially recognize Israel as an independent nation.

 

1949-1973- US-Israel Aid Commences- The United States gives Israel an average of $122 million per year in foreign aid payments.

 

Summer 1954- Lavon Affair- Israel recruits Egyptian Jews to blow up American and British targets in Egypt. Israel planned on blaming the murderous false-flag attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood in an effort to garner support from the US and Britain. After officially denying any involvement, the Israeli government finally admitted their role in the incident in 2005 by honoring the surviving agents with a certificate of appreciation.

 

1955-1970- Israel Steals American Uranium to Build It’s First Nuclear Weapons- In 2011, the Institute for Research on Middle Eastern Policy examined hundreds of newly de-classified documents from the FBI and CIA and discovered that Israeli spies in collaboration with American Jews stole hundreds of kilograms of weapons grade uranium from US stockpiles and shipped it to Israel. Although Israel does not officially acknowledge the possession of nuclear weapons, their nuclear arsenal is estimated at between 200-300 nuclear weapons. (Source: PressTV)

 

1963- AIPAC Formed- The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) “America’s Pro-Israel” is formed, but refuses to comply with US law and register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. AIPAC has been in violation of federal law for nearly 50 years, but through political contributions and connections, AIPAC officials have remained above prosecution for their many violations of Federal law, including espionage (as addressed later).

 

June 8, 1967- USS Liberty- Israeli jets and torpedo boats attack the American naval ship USS Liberty with the intention of murdering every sailor on board and then blaming the attack on Egypt. Israel’s goal was to draw America into the Israeli-Arab War. Israel has officially claimed the attack was an “accident,” but every survivor of the USS Liberty claimed that it could not possibly have been an accident given that Israeli jets flew directly over the ship hours earlier on several occasions and one pilot flew so close that he waved to the US sailors, and the sailors waved back. Given the proximity of the jets and the surrounding facts of the incident, there is no question that Israel knew whose ship it was. Lt. General Marshall Carter, the director of the NSA, told congress the attack, “couldn’t be anything else but deliberate.” A later coverup ensued, and in 2002, Captain Ward JAGC senior counsel for the court of inquiry claimed that the court of inquiry’s findings were intended to coverup what was a deliberate attack by Israel on a ship it knew to be American.

 

1975-  Oil Guarantee-  The Jewish US Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, secretly brokered a deal in which the United States of America guaranteed Israel’s oil supply in the event of a crisis. The 1975 Israel-United States Memorandum of Understanding (see the full text here) required the United States to maintain an oil reserve for Israel and guarantee the shipping of that oil to Israel in times of emergency. This deal has cost the United States more than a hundred billion dollars since it was first enacted. The most troubling aspect of this deal was not the cost however, but the stipulation that in case of an oil emergency in which both the US and Israel needed oil, the US would give its oil to Israel. Section 3 (b):

 

     If the oil Israel needs to meet all of its normal requirements for domestic consumption is unavailable for purchase in circumstances where’ quantitative restrictions through embargo or otherwise also prevent the United States from procuring oil to meet its normal requirements, the United States Government will promptly make oil available for purchase by Israel in accordance with the International Energy Agency conservation and allocation formula as applied by the United States Government, in order to meet Israel’s essential requirements. If Israel is unable to secure the necessary means to transport such oil to Israel, the United States Government will make every effort to help Israel secure the necessary means of transport.

 

This is oil that would have been used to heat homes during the winter, power ambulances, and provide the fuel for tractors to farm America’s agricultural lands. To put this into perspective, in the event of an oil crisis, the fuel that Americans would need to heat their homes, get them to work, and produce food would go to Israel. This agreement very well could have starved tens of thousands of Americans in order to save Israelis if an oil crisis would have taken place.

 

1978- US Starts Paying Egypt $1.3 Billion Annually In Exchange For Maintaining Good Relations With Israel- John McCain admitted in a CNN interview that US-Egyptian aid was essentially a bribe to maintain good relations with Israel. The aid was pledged during a US-brokered peace negotiation between Egypt and Israel, and began to be distributed just after the signing of the Egypt-Israel peace accord.

 

1980-1981- Israel Teams Up With Republicans to Defeat Jimmy Carter- During the Iran hostage crisis of 1979-1981, Israel, upset at President Jimmy Carter’s attempt to create a peaceful two-state solution in Palestine, used its clandestine operations in Iran to prevent American hostages from being released before Carter’s re-election bid. Carter wrote in his White House Diaries that Israel was purposefully thwarting the peace process with Palestine so it could continue to settle on Palestinian land. History has certainly proven Carter right, and Peter Beinart, the author of The Crisis of Zionism confirms this fact by investigating every major Israeli-Palestinain peace negotiation, and pointing out Israel’s efforts to subvert them. According to Consortium News, Israel used its operatives in Iran to ensure that US hostages were not released before the election, which doomed Carter’s chances for re-election. The hostages were released immediately after Reagan’s inauguration, and Israel was subsequently caught shipping US weapons to Iran after an Israeli chartered plane crashed in the Soviet Union. Israel claimed to have the Reagan administration’s approval for the transfer. As the Consortium article points out, recent discoveries make the cooperation between the Israelis and Republicans to remove a US President by using American hostages as political pawns, impossible to ignore.

 

1980-1990- Israel Steals American Technology and Equipment at Unprecedented Levels- According to the Israeli newspaper Hareetz, “It is worth mentioning that in the 1980s, regardless of Jonathan Pollards’ espionage activities for Israel, Israeli companies and individuals were involved many cases of  technological espionage, steeling U.S. secrets, technology and equipment. The most outstanding case involved Milco, a U.S. based company owned by Israeli tycoon Arnon Milchan, which bought and shipped equipment with which could have also been used as triggers for nuclear weapons.” Recently released FBI documents revealed that current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was integrally involved in the Milco incident.

 

1982- Sabra and Shatila Massacres- The Israeli military purposefully allowed a right-wing Lebanese militia to enter two Palestinian refugee camps, which were under Israel’s control, and rape, murder, and dismember 800 civilians. Nearly all of the dead were women, children, and elderly men. In 1983, an Israeli investigation concluded that then Defense Minister Ariel Sharon bore “personal responsibility” for failing to prevent the massacre. The New York Times recently uncovered de-classified transcripts of conversations between US officials and Israeli officials, in which Israeli officials misled the Americans about the events in Beirut, and bullied them into accepting outrageous accusations that the Palestinian women and children were “terrorists,” and therefore deserved to be massacred. According to the New York Times, “The Sabra and Shatila massacres severely undercut America’s influence in the Middle East, and its moral authority plummeted.” Only a year later, in 1983, the US marine barracks were bombed in Lebanon, in which 241 marines were killed.

 

1985- Jonathan Pollard Incident- A Jewish American named Jonathan Pollard was caught stealing American secrets and selling them to Israel. At first, Israel denied any involvement in the incident, but later admitted complicity in in 1998. The wife of Pollard’s handler, Avi Sella, worked for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and Pollard later admitted that a prominent ADL member was deeply involved in the spying. Like AIPAC, the ADL does not register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act as per the law, even though it works closely with the Mossad, and has been caught spying on Americans for Israel. Amazingly, the ADL even had the gumption to shamelessly appeal to President Clinton in 1993 to commute their spy’s sentence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also campaigned for Pollard’s release.

 

1987- Israel Starts Receiving Regular Payments of More Than $3 Billion Per Year. The real US-Israel aid is estimated to be $15-$20 billion per year when valuable military equipment deemed “scrapped”, loan guarantees, under the table aid, and preferential contracts are factored in.

 

1990- First Gulf War. Saddam agreed to withdraw from Kuwait if Israel complied with international law and withdrew from Palestine. Instead of encouraging Israel to abide by international law, the US launched an attack on Iraq, even though Iraq did not threaten America’s oil supply nor pose any danger to US interests. Israel did not send any troops or material support for the invasion.

 

1993- ADL Spying Scandal- San Francisco newspapers broke the story that the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, which has close ties to Israel, had been paying American police officers for confidential information, illegally wire-tapping phones, and even dumpster diving to acquire  private information on American citizens. The Anti-Defamation League later sold the information to the Israeli and South African governments. Among the individuals the ADL spied on were civil rights activists deemed “anti-Israel”, Congressmen such as Nanci Pelosi, reporters, labor unions, the NAACP, African National Congress, and the Rainbow Coalition. Presumably the ADL was going to use any damning material acquired during their spying efforts to blackmail these politicians and influential people into changing their negative stances on Israel. Just one of their spies, Roy Bullock, had compiled files on more than 9,800 Americans and 950 organizations spanning three decades. After the search of the ADL offices, the San Francisco District Attorney said the ADL was conducting a “national spy network.”

 

1993- AIPAC President David Steiner Caught on Tape Bragging About his Organization’s Incredible Power in America. Steiner first admitted to manipulating the US Secretary of State into giving Israel more foreign aid. Steiner said he, ”met with [Secretary of State] Jim Baker and I cut a deal with him. I got, besides the $3 billion, you know they’re looking for the Jewish votes, and I’ll tell him whatever he wants to hear … Besides the $10 billion in loan guarantees which was a fabulous thing, $3 billion in foreign, in military aid, and I got almost a billion dollars in other goodies that people don’t even know about.”

 

In the same conversation, Steiner said he would support any politician who has been good to Israel over his own brother. He also discussed his efforts to get Jewish, and pro-Israel candidates re-elected, even by paying for a rigged poll. Steiner was attempting to raise money for dozens of pro-Israel candidates through his position at AIPAC, even though the organization claims that it doesn’t engage in such behavior. In the conversation, Steiner asked a potential Jewish donor to get his children to write checks in order to subvert political donation laws.

 

Steiner also said, “We gave two employees from AIPAC leave of absences to work on the [Clinton] campaign. I mean, we have a dozen people in that campaign, in the headquarters….and they’re all going to get big jobs. We have friends. I also work with a think tank, the Washington Institute. I have Michael Mandelbaum and Martin Indyk being foreign policy advisers. Steve Speigel—we’ve got friends—this is my business.”

 

“I talked to Bill Clinton [and he made a commitment that] he’s going to be very good to us.” ”One of my officers, Monte Friedkin, is one of the biggest fund-raisers for them [Clintons]. I mean, I have people like that all over the country.”

 

When asked if he knows who Bill Clinton would put on the Supreme Court if elected, Steiner replied, “We’re talking now. We don’t have no commitments yet. We’re just negotiating. We’re more interested right now, in the Secretary of State and the Secretary of National Security Agency. That’s more important to us.” He also said, “we are negotiating” who will be Secretary of State.

 

1993- Israel Caught Selling US Military Secrets to China- Israel sold $2-3 billion worth of sensitive US military technology to China. This was technology that the US had specifically forbidden to be delivered to China in anyway shape or form, as it would undermine America’s national security. Read this link for the full story.

 

1996 GAO Spy Report- The Government Accountability Office reported that Israel spies on the US more than any other ally.

 

2000-2003 Iraq Sanctions-  In 2000, AIPAC distributed a letter asking AIPAC members to put pressure on the US Congress and the President to ramp up sanctions on Iraq and block the oil for food program, which was providing Iraqi civilians with much needed food and medicine. In 2003, AIPAC attempted to block a bill that would have allowed US companies to export food and medicine to Iraqi civilians. AIPAC took the position that the food and medicine would not help the Iraqi people, which is obviously untrue, and that the bill would hasten Saddam’s effort to procure weapons of mass destruction. Saddam was of course not building weapons of mass destruction, and the AIPAC efforts ended up murdering thousands of Iraqi civilians.

 

September 11, 2001- Five Dancing Israelis- The terrorists who perpetrated the worst attack on America in its history stated on record that their motivation was America’s unabashed support for the apartheid regime of Israel. Five dancing Israelis were actually caught filming the world trade center attacks and dancing in celebration afterwards. When the Israelis were caught in a van that had contained explosives, they said we are all on the same side now against the Palestinians. The dancing Israelis later admitted on an Israeli talk show that they were there to document the event. Before the US government classified all information on Israel’s involvement in 9-11, the FBI officially concluded that Israel had to have known of the attack before 9-11-2001 and didn’t warn the US. After the attacks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “We are benefitting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.” He also said, “these events have swung American public opinion in our favor.”At best, Israel knew of the attacks before hand and did not warn America because of the strategic support against the Palestinians that it would bring. At worst, Israel had a hand in planning the attacks.

 

2001- Israeli Spies Deported- More than 60 Israeli spies were arrested and detained. Most of them failed lie-detector tests about their spying activities on the US and their connection to the September 11, 2001 attacks.

 

2002- Harvard Economist Estimates Total US-Israel Aid At $3 trillion. Dr. Thomas R. Stauffer, a world renowned economist who taught economics and Middle East studies at Harvard, as well as serving twice in the Executive Office of the President on a task force for oil imports and controls, estimated that as of 2002 (in 2002 dollars) Israel has cost the US $3 trillion. His estimate took into account direct military aid, political support, oil price increases as a result of conflicts, and peripheral/hidden foreign aid.

 

In Stauffer’s estimation, US aid to Israel costs 275,000 American jobs per year due to unfair trade imbalances and sanctions on Israel’s enemies. In one example of under the table aid, Stauffer pointed out that the US actually gave Russia and Romania billions of dollars in undeclared aid to facilitate Jews moving to Israel. The US has also spent hundreds of billions in the region to secure friendly relationships with Israel. John McCain admitted in an interview that US aid to Egypt is really just a bribe so the Egyptians will maintain friendly relations with Israel. The US has also given Turkey and Greece billions for the same purpose.

 

A summary of Stauffer’s breakdown can be found here:

 

2003- Iraq War-  In January 2003, AIPAC executive director Howard Kohr stated, “quietly lobbying Congress to approve the use of force in Iraq” was one of AIPAC’s successes over the past year.” Jeffrey Goldberg reported during a profile piece of AIPAC’s policy director Steven J. Rosen that, “AIPAC lobbied Congress in favor of the Iraq war.”

 

In addition, the US media, which by this point was almost completely controlled by Jewish American supporters of Israel (see this link for proof), refused to investigate the validity of the government’s accusation of Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction. The mainstream media then went a step further by criticizing anti-war activists and even called them traitors who were against the troops. Many Americans leaders and reporters came out after the war and criticized the media for its pro-war propaganda, but very few spoke of the Israeli connection for fear of being labeled anti-Semitic.

 

Even though Israel aggressively lobbied America to attack Iraq, they committed no troops or resources to the struggle.

 

2005- AIPAC Spying Scandal- A pentagon analyst pleads guilty to passing military secrets to two AIPAC employees en route to Israel. After some political wrangling, all charges were dropped against the two Jewish AIPAC employees in 2009, even though the analyst agreed to testify against the AIPAC employees, and the government had overwhelming evidence to prosecute. It was later reported by Time magazine that Jane Harman, a Jewish congresswoman, was bribed by AIPAC to lobby the Department of Justice to drop the spying charges against the AIPAC employees. In 2009, CQ politics reported that Harman was caught on a NSA wiretap telling an Israeli agent that she would lobby the Department of Justice to drop the case.

 

2008-2009- Israel Fires White Phosphorous Shells Into Civilian Locations, Including a Crowded Refugee Camp. At first, the Israeli army categorically denied the use of white phosphorous gas on civilians (a war crime), but then later admitted it when video footage made it impossible to deny. These weapons were made in the USA.  The entire planet criticized the barbaric and internationally illegal war crimes, but President Bush and the United States supported the Israeli atrocities, which hurt America’s standing in the world.

 

2010- Israel is Caught Stealing America’s Nuclear Triggers- The United States Bureau of Industry and Security released a report concluding that nuclear triggers were illegally exported to Israel. (Source)

 

2010- Israel Bribes US News Outlets for Biased Stories- Newly declassified files prove that Israel has actually been covertly paying American media outlets tens of millions of dollars to publish pro-Israel stories. Among other things, the documents revealed that Israel paid the Atlantic magazine $50,000 to disrupt a US peace proposal that would have allowed Palestinian refugees to return to their homes in Israel. These documents came from a Senate hearing, which ended up being censored by American politicians who received significant campaign financing from non-gentile sources. The bribed senators even went as far as sealing the most damning documents from the investigation.

 

January 13, 2012- Atlanta Jewish Times Owner Claims the Mossad is Considering Assassinating President Obama- Andrew Adler, the owner of the Atlanta Jewish Times, writes an article stating that Israel has three options in order to defend itself. 1. Attack Hezbollah and Hamas 2. Defy the US and attack Iran 3. “give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.” He went on to say, “Yes you read three correctly. Order a hit on a US President in order to preserve Israel’s existence.” He claimed to know for sure that this option was already “being discussed in Israel’s most inner circles”, and given his high powered Israeli friends, you can bet that he is correct.

 

April 18, 2012- The FOIA Report Estimates the Total Cost of America’s Relationship with Israel, Adjusted for Inflation and Including the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, to be in Excess of $5 trillion, or $16k per American.

 

July 28, 2012- CIA Reports that Israel is the Largest Spy Threat in the Middle East. The report details numerous incidents of Israeli spies breaking into American diplomats’ homes and offices to steal sensitive material.

 

*****VIDEO DUMP*****

 

Based Brother Nathanael

http://www.youtube.com/user/zionget/videos

 

Jewish people chase American guy in Israel!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83t_s7Y3EH4

 

How the Jews Treat Christians in Israel - It's Serious!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jG6kJm-50k

 

Rahm Emanuel on the Opportunities of Crisis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mzcbXi1Tkk

 

Rahm Emanuel: You never want a serious crisis to go to waste

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yeA_kHHLow

 

This is why people hate the Jews

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TTrfHmBx88

 

This is why people hate the Jews 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cghfHwMcgXM

 

How the Jews Treat Christians in Israel?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlT3ARuUSGc

 

Growing Jewish anti-Christian hatred in Israel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcLTqo4jEK4

 

Watch "God's Chosen" kick women and children out of their homes to live on the streets

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIMiX8l7mTo

 

Insulting Jesus on Israeli TV - צליבת ישו - The Crucifixion of "Yeshu"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA6vRC1xW_c

 

Orthodox Jews harassing Christians outside a Christian shop

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSrFbNwxAlg

 

Jew: We killed Jesus, we're proud of it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M539PgDjbas

 

Crazy Israeli settler attack pacifists at Jerusalem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSZZKJp8Syw

 

Israeli soldier shoots blindfolded and handcuffed Palestinian man at point blank range

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY8dPGiOTGs

 

Tourists praising the Lord / all hell broke loose! (1 of 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmCJGiL_kpQ

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gohRo7DQ7As

Tourists praising the Lord / all hell broke loose! (2 of 2)

 

Jew: We killed Jesus, we're proud of it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M539PgDjbas

 

Israelis Enjoy Massacre (Shocking)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkCBK4-5tRI

 

Famous Jews who changed their names

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zS7aMGByxY

 

ZIONISTS WON'T LET YOU SEE THIS ON YOUR TV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX18zUp6WPY

 

Ethiopian Jews blame Israeli racism for discrimination and price tag graffiti

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_acfNfFkgw

 

Racism against Ethiopian Jews

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zPSO4REesc

 

Jews and Bilderberg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIZehLyLhP0&feature=player_embedded

 

Not a pleasant ride home

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FEKhgBye5K0

 

Luke Rudkowski Almost Set Up By Larry Silverstein's Mafia Thugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hA5AqJsQg

 

The Assault On Art

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ4CeNu6Vr4

 

Ashkenazi Jews are not Khazars - Ashkenazi Jews are Israelites

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udO65M_KIOA

 

SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk

 

Black Hebrew Israelite makes a Jew Cry in New York City

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyBVaBFzkSk

 

Lady Michele Renouf on Birobidjan: The First Jewish Homeland/Republic: Est. in 1928 in Asia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbb6zO-XJg8

 

Joe Biden says “I am a Zionist”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0ZIJdN05QE

 

Jewish in Hollywood

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMbgPRbJBDo#t=2m33s

 

Defamation (2009) - What is anti-Semitism today?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm8-yTBs964

 

Malcolm X exposes the Jews

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reXVJaUgyPo

 

Allegations of Child Sex Abuse Cover-up in Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Communities

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgrEfIwgmtk

 

9-11 Mossad 'Mural Van' - NYPD Radio Transmission

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Huf2Kz7bV2k

 

Jews Kick Out Blacks

http://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseknutsen/2013/01/28/israel-foribly-injected-african-immigrant-women-with-birth-control/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israel-kicks-out-migrants--by-changing-their-nationality-and-sending-them-to-another-country-8057342.html

http://thebilzerianreport.com/why-do-so-many-jews-hate-black-people/

 

US to assist Israel in the case of attack on Iran: US senate

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JxcJQFrEdY

 

Netanyahu Unaware of Camera

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrtuBas3Ipw

 

Sweden: Leading Social Democrat "The White Majority is the Problem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=1HNcLKj_USE

 

We Are Not Allowed to Criticize Israel!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lXAbHHgxT6o

 

9-11 Cop Who Arrested Dancing Israelis Speaks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-B2J7tp8eg

 

Mocking Jesus on Israeli Zionist TV - צליבת ישו - The Crucifixion of Yeshu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RY83mAr5uA

 

Five Dancing Israelis Lie About Their Involvement in 9-11! (New Clips Never Seen Before in USA!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztgz_W4cOdw

 

Was It Right To Fire Rick Sanchez?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YvW5X456jdg

 

Video Dispatch: Japan Steps Into Iran's Nuclear Debate

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02ew7I3-0o

You are now aware that Japan offered to help Iran to help them with their nuclear program several months before the reactor meltdown in Fukushima

 

Anti-Racist Hitler (for the lulz)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKDeyuM0-Og

 

Child Sex Abuse Cover-up in Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Communities

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgrEfIwgmtk

 

The worst has to be the mass murder of 100,000 children by Ashkenazi Khazar Israelis. A true holocaust. Ringworm Children -- Zionist Israel's Extermination of 100,000 Sephardim Children

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKUPaI4K620

 

Israeli attack on USS Liberty (US Navy ship)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRZSzdQuOqM

 

General Patton on the Jews & the persecution of German National Socialists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7jC07xQcuc

 

"SIX MILLION JEWS" reference in ten newspapers between 1915 - 1938

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEJ_7vJIuUc

 

Wikipedia - Israel is paying internet workers to manipulate online content

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x2DFnGI9Ac

 

Barbara Lerner Spectre and Jewish implementation of multiracial multiculturalism in the Europe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Vq_e2Z1ug

 

Jewish French deputy, Daniel Cohn-Bendit admits to pedophilia

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=625_1331769572

 

Interesting video about a famous French-Jewish politician and… pedophile

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=678_1244825486

 

Nationell.nu (Swedish)

destroyzionism.com/2013/04/19/media-ownership-in-sweden/

The Swedish media market is dominated by the large media groups Bonnier, Schibsted and Stampen. The following are, for example, the largest daily newspapers in Sweden:

1. Aftonbladet (Schibsted)

2. Dagens Nyheter (Bonnier)

3. Expressen (Bonnier)

4. Goteborgs-Posten (Stampen)

5. Svenska Dagbladet (Schibsted)

6. Sydsvenskan (Bonnier)

7. Dagens Industry (Bonnier)

As you can see, Bonnier owns or controls four of them, Schibsted two, and Stampen one. Together, they control all of the largest daily newspapers. Bonnier is owned by the Jewish family Bonnier, and Stampen is owned by the Jewish family Hjorne. Both families are known to be engaged in Jewish causes. Schibsted is owned by major Jewish international banks such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Bank of New York Mellon. However, this is not merely about ownership and financial interests. The Schibsted-owned newspaper Aftonbladet (the largest in Sweden) recently admitted that the management of Schibsted when needed consults with their Jewish masters. Aftonbladet says the banks’ power over Schibsted is “both direct and indirect”.

We could go on about smaller newspaper, TV channels, and so on, and the pattern is similar. Jews also sit on key positions in these companies – for instance, the Jew Peter Wolodarski is editor-in-chief of the Bonnier-owned Dagens Nyheter. A tiny group of parasites – there are only about 20,000 of them in Sweden – control all of the country’s media, directly and indirectly.

 

 

"If anything, the law should encourage, not forbid, the intermingling of bloods...But legislation cannot change the human heart. The only way we can accomplish that, the only we can achieve a Final Solution to racial prejudice, is to create a clan of races so universal that no one can preen himself on his racial 'purity' or practice the barbarism to safeguard it. The deliberate encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short. The dominance of our world has begun to shift, like cargo in a listing vessel, from the White races to the colored. The sooner we adjust to this fact, the better it will be for our children. For we might well acknowledge, even the most enlightened of us, that we will never completely eliminate racial prejudice until we eliminate separate races."

Rabbi Abraham L. Feinberg, Maclean's Magazine, September 5, 1967

 

 

What about the Frankfurt School, the creator of Cultural Marxism out of the ashes of Marxism, the great cultural destroyer of the last half of the century? What about its founders?

Early members of the Frankfurt School were:

Max Horkheimer, the only son of a wealthy orthodox Jewish family.

Theodor W. Adorno, son of an assimilated Jew.

Herbert Marcuse, his family was Jewish.

Friedrich Pollock, his family was Jewish.

Erich Fromm, the only child of Orthodox Jewish parents.

Otto Kirchheimer. a German lawyer of Jewish ancestry and political scientist of the Frankfurt School.

Leo Lowenthal, born in Frankfurt as the son of assimilated Jews

Franz Leopold Neumann, German-Jewish left-wing political activist, Marxist theorist and labor lawyer.

 

 

 

Summer 1954- Lavon Affair- Israel recruits Egyptian Jews to blow up American and British targets in Egypt. Israel planned on blaming the murderous false-flag attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood in an effort to garner support from the US and Britain. After officially denying any involvement, the Israeli government finally admitted their role in the incident in 2005 by honoring the surviving agents with a certificate of appreciation.

1955-1970- Israel Steals American Uranium to Build Its First Nuclear Weapons- In 2011, the Institute for Research on Middle Eastern Policy examined hundreds of newly de-classified documents from the FBI and CIA and discovered that Israeli spies in collaboration with American Jews stole hundreds of kilograms of weapons grade uranium from US stockpiles and shipped it to Israel. Although Israel does not officially acknowledge the possession of nuclear weapons, their nuclear arsenal is estimated at between 200-300 nuclear weapons. (Source: PressTV)

 

 

the 19th century saw increasing appearance of Jewish names in politics, art, science, philosophy, religion etc. in Europe, as well as the rise of Zionism - all these things would later be noticed by Hitler and used to justify his belief that they were behind all the major shifts in ideology and power structures in the 19th century. In 1868, Benjamin Disraeli became the UK's first Jewish prime minister - the same year Lionel de ROTHSCHILD was submitted as a member to Parliament (Jewish nepotism, anyone?) Note that the UK was becoming leading powerhouse nation of the world at this point with the largest empire; guess who got all the profits.

       

 

Since the mid-1970s, there's been an international consensus for resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict. [...] It's called a two-state settlement, and a two-state settlement is pretty straightforward, uncomplicated. Israel has to fully withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza and Jerusalem, in accordance with the fundamental principle of international law, [...] that it's inadmissible to acquire territory by war. The West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem, having been acquired by war, it's inadmissible for Israel to keep them. They have to be returned. On the Palestinian side and also the side of the neighboring Arab states, they have to recognize Israel's right to live in peace and security with its neighbors. That was the quid pro quo: recognition of Israel, Palestinian right to self-determination in the West Bank and Gaza with its capital in Jerusalem. That's the international consensus. It's not complicated. It's also not controversial.

Norman Finkelstein & Former Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami Debate: Complete Transcript

 

 

 

9/11 and Israel.

Many key Bush Administration officials came from PNAC (Project for a New American Century). All were Zionists (Israeli partisans). They wrote about the need for a “catalytic event” to mobilize the American people. Eight months after coming into office, they got their catalytic event on 9/11, followed by the wars their agenda required. The company providing 24/7 electronic & personal security to the WTC, Kroll Associates, was owned & operated by Zionists, as was the WTC itself as of July 2001. The owners and their immediate relatives seem to have been uncharacteristically absent on the morning of 9/11. Hundreds of American Jews died at the WTC & the Pentagon, but as best as can be determined, only 3 Israelis out of some 4,000 normally there, plus 2 more on the planes.

The senior fatality among WTC personnel was a retired Irish-American FBI agent in his first days on his job as Director of Security.

A private Israeli-owned security company called ICTS registered in the Netherlands, provided security services (sometimes through a wholly owned subsidiary) to all three airports from which the four hijacked planes departed. ICTS also provided security at the airports in Paris & Amsterdam, from which the so-called “shoe” & “underwear” bombers respectively departed.

Bergen, NJ residents saw five people on a white van filming the attacks and visibly celebrating. They had set up their cameras before the first plane hit. Police arrested them. All were Israelis. Bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives, although officers were unable to find anything. The FBI seized the van for further testing. All 5 were later released at the instigation of Israeli & American Jewish leaders, some in the US Government. Details are still classified.

 

+++Proof of extensive Israeli involvement and knowledge of the 9/11 attacks+++

http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367

 

 

Here is a book called "Masters of Deception" by writer Zander C. Fuerza proving Zionists orchestrated 9/11 and the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc.

 

Official book page: http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/

 

Direct download: http://archive.org/download/MastersOfDeception/MastersOfDeceptionBook.pdf

 

Masters of Deception selected chapters

 

Chapter Two

http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/2013/07/16/masters-of-deception-chapter-two/

 

Chapter Three

http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/2013/07/16/masters-of-deception-chapter-three/

 

Chapter Four

http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/2013/07/16/masters-of-deception-chapter-four/

 

Chapter Fourteen

http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/masters-of-deception-chapter-fourteen/

 

Chapter Fifteen

http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/masters-of-deception-chapter-fifteen/

 

Chapter Seventeen

http://mastersofdeception.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/masters-of-deception-chapter-seventeen/

 

 

Anti-conception pill was created by a Dutch Jew.

nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_de_Winter

 

The Netherlands’s first feminist was Jewish

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aletta_Jacobs

 

American Jews are responsible for most feminists in the United States

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists

 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Origins_Formula

The National Origins Formula was an American system of immigration quotas, between 1921 and 1965, which restricted immigration on the basis of existing proportions of the population. The goal was to maintain the existing ethnic composition of the United States.

 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished the National Origins Formula that had been in place in the United States since the Emergency Quota Act. It was proposed by United States Representative Emanuel Celler of New York

 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler

All of his grandparents emigrated from Germany; his paternal grandparents and maternal grandmother were Jewish.

Mass immigration to USA and the multiculti clusterfuck it is currently in was brought about by a single Jew.

 

FEMEN receives its funding from Jed Sunden, a Brooklyn-born Jewish businessman

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEMEN#Financing

 

Attacks and assassinations of British Soldiers, Civilians, Civil Servants, and Diplomats

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks

 

King David Hotel Bombing

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

 

European Jewish Fund

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Jewish_Fund

The European Jewish Fund (EJF) is an international non-governmental organization that coordinates and supports programs and events aimed at improving interreligious and interethnic relations, reinforcing Jewish national identity, counteracting assimilation, promoting tolerance and reconciliation in Europe, fighting against xenophobia, extremism and anti-Semitism, and preserving Holocaust memories. The EJF was established in 2006 on the initiative of Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor, who is President of the European Jewish Congress and EJF Chairman. Arie Zuckerman is EJF Secretary General.

 

 

Matthew Broderick, the star of Ferris Bueller's Day Off and Lion King, has a skeleton in the closet you may not have heard of. He is also married to Sarah Jessica Parker, the main protagonist of Sex and the City. They are both Jews.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Broderick#Personal_life

On August 5, 1987, Broderick was in a car accident in Enniskillen, Northern Ireland, while vacationing with Jennifer Grey [who is also a Jew!!], whom he had begun dating in semi-secrecy during the filming of Ferris Bueller's Day Off. The accident, which was the event through which their relationship became public, occurred when the rented BMW Broderick was driving crossed into the wrong lane and collided head-on with a Volvo driven by a local mother and daughter, Anna Gallagher 28, and Margaret Doherty 63, who were killed instantly in the accident. Broderick suffered a fractured leg, fractured ribs, a concussion, and a collapsed lung. Grey received minor injuries, including severe whiplash. Broderick told authorities he had no recollection of the crash and did not know why he was in the wrong lane. "I don't remember the day. I don't remember even getting up in the morning. I don't remember making my bed. What I first remember is waking up in the hospital, with a very strange feeling going on in my leg," he said at the time. Broderick was charged with causing death by dangerous driving and faced up to five years behind bars, but was later convicted of the lesser charge of careless driving and fined $175, which the victims' family called "a travesty of justice." Martin Doherty, whose sister and mother were killed in the crash, later stated that he forgave Broderick, amid plans to meet with Broderick in 2003, in order to gain a sense of closure. As of April 2013, the meeting has not taken place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Federal Reserve Bank is a consortium of 9 Jewish-owned & associated banks with the Rothschild’s at the head:

 

1. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin.

2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.

3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.

4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.

5. Lehman Brothers of NY.

6. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of NY (Now Shearson American Express).

7. Goldman, Sachs of NY.

8. National Bank of Commerce NY/Morgan Guaranty Trust (J. P. Morgan Bank - Equitable Life - Levi P. Morton are principal shareholders).

9. Hanover Trust of NY (William and David Rockefeller & Chase National Bank NY are principal shareholders).

 

 

 

 

Goldman Sachs Management

 

Executive

Lloyd C. Blankfein (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Gary D. Cohn (Ashkenazi Jew) – President and Chief Operating Officer

John S. Weinberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman

J. Michael Evans (White European) – Vice Chairman

Michael S. Sherwood (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman

David A. Viniar (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Gregory K. Palm (White European) – Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation

Esta E. Stecher (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation

Alan M. Cohen (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Global Head of Compliance

 

Board of Directors

Lloyd C. Blankfein (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Gary D. Cohn (Ashkenazi Jew) – President and Chief Operating Officer

John H. Bryan (White European) – Director

Claes Dahlbäck (White European) – Director

Stephen Friedman (Ashkenazi Jew) – Director

William W. George (White European) – Director

Rajat K. Gupta (Indian) – Director

James A. Johnson (Jewish spouse: Maxine Isaacs) – Director

Lois D. Juliber (Ashkenazi Jew) – Director

Lakshmi N. Mittal (Indian) – Director

James J. Schiro (Ashkenazi Jew) – Director

H. Lee Scott, Jr. (White European) – Director

 

Management Committee:

Lloyd C. Blankfein (Ashkenazi Jew)

Gary D. Cohn (Ashkenazi Jew)

John S. Weinberg (Ashkenazi Jew)

J. Michael Evans (White European)

Michael S. Sherwood (Ashkenazi Jew)

Kevin W. Kennedy (White European)

Richard A. Friedman (Ashkenazi Jew)

Timothy J. O’Neill (White European)

Gregory K. Palm (White European)

Masanori Mochida (Japanese)

David A. Viniar (Ashkenazi Jew)

Christopher A. Cole (Ashkenazi Jew)

Esta E. Stecher (Ashkenazi Jew)

David B. Heller (Ashkenazi Jew)

Edward C. Forst (Ashkenazi Jew)

Richard J. Gnodde (White European)

Richard M. Ruzika (Ashkenazi Jew)

Yoël Zaoui (Ashkenazi Jew)

 

Goldman Sachs Management (2/2)

Management Committee Cont.

Gordon E. Dyal (White European)

David M. Solomon (Ashkenazi Jew)

Edith W. Cooper (White/Black)

Isabelle Ealet (White European)

Edward K. Eisler (Ashkenazi Jew)

Gwen R. Libstag (Ashkenazi Jew)

John F.W. Rogers (Jewish spouse: Deborah M. Lehr)

Pablo J. Salame (White/Hispanic)

Jeffrey W. Schroeder (Ashkenazi Jew)

Donald R. Mullen (White European)

Harvey M. Schwartz (Ashkenazi Jew)

Steven H. Strongin (Ashkenazi Jew)

Alan M. Cohen (Ashkenazi Jew)

Yusuf A. Alireza (Iranian)

David C. Ryan (White European)

 

Summary:

Of the nine (9) Goldman Sachs executive officers, seven (7) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 78%. Of the twelve (12) Goldman Sachs directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 50%. Of the thirty-three (33) Goldman Sachs management committee members, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Goldman Sachs executive officers by a factor of 39 times(3,900 percent), over-represented on the Goldman Sachs board of directors by a factor of 25 times(2,500 percent), and over-represented on the Goldman Sachs management committee by a factor of 30.5 times(3,050 percent).

 

 

 

 

AIG

 

Board of Directors

Robert H. Benmosche (Ashkenazi Jew)

Harvey Golub (Ashkenazi Jew)

Laurette T. Koellner (Ashkenazi Jew)

Donald H. Layton (Ashkenazi Jew)

Christopher S. Lynch (White European)

Arthur C. Martinez (White European)

George L. Miles, Jr. (Black American)

Henry S. Miller (Ashkenazi Jew)

Robert S. Miller (Ashkenazi Jew)

Suzanne Nora Johnson (Ashkenazi Jew)

Morris W. Offit (Ashkenazi Jew)

Ronald A. Rittenmeyer (Ashkenazi Jew)

Douglas M. Steenland (Ashkenazi Jew)

 

Trustees:

Jill M. Considine (White European)

Chester B. Feldberg (Ashkenazi Jew)

Peter A. Langerman (Ashkenazi Jew)

 

Summary:

Of the sixteen (16) directors and trustees of American International Group, twelve (12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the directors and trustees of American International Group by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).

 

 

 

 

Federal Reserve

 

Board of Governors

Ben S. Bernanke (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman

Janet L. Yellen (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman

Elizabeth A. Duke (White European)

Daniel K. Tarullo (White European)

Sarah Bloom Raskin (Ashkenazi Jew)

Jerome H. Powell (White European)

Jeremy C. Stein (Ashkenazi Jew)

 

Federal Reserve District Banks:

Eric S. Rosengren (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

William C. Dudley (Ashkenazi Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Charles I. Plosser (Ashkenazi Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Sandra Pianalto (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Jeffrey M. Lacker (Ashkenazi Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Dennis P. Lockhart (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Charles L. Evans (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

James B. Bullard (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Narayana Kocherlakota (Indian) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Esther L. George (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

John C. Williams (White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

 

Summary:

Of the seven (7) Federal Reserve Board governors, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the twelve (12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 33%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent), and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 16.5 times(1,650 percent).

 

 

 

 

MEDIA

CBS is owned by Murray Rothstein (aka Sumner Redstone).

NBC is owned by Brian Roberts.

ABC is owned by Sydney Bass with Robert Iger as CEO.

CNN is primarily owned by Aviv Nevo.

 

White house influence

Jacob Lew — Treasury Secretary

Penny Pritzker — Commerce Secretary

Kenneth Feinberg — Pay Czar

Valerie Jarrett — Senior Advisor

David Axelrod — Special Advisor

 

-News Corp. President Peter Chernin

-Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey

-Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger

-Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise,

-Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer,

-CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel),

-MGM Chairman Harry Sloan

-NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker

 

LOBBIES

Jewish lobby's in America

American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)

American Jewish Congress (AJC)

Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations

Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA)

Middle East Forum (MEF)

Zionist Organization of America (ZOA)

 

MASS MEDIA

-Fairness and Accuracy in Media (FAIR),

Executive Director: Jeff Cohen

-Paul Revere Society,

The PRS apparently IS Michael Savage (born Michael Weiner). Conservative talk-show host and apologist for Israel.

Association of American Publishers,

Chairman of the Board of Directors: Jane Friedman

-Screen Actors Guild,

President: Melissa Gilbert

-American Film Institute,

Director and CEO: Jean Picker Firstenberg (Jewish?)

-Recording Industry Association of America,

Prior Chairman and CEO: Hilary Rosen

New Chairman and CEO: Mitch Bainwol (formerly a Jewish Republican Party official)

President: Cary Sherman

-National Association of Recording Merchandisers,

"The Voice of Music Retailing"

President: Pamela Horovitz

Chairman: David Schlang (Jewish?)

-National Film Board of Canada, (government subsidies for independent filmmakers) Commissioner and Chairperson: Jacques Bensimon

-Arbitron, (media research)

President and CEO: Stephen B. Morris

(non-executive) Chairman: Lawrence Perlman

-The Media Coalition, Inc.,

Executive Director: David Horowitz

-The Media Access Project,

President and CEO: Andrew Jay Schwartzman

-Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (Canada's BBC),

President and CEO: Robert Rabinovitch

 

-Canadian Museum of Civilization,

President and CEO: Victor Rabinovitch (brother of Robert - see above)

"Their [the Rabinovitch brothers] appointments, the apex of careers built largely in the federal civil service, were 'a source of naches [pride] for the entire Jewish community,'' said Irving Abella, a Toronto historian and former president of the Canadian Jewish Congress. ‘They are energetic and dedicated, and never tried to hide their Jewish background.'"

-Center for Media and Public Affairs,

President: S. Robert Lichter

Vice President: Linda Lichter

-Association of Alternative Newsweeklies,

Executive Director: Richard Karpel

-Project for Excellence in Journalism/Committee of Concerned Journalists,

Director (and Vice Chairman of CCJ) -- Tom Rosenstiel

Chairman of CCJ -- Bill Kovach (Jewish?)

-Directors Guild of America,

President: Michael Apted

National Vice-President: Edwin Sherin

National Executive Director: Jay D. Roth

Associate National Executive Director: Warren Adler

(Also: Presiding Officer, Western Directors

Council: Michael Apted Presiding Officer,

Eastern Directors Council: Edwin Sherin)

-The Society of Professional Audio Recording Services,

President: Jeff Greenberg

President-Elect: Andrew Kautz

Treasurer: Doug Levine

Executive Director: Larry Lipman

-Academy of Television Arts & Sciences ("Emmy" awards),

Chairman & CEO: Dick Askin

Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Foundation,

Chairman & CEO: Tom Sarnoff

 

-Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS), ("Academy Awards")

AMPAS Board of Governors:

First Vice President: Sid Ganis

Vice President: Gilbert Cates

Executive Director: Bruce Davis (Jewish?)

AMPAS DJ 4DM1Nistration:

Executive Director: Bruce Davis (Jewish?)

AMPAS Foundation Board of Trustees:

President: Fay Kanin

Vice President (1 of 2): Charles Bernstein

Executive Secretary: Bruce Davis (Jewish?)

Secretary: Sid Ganis

-"Tony" awards are presented by the following two organizations:

The League of American Theatres and Producers (LATP),

Chairman: Gerald Schoenfeld

President: Jed Bernstein

The American Theatre Wing (ATW),

Executive Director: Howard Sherman

-National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS),"The Recording Academy" ("Grammy" Awards),

President & CEO: Neil Portnow

General Council: Joel A. Katz

-Songwriters Guild of America (SGA),

Executive Director: Lewis Bachman

National Projects Director: George Wurzbach (Jewish?)

Executive Vice President: Richard Adler

Second Executive Vice President: George David Weiss

First Vice President: Ervin Drake

-Dramatists Guild of America, Inc.,

President: John Weidman

Secretary: Arthur Kopit (Jewish surname)

-Motion Picture Association of America,

President: Dan Glickman

-American Cinema Editors,

President: Alan Heim

-National Cable and Telecommunications Association,

President and CEO: Robert Sachs

-Online News Association,

President: Ruth Gersh, Director of Online Services, AP Digital

Vice President: Michael Silberman, Managing Editor, East Coast, MSNBC.com

Secretary: Jonathan Dube Jonathan Dube Jonathan Dube, Managing Producer, MSNBC.com

 

Homeland security

The Chertoff Group, Anti-Defamation League, Israeli Intelligence, have Major influence

 

Military

Military brass depends on the Jewish-owned Fed for their paychecks.

Military brass depends on Armaments Manufacturers, whose stocks are underwritten by Jewish Investment Banks, for perks and post-military careers.

Bowing to the Jews in Israel last month, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel took the mark-of-the-beast when placing the Jewish Yarmulke on his head.

 

Corporations

Investment Banks like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup underwrite the stocks of American corporations and thus dictate the offshoring of US jobs to China and India for cheap labor and BIG profits.

 

Education

-The American Federation of Teachers is run by Jews like Albert Shanker and Randi Weingarten

-Jews donate huge grants to the Ivy League Schools and place Jewish personnel in high positions such as David Skorton, President of Cornell and Allan Garber, Provost of Harvard.

-Jewish Wall Street mogul, Sanford Weil, Chairman Emeritus of Citigroup, is a major benefactor of Cornell University and also funds 500 Academies via his National Academy Foundation.

 

 

 

 

 

******GENERAL PATTONS DEATH******

Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized. He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons (DP's) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved when they were housed in German hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that "these people do not understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor." He described in his diary one DP camp,

"where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel' applied to the tribes which disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."

PATTON cont.

Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:

"This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."

These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them.

Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings:

"Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is -- not intended for the individual but for the race.

Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals."

One of the strongest factors in straightening out General Patton's thinking on the conquered Germans was the behavior of America's controlled news media toward them. At a press conference in Regensburg, Germany, on May 8, 1945, immediately after Germany's surrender, Patton was asked whether he planned to treat captured SS troops differently from other German POW's. His answer was:

"No. SS means no more in Germany than being a Democrat in America -- that is not to be quoted. I mean by that that initially the SS people were special sons of bitches, but as the war progressed they ran out of sons of bitches and then they put anybody in there. Some of the top SS men will be treated as criminals, but there is no reason for trying someone who was drafted into this outfit . . ."

Despite Patton's request that his remark not be quoted, the press eagerly seized on it, and Jews and their front men in America screamed in outrage over Patton's comparison of the SS and the Democratic Party as well as over his announced intention of treating most SS prisoners humanely.

With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had thrown German families out of their homes to make room for more than a million Jewish DP's -- part of the famous "six million" who had supposedly been gassed -- but he balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories, in accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany's economic basis forever. In his diary he wrote:

"I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the factories are being blown up -- that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war -- can be equally well attained through the destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons."

Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the overwhelming emphasis being placed on the persecution of every German who had formerly been a member of the National Socialist party. In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said:

"I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW's to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union's Gulags), where many will be starved to death."

Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife he commented:

"I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is 'Liberty, then give me death.' I can't see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it."

And in his diary he noted:

"Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc.? . . . We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles."

His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him with the German people and their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people.

After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: "Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It's said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed."

This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks. During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: "It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country -- and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism."

Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote: "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."

By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being "soft on Nazis" and continually recalling an incident in which he had slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper printed the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a "yellow-bellied Jew."

Then, in a press conference on September 22, reporters hatched a scheme to needle Patton into losing his temper and making statements which could be used against him. The scheme worked. The press interpreted one of Patton's answers to their insistent questions as to why he was not pressing the Nazi-hunt hard enough as: "The Nazi thing is just like a Democrat-Republican fight." The New York Times headlined this quote, and other papers all across America picked it up.

The unmistakable hatred which had been directed at him during this press conference finally opened Patton's eyes fully as to what was afoot. In his diary that night lie wrote:

"There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs.

"They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law . . .

"Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing too much for the Germans to the detriment of the DP's, most of whom are Jews. I could not give the answer to that one, because the answer is that, in my opinion and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is vitally necessary for us to build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I am afraid we have waited too long."

And in a letter of the same date to his wife: "I will probably be in the headlines before you get this, as the press is trying to quote me as being more interested in restoring order in Germany than in catching Nazis. I can't tell them the truth that unless we restore Germany we will insure that communism takes America."

Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to relieve him of his duties as military governor and "kick him upstairs" as the commander of the Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not unhappy with his new assignment, because "I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe."

On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, who was back in the States. In the letter Patton bitterly condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower's pusillanimous behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the politicization, corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S. Army which these things were causing.

He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America's enemies:

"I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and Semitic elements of our government have leveled against me and practically every other commander. In my opinion it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders, because the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do."

In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying the morale and integrity of the Army and endangering America's future by not opposing the growing Soviet might:

"It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait until I can start an all-out offensive . . . ."

http://gatorpress.com/?p=1664

General George S. Patton was seriously injured on December 9th, 1945. He was riding in a jeep when it was apparently struck by another Army vehicle. The driver of the large truck that struck Patton and the details of the crash were never disclosed. Patton did survive the crash. On the way to the hospital, Patton’s vehicle was then struck again by a second two-ton US Army truck. This time he was injured much more seriously, but still clung to life.

Neither of these two truck drivers were arrested nor even had their names disclosed.

In June 1998, an elderly veteran stepped forward and claimed that he had witnessed the second accident. The old soldier recalled that after the vehicles collided, Patton stumbled out. When the truck driver saw Patton still alive, he struck him several times with a 2 foot long pipe wrench.

In spite of the crashes and the beating, Patton survived and was taken to the military hospital.

Reportedly, he asked his wife to remove him from the hospital because “They’re going to kill me here.” He was reported to be recovering quickly, then suddenly died. The cause of his death was officially listed in Army medical records as embolism and heart failure.

A year later Patton’s wife Beatrice died one week after announcing she would release hundreds of Patton’s personal papers regarding the war. An accomplished rider, she reportedly fell from her horse and died of a broken neck. Patton remains buried in Germany. The remains of this American hero were never even brought back to the US, and no autopsy was ever performed.

Was he murdered? If he had only been hit by one truck, I might buy it. But that second truck is just too much of a coincidence. Somebody intentionally killed America’s greatest General.

******END OF GENERAL PATTON SECTION******

 

############BEGINNING OF MULTICULTURALISM/DIVERSITY/CULTURAL MARXISM SECTION############

Multi-Cultural, Anti-Racist Leftism = Mental AIDS

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/45619160917

 

The HIV virus attacks human immune systems. It destroys your protection against invading microbes and contamination.

 

When immunity is destroyed, the human body can’t fight infections and prevent the diseases that follow… And so you die.

 

Multicultural leftism works on a similar principle:

-Undermine and destroy the immune system of a nation.

 

Primary symptoms of the disease include:

>Xenophilia - Preference for foreign and different people.

>Oikophobia and Ethno-Masochism - hatred towards one’s own people.

>Emasculation of the society - undermining vitality and strength of the society.

 

Xenophilia

-A systematic preference for the other, rather than for the same.

 

Xenophilia is generally a sign of deformed character, delinquent frustrations, or psychic deviancy.

 

Oikophobia (oikos = home)

-Negative feelings, aversion or hate towards one’s home, country, national culture, and heritage of one’s own society.

 

Oikophobia prevails today among Western artists, journalists, Leftism “intellectuals” and their followers.

 

It’s a collective psychopathy which can be characterised by:

>Glaring inconsistent opinions, for example: they fight against discrimination, but support Islam - a very discriminatory religion.

>A tendency, in any situation, to stand by others, against one’s own.

>The denial of minority criminality and hysterical focus on only White crime.

 

Ethno-mascochism (ethnic-masochism)

 

Sexual masochism = taking perverse pleasure in causing pain to your self.'''

 

Ethno-masochicm = taking pleasure in attacking and humiliating one’s own ethnicity, nation or race.

 

It is a pathological tendency to perpetually ridicule and destructively criticise one’s own nation, ethnicity or race:

 

“Whites are the worst - racists! Imperialists! Nazis! Whites are responsible for all evil!”

 

Oikophobes and ethno-mascochists are in permanent opposition to their own nation, race and culture.

 

Emasculation

 

Emasculation of the society - an effort to “castrate” the nation:

>Support for everything that undermines vitality and strength of the nation and its immunity against aggressive foreign cultures:

>Homosexuality and homosexual family.

>Feminism, “gender” ambiguity and rejection of traditional roles - weak man and the careerist childless woman.

>Celebration of deviant behaviour and drug use; breaking traditions and moral rules.

>Pathological (sick) humanitarianism: obsession with saving all who are considered to be “discriminated” or disadvantaged; A cult of weakness.

 

It is an attack on all historically proven and successful traditions and values that kept European society vital and strong for centuries.

 

A nation is like a living organism

 

When a virus enters a body, the body fights it.

 

When foreign and alien cultures and races encroach on a nation’s territory, that nation defends itself in order to survive and save its culture.

 

Nationalism, as well as supposed defensive “racism,” “xenophobia” and other such Marxist buzzwords are all part of this protective immune system.

 

Multicultural Leftism (like AIDS) seeks to corrupt and break the immune system of the nation, to kill a nation.

 

Multicultural, anti-racist leftism should be treated as a dangerous disease.

 

Marxists Of The 21st Century: The New Left

“This great evil. Where does it come from? How’d it steal into the world? What seed, what root did it grow from? Who’s doin’ this? Who’s killin’ us?”

 

Europe 1920’s:

 

>The standard of living of workers in capitalism is improving.

>The Red Revolution succeeded only in Russia.

>People in the Soviet Union live under violence and poverty.

>The forecasts and ideas of old Marxists appeared to be wrong and utopian.

 

Paris, 1968:

 

>Students are supporting Marxism, left radicalism is on the rise.

>May, 1968, Red Anarchists, Maoists and other leftists provoked a revolt; building barricades, burning cars, etc.

>France refused these left radicals.

>On the 30th May, 1968, over 400,000 citizens protested AGAINST the red radicals, the conservatives won in the elections.

>The leftists realised that the nation wouldn’t support them, so they and their leaders escaped.

>They promised to return, with new strategies, new ideas and new slogans.

 

The young Marxists distanced themselves from the old communists and The New Left was born.

 

>The old Marxists wanted to change society and seize power in revolution.

>“The New Left” stopped supporting violent revolution and came up with a new strategy.

>Instead they started supporting immigrants, minorities, radical ekologism, egalitarianism.

>They fought against “racism,” fascism, for human rights, for multiculturalism…

>With this new ideology “The New Left” is grabbing power in a democratic way.

 

For the New Leftists in the the West there was a great barrier…

…That old Christian, conservative and patriotic society had no sympathy with them.

 

So, the New Leftists decided to disrupt and break this society first:

>To destroy traditional values

>Nations

>Patriotism

>Traditional family

>Morality

 

As a result society will look like this:

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/45389080258

 

Then they will overrule with their ideology and get the power.

 

These monstrous plans didn’t form only in the heads of street leftists:

-At Frankfurt University worked a group of Marxist sociologists, who designed this new ideology for The New Left.

 

Marxists from the Frankfurt school created a devastating ideology, the goal of their ideology is to:

Create a psychological and cultural terror against Western white society using psychoanalysis, manipulation… Until they exterminate all patriotism, pride, European Christian cultural and traditional model of a family.

 

In practice, their ideology expresses itself like this:

 

>He who shows a national pride tramples an oppressed minority… And thus he is a Nazi, extremist…

>He who supports the traditional model of a family oppresses a homosexual minority… And thus he is a homophobic fascist…

>Immigrants have the “RIGHT” to come to European countries - He who refuses multiculturalism oppresses an immigrants human rights… And thus he is a xenophobic racist…

>He who has different ideas from New Leftism must be disqualified from public life.

 

Another Marxist philosopher called upon The New Left to:

“Long march through the institutions.”

-Antonio Gramsci

 

Meaning, to grab power slowly, democratically, to left leftists slowly occupy the education system, film industry, media, politics, to spread their ideology and overrule Europe using their propaganda, their law, quotas and restrictions.

 

It was the beginning of:

 

>Political correctness.

>Positive discrimination (Affirmative action) of minorities.  

>Modern anti-fascism.

>Anti-racism.

>Multiculturalism.

>Human rights movements.

>Radical feminism.

>Homosexual rights movements.

>For drug legalisation.

 

Devastating ideas of the New Left are packed into modern “ideals” and attractive mottos:

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/45389080258

 

Their ideology is enforced on the political sphere by leftists who reached powerful positions, they make new laws, enable immigration…

 

José Manuel Barroso

35 years ago: radical leftist-Maoist

Today: President of the EU commission

 

Daniel Cohn-Bendit (“Red Danny”)

In 1968: radical anarchist student leader.

Today: Chief of the Green Parties in the European parliament.

 

Hundreds of unknown EU officials in Brussels have influence in the creation of EU law, which invariably controls the majority of laws of the countries within the EU. They appoint each other, meet in secret and we cannot sack them, many of them are New Leftists.

 

Almost all big commercial media in the EU are the property of only a few international corporations, which are supporting multicultural propaganda.

 

The red Marxist revolution did not die with the fall of Communism, it has just changed its face, it lives and it is destroying us in a more effective and more malicious way.

 

Studies reveal racial segregation in dating:

http://www.thegrio.com/specials/life-and-style/study-reveals-racial-segregation-in-online-dating.php

 

As in all similar studies, White females are the most likely to exclude those who are not members of their race.

 

Judging from the first picture, I think someone needs to tell non-whites that there simply isn’t enough white people to go around.

http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/emir.kamenica/documents/racialPreferences.pdf

 

-“One of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large. This finding is consistent with racial–beauty exchange theories in that white women who do not meet conventional standards of beauty (in terms of having a thinner body type) are more open to dating black men, who may be considered a lower status group.”

 

>“While political views also have no effect on racial exclusion by white men, white women who describe themselves as liberal or very liberal are less likely to exclude black men as dates than women who are not political, middle of the road, or conservative. Surprisingly, liberal white women appear more likely to exclude Asian men as dates.”

 

>“Among white men, however, a preference for a particular body type increases the likelihood of excluding black women as possible dates substantially. Similarly, a preference for a particular height by white women substantially increases the likelihood of excluding Asian men.”

 

>“These findings suggest that the idea that black women or Asian men are associated with undesirable physical and social characteristics may be part of the reason they are so highly excluded by white men and women.

 

>“Therefore, an openness to dating black men among these white women may actually reflect their knowledge that they do not fit the conventional beauty standards that appeal to white men.”

http://paa2008.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=80046

 

>“They also found that those who grew up in places where there were many people of another race were less likely to date that race.”

http://abagond.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/race-and-dating/

 

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/47387506454

 

=Two examples of unnatural moral convictions that are found amongst liberals

 

The first is the picture; she was raped in Haiti and it’s somehow whitey’s fault, the second is below:

 

 

Amy Biehl

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Biehl

 

-“Amy Elizabeth Biehl was a white American graduate of Stanford University and an Anti-Apartheid activist in South Africa.

 

When 26-year-old Biehl drove a friend home to the township of Guguletu, outside Cape Town, on August 25, 1993, a black mob pelted her car with stones and smashed its windows while shouting racial epithets. Biehl was struck in the head with a brick, then dragged from her car and surrounded by a mob who stoned and stabbed her to death while she begged for her life. Four of Biehl’s murderers were convicted for her killing; however, in 1998, all were pardoned by South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

 

Biehl’s family supported release of the killers, and her father shook the murderers’ hands, stating that:

>“The most important vehicle of reconciliation is open and honest dialogue…we are here to reconcile a human life which was taken without an opportunity for dialogue. When we are finished with this process we must move forward with linked arms.”

 

During the killers’ 1993 trial, the gallery was full of blacks, who laughed mockingly as the defence related how Biehl pleaded for her life.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Biehl

 

Sorry, but to me this isn’t a healthy tolerance, a tolerance of perhaps accepting that others make mistakes too and appreciating those closest to you, despite their faults, is a healthy tolerance, but you don’t “tolerate” that one or more men beat/rape/kill your daughter; you AVENGE it – if you don’t you are not a man, you’re a coward with no concept of honour, courage or duty whatsoever, also known as; a liberal.

 

Crush pacifism.

 

Solutreans Are The Indigenous Americans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNTXCMYjwEk

 

-“In the Ice Age Columbus DVD, fascinating new archaeological data and DNA research Discover’s that Europeans discovered the Americas 17,000 years prior to the birth of Columbus.

 

- As you will see in American history DVDs, they overcome starvation and storms along the way, with the help of a revolutionary weapons technology they would later be wiped out by the invading peoples of Asia. But awaiting the pioneers’ arrival is a stark, empty continent, filled with a plethora of bizarre and lethal animals — all brought to life by brilliant computer animation. The Ice Age Columbus DVD, firmly rooted in the latest scientific discoveries, is a compelling vision of the greatest migration in human history of Europeans returning to the land which once broke off of their own ethnic home lands of Europe.”

 

Indigenous Stone-age Europeans ‘were the first to set foot on North America’

?“Stone-age Europeans were the first to set foot on North America, beating American Indians by some 10,000 years, new archaeological evidence suggests.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html

 

Anthropologists, archaeologists and geneticists agree the Solutreans (sometimes referred to as ethnic Japhethites) were the first in North America.

Archaeologists and RNA specialists also agree North America broke off of the side of Europe, and that South America broke off of the side of Africa.

North America = European.

South America = African.

 

-The RNA of the plants in North America are related to the RNA plant species found in Europe, not Asia.

-The RNA found in plants in South America are the closest related to RNA in plant life found in Western Africa.

 

_________________________________

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/47730994985

 

Windover, Florida Bog Mummies (Caucasoid):

http://youtu.be/C2LbIE7juOw

 

Kennewick Man - Clovis/Solutrean - Haplogroup X:

http://youtu.be/lIkkA8STBDI

>“This fixed the age of the skeleton at approximately 9,300 years (8,400 uncalibrated “radiocarbon years”), not the nineteenth century, as had originally been assumed.[4] After studying the bones, Chatters concluded they belonged to a Caucasoid male about 68 inches (173 cm) tall who had died in his mid fifties.[4]” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennewick_man

 

WHO GENOCIDED WHOM?

Archaeology Story Of The Century: Europeans Were Original Inhabitants Of Americas

>“New archaeological evidence suggests that America was first discovered by Stone Age people from Europe – 10,000 years before the Siberian-originating ancestors of the American Indians set foot in the New World.

 

>A remarkable series of several dozen European-style stone tools, dating back between 19,000 and 26,000 years, have been discovered at six locations along the US east coast. Three of the sites are on the Delmarva Peninsular in Maryland, discovered by archaeologist Dr Darrin Lowery of the University of Delaware. One is in Pennsylvania and another in Virginia. A sixth was discovered by scallop-dredging fishermen on the seabed 60 miles from the Virginian coast on what, in prehistoric times, would have been dry land.

 

>The new discoveries are among the most important archaeological breakthroughs for several decades - and are set to add substantially to our understanding of humanity’s spread around the globe.

 

>Now archaeologists are starting to investigate half a dozen new sites in Tennessee, Maryland and even Texas – and these locations are expected to produce more evidence.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-evidence-suggests-stone-age-hunters-from-europe-discovered-america-7447152.html

 

This one may only be about tools, but evidence is evidence. They are European-style tools that are dated older than the oldest Asiatic artifacts.

Clovis spear and arrowhead technology is developed from Solutrean technology. The oldest human remains found in North America are European.

 

They cannot be forged steel tools, or copper for that matter, as the European settlements never developed beyond the Stone Age, they were absorbed/suffered genocide by the arriving Asiatics.

 

Link relating to Sarah Winnemucca (last two pictures above):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si-Te-Cah

 

Race Is A Social Construct? Part 1

>The genetic distance between the common chimp and the bonobo is 0.103% (Curnoe, 2003, Table 2), less than half the English-Bantu genetic distance of 0.23%, and therefore either (at least some) sub-Saharan blacks and Eurasians should be classified as different species or the common chimp and the bonobo (and the two species of orangutan) should be classified as the same species.[19] Although wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are a different species (lupus) than coyotes (Canis latrans), “… there is less mtDNA difference between dogs, wolves, and coyotes than there is between the various ethnic groups of human beings…” (Coppinger, 1995).

 

______________________

 

dog - wolf FST = .165 [1]

 

Negroid - non-Negroid FST = .2+ [2]

 

[1] doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046

 

[2] doi:10.1101/gr.116301.110

 

_________________________

 

Race Is A Social Construct? Part 2

Genetic Differences Between African and Asiatic Lions Is Less Than Those Found Between Different Human Racial Groups

 

>mtDNA distance between Sub-Saharan Africans and White Europeans is around 2.0

>mtDNA distance between African and Asiatic Lions is around 0.92.

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000251

 

“There is only ONE SPECIES of lion: Panthera leo. The Asiatic lion is just ONE of MANY SUBSPECIES, all of which have been geographically isolated from one another for thousands of years. Though they ALL possess slightly different physical and behavioral traits, they are still capable of interbreeding and producing viable offspring.”

http://animal.discovery.com/tv-shows/wild-kingdom/about-animals/asiatic-vs-african.htm

 

Hmm, sounds familiar…

 

In fact, modern Europeans are more closely related to Neanderthals (an average mtDNA difference of around 1.1) than are modern Europeans to modern Sub-Saharan Africans (an average mdDNA distance of around 2).

 

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/48804160688

 

Leftists go to a Muslim ghetto in Rosengard, Sweden, expecting to be welcomed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG3WmgUfqrk

 

I guess AntiFA expected the immigrants to acknowledge how amazing they are for standing up for them, instead they’re attacked by the multicultural enrichers they support and are forced to flee.

 

More poetic justice for AntiFa:

 

A mob of Kurdish immigrants stormed AntiFa’s Berlin gang house and brutally beat them with baseball bats. The attack occurred just days ago. The Kurdish immigrants simply wanted to attack some white people, any white people.

 

The following night two members of a band that perform at the Antifa gang house were attacked by Kurds

 

The same thing happened during the Cincinnati race riots:

 

Members of a self-described “anti-racist” gang urged members in e-mails to join the Black rioters. One e-mail told White “anti-racists” to try to get in front of media cameras so it could not be said that the rioters were “all Black."At least two members of the gang did in fact join the Black rioters and were brutally beaten. A follow-up e-mail later announced that two of their members had been brutally beaten and lamented that the Black rioters did not understand that the “anti-racists” were simply trying to help them. One of the thugs is actually visible in a youtube video made by the CofCC. He is wearing a mask and standing in the middle of a bunch of hard-core black gangbangers waving a sign. He was later brutally beaten for being white after the media cameras left.

http://cofcc.org/2012/02/anti-racist-gangbangers-brutally-attacked-by-kurdish-immigrants/

 

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/48314525519

 

The Holodomor?

Pre-Holocaust, many Europeans suffered under the Soviet Union, particularly in the Gulag concentration camps. A deliberate famine was inflicted upon the Ukrainians by the Jewish-led Bolsheviks. Is it any surprise that they, along with hundreds of thousands of other Europeans, welcomed their Nazi liberators fought with them to the death against Communism?

 

Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a “worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.”

 

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.”

 

- Winston Churchill, February 8, 1920.

 

Battle of Stalingrad

 

>Over 300,000 German, Croatian, Romanian, Hungarian and Italian soldiers, including some 35,000 Soviet volunteers fighting the Communists had been surrounded.

>Over 11,000 soldiers would refuse to lay down their arms at the official surrender, preferring instead to fight to the death with the Bolsheviks.

>By early March, 1943, all pockets of resistance had been wiped out.

>Many of the remaining prisoners will freeze and die on the forced death march. Others will die from disease, mistreatment, or worked to death in the Gulag concentration camps.

>Later, historians discovered that of 11,237 letters sent by soldiers inside of Stalingrad to their families, between… 20 December 1942 and 16 January 1943,

>Almost every letter expressed their willingness to fight Communism and die for National Socialism and their Fuhrer… Adolf Hitler.

 

“In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War…. The vanquished are in the process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished…. Whatever else might be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.”

 

– Winston Churchill, 1935.

 

Operation Paperclip

 

The Nazi’s were so evil in fact, that instead of putting them on trial, the USA secretly rewrote the biographies of known Nazi rocket scientists and then moved them over to work in the USA, over 1,800 German technicians and scientists, along with 3,700 family members ended up in the States.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

 

At first they wanted to exclude anyone who was found “to have been a member of the Nazi Party, and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism,” but this was quietly revised as it would have rendered ineligible most of the leading scientists and physicians that they had identified for recruitment.

 

So now you know what happened to the Nazi scientists that invented the V1 and V2 rockets, now you know how NASA got started, now you know that Nazi’s put America on the moon.

 

The Untold Story of WWII is of the Waffen SS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBkHzkd-dhI

Léon Degrelle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Degrelle

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/46781927869

 

The swastika flag flew from the North Pole to shores of Greece to the borders of Spain, the European civil war between Germany and England continued, the rulers of Communism got ready to move in and pick up the pieces, but Hitler beat them to it and invaded the Soviet Union on the 22nd June, 1941, for Europe it was to be heads or tails; Hitler wins or Stalin wins, it was then that from every country in Europe that hundreds of thousands of young men made up their minds that the destiny of their native country was at stake, they would volunteer their lives to fight Communism and create a united Europe, in all they would grow to be more than 600,000 non-German Europeans fighting on the Eastern front, they would bring scores of divisions to the Waffen SS, the Waffen SS were the ideological and military shock troops of Europe, the Germans numbering 400,000 were a minority, the 1,000,000 strong Waffen SS represented the first truly European army to ever exist.

 

Historical records still ignore this extraordinary army of volunteers. The most important military and political phenomenon of WWII is also the least known; the phenomenon of the Waffen SS.

 

History repeats itself…

 

Last Political Testament

by Adolf Hitler, April 29, 1945

 

Since 1914, when as a volunteer, I made my modest contribution in the World War which was forced upon the Reich, over thirty years have passed.

 

In these three decades, only love for my people and loyalty to my people have guided me in all my thoughts, actions, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions, such as no mortal has yet had to face. I have exhausted my time, my working energy, and my health in these three decades.

 

It is untrue that I or anybody else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made so many offers for the reduction and elimination of armaments, which posterity cannot explain away for all eternity, that the responsibility for the outbreak of this war cannot rest on me. Furthermore, I never desired that after the first terrible World War a second war should arise against England or even against America. Centuries may pass, but out of the ruins of our cities and monuments of art there will arise anew the hatred for the people who alone are ultimately responsible: International Jewry and its helpers!

 

As late as three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish War, I proposed to the British Ambassador in Berlin a solution for the German-Polish problem — similar to the problem of the Saar area, under international control. This offer cannot be explained away, either. It was only rejected because the responsible circles in English politics wanted the war, partly in the expectation of business advantages, partly driven by propaganda promoted by international Jewry.

 

But I left no doubt about the fact that if the peoples of Europe were again only regarded as so many packages of stock shares by these international money and finance conspirators, then that race, too, which is the truly guilty party in this murderous struggle would also have to be held to account: the Jews! I further left no doubt that this time we would not permit millions of European children of Aryan descent to die of hunger, nor millions of grown-up men to suffer death, nor hundreds of thousands of women and children to be burned and bombed to death in their cities, without the truly guilty party having to atone for its guilt, even if through more humane means.

 

After six years of struggle, which in spite of all reverses will go down in history as the most glorious and most courageous manifestation of a people’s will to live. I cannot separate myself from the city which is the capital of this Reich. Because our forces are too few to permit any further resistance against the enemy’s assaults, and because individual resistance is rendered valueless by blinded and characterless scoundrels, I desire to share the fate that millions of others have taken upon themselves, in that I shall remain in this city. Furthermore, I do not want to fall into the hands of enemies who for the delectation of the hate-riddled masses require a new spectacle promoted by the Jews.

 

I have therefore resolved to remain in Berlin and there to choose death of my own will at the very moment when, as I believe, the seat of the Fuehrer and Chancellor can no longer be defended. I die with a joyful heart in the awareness the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our soldiers at the front, of our women at home, the achievements of our peasants and workers, and the contribution, unique in history, of our youth, which bears my name.

 

It goes without saying that I thank them all from the bottom of my heart and that it is also my desire that in spite of everything they should not give up the struggle, but continue fighting wherever they may be, faithful to the great Clausewitz, against the enemies of the Fatherland. From the sacrifices of our soldiers and from my own comradeship with them, there will come in one way or another into German history the seed of a brilliant renaissance of the National Socialist movement and thus the realization of a true national community.

 

Many very brave men and women have resolved to link their lives to mine to the very end. I have requested them, and finally ordered them, not to do so, but instead to take part in the continuing struggle of the nation. I ask the commanders of the army, navy, and air force to strengthen by all possible means the spirit of resistance of our soldiers in the spirit of National Socialism, emphasizing especially that I too, as founder and creator of this movement, have preferred death to cowardly flight or even capitulation.

 

May it be one day a part of the code of honor; as it is already in the navy, that the surrender of an area or of a town is impossible, and above all in this respect the leaders should give a shining example of faithful devotion to duty unto death. Before my death I expel the former Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering and deprive him of all the rights he may enjoy by virtue of the decree of June 29, 1941, and also by virtue of my statement in the Reichstag on September 1, 1939. I appoint in his place Grossadmiral Doenitz as President of the Reich and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces.

 

Before my death I expel the former Reichsfuehrer-SS and Minister of the Interior Heinrich Himmler from the Party and all offices of state. In his place I appoint Gauleiter Karl Hanke as Reichsfuehrer-SS and Chief of the German Police and Gauleiter Paul Giesler as Reich Minister of the Interior.

 

Goering and Himmler, by their secret negotiations with the enemy, without my knowledge or approval, and by their illegal attempts to seize power in the state, quite apart from their treachery to my person, have brought irreparable shame to the country and the whole people.

 

In order to give the German people a government composed of honorable men, who will fulfil their duty of continuing the war by all available means, I, as the Fuehrer of the nation, nominate the following members of the new Cabinet:

 

President of the Reich: Doenitz;

Chancellor of the Reich: Dr. Goebbels;

Party Minister: Bormann;

Foreign Minister: Seyss-Inquart;

Minister of the Interior: Gauleiter Giesler;

Minister for War: Doenitz;

C.-in-C. of the Army: Schoerner;

C.-in-C. of the Navy: Doenitz;

C.-in-C. of the Air Force: Greim;

Reichsfuehrer-SS and Chief of the German Police: Gauleiter Hanke;

Economics: Funk;

Agriculture: Backe;

Justice: Thierack;

Culture: Dr. Scheel;

Propaganda: Dr. Naumann;

Finance: Schwerin-Krossigk;

Labor: Dr. Hupfater;

Munitions: Saur;

Leader of the German Labor Front and Member of the Reich Cabinet: Reichminister Dr. Ley

 

Several of these men such as Martin Bormann, Dr. Goebbels, etc., together with their wives, have joined me by their own free will and do not wish to leave the capital of the Reich under any circumstances, but on the contrary are willing to perish with me here. Yet I must ask them to obey my request, and in this instance place the interests of the nation above their own feelings.

 

Through their work and loyalty they will remain just as close to me as companions after my death, just as I hope that my spirit will remain amongst them and will always accompany them. Let them be hard, but never unjust; above all, let them never allow fear to counsel their actions, but may they place the honor of the nation above everything on this earth. Finally, may they be conscious of the fact that our task of building a National Socialist state represents the labor of the coming centuries, and this places every single person under an obligation always to serve the common interest and to subordinate his own interests. I demand of all Germans, all National Socialists, men and women and all soldiers of the Armed Forces, that they remain faithful and obedient to the new government and to their President unto death.

 

Above all, I charge the leadership of the nation and their followers with the strict observance of the racial laws and with merciless resistance against the universal poisoners of all peoples, international Jewry.

 

Our Speakers in the Anti-Marxist Battle

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/47732861920

 

by Fritz Oerter, 1932

 

“As we review the Reichstag, provincial parliament, and city elections of 1932, we must conclude that the day of huge mass meetings and mass marches is over, at least when it comes to winning new supporters for the National Socialist movement.

 

Those citizens whom we could interest in our world view through marches and mass meetings, the sensible members of the middle class, have been reached. The “middle class” reactionary front has been ground down — despite their election “victory” of 6 November. Nationalist circles are the ones that increasingly visited our mass meetings, that saw our marches with growing enthusiasm, and remain today about 95% of the attendees at our meetings, although they have long since been won over to National Socialism.

 

 

But this loyal core of National Socialist supporters will surely grow weary of filling our mass meetings. In some Gaue, it is already true that only the most prominent leaders of our party like Hitler, Straßer, Goebbels, Goering, Frick, etc., are able to bring out crowds in the tens of thousands. The high point of this form of propaganda is over, and we must now reach those circles which our propaganda so far has unfortunately been unable to reach in sufficient numbers.

 

Let us be honest with ourselves. The road is free and open, but our main enemy has done unexpectedly well in resisting the National Socialist advance. We have certainly succeeded in fragmenting the Marxist front and in winning a large number of former Marxists for our worldview. The Social Democrats are fighting desperately for their survival, and thanks to National Socialist educational work hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people who once were firm supporters of Marxist nonsense are beginning to waver. They are looking into the National Socialist movement, naturally against the wishes of their “leaders.” Still, Marxist propaganda, and especially its press, regularly succeeds in leading people have seen the light back into error, and bringing them back under the control of Marxist party leaders.

 

Why? In opposing Marxism, we oppose a deeply-rooted worldview that is based on over sixty years of intensive work. It is in turn founded on the still older liberal worldview and economic order. It enjoys not only the protection of tradition, but the strength a younger movement can bring to bear against an older one.

 

Liberalism was not able to resist Marxism. The liberal parties and ideologies could only fight defensively against a worldview with greater strength and clarity of purpose. Even the Marxist worker who long doubted and sought for something better eventually had to conclude that Marxism is the only worldview that can bring a new and better society and economic order. Who can hold it against him that he rejected the forces that denied him equality and a share in the results of his labor? The German worker absorbed Marxism in his parents’ home, and was surrounded by people who thought the same in the workplace. In what remained of his sound understanding, he knew that there was a flaw somewhere in the worldview. He realized that there was a catch somewhere to the lovely teachings of “expropriating the expropriators,” of “the equality of everyone with a human face,” of “international brotherhood,” of “international solidarity,” but he did not know where, and there was no one to show him the contradictions, the weak points, in the thinking of Karl Marxand his followers.

 

Thanks to our ten years of educational work, he is suspicious. He became a seeker, a doubter, but unfortunately only a few of his comrades have found their way to us. The 1932 election results prove this. We have made inroads into the ranks of the SPD [Socialists] and the KPD [Communists], but not to the extent that the “leaders” of the Marxist parties have deserved as a result of their inability, incompetence, and contradictory policies.'

 

Every National Socialist fighter who speaks to meetings of Marxist workers must recognize this and draw the necessary conclusions. The Marxist party “leaders” have made mistake after mistake. They have promised everything since 1918 and delivered nothing. They have worked a hundred times with Jewish racketeers and a thousand times with capitalism. They are responsible for all the need and misery of the German people, and of German workers. Yet if our Reich, Gau, and county speakers do not succeed in reducing the Marxist nonsense propounded by the Socialists and Communists to absurdity, their sacrificial work will not succeed in widening the breach in the Marxist front. Without that, the deceptive Marxist worldview will fail to collapse in the manner of those organizations that supported calcified liberalism.

 

-Fritz Oerter, 1932

 

Continued:

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/wilweg03.htm

 

As for the “socialism” in National Socialism, don’t let yourself be deceived by its enemies, among whom are the adherents of the Judeo-capitalists New Right; it certainly has nothing to do with the Semitic socialism Marx and his kinsmen peddled. The first slogan of Hitler’s National Socialists was: “The common interest before self-interest!” They believed that every German, whether a factory owner or a janitor, should put the interests of his nation and his race ahead of his personal interests. That was really what they meant by the “socialism” in National Socialism.

 

They also believed that it was the responsibility of the nation’s leaders to concern themselves with the physical health of every member of the nation — not to cater to special-interest groups or to win popularity contests with the fickle and easily swayed masses.

 

These beliefs determined the racial, economic, and educational policies of Hitler’s government. That government was “socialist,” in that it devoted much of its efforts to improving the economic welfare of working-class and middle-class Germans, as well as the racial quality and racial consciousness of the whole nation. But it did not attempt to enforce any sort of artificial “equality” on its citizens, either of status or income. And it did not discourage the entrepreneurial activities of individual Germans, so long as those activities were not harmful to national interests. Private property not only remained sacrosanct in National Socialist Germany, but the government instituted new policies to enable small farmers to avoid losing their land to moneylenders. -W. L. P.

 

THE FATE OF EMPIRES AND SEARCH FOR SURVIVAL

 

by Sir John Glubb

Easily available online if anyone wants to read it.

http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf

 

-Second- or third-generation foreign immigrants may appear outwardly to be entirely assimilated, but they often constitute a weakness in two directions. First, their basic human nature often differs from that of the original imperial stock. If the earlier imperial race was stubborn and slow-moving, the immigrants might come from more emotional races, thereby introducing cracks and schisms into the national policies, even if all were equally loyal

 

-Second, while the nation is still affluent, all the diverse races may appear equally loyal. But in an acute emergency, the immigrants will often be less willing to sacrifice their lives and their property than will be the original descendants of the founder race.

 

-Third, the immigrants are liable to form communities of their own, protecting primarily their own interests, and only in the second degree that of the nation as a whole.

 

http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf

 

Any expansion of our knowledge which may lead to a reduction in our unjustified hates is therefore surely well worthwhile. XXXIX Summary. As numerous points of interest have arisen in the course of this essay, I close with a brief summary, to refresh the reader’s mind. (a) We do not learn from history because our studies are brief and prejudiced. (b) In a surprising manner, 250 years emerges as the average length of national greatness. (c) This average has not varied for 3,000 years. Does it represent ten generations?

 

(d) The stages of the rise and fall of great nations seem to be:

 

>The Age of Pioneers (outburst)

>The Age of Conquests

>The Age of Commerce

>The Age of Affluence

>The Age of Intellect

>The Age of Decadence.

 

(e) Decadence is marked by:

 

>Defensiveness

>Pessimism

>Materialism

>Frivolity

>An influx of foreigners

>The Welfare State

>A weakening of religion.

 

(f) Decadence is due to:

 

>Too long a period of wealth and power

>Selfishness

>Love of money

>The loss of a sense of duty.

 

(g) The life histories of great states are amazingly similar, and are due to internal factors.

 

(h) Their falls are diverse, because they are largely the result of external causes.

 

(i) History should be taught as the history of the human race, though of course with emphasis on the history of the student’s own country.

 

There is now substantial research showing that people who consume porn are indeed inclined to attitudes and behavior incompatible with strong family relationships based on affection and care for children.

 

Frequent consumption of pornography is associated with:

 

>sexually aggressive behavior toward women, particularly for men who are prone to sexual aggression and particularly for the use of violent pornography (see, e.g., http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/malamuth/pdf/00arsr11.pdf, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111620, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111620, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01077.x/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=). Men who are sexually aggressive—men like Thomas Schiro and Ted Bundy may well process sexually violent pornography differently from non-aggressive men. For these men, pornography likely results in fantasies that they are only too likely to act out;

 

>reports by sex offenders that they were influenced to sexually offend as a result of viewing pornography (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19308844);

 

>non-sexual delinquency, e.g., felony assault and theft, drug and alcohol use among teenagers (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01077.x/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=);

 

>callousness (lack of affection and concern for partner) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111620) and suppression of intimacy (http://www.springerlink.com/content/c1k7r32gj9q72248/) among teenagers;

 

>sexual harassment (http://www.springerlink.com/content/yn7tj4747k122495/) among teenagers;

 

>attitudes supporting violence against women, especially if  the pornography is violent (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19308844);

 

>attitudes among young adults that sex is recreational (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00313.x/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=)—attitudes likely to lead to less involvement with marriage and children and thus lower fertility

 

>engagement in more casual sex, less relationship satisfaction, and copying the types of behaviors they see in the porn (see http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2010.543960).

 

>multiple sex partners, using drugs or alcohol during sex (suggesting recreational sex), and anal intercourse (presumably the result of imitation of porn scenes) among teenagers who use Internet porn sites (see http://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2808%2900658-7/abstract).

 

There is thus not any reasonable doubt that extensive use of pornography is associated with a number of socially undesirable attitudes and behaviors. There remains a legitimate debate on the importance of self-selection factors: People with certain traits (in particular aggression, callousness and low intelligence) are more likely to seek out pornography and are more likely to be influenced by its images and messages (A. F. Bogaert, “Personality, Individual Differences, and Preferences for the Sexual Media”; Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 29–53, 2001):

http://www.springerlink.com/content/hx42l7j657747wl2/

 

White girl didn’t want to report being gang-raped by blacks, because she didn’t want to be seen as racist

http://www.buffalonews.com/258/story/74176.html

 

 

White Woman Protects Family With Gun

http://myfox8.com/2013/01/06/ga-mom-shoots-intruder-5-times-saves-children/

“A Georgia mother hid her two 9-year-old twins and shot an intruder”

 

Followup:

“The guy’s face down, crying,” the sheriff said. The woman told him to stay down or she’d shoot again

 

-The victim’s husband says he’s proud of his wife. “My wife is a hero. She protected her kids. She did what she was supposed to do as responsible, prepared gun owner,”Donnie Herman said.

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/breakingnews/Mom_shoots_an_intruder_5_times_20130106.shtml

 

She is a strong independent woman because she protected her family, not because she called herself a slut and protested that her degree in Belgian Lesbian Sociology-Psychology Marxist Gender Studies wasn’t entitling her to CEO pay.

 

White Guilt.

 

Helen Elizabeth “Haley” Koch (Born ca. 1987) is an American Left-wing student, “Queer” activist and cabaret performer.

 

>Pictured dancing naked with member of the Himba tribe while in South Africa.

http://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/47815024442

 

-Haley Koch calls herself a “radical queer femme-inist artist activist with a love of social justice and sparkles.” She is head of The Southeastern Regional Unity Conference, which calls itself a group for “progressive lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer identified people.” The Conference includes an event known as the “Gender F***ing Cabaret”

 

-Haley Koch is a member of UNC-NOW (United with Northside Community Now) which is an left-wing organization dedicated to preserving Afro-american Culture.

-Haley Koch is also a cabaret performer under the name “Haley Honeybee Sparkles Hegemony.” In her performances she explores being “queer” and also performs monologues on “queer sex.”

 

So progressive!

 

The liberal thought process; you’re only worthwhile if you are different. Tradition and status quo are immoral. White is bad.

 

The Extinction Of The Australian Pygmies

Why have they been forgotten? Because their existence was politically inconvenient for leftist activists who wanted to put forth a santized notion of Aboriginal inhabitants who discovered the land and never displaced one another. Or so goes the thesis put forth here: http://www.sydneyline.com/Pygmies%20Extinction.htm

 

 

Excerpts from the summary:

 

-Moreover, the moral appeal of the activists’ case would have been weakened by the notion that there had been several waves of Aboriginal migrants, each of whom had violently dispossessed the other. Rather than a story of aggressive white imperialists disrupting an arcadian Aboriginal people living in harmony with one another and their environment, the long term history of Australian habitation would have resembled more that of humanity at large where the stronger have pushed aside the weaker, irrespective of the colour of either side. Hence, instead of a simple moral tale of goodies and baddies, the history of this continent would have reflected more the hard reality of the human condition everywhere.

 

-For the past thirty years, there have been few in mainstream political or intellectual life with the stomach to make these points. As a result, the activists’ case about Aboriginal origins has been accepted, largely without dissent. Few authors, and certainly none writing for schoolchildren, have dared to even suggest that Aborigines had anything but one common source. This is why today the educated but non-specialist public has no inkling that there were ever pygmies in Australia. Knowledge of their existence would pose an obvious question mark over the central doctrine of Aboriginal politics. Hence, for public consumption, politics have made the topic taboo.

 

2000–2009: More than 1000 Peace Corps Volunteers, Largely White, Raped in Third World Countries

 

http://unamusementpark.com/lists/minority-rape/

 

Hispanics are a victim category but not a perpetrator category, as perpetrators they’re conveniently listed as “white.”

 

Meaning, Hispanics are included in the recorded crimes committed by “Whites.”

 

Important to note when you encounter statistics on crime in the US.

 

http://www.ethnic.ndo.co.uk/Mulindex.htm

 

Migration Mystery: Who Were the First Americans?

 

http://www.amren.com/news/2013/05/migration-mystery-who-were-the-first-americans/

 

EQUALITY/EGALITARIANISM

“The morality of equality is an evil and destructive morality. What is equal is replaceable, and what is replaceable has no value. Equality makes everyone a slave. Value comes from two sources, superiority and scarcity. What is superior is higher in quality than what is average. And what is scarce, what is rare or unique has higher value than can be found everywhere. The ultimate consequence of an egalitarian morality is the destruction of human value.

 

It’s no surprise that the history of egalitarianism is a history of state terror, and mass murder. The French revolution led to the guillotine, and the reign of terror. And since the only people in the world who honestly believe in the absolute moral goodness of equality, are the European descended people of the West, and those in the white western diasporas and elsewhere. The egalitarian morality is ultimately the methodology for destroying the value of western man, in the eyes of western man. And what makes this especially nefarious is the fact that western man is deeply preoccupied with morality. That’s why he is more worried about being called a name, than about his own continuity and prosperity. That’s why he is more worried about being thought of as a bad person than about feeling at home, in his own homeland. That’s how he becomes an ethnomasochist.

 

You may think it’s strange to speak about western mans moral preoccupation in times of perceived widespread immorality. But the truth is, we are living in Puritanical times. When it comes to the belief in the moral goodness of equality, the consequences of heterodoxy are severe. So western man is and remains deeply preoccupied with morality, and ultimately this has geopolitical implications, because most of the peoples of the world value their own uniqueness. They think tribally, ethnically, and racially. They are willing to act in consequence, no matter what it says on their passport. For them this is right and good and completely uncontroversial.”

— Alex Kurtagic, extract from his speech @ Identitarian Ideas 4

 

PACIFISM

 

“All society, all “civilization” that proceeds from the same aspiration to human well-being above all, to well-being or human “happiness” at any price, is marked by the seal of the Powers of Decadence, enemies of the cosmic order of the play of forces without end. It is a civilization of the Dark Age. If you are obliged to suffer it, suffer it by unceasingly opposing it, denouncing it, combating it every minute of your life. Make it your glory to hasten its end—at least to cooperate with all your might with the natural action of the forces leading to its end. For it is accursed. It is organized ugliness and meanness. Rid yourself not only of the superstition of “happiness,” if it ever allured you, but also that of man. Protect yourself from the attitude, as vain as it is stupid, that consists in trying “to love all men” simply because they are men. And if this attitude was never yours, if, from childhood, you were impermeable to the propaganda of the devotees of “humanity,” give thanks to the immortal Gods to whom you owe this innate wisdom. Nothing prohibits to you, certainly, from giving a hand to a man who needs help, even the most worthless. The Strong are generous.”

— Savitri Devi, from “The Religion of the Strong”

 

GROUP POLARIZATION AND THE FAD OF ETHNOMASOCHISM

By Hugh Mcdonald

“In the field of social psychology, group polarization is a term that refers to a phenomenon, where by individuals will become more extreme in their views when they are surrounded by a group of people who hold a similar perspective. Group polarization is an observable phenomenon in of itself, but their are different theories to explain why group polarization occurs. One such theory is called Social Comparison Theory. According to this theory, group polarization is caused by the desire to be liked by the rest of the group. What happens is that individuals within a group are constantly reassessing how other group members present themselves. They then readjust their own positions, in order to be perceived in a more favorable light. Isenberg refers to this as “one-upmanship” it’s like “im similar to the group, but i’m just a little bit better than the group, I hold the popular opinion, but I hold it even more than others.”

 

Consider group polarization, and social comparison theory in the context of our cultural struggle. Think of the European who emphatically spits on his own people, what drives him to such an extreme? Like all Europeans in the 21st century, he is sensitive to, and appreciate of, the ever present threat of being labeled a “racist”. Pushed by this fear of persecution, and pulled by his desire to come across as “better than average”, it isn’t enough for him to stop at saying it’s bad to hurt other peoples. He has to one up his peers and say “not only do I believe in treating people equally, I actually really like other peoples. I don’t just really like other peoples, I prefer other peoples. I don’t just prefer other peoples, I hate my own people. My people are a bad people. See? That’s how far from racist I am. Not only do I not dislike others, I actually hate my own people. That’s just how much of a great person I am. See how unracist I am? Im not just good, I go above and beyond. Im outstanding.”

 

For this polarized European, this kind of self flagellation is an opportunity to prostrate, and humiliate himself before the group, to demonstrate that he is not a rebel, he is completly onboard with the norms of the group, and then some. Even if those group norms are screwing him over. He says, “You don’t have to worry about me sir, I’m a fully brainwashed conformist, and I like it that way.” This is a depressing and pathetic state of existence.

 

Like the high school outcast who makes a fool of himself, in order to gain the temporary and superficial approval of the cool kids. Rather than standing up for himself, and enduring the hardships of swimming against the stream, he buckles under the pressure, and embraces his own oppression. Now, the classic case of group polarization occurs within an actual group of people but perhaps the same psychological mechanism can be generalized to a polarized environment of homogeneous ideas.

 

The polarized environments to which the self hater is exposed to include, our movie theaters, our living rooms (TV), and most of all our educational systems, especially the Marxist echo chambers, that are our universities. Raised on a diet of anti western propaganda, perhaps it doesn’t take much for those Europeans of an acquiescent disposition, to be pushed to an ethno-masochistic extreme within these polarized environments, The pressures and the incentives of the group dynamic drive those conformist Europeans to abandon their homeostatic and adaptive instincts of self preservation, and instead they conform to a new extreme of maladaptive, self hate.”

 

“Blacks in Hollywood aren’t used as people, they are used as weapons.

Hollywood can use blacks as “Numinous Negros” as in the ‘Green Mile’, serving as supernatural personifications of virtue, wisdom and Christian suffering that displays to the white man his own moral failings. They can use blacks as symbols of sexiness and cool, like Will Smith in ‘Men in Black’, who tells the 50’s style white guy, “You know the difference between me and you? I make this look good.” Finally, they can use blacks as crude instruments of subversion, to bluntly tell white Americans this is not their country anymore. This can take the form of remaking classic films such as ‘Walking Tall’ or ‘The Karate Kid’ with black actors, turning movie versions of television shows such as ‘The Honeymooners’ into all black affairs, and most spectacularly, deliberately turning figures whose white racial identity is integral to the character into blacks, for no other reason than to push a political message.

 

It is impossible to overestimate the power and importance of Hollywood. Rather than simply reflecting the culture, it is not an exaggeration to suggest that movies have the power to shape the culture itself in ways that other media simply cannot touch. Poetry could be banned without the masses even noticing it, and most of us would find it difficult to think of a painting or opera that dramatically shaped our world view. However, our speech is riddled with movie quotes and references. Most Americans take their models for such concepts as masculinity, beauty, sexiness, fashion, and heroism not from religions or tradition, but from the movies. Even in the midst of the most profound human dramas, like the destruction inflicted on September the 11, 2001, the most common description was that “it was like being in a movie”. Even having death thrust directly in front of your face cannot break the dream machine. Far more than books, and even more than music, movies are the key tool by which the American consciousness is shaped.”

— Gregory Hood, forward to the book “Hollywood in Blackface” by Paul Kersey

_______________________________

“The Euro-white tradition of values, customs and culture that built America (the “dead white men”) is routinely denounced and “deconstructed” in public schools and universities. This is textbook cultural Marxism: first revolution, to smash traditional ideology; then replace it with egalitarian (socialist) statism.

 

History is revised to shame the “white oppressor.” Designedly ignored is the historical reality that all races have sinned equally as oppressors in distant history, but whites were the first to abolish slavery. Ironically, while any hint of “hate speech” against minorities is prosecuted vigorously, the book- length Hating Whitey documents widespread anti-white speech by professors in class openly smearing whites as ”the scourge of mankind.” All “racism” is evil—unless it’s anti-white.

 

Hollywood churns out cascades of high-imagery movies demonizing white oppressors, dramatizing the plight of non-whites and extolling their peaceful cultures. TV “histories” such as ”Roots” (grossly falsified) and equally emotional programs daily shape the public mind, especially the naive young. Floods of primetime TV and commercials subtly portray a flawless balance of races by quota, all merged happily in playgrounds, parties or homes. As a humorous example, Roger McGrath, history consultant for TV’s Pony Express series ”The Young Riders,” recounts in his satirical Chronicles article (March 1999) how historical accuracy about the all-white Pony Express was discarded; it comes to the screen with a saintly all-perfect black rider, Noah, along with Mexican heroes, these in marked contrast with some avaricious or downright mean whites. Such vivid white-bashing and race-mixing images are crammed into American brains ceaselessly and reshape attitudes.

”

— James Owens, Ph.D., excerpt from “Ending the Race Crisis in 21st Century”

 

Aesthetics -

According to its Greek etymology, ‘that which evokes a strong sensation’. Aesthetics is linked to notions of beauty, harmony, achievement of form.

 

Contemporary egalitarian ideology abhors and implicitly demonizes aesthetics. It associates (rightly) the will to power with discipline, which it considers morally unacceptable, ‘fascist’ in effect. This ideology opposes aesthetics to ‘ethics’ and situates itself in ethics iconoclastic tradition.

With plastic arts, architecture, cinema, literature, theatre, even fashion, the ugly, the unachieved, the unformed, the most far fetched nonsense, the shady and the watered down are now preferred to the aesthetic, which is made synonymous with a menacing ‘order’.

 

Since the mid-twentieth century, contemporary arts, encouraged by the dominant ideology, have rejected any notion of aesthetics. Instead of harmony, the power of forms, the exaltation and the elevation of sensation and beauty — notions of abstract ‘conceptual art’ are preferred, which become a pretext for degeneracy, willful ugliness, and subsidized incompetence. Abstraction accordingly reigns, just as a jargonising meaningless and obscurity enthralls the intellectuals. The genuine aesthete, the authentic artist, is ostracized or marginalized — as if he was politically correct. Hence, the paradox of a society that strives to be ‘moral’ and humanistic, but ends up privileging barbarism, the inversion of values and new forms of primitivism.

 

We’re witnessing the simultaneous cohabitation of (1) abstruse ‘contemporary’ art subsidized by the system, (2) a cult which turns the ‘past’ into museum pieces, and (3) a commercial and consumerist subculture. Contemporary art has become the very opposite of avant-garde art. Its sad impostures haven’t budged for a century. It combines a dull academism, impostures, an absence of talent, and financial speculation. Instead of aesthetics, the system prefer pessimistic or suicidal values of representation, those that come from chaos and deformity, nonsense, pathological abstraction, regression, infantilism, scatology, a psychotic pornography: the exaltation of primitive forms. Accompanying this wretchedness, this impotence of old men, there’s the vulgar, artificial boom of costume-culture, which is to culture what costume jewellery is to jewelry.

 

The rejection of aesthetics is crucial to the dominant ideology. For aesthetics, at root, is aristocratic, opposed to massification and fake elites.

 

In its historical essence, the political is a declension of aesthetics. ‘Grand Politics’ aims, in effect, at forming a people in history, making civilization a creator of great works, turning civilization itself into a work — a work of art.

 

This conception opposes the modern doctrine that reduces the political to the administrative, that hollows out the notion of a people’s destiny, and rejects the creative projects of the statesmen for the sake of career politician.

 

“Every race carries a certain record of super-physical and subjective phenomenon through it’s blood stream, and it is these memories which manifest our race mythos and ancient origins. Through genetic memory we carry the entire lineage of former civilizations, gods, demi-gods, heroes and patriarchs. These entities, no matter how distant. cannot be forgotten; they are locked within the blood record - the subconscious mind.

 

As the blood reveals our past it, also, reveals our future, for within it are setup the vibrations and patterns by which the future estate of the race is to be determined. Blood has long been referred to as the “river of life”, coursing endlessly through the veins and arteries of our bodies and passed on to our children. But more than that, it is the vehicle for ethnic continuity, our consciousness and our natural salvation.

 

The race is the foundation of every great culture, and likewise, the blood is the foundation to every great race. Thus, in the unmixed blood is expressed the essential power of our ancestral being, which fortifies the character and essence of our present and potential being. The very blood which we possess today in our bodies is the undying, life liquid of countless centuries of history, the great arcanum of life.”

-Ron McVan, from “Temple of Wotan”

 

Friendships Moderate an Association between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7909320

 

“Here, we hypothesize that individuals with a genetic predisposition toward seeking out new experiences will tend to be more liberal, but only if they are embedded in a social context that provides them with multiple points of view. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, we test this hypothesis by investigating an association between self-reported political ideology and the 7R variant of the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4), which has previously been associated with novelty seeking. Among those with DRD4-7R, we find that the number of friendships a person has in adolescence is significantly associated with liberal political ideology. Among those without the gene variant, there is no association. This is the first study to elaborate a specific gene-environment interaction that contributes to ideological self-identification, and it highlights the importance of incorporating both nature and nurture into the study of political preferences.”

 

Essentially, liberalism = neophilia.

A faulty mutation that should be weeded out. It leads to people wanting acceptance from everyone and a higher probability of wanting to try out new things, even if it’s downright stupid, like liberalism. It seems to work in the sense that people seek the novelty of say, being friends with people of other races because it’s deemed “cool.” “Anything unconventional is alluring,” etc.

 

nov·el·ty

 

n.pl.nov·el·ties

(derived from Latin word novus for “new”) is the quality of being new, or following from that, of being striking, original or unusual.

Think; abstract art, anything deemed “quirky…”

 

A Tribute to the Revolutionary Third Position

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qhu9xz18P0

 

DEMOCRACY

“A people is not capable of governing itself. It ought to be governed by its elite. Namely, through that category of men born within its bosom who possess certain aptitudes and specialties. Just as the bees raise their “queen” a people must raise its elite. The multitude likewise, in its needs, appeals to its elite, the wise of the state.

 

Here are two opposite ideas, one containing truth, the other the lie. Truth-of which there can be but one-is sought. The question is put to a vote. One idea polls 10,000 votes, the other 10,050. Is it possible that 50 votes more or less determine or deny truth? Truth depends neither on majority nor minority; it has its own laws and it succeeds, as has been seen, against all majorities, even though they be crushing.

 

Can the people choose its elite? Why then do soldiers not choose the best general? In order to choose, this collective jury would have to know very well: a) The laws of strategy, tactics, organization, etc. and b) To what extent the individual in question conforms through aptitudes and knowledge to these laws. No one can choose wisely without this knowledge.

 

That is why we believe that the leading elite of a country cannot be chosen by the multitude. To try to select this elite is like determining by majority vote who the poets, writers, mechanics, aviators or athletes of a country ought to be.

 

Democracy elects men totally lacking in scruples, without any morals; those who will pay better, thus those with a higher power of corruption; magicians, charlatans, demagogues, who will excel in their fields during the electoral campaign. Several good men would be able to slip through among them, even politicians of good faith. But they would be the slaves of the former.”

— Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

 

The Soviet Union Planned To Move In And Pick Up The Pieces During The European Civil War Between Germany and England

http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/04/viktor-suvorovs-icebreaker/

 

Western Europe, Fall 1941: The Red Army sweeps on from Germany and France toward Italy and Spain. Everywhere the NKVD imposes the bloody terror already suffered by the tortured nations of the East. Political opponents, former army officers, shopkeepers, landowners, small farmers, members of youth movements and cultural associations–millions are rounded up. The fortunate ones are shot, many more die horribly in the blood-spattered basements of Communist interrogation centers. The rest join the endless columns shuffling to the Siberian Gulag. Only the prettiest girls are kept behind alive, for now.''

 

The lower ranks of the new Red puppet administrations consist mainly of criminals and perverts, but everywhere the key posts are dominated by Jews. Too late the peoples of Europe learn that the Talmudic admonition that “the best of the goyim must be destroyed” is taken literally by their new masters.

 

How close this nightmare came to becoming reality is revealed in Russian military historian Viktor Suvorov’s definitive account of the buildup to Operation Groza (“Thunderstorm”), the Red Army’s massive assault on Germany and the rest of Europe scheduled to begin on July 6, 1941.

 

Icebreaker details the huge scale of the long Soviet preparations to attack “the imperialist powers.” In 1939, for example, when Hitler had a total of 4,000 paratroopers ready to seize key points ahead of an advance, Stalin had more than one million. Soviet tank production dwarfed that of the rest of the world put together, but the majority of the tanks were capable of effective operation only on the good roads of western Europe and were useless when forced onto the defensive in the backward wastes of Russia. Soviet pilots were totally untrained in aerial combat, since the German Luftwaffe was to be destroyed on the ground on Day 1.

 

In the event, as the Chief of the General Staff Academy of the Armed Forces of the USSR, General S.P. Ivanov, admitted in 1974, “The Nazi command succeeded in forestalling our troops literally two weeks before the war began.” This was why the advancing German Wehrmacht found millions of Russia’s best troops crowded together with huge supplies of ammunition and fuel in undefensible positions right on the frontier.

 

Suvorov shows clearly how Stalin came within fourteen days of taking this key step along the path to Bolshevizing the world. “But Hitler guessed Stalin’s design. That is why WWII ended catastrophically for Stalin. He only got half of Europe, and some places here and there in Asia.”

 

Regardless of the abuse heaped on him by the media and the court historians, this book proves that Adolf Hitler saved the West.

 

ARKAIM - Swastika City.

 

“The ancient capital of early Aryan civilization,” as described in the Avesta and Vedas.

Location: near Magnitogorsk, (Siberia) Russia, carbon dating shows the age of ARKAIM as ~3,500-4,000BC (site itself is much older):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7noXqRsiEY

 

ARKAIM is much older than Stonehenge, but the latitude of the ARKAIM placement is the same as Stonehenge. There are a lot of pseudoscience and even conspiracy theories surrounding the site, but its significance is undeniable. Vladamir Putin himself has acknowledge the significance of this ancient, advanced (for its time) flourishing Aryan culture on Russian soil.

 

Judeo-Christianity destroyed European (and African and Asian) cultures, those in Venice burned their books and built Churches over the old monuments, so little is known about our pre-Christian (pagan) mythology, traditions and culture, but history is testament to how advanced European pagans were during the Roman period.

 

 

It is referred to as “Swastika City” because the floor plan resembles the shape of the Swastika; an ancient European symbol of Neolithic Europe (6th to 5th millennium BC) which predates its Hindu usage by around 3500 years, aka the Sun wheel (an incomplete circle with a cross), a hooked cross, the Hakenkreuz/Hakekors/Fylfot cross/Thor’s hammer, etc - A Swastika.

 

A possible light has been thrown on the development, nature and wide migratory pattern of early Indo-European culture. This however, has only been the beginning of the quest for a new ethnic, cultural and religious identity in a small, but influential Russian minority since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

 

Increasingly rejecting the American and European vision of a global hegemony rooted in Western Christianity, they are turning Eastwards to find a connection with the Indo-European roots, cemented by spiritual bonds far older than those of Christianity, Judaism or Islam.

 

Red-Haired Mummies of China

-“Excavations in the Tarim Basin in Xinjiang province have uncovered more than 100 naturally mummified corpses of people who lived there between 4,000 and 2,400 years ago.

 

-The bodies were amazingly well preserved by the arid climate, and according to the New York Times “…archaeologists could hardly believe what they saw.”

“The mummies had long noses and skulls, blond or red hair, thin lips, deepset eyes, and other unmistakably Aryan features. Dr. Victor H. Mair of the University of Pennsylvania said,”

 

-“One such mummy is of a teenage girl with blond hair and blue eyes. Her remains were found in a cave and she has become quite a tourist attraction in Beijing. She has been given the name, “The Lady of Tarim” and is on display at the museum. It is believed that she was someone of importance who lived over 3,000 years ago. She was found buried in fine embroidered garments of wool and leather, along with beautiful jewellery, jars and ornaments of gold, silver, jade and onyx. Her remains are in such a remarkable state of preservation that she looks as if she was sleeping.”

 

-“The new finds are also forcing a re-examination of old Chinese books that describe historical or legendary figures of great height, with deep-set blue or green eyes, long noses, full beards, and red or blond hair. Scholars have traditionally scoffed at these accounts, but it now seems that they may be accurate.”

“Chinese scientists were initially hesitant to give up the DNA samples because they were sensitive about the nationalist Uighur claims, and to prevent a pillaging of national monuments by foreigners.”

 

Red-Haired Mummies of China - Part 2

Xinjiang

 

This is the place of discovery of the Tarim Basin mummies whose some are about 4,000 years old. Many of them have Europoid phenotypes (and indeed, it is worthy of mention that some old Chinese texts described some populations of these general regions, like the Wusun, as redhead individuals with blue eyes, which is also in accordance with some Tarim basin frescoes that also show the Tocharians as individuals with light hair and eyes).

 

Evidences of west Eurasian/Europoid populations, deep in Asia, in an ancient past (at least as old as the chalcolithic time), have been established. These tracks cover central Asia, south Siberia and apparently as far as the Shandong region in north-east China (see further below in this page).

https://pastmists.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/xinjiang/

 

Calhoun Mice Experiment

John B. Calhoun was an American ethologist and behavioral researcher noted for his studies of population density and its effects on behavior. He claimed that the bleak effects of overpopulation on rodents were a grim model for the future of the human race.

 

Mass-immigration = over population:

“The conclusions drawn from this experiment were that when all available space is taken and all social roles are filled, competition and the stresses experience by the individuals will result in a total breakdown in complex social behaviours, ultimately resulting in the demise of the population.”

 

Mice, men share 99 percent of genes

http://articles.cnn.com/2002-12-04/tech/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome_1_human-genome-new-human-genes-genes-that-cause-disease?_s=PM:TECH

 

Brigitte Bardot

In a section of her 1999 book Le Carré de Pluton (“Pluto’s Square”), entitled, “Open Letter to My Lost France,” Bardot writes that “my country, France, my homeland, my land is again invaded by an overpopulation of foreigners, especially Muslims”. For this comment, a French court fined her 30,000 francs in June 2000. She had been fined in 1997 for the original publication of this open letter in Le Figaro and again 1998 for making similar remarks.

 

 

-In the book, she also made comparisons of her close gay friends to today’s homosexuals, who “jiggle their bottoms, put their little fingers in the air and with their little castrato voices moan about what those ghastly heteros put them through” and that some contemporary homosexuals behave like “fairground freaks”.

 

-Bardot’s book also condemned miscegenation; made attacks on modern art, which Bardot equated with “shit;” drew similarities between French politicians and weather vanes; and compared her own beliefs with previous generations who had “given their lives to push out invaders.”

 

-On 10 June 2004, Bardot was again convicted by a French court for “inciting racial hatred” and fined €5,000, the fourth such conviction and fine from a French court.

 

-In 2008, Bardot was convicted of inciting racial/religious hatred in relation to a letter she wrote, a copy of which she sent to Nicolas Sarkozy when he was Interior Minister of France. The letter stated her objections to Muslims in France ritually slaughtering sheep by slitting their throats without anesthetizing them first. She also said, in reference to Muslims, that she was “fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country and imposing its habits”. The trial concluded on 3 June 2008, with a conviction and fine of €15,000, the largest of her fines to date. The prosecutor stated that she was tired of charging Bardot with offences related to racial hatred.[6]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigitte_Bardot#Politics_and_legal_issues

 

Norway: in the last year 94% of rape suspects overall were “non-Western-looking:”

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/45-av-48-voldtektsmistenkte-av-utenlandsk-opprinnelse—6681203.html

 

Norway: all assault rapes last 5 years have been committed by non-Western immigrants:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/76695373/Excerpt-From-Oslo-Police-District-Report-on-Rape

 

Immigrants in Norway are a net loss to the economy:

http://www.emnbelgium.be/publication/report-norwegian-welfare-and-migration-committee

 

Immigrants in Sweden are a net loss to the economy:

http://www.amid.dk/pub/papers/AMID_48-2006_Jan_Ekberg.pdf

 

An upcoming special issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal "Personality and Individual Differences" has been dedicated to the contributions of our favorite scientist, John Philippe Rushton. Pre-print versions of a number of the articles have already been made available online:

 

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/rushton-the-great-theoetician.pdf

>Templer, 2012. Rushton: The great theoretician and his contribution to personality

 

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/j-p-rushtons-contributions-to-the-study-of-

altruism.pdf

>Hur, 2012. J.P. Rushton’s contribution to the study of altruism

 

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/rushtons-contribution-to-the-study-of-menta

l-ability.pdf

>Jensen, 2012. Rushton’s contributions to the study of mental ability

 

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/in-conversation-with-j-philippe-rushton.pdf

>Nyborg, 2012. A conversation with J. Philippe Rushton

 

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/the-measurement-of-human-life-history2.pdf

>Figueredo et al., 2012. The measurement of Human Life History strategy

 

http://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/migratory-selection.pdf

>Nyborg, 2012. Migratory selection for inversely related covariate T- and IQ- nexus traits: Testing the IQ/T-Geo-Climatic-Origin theory by the General Trait Covariance model

 

http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Rushton-ethnicnationalism-geneticsimularity.pdf

 

>"If the defendant has any African ancestry, this could bring up a question of how well the genotype of that particular gene could relate to his personal behaviour," Moffitt says.

http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091030/full/news.2009.1050.html

 

>Sweden, 48% of assault rapes committed by non-western immigrants

http://www.thelocal.se/28580/20100825/

 

>Immigrants in Norway are a net loss to the economy

http://www.emnbelgium.be/publication/report-norwegian-welfare-and-migration-committee

 

>Immigrants in Sweden are a net loss to the economy

http://www.amid.dk/pub/papers/AMID_48-2006_Jan_Ekberg.pdf

 

>Public opinion in most countries are not in favor of immigration

http://www.ipsos.fr/sites/default/files/attachments/globaladvisor_immigration.pdf

 

>Norway has begun to self-segregate pupils based on ethnicity to avoid ethnic conflict even with just a tiny bit of diversity

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8916947/Apartheid-row-at-Norwegian-school-af

ter-it-segregates-ethnic-pupils.html

 

>Increases in diversity correlate with problems worldwide, and the downsides of diversity effect everyone, it's a universal human problem:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/the-downside-of-difference/story-e6frgcjx-111111291

4289

 

>Increased diversity correlates sharply with decreased community spirit, decreased altruism, depressed social capital, less ethical behaviour, more crime, fear, isolation and depression:

http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-06-25jl.html

 

>Diversity experiments in Germany end in disaster

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany-s-immigrants-integration-in-theory-alienation-in-practic

e-a-433006.html

 

>In the UK, ethnic minorities disproportionate source of crime and asocial behaviour:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856404/Police-statistics-shed-fresh-light-on-link-betw

een-crime-and-race.html

http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/statistics/mojstats/stats-race-cjs-2010.pdf

 

>Denmark saved billions by restricting immigration:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/putting-a-price-on-foreigners-strict-immigration-laws-sav

e-denmark-billions-a-759716.html

 

Lower attractiveness and higher weight in White girls is associated with greater interest in Black males. Higher attractiveness and healthy weight is associated with almost exclusive interest in White males.

http://paa2008.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=80046

 

White males are the most attractive to all races, black males are the least attractive.

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-race-affects-whether-people-write-you-back/

 

First marriages in which the husband and wife are both members of the same race/ethnicity are more likely to succeed than those in which the spouses are of different race/ethnicity. After 10 years of marriage, interracial marriages have a 41% chance of disruption and same-race marriages have a 31% chance of disruption.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf

 

White women were 12 times more likely to be murdered by their spouse in an interracial marriage, as compared to a same-race marriage. White men in interracial marriages were 21 times more likely to meet the same fate.

http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/reprint/79/5/595.pdf

 

British Voters Sour on Immigration, Prefer Western European Immigrants, Then Eastern European, Followed By Asian/African Immigrants

The 2012 edition of the survey, published on September 17, found that 75% of Britons would like to see a reduction in immigration and 51% would like to see a large reduction. Moreover, 52% of respondents believe that immigration has a negative economic impact and 48% believe that it has a negative cultural impact.”

 

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3366/british-voters-immigration

http://www.bsa-29.natcen.ac.uk/media/13421/bsa29_full_report.pdf

 

Ethnic diversity, segregation, and the collapse of Yugoslavia

Demographic analysis clarifies political issues in the collapse of Yugoslavia. In most regions, 1961-1991, ethnic diversity (estimated by informational entropy) increased and segregation (estimated by Theil’s H) decreased. In a few regions there was a reversal in 1991 as migration flows or presentations of self perhaps changed in anticipation of war. The analysis strengthens refutations of the view that long standing ethnic hatreds were the root cause of the Yugoslav collapse and supports analyses that attribute collapse to general economic crisis, economic competition between regions, and failures at the peak of government.

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol22/35/

 

Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence

 

Abstract

 

>We consider the conditions of peace and violence among ethnic groups, testing a theory designed to predict the locations of violence and interventions that can promote peace. Characterizing the model’s success in predicting peace requires examples where peace prevails despite diversity. Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence.

 

>Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained. Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups. Mountains and lakes are an important part of the boundaries between sharply defined linguistic areas. Political canton and circle (sub-canton) boundaries often separate religious groups. Where such boundaries do not appear to be sufficient, we find that specific aspects of the population distribution either guarantee sufficient separation or sufficient mixing to inhibit intergroup violence according to the quantitative theory of conflict.

 

>In exactly one region, a porous mountain range does not adequately separate linguistic groups and violent conflict has led to the recent creation of the canton of Jura. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that violence between groups can be inhibited by physical and political boundaries. A similar analysis of the area of the former Yugoslavia shows that during widespread ethnic violence existing political boundaries did not coincide with the boundaries of distinct groups, but peace prevailed in specific areas where they did coincide. The success of peace in Switzerland may serve as a model to resolve conflict in other ethnically diverse countries and regions of the world.

http://necsi.edu/research/social/scienceofpeace.pdf

 

Even so, we should note that Switzerland’s example of “diversity” is of European ethnic/cultural diversity…

 

 

LBJ's great society. "I'll have those niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years."

 

Jews are enrolled in the Ivies by a proportion ten times greater than their numbers; for example they represent 30% of Yale students, 27% of Harvard, 23% of Brown, 32% of Columbia, and 31% of Pennsylvania.

 

 

Harvard study - multiculturalism erodes social trust

    >harvard study

    >done for almost ten years

    >using over twenty six thousand people

 

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiculturalism#Opposition_to_multiculturalism

 

    Harvard professor of political science Robert D. Putnam conducted a nearly decade long study how multiculturalism affects social trust.[134] He surveyed 26,200 people in 40 American communities, finding that when the data were adjusted for class, income and other factors, the more racially diverse a community is, the greater the loss of trust. People in diverse communities "don’t trust the local mayor, they don’t trust the local paper, they don’t trust other people and they don’t trust institutions," writes Putnam.[135] In the presence of such ethnic diversity, Putnam maintains that

 

    >[W]e hunker down. We act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don’t trust people who do look like us.[134]

 

    Even Harvard knows this is all a pile of ''feel good'' shit like religion and like religion it relies on persecuting those who dont agree to keep itself mainstream thought.

    _____________________________________

 

    Full disclosure: After the study was released Putnam was intimidated and harassed because he was accused of helping racists with this study. He later came out and gave a very vague statement saying diversity "had problems but was worth it in the long run" to keep these morons appeased.

    This statement gives no indication of the long run is and in fact is not quantified by anything.

 

    >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract

 

 

 

The world's foremost anthropologist, Dr. Christopher Stringer, the same one who originally developed the Out of Africa Origin theory of mankind now says he was wrong. The origin of mankind occurred in the Levant region, and there were migrations into Africa, with modern Africans being hybrids between archaic Homo Sapiens and surviving populace of Homo Heidelbergensis.

 

http://www.edge.org/conversation/rethinking-out-of-africa

 

We're different sub-species from one another.

 

Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy

 

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

 

A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat- eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.

 

> The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B

 

 

Jews run like the slime they are after being white isn't good for them such as in this situation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s

 

Jewish Harvard Professor calls for Genocide of White People

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Ignatiev

 

Did you know that niggers believe that raping a virgin cures AIDS? And that to be certain the girl they're raping is a virgin, they'll rape babies?

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/1362134/South-African-men

-rape-babies-as-cure-for-Aids.html

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_violence_in_South_Africa#Baby_rape_and_sexual_violence_against_m

inors

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_cleansing_myth

 

How Sweden Quietly Became a Socialist State

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27911594/The-New-Totalitarians-by-Huntford-Roland

 

The New Totalitarians (1971) by Roland Huntford.

 

At the time, Sweden was a nation controlled by the Social Democratic Party of Sweden, which had ruled the country’s government for over 40 years. Huntford argued that this had led to the complete dominance of socialist thought at all levels of the government, including the bureaucracy and the judiciary, which were all controlled by a powerful interconnecting network of Social Democratic labour unions, lobby groups, and partisan organizations. He likewise argued that these networks made it very difficult for non-socialists to get to any position of real power in Sweden, but noted that few Swedes seemed to view this massive politicization of their state with concern.

 

The New Totalitarians also analyzes Swedish society in a broader historical context, arguing that since the country bypassed the feudal system and has always been a very centralized state, Sweden never really developed a culture that champions individualism like other countries of Western Europe. He thus argues that the country’s political culture and institutions are very much the product of a unique socio-political context, and thus not applicable to other states in the west.

 

 

At the same time he analyses how sex was being “politicized” by design from above. The changes in the sexual behaviour of the Swedes was a matter of official direction. Sex had become the vicarious passion of a society otherwise trapped in boredom and the “engineered consent.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Totalitarians

 

Certainly slavery was a cause for the Civil War, but not the primary cause. Lincoln knew that the economy of the South depended upon slavery and so (before the Civil War) he had no intention of eliminating it. Lincoln had put it this way in his inaugural address only one month earlier:

 

>“I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.”

-First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861

 

Even after the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter, Lincoln continued to insist that the Civil War was not about the issue of slavery:

 

>“My paramount objective is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it.“

-Lincoln’s letter to Horace Greeley

 

White Flight - California

In 1970, when the United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered the Pasadena Unified School District Desegregation, the white-student proportion (54%) of the schools approximately reflected the school district’s proportional white populace (53%). Once the federally ordered school desegregation began, whites who could afford private schools withdrew their children from the racially diverse Pasadena public school system. By 2004, Pasadena had 63 private schools educating some 33% of schoolchildren, while white students made up only 16% of the public school populace. The Pasadena Unified School District superintendent characterized public schools as “like the bogey-man” to whites. He implemented policies to attract white parents to the racially diverse Pasadena public school district.[35] In the event, white flight rapidly altered the racial composition of public school systems. For instance, upon desegregation in 1957 in Baltimore, Maryland, the Clifton Park Junior High School had 2,023 white students and 34 black students; ten years later, it had twelve white students and 2,037 black students. In northwest Baltimore, Garrison Junior High School’s student body declined from 2,504 whites and twelve blacks to 297 whites and 1,263 blacks in that period.[36] At the same time, the city’s working class population declined because of the loss of industrial jobs as heavy industry restructured.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_flight#Desegregation:_public_schools_and_student_busing

 

California’s Higher Tax - Where America Is Heading?

California has become tax-crazy, imposing the nation’s highest unemployment tax and personal capital gains tax rates, it’s near the top on income taxes, corporate tax rates, and corporate capital gains tax rates. Californians now experience the joys of one-party, union-run, liberal, “progressive” governance.

 

California’s taxes are currently causing 150,000 residents to flee the state each year. “In fact, Los Angeles alone has lost more households than New York, Miami, and, incredibly, the economically decimated city of Detroit…combined.”

 

The result of this fiscal insanity is that “In 2010, at least 204 companies said goodbye to the state, exactly four times more than fled in 2009. The exodus surged to more than 280 companies in 2011, when they left the state at a clip of 5.4 companies per week.” This just leaves joblessness and economic stagnation in its wake.

 

In addition to its unions, the other factor pushing California into the grave has been its obsession with the environment. Unelected green regulators, influenced by environmental lobbyists, celebrated when a Green Chemistry Initiative passed in 2011. It is 92 pages that list chemicals that cannot be used in manufacturing or anything else.

 

Despite the fact that there is no global warming, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the state’s “greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020.”

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/california-is-destroying-itself-the-u-s-is-next/26134/

 

Despite these major tax increases, California revenues are in freefall:

http://www.oc-breeze.com/2012/12/07/25235_california-state-revenues-10-8-below-budget-projections-in-november/

 

Related:

 

In 2011 the California governor signed a bill requiring schools to teach about the history and contributions of the LGBTQ community.

http://sanjuancapistrano.patch.com/articles/dad-doesn-t-want-lgbt-agenda-in-cusd#photo-8221465

 

California no longer required 8th grade algebra

“Last month, California formally shifted to the Common Core mathematics standards, which recommend that students delay taking algebra if they aren’t ready for it. Previously, algebra class was a requirement for all eighth-graders in the state.”

http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/08/california-no-longer-requiring-eighth-graders-to-take-algebra

 

This may well be a class issue on the surface, but let’s not forget, Californians tried to stop this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187_(1994

 

California Proposition 187(also known as the Save Our State (SOS) initiative) was a 1994 ballot initiative to establish a state-run citizenship screening system and prohibit illegal aliens from using health care, public education, and other social services in the U.S. State of California. Voters passed the proposed law as a referendum in November 1994. The law was challenged in a legal suit and found unconstitutional by a federal court.

 

Passage of Proposition 187 reflected state residents’ concerns about illegal immigration into the United States and the large Hispanic population in California. Opponents believed the law was discriminatory against immigrants of Hispanic or Asian origin; supporters generally insisted that their concerns were economic: that the state could not afford to provide social services for so many illegal residents.

 

Girl Scouts Leadership: Pro-choice, Pro-Gay Ideologues

-The official spokespersons’ carefully worded statements make small concessions, hoping to blow the smoke far enough away to divert attention from the incendiary truth: the leadership of today’s Girl Scouts is driven by a liberal ideology far out of step with the families and churches that support them.

 

-The Girl Scouts have filled their National Leadership Team and Board of Directors with unwavering ideologues whose careers, non-profit work and philanthropic choices reflect a hefty commitment to liberal causes – same-sex marriage, gay and lesbian rights, abortion rights, comprehensive sex education and ‘girl power’ feminism.

 

-Traditional sexual morality takes a hit, while lesbians enjoy good press in required Girl Scout materials. These books – the “Journeys” series – generally push global environmentalism from a feminist slant; certain books go further, normalizing homosexuality and degrading sexual behavior.

 

-And the 4th and 5th grade “Journeys” book, “Agent of Change,” highlights author Marjane Satrapi, a young Iranian woman with “real moxie,” whose life – detailed in her comic book-style autobiography, “Persepolis” – will “inspire” Girl Scouts. But in Persepolis, Satrapi ”’crudely discusses men’s genitalia (even with her own father), calls nuns prostitutes, gets explicit lessons about sex from a promiscuous friend, lives with eight homosexual men and attempts suicide twice. Offensive illustrations and shocking sexual dialogue complete the picture. For ten-year olds?

 

-It gets worse. Another “Journey” book, “GIRLtopia,” encourages 9th and 10th graders, “to imagine a perfect world – for girls.” It recommends the book, “The Gate to Women’s Country,” by Sheri Tepper (former Executive Director of Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood), as a utopian journey into “a future world where women spend their lives learning and discovering lost knowledge.” That’s a deceptive gloss on a book laced with obscenities, revolting dialogue, and lewd descriptions, and which presents men as violent barbarians. The book graphically describes women having sex with random warriors at a semi-annual Carnival, undergoing brutal, demeaning genital exams, and breeding out violence by compulsive sterilization and selective prostitution. The only good men are castrated men. This is Girl Scout utopia?

 

-Why would Girl Scout Execs and Board members approve this material? Because they don’t find it shocking or radical at all.

 

-It reflects their worldview – sexual promiscuity is a given and homosexuality is normal. And indeed, key players at the Girl Scouts have a history of advocating those very positions, particularly on homosexuality.

 

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/cw/post.php?id=621

http://wordsfromcana.wordpress.com/2012/01/14/girl-scouts-leadership-pro-choice-pro-gay-ideologues-worlds-apart-from-the-families-they-serve/

 

The European Union & Soviet Union similarities

http://youtu.be/-KIc7jLx8RA

 

The Soviet Union was governed by fifteen unelected people who appointed each other and who were not accountable to anyone. The European Union is governed by two dozen people who appoint each other, meet in secret and whom we cannot sack. In the Soviet Union they told us we need a federal state to avoid war, in the European Union they are telling you the exact same thing.

 

>In the Soviet Union we had the Gulag, we have a Gulag in the European Union; an intellectual Gulag known as political correctness.

 

>Anyone who dares to stand up and give a political view that is different to the received wisdom is written off as mad, insane, violent, fascist…

 

>In the EU there are hundreds-thousands of Eurocrats, with huge salaries, with staff, servants, bonuses and privileges, they have a life-long immunity from persecution, which is simply shuffled from one position to another no matter what they do, or fail to do.

 

>We were taught the purpose of the Soviet Union was to create an historic entity, the Soviet people, and that we must forget our nationalities, our ethic traditions and customs, the same is true of the EU, they want you all to be a new historic entity; European.

 

>The SU was created by coercion, often military, the EU is being created admittedly not by armed force, but by coercion and economic bullying.

 

In 2008, 12.7 million non-EU nationals, mostly bonafide tourists and businessmen, arrived in the UK, how many left? No one knows because we [The Labour government] kept no embarkation records. Checks are rarely made on over-stayers and no action is taken to locate and remove them. The number of people living illegally in Britain is estimated to be between half a million and one million, but may well exceed even the higher figure.

 

“Asylum Seekers”

Many asylum seekers are in fact economic migrants who are, not unreasonably from their point of view, trying to better their lives by coming to Britain. These are not necessarily people who would fulfil legitimate immigration requirements, but by posing as asylum seekers they can by-pass the system. The number of potentially bogus asylum seekers in the world is effectively unlimited since so many people live under undemocratic and tyrannical regimes.

 

Myth of Black Inventions

www.tightrope.cc/Black-Invention-Myths.htm

whitelocust.wordpress.com/black-invention-myths

www.niggermania.com/tom/blackinventionmyths/

 

The Frankfurt School

THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE

Cultural Marxism gave birth to the critical theory that criticizes basically every pillar of western civilisation, promoting the leftist, liberal, multicultural, feminist, antifascist, anti-racist view point with “sensitivity training.”

 

Who is responsible for the downfall of Western nations?'

 

The Frankfurt School'

They developed the idea of Cultural Marxism,” which included ideas like:

 

>Diversity

>Multiculturalism

>Gender Mainstreaming

 

They heavily influenced the members of the ‘68 generation with these sick and perverted ideas.

 

Cultural Marxism is an amalgam of Marxism and Freudian psychoanalysis.

They came from Frankfurt, Germany, to Switzerland, and then to America, fleeing Hitler in 1933. They created and spread a negative “critical theory” of White society. They came to America to tell Whites that their culture, every aspect of it, was sick, backwards and “anti-Semitic.” This cabal of academics and intellectuals was widely seen as existing solely to push Marxist theories; nevertheless, this school is still highly regarded in many academic circles, and it had a profound impact on the West.

 

Felix J. Weil (creator/funder of the School, 1923), Carl Grünberg (first director), Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm, Wilhelm Reich, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, Otto Kirchheimer, Friedrich Pollock, Leo Lowenthal, Franz Neumann Henryk Grossmann, Karl August Wittfogel, Franz Borkenau, Julian Gumperz, Paul Massing, Paul Lazarsfeld, Mirra Komarovsky and Herbert Marcuse.

 

The Frankfurters set up shop at Columbia University in 1936. They later moved to California, then back to Germany when the Nazis were stopped by the Allies. Wherever they were located, the Frankfurters waged social and ethnic war on White culture. These Frankfurters influenced scores of Western college professors and intellectuals. They remade American ideas about race and sex: race didn’t exist, and sex was gender.

 

Furthermore, Herbert Marcuse laid the groundwork for the hippie culture in America with his social ideas. His book One-Dimensional Man (1964) became a bible of the New Left.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/lettersOct-Nov03/102903wsifrankfurtschool.htm

 

The Sad Story of David Reimer - Debunking “Gender”

David Reimer

His parents, working-class people from the plains of Manitoba, drove him to the local hospital for a routine circumcision. He was eight months old. The regular surgeon had not made it in and an assistant took over. She botched the job. A cauterising implement burned David’s penis - and it fell off.

 

It was John Money, a native of New Zealand and the author of some 40 books on human sexuality, who persuaded them that the best course of action was to transform their son into a daughter. He recommended surgery, including clinical castration, and hormone treatment to turn young Brian into a girl. His parents agreed and the treatment began. Brian became Brenda and long trousers gave way to skirts.

 

The reality was far more complicated. At age 2, “Brenda” angrily tore off “her” dresses. “She” refused to play with dolls and would beat up her brother. In school, she was teased for her masculine behaviours. She complained to her parents and teachers that she felt like a boy. Brenda’s guilt-ridden mother attempted suicide. In the end Brenda changed her name to David saying she always felt like a boy, he took testosterone injections and attempted to lead a normal life.

 

On 4 May, Reimer, 38, took his own life.

 

Dr. Money (Psychologist John Money) had developed a radical new theory about gender identity and how nature versus nurture impacts whether we think of ourselves as a girl or a boy. He thought that while genes were important, as far as gender was concerned a baby is essentially neutral for the first two years of life. He determined the babies upbringing, how it was natured would determine whether it would feel masculine or feminine.

 

He actually had difficulties even then. He didn’t get along with the other girls; he liked rough housing too much, and didn’t like girl games like playing with dolls. Dr. Money kept this information from his reports, it didn’t come out until David’s biography.

 

 

Oh, there’s more to this psychologist John Money by the way:

John Money was a “sexologist” and he was the one who introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word “gender” to refer to anything but grammatical categories.

 

However, Money’s meaning of the word did not become widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. Today, the distinction is strictly followed in some contexts, like medicine,[4][1] social sciences,[5][6] feminist literature,[7] documents written by organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO),[8] and in some dictionaries,[9] but in many contexts, even in some areas of social sciences, the meaning of gender has expanded to include “sex” or even to replace the latter word.[2][3] Although this gradual change in the meaning of gender can be traced to the 1980s, a small acceleration of the process in the scientific literature was observed when the Food and Drug Administration started to use “gender” instead of “sex” in 1993.[10] “Gender” is now commonly used even to refer to the physiology of non-human animals, without any implication of social gender roles.[3]”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender

 

Meanwhile, in Socialist Sweden: (Bottom Picture)

>Boys will be girls, as they say in Sweden, especially if you’re Toys R Us. The firm’s Swedish franchise has been through its Christmas catalogue and made it gender-neutral. Boys now pucker up to the camera clutching baby dolls. Girls wave guns at the reader to reassure us that females can be violent too.

 

It is difficult to be surprised. Sweden’s anti-discrimination laws are as bizarre as they are magical.

-Hairdressers are not allowed to vary their prices based on gender, putting up the price of a short-back-and-sides towards the £50 mark.

 

-Activists are pushing to end gender specific pronouns in the language.

 

-Women can swim topless in public pools unless there is a law to require men cover their nipples.

 

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/thomaspascoe/100021481/swedens-insane-anti-discrimination-laws-have-created-a-generation-of-lost-women/

 

“Rapidly we are moving through a chaotic time space, a spinning maze of intense complexity that whirls on a fragile teetering point, expressing the scales of the delicacy of nature. The Aryan race has become like an aging champion, who after endless victories discovers a first day of invulnerability. It all seemed so easy when our opponents where standing before us, man to man, when our true Gods roared within us and we could grasp our invincibility. Now the enemy has become vague. We have become doubtful, divided and spiritless. Instead of a natural, intrinsic confidence we harbor unnatural guilt, embarrassment and apology for our former alpha-race stature. Yes, it has become a sad, if not shameful day for Aryan man. It is not our enemies who have made us weak. A good enemy will galvanize a people and make them stronger; it is we, our own people, who have made us weak. We have become our worst enemy and executioner. There is only one solution to such a critical dilemma, and that is an immediate return to the well-spring from which all great races are born, the ethnic center of our essence, which is found in our mythos and exudes our spirituality, culture, and unity.”

 

— Ron McVan, from “Temple of Wotan”

 

Genes Are Destroyed With Admixture/Racial Mixing

Nonindigenous species can bring about a form of extinction of native flora and fauna by hybridization and introgression either through purposeful introduction by humans or through habitat modification, bringing previously isolated species into contact. These phenomena can be especially problematic for rare species coming into contact with more abundant ones. Increased use of molecular techniques focuses attention on the extent of this underappreciated problem that is not always apparent from morphological observations alone. Some degree of gene flow is a normal, evolutionarily constructive process, and all constellations of genes and genotypes cannot be preserved. However, hybridization with or without introgression may, nevertheless, threaten a rare species’ existence.

http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83

 

Allopatric speciation

Allopatric speciation or geographic speciation is speciation that occurs when biological populations of the same species become vicariant — isolated from each other to an extent that prevents or interferes with genetic interchange. This can be the result of population dispersal leading to emigration, or by geographical changes such as mountain formation, island formation, or large scale human activities (for example agricultural and civil engineering developments). The vicariant populations then undergo genotypic or phenotypic divergence as: (a) they become subjected to different selective pressures, (b) they independently undergo genetic drift, and (c) different mutations arise in the populations’ gene pools.[1]

 

The separate populations over time may evolve distinctly different characteristics. If the geographical barriers are later removed, members of the two populations may be unable to successfully mate with each other, at which point, the genetically isolated groups have emerged as different species. Allopatric isolation is a key factor in speciation and a common process by which new species arise.[2] Adaptive radiation, as observed by Charles Darwin in Galapagos finches, is a consequence of allopatric speciation among island populations.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allopatric_speciation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation

 

Reproductive isolation - Sexual isolation by behavior or conduct

Even where there are minimal morphological differences between species, differences in behavior can be enough to prevent mating. For example, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans which are considered twin species due to their morphological similarity, do not mate even if they are kept together in a laboratory.[3][12]Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa are twin species from Melanesia. In the wild they rarely produce hybrids, although in the laboratory it is possible to produce fertile offspring. Studies of their sexual behavior show that the males court the females of both species but the females show a marked preference for mating with males of their own species.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_isolation

 

>Picture: drosophila fruit flies are popular choices for these types of experiments.

 

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/VBDefiningSpeciation.shtml

 

Just imagine what a few extra years of separation could have done for certain human populations…

 

Glaciations, Migration, Hybridization and Survival

By Marie Cachet

http://atala.fr/2012/09/26/2-glaciations-and-migration-hybridization-and-survival-en/

 

The northern hemisphere has always been traversed by ice ages. There were more cold years than warm years, as summarized in the following graph. We are clearly in interglacial (warm) period since -10 000. The glacial (which have very different names depending on their geographic locations where their signs are observed, even if it is the same phenomenon at the scale of the entire world) and inter-glacial periods are governed by solar and astronomical complex cycles, and they cause violent change on the earth’s climate, as demonstrated by the Serbian astronomer Milutin Milankovitch between 1920 and 1941.

 

http://www.cours.polymtl.ca/glq1100/milankovich/milankovich.html

 

These giants climate cycles (80 000-120 000 years) are quite similar in form, but have some differences, which, at the human level, are considerable. They are governed by three main parameters:

- Precession

- Obliquity

- Eccentricity

 

https://mariecachet.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/glaciationpleistocene-2.jpg?w=300&h=262

Glaciations Pleistocene

 

https://mariecachet.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/courbe_t_milanko-2.gif?w=300&h=215

Solar radiation and temperatures

 

Comparison between the curve of solar radiation at latitude 65 ° (top) and the curve of temperatures calculated from the ratio O-18/O-16 ice at Vostok, Antarctica (bottom).

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

 

When we observe these graphs there are several observations:

The two last glaciations (Weichselian and Wolstonian) were even colder than the preceding two glaciations. The Wolstonian Glaciation is almost bonded to the previous glaciation (Kansan), since the interglacial period that separates them is very short. Glaciers have the time to melt only a little, and the volume of ice does not reach the usual minimum.

 

In the Wolstonian glaciation, temperatures reached their lowest three times (around -190 000 years, -160 000 years and -140 000 years respectively), against only once in the previous two (– 340 000 years and -240 000 years) and twice in the Weichselian glaciation (-70 000 years and -20 000 years).

 

https://mariecachet.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/ice_age_temperature-2.png?w=300&h=200

Glaciations and temperatures

 

Glaciations and migratory reflex

It is important to consider all of these parameters, then we can understand how much the “Out of Africa” theory is absurd. This theory never gives the cause of the so-called modern human exodus from Africa. It claims probably, as evolutionism wants to, that humans from Africa were shaken by such evolutionary change (but which one?) that they had a sudden urge to migrate north for about 50,000 ago, in the middle of the ice age, while the climate of France was roughly equivalent to current Siberia, tundra and taiga, while the Middle East and North Africa were a pleasant oasis covered with deciduous green forest.

 

https://mariecachet.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/extension-maximum-des-glaciers-lors-de-la-derniere-glaciation-dans-la-partie-occidentale-de-l-europe_large-2.jpg?w=726

Glaciation and landscape in Europe

 

It is absolutely unreasonable.

 

There are no species adapted to the African climate that would have committed such a crazy project. However, there are many species from the northern hemisphere that have the migratory instinct in them. Whether seasonal, or larger cycles. This is the case for example for many migratory birds from Europe such as greylag geese and some swallows, who no longer migrate to Spain or Africa in winter since the climate became warmer, the temperature is sufficient for them further north.

 

http://www.mnhn.fr/spn/docs/rapports/SPN%202009%20-%204%20-%20SPN_2009_-_4_-_oie_cendree.pdf

 

The migratory instinct is well known – and entirely probable – among Neanderthals, since it is assumed that they followed their usual prey among others, as the reindeer and the mammoth, according to the specific movements of the latter.

 

Several Neanderthal sites have been discovered in the Middle East:

 

Shanidar in Iraq (60 000 to 80 000 BC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanidar_Cave

 

Dederiyeh in Syria

http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/paleo_0153-9345_1995_num_21_2_4619

 

Sites in Israel:

 

Amud (85 000 to 55 000 BC)

http://archaeology.huji.ac.il/depart/prehistoric/erellah/1999_Valladas_et_al.pdf

 

Tabun (500 000 to 40 000 BC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabun_Cave

 

Kébara (60 000 BC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kebara_Cave

 

And Skhul and Qafzeh which will be discussed later (see map):

https://mariecachet.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/carteneandhs-2.jpg?w=300&h=291

 

Neanderthal and Sapiens sites

 

It is therefore reasonable to think that this species took refuge here during the coldest periods, an assumption which is not popular with archaeologists, who probably prefer to think in a purely geographical and cultural way. The European barrier becomes a cultural barrier, and they think as now, in our modern sedentary societies, even though everyone knows that peoples of the Stone Age were nomads.

 

Thus, JJ Hublin claims that Neanderthals disappeared probably because they lived in small groups on a small geographical area and they were dying of cold and hunger.

 

http://www.franceculture.fr/emission-neandertalensis-versus-sapiens-sapiens-2010-03-24.html

(Unfortunately, this program is now archived and is no longer possible to listen it)

 

No earthly creature behaves thus, and many even manage to adapt to the whimsical behavior of modern man. It seems particularly inappropriate to think that Neanderthals would suddenly behaved as so when he has survived several ice ages before.

Note that they lived in Byzovaya (presently in Siberia) in full ice age (around -28 500), and probably during the winter (? currently no proof), according Ludovic Slimak, a researcher at CNRS in the program Le Salon Noir on french radio France Culture(22.06.2011):

http://www.franceculture.fr/emission-le-salon-noir-l%E2%80%99homme-de-neandertal-pres-du-cercle-polaire-le-site-russe-de-byzovaya-2011-0

 

For example, I made a pedestrian route on Google Maps, from Paris to Israel’s border, which gives me about 4300 km, or 35 days and 15 hours. With an average of 5km a day and some holidays, it will be about 3 years.

 

Obviously, no one walks days and nights. They must have time to live, eat, defend themselves if necessary, to bear children, etc.

 

Anyway, the goal was not to go to Israel or to move as fast, but to move step by step with changes and climatic disadvantages, over several centuries. I take this example to expose to the eyes of motorized sedentary humans we are that this is clearly and fully possible, and that to claim the opposite (Hublin) is quite absurd.

 

 

Let us now look at our graphics and the particularly harsh glacial period called Wolstonian or Wisconsinan (in America), and the one before (Kansan on the graph), since they are almost only one. In 200,000 years, the minimum temperatures of the Pleistocene have been reached four times, which is considerable. It seems clear that Neanderthals were particularly weakened. Even if Neanderthals could live in Byzovaya in -28 500 in full ice age, it is not certain that it was an example of a whole group (men, women, children), *and it is obvious that the mildest circumstances in the south attracted them. They moved further south to the Israelis sites, then covered with forests.*

 

I will mention that below, but the question of temperature is not the only one that played a role in population displacement. The solar radiation, which does not fully bound with temperature is crucial. In –28 500, the solar radiation was pretty high for such low temperatures, and this certainly played a positive role in the peopling of the far north.

 

c. Hybridization as a survival mechanism of the species

You can compare this situation to the current and well-known situation of polar bear. The conditions of its environment have been degraded (from its point of view) dramatically. This species has entered a survival mechanism. I think this was the same for Neanderthals whenever the temperature fell very low, especially when the solar radiation also was low (too little solar radiation causes rickets, lower growth and thus a smaller size, an increase in disease).

 

It occurs then the survival mechanism of the species, which drove them not only to move, as this is also known in warmer weather, but also to hybridize to the humans from the South just like the polar bear hybridizes to brown bear. The fair genes are recessive in the hybrid and are ready to emerge again when the climate will be favorable, if the species became extinct between time.

 

Polar bears and grizzlies are closer than Neanderthals and Sapiens, but the comparison is interesting. The grizzly, named like this because of its grey color, sometimes brown and sometimes blond had a common ancestor about 200 000 years ago with the polar bear. 200 000 years is also the period when the ice extent in the northern hemisphere was a longtime low.

 

It is now even lower, and this has been so for only 10 000 years, but we must also consider the role of humans in the polar bear habitat to understand that the modern critical situation in which it finds itself, was approximately equivalent to that which lasted from – 240 000 to – 180 000 years. The pizzly, a hybrid between a grizzly and polar bear, is almost grey. It is less suited to the ice, but more adapted to life on land. Hybridization with the grizzly is an instinctive way for the polar bear to keep the genes of its species.

 

It is probable that the white genes form gradually a “recessive package” as it is known in many species of animals, including the Kermode bear (or « Spirit Bear »), which was considered among American Indians as a relic of the last glaciation. 10% of black bears there are born white (genetic studies have shown that this phenomenon is caused by a package of recessive genes), and this color is probably the remnant of a dead species, but one which was saved and who lived there at the last ice age. This bear has, by this survival mechanism, hybridized to his black neighbor, to “freeze” its species until the next ice age, in which the white coat is essential.'

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kermode_bear

“In ancient times, there was a legend that every tenth bear was turned white as a reminder of the hardships of the last ice age, a pronouncement that the Spirit Bear would live forever in peace.”

 

http://www.isfoundation.com/news/creatures/spirit-bear

 

This mechanism is dangerous for the species, but it may thus be essential to its survival, and that’s probably why it exists. It is likely that if the polar bear would disappear, this “white genes package”, called ”leucism” or “leucitism,” which is found in the grizzly/pizzly would appear occasionally. The grizzly, who is a subspecies of the brown bear, is almost certainly already a polar bear/brown bear hybrid as suggested by its habitat that it shares with the polar bear, its massive size compared to the classic brown bear, the shape of its head, and its coat that ranges from blonde / gray to dark brown.

 

In this sense, it is a genetic reserve for the polar bear, which makes the hybridization possible and limits the damage it would cause (genetic incompatibility, too different in size, etc). As long as polar bears exist, it is probable that the mixtures are not consistent enough or old enough to form this « white genes package » or leucism in another species, such as Kermode bear, white tigers, white lions, white deer, white blackbird, white peacock and other animals with this recessive so-called “anomaly” that is classical in animals of the northern hemisphere or mountainous regions, who suffer dramatic climate changes during glacial periods.

 

Note also that the leucistic animals are often larger, including the tiger, which gives them an advantage in cold climates.

 

In humans, it is possible to find blue-eyed and blond Mongolians for example, without them having any blue-eyed and blond-haired parents.

 

If the leucistic population, like the Kermode bear, who were able to live in the northern hemisphere or in mountain areas during ice ages, disappeared whenever the climate of their habitat were transformed, as is frequently the case, then these areas would be quickly drained of all life, and they would have been empty a long time ago. With this system they ensure the protection of their species until they again enter a favorable climate. The leucitisme or leucism is the stigma of this survival mechanism.

 

It is possible that these genes may become dominant if solar radiation decreases, as a variable coat with large cycles. Concerning such cycles, we note that the size of the cave bear increased during glaciations, and decreased during inter-glacial (warm) periods (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ours_des_cavernes); for better known variable cycles, we can mention the arctic fox, arctic wolf, ptarmigan, arctic hare or alpine hare, etc.. While the white coat (or white skin) can be a disadvantage in interglacial period (and recessive) it is very useful in ice age (camouflage and in humans in particular; less filtering of very useful solar radiation), and it could become dominant.

 

This is an hypothesis, but it is probable that these individuals or populations have a special attraction for the northern regions and mountains. Scandinavians are not blonde because they live in the north, but they live in the north because they are blond. Here’s why you’ve always loved skiing, and why many Europeans have a very special affinity with the snow, they miss it as soon as winter is a bit hot.

 

I do not believe in psychology and that we are attracted by the snow because it would remind us nostalgic cold winters of our childhood. First, the winters have not all been cold, and childhood has not always been sweet. I believe in the power of DNA, the platonic thumos in the soul, which dictates what is good for us, depending on our environment.

 

It is clear that such micro-evolution exists, but what is called a mutation, however, is probably often either a direct hybridization or a past hybridization which has left recessive marks, which are able to reappear.

 

It is still necessary to clarify that the hybridization between the bear is different from the hybridization between humans, even if it is comparable. While the polar bear is perfectly adapted to the coldest climates, and while it is the interglacial that kills it, the Neanderthal is adapted to cold climates, but only moderately cold. An inland ice sheet which is too big, a low temperature and too little solar radiation causes damage to him. It was thus “threatened” during the coldest and less sunny periods of glaciation, thus he had migrated southwards.

 

What is strange is that we think in an entirely different – and much more logical – way when it comes to animals. Nobody is surprised if a breeder of a Samoyed dog tells us that these dogs become other dogs in the first winter snow, and that they roll in the snow with happiness. Here there is no question of psychology and childhood, this seems obvious. Similarly, no one will tell you that the kittens are jealous if they fight, no one will bother you with this unfortunate Freudian Oedipus complex if they growl in front of their father or mother, they will tell you that they learn to hunt, and at worst that they learn the hierarchy imposed by their species. Sometimes it is good to look at the human being as an animal.

 

To a certain degree, the human is an animal, but a particular animal. This singularity is the weapon that nature has given to him. Human does not have long canines, he is not very large, he is not very fast, he is not very quiet, he has no shell, but he has his head. This is where everything changes, and that is why this hybridization has great implications for the Neanderthal species, or the European species that we are, at least on our scale of modern humans of the second millennium.

 

d. The survival of the Neanderthal species

We know that Neanderthals had a hard life, it is assumed that women were few, and this seems logical, since females appeared to more or less participate in hunting too, (found was a Neanderthal women with serious fractures, such the woman from St. Cesaire, called “Pierrette,” -36 000 years – she had a severe skull fracture), and since women have an additional disadvantage to survive compared to men, since they are more fragile and have to go through periods of pregnancy and childbirth that are particularly dangerous, especially in cold climates.

 

It is likely that Neanderthals, who were stronger than Sapiens, took a few Sapien women. The reverse is rather unlikely, when we see the inequality of force between the two species, and the results of studies on mtDNA we discussed earlier. These hybrids probably occurred over a long time, probably every time the temperature and/or the solar radiation was low, and the ice level was high. Neanderthals migrated southwards, seeking warmer temperatures.

 

In -340 000 we can imagine a hybridization. It was probably insignificant, and the resulting hybrid probably had poor fertility, especially men, who might be sterile, as in many animals (see previous article).

 

Either way offspring was born, probably through the female hybrid, and it built the archaic “Neanderthal” Homo sapiens that I have listed in the preceding article. Some remained in Africa, and their blood was diluted in the African blood in the Middle East and in Ethiopia. Some others went away to Europe, perhaps instinctively, during the warming that followed. This may have slightly modified the appearance of the Neanderthal, but at this stage, the share of hybridization was too small to be meaningful, and most hybrids have probably given little or no offspring.

 

In –270 000, the temperature again reaches its minimum, and the Neanderthal is again in serious danger. New migration, new hybridization, probably slightly easier, since the sapiens in Ethiopia and in the Middle East now had a little Neanderthal blood, but still very small and almost insignificant. After that, the climate did not warm up clearly, what happened was a moderate and different inter-glacial period; the glaciers are melting less than usual, then the ice age arrives, with three consecutive very low temperatures, instead of only one, and a low level of solar radiation time. The Neanderthal is then severely weakened, and the entire species is endangered. Neanderthals, mostly women, die young, and the survival mechanism of of the species is again established: three migrations, three hybridizations, in –185 000, in – 160 000 and in -140 000.

 

The so-called « modern Archaic Homo Sapiens » appears slowly in Ethiopia and in the Middle East. It is actually an early Neanderthal/ Sapiens hybrid. A Cro-Magnon of Wolstonian glaciation.

 

Then comes a classic inter-glacial period, where some hybrids remain in Asia/Africa and others go back to the north, the Neanderthal blood is already changed. A new ice age arrives and the temperature decreases dangerously around anno -120 000, and the solar radiation reached its minimum again and then around anno – 90 000, and part of the Neanderthal species migrated south. In Tabun (-120 000 ) and Skhul and Qafzeh (-100 000 to -90 000), and then returned without explanation - this is the lack of physical evidence of the so-called “Out of Africa” theory, in archaic Homo Sapiens.

 

It is in Skhul and Qafzeh, located in current Israel, that is the key to history. In Skhul, Qafzeh, Amud and Tabun are the first outstanding true hybrids, they’re not just the first homo sapiens who suddenly appeared in Israel. We will return to this subject, and detail their characteristics in the next article.

 

Some of these hybrids would again moved northwards around anno -60 000 when the climate was becoming a little warmer, and they would be mixed on site with the Neanderthals, some of whom lived to the limit of glaciers in the north, as in Byzovaya, located today in Russia.

 

The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy

By Stephen Steinlight

 

A paper written by a Jewish leader primarily for just fellow Jews, so it is perhaps a bit more revealing of Jewish attitudes then it would be if were addressed to the general public instead, some sections:

 

 

>Is the emerging new multicultural American nation good for the Jews? Will a country in which enormous demographic and cultural change, fueled by unceasing large-scale non-European immigration, remain one in which Jewish life will continue to flourish as nowhere else in the history of the Diaspora? In an America in which people of color form the plurality, as has already happened in California, most with little or no historical experience with or knowledge of Jews, will Jewish sensitivities continue to enjoy extraordinarily high levels of deference and will Jewish interests continue to receive special protection? Does it matter that the majority non-European immigrants have no historical experience of the Holocaust or knowledge of the persecution of Jews over the ages and see Jews only as the most privileged and powerful of white Americans? Is it important that Latinos, who know us almost entirely as employers for the menial low-wage cash services they perform for us (such a blowing the leaves from our lawns in Beverly Hills or doing our laundry in Short Hills), will soon form one quarter of the nation’s population? Does it matter that most Latino immigrants have encountered Jews in their formative years principally or only as Christ killers in the context of a religious education in which the changed teachings of Vatican II penetrated barely or not at all? Does it matter that the politics of ethnic succession — colorblind, I recognize — has already resulted in the loss of key Jewish legislators (the brilliant Stephen Solarz of Brooklyn was one of the first of these) and that once Jewish “safe seats” in Congress now are held by Latino representatives?

 

 

>Even with these caveats, 'an era of astoundingly disproportionate Jewish legislative representation may already have peaked. It is unlikely we will ever see many more U.S. Senates with 10 Jewish members. And although had Al Gore been allowed by the Supreme Court to assume office, a Jew would have been one heartbeat away from the presidency, it may be we’ll never get that close again. With the changes in view, how long do we actually believe that nearly 80 percent of the entire foreign aid budget of the United States will go to Israel?

 

 

>It is also true that Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry,' theoretically a boon in terms of the formation of favorable public images of Jews and sensitizing the American people to issues of concern to Jews.

 

There is no distortion of this text by paraphrasing it, it is freely available online in full:

http://www.cis.org/ChangingDemography-JewishInterestImmigrationPolicy

 

Dr. Steinlight for more than eight years was the National Affairs Director at the American Jewish Committee (AJC) where he oversaw its public policy agenda centered on First Amendment issues, civil rights, immigration, and social policy. A policy maker, with unquestionable credentials.

 

Sexual masochism - taking perverse pleasure in causing pain to your self.'''

 

Ethno-masochicm - taking pleasure in attacking and humiliating one’s own ethnicity, nation or race.

- It is a pathological tendency to perpetually ridicule and destructively criticise one’s own nation, ethnicity or race.

 

Non-White Men Encounter A White Woman

 

>A female Dutch television host goes to Iran for a report.

>She wore a headscarf and everything!

>At first she attracts the attention of a group of men, who proceed to touch, grope and follow her.

>Her next confrontation is with a cop, a cop which just previously helped guide her through the crowd, so surely he will be more professional?…

 

Video of incident, from 1 minute onwards:

http://dump.geenstijl.nl/mediabase/2076/c5418384/index.html

 

What shockingly poor impulse control. Just imagine if the cameras weren’t there…

 

Lara Logan, the CBS reporter who was dragged away from her crew and viciously sexually assaulted by a mob of Egyptian men during the uprising:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12476771

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382653/Lara-Logan-reveals-new-details-sex-assault-Egypt.html

 

“My flirtations with all children soon acquired a definitely erotic character. I could sense how young girls aged five had already learned how to get off with me…”

 

Daniel Cohn-Bendit (“Red Danny”)

 

In 1968: radical Marxist-anarchist student leader (of the ‘68 revolution)

 

Today: chief of the Green Parties in the European parliament.

 

He worked as an educator in a day care centre for children that had been set up to make experiments with “anti-authoritarian” education. An essential tenet of the “anti-authoritarian” concept apparently was to confront the children, who were at the time five or six years old, with unbridled sexuality, in order to overcome traditional morality.

 

Later on, Cohn-Bendit wrote a book about this, describing his experiences as a nursery school teacher in the following terms (as above):

http://www.emma.de/hefte/ausgaben-2001/maijuni-2001/ich-hatte-lust-2001-03/

 

“It happened several times that some children opened my codpiece and started caressing me. According to the circumstances of each case, I reacted differently, but the children’s wishes posed problems for me… when they insisted, I caressed them in return."

 

“In Germany, the anti-authoritarian movement has had its strongest impact in the field of education…(Wilhelm) Reich and Marx were the pillars of this new movement. Freud was less important, because he had done objective research on sexuality, whereas Reich represented the fight for sexuality, in particular for the sexuality of younger people.”

____________________

 

These lines were published in 1975. At the time they seemed to represent a “modern” and “enlightened” approach to education, and nobody took offense.

 

Is there any country in the world where a prominent politician could publicly boast his sexual experiences with children aged six years and less, and still stay in office? Probably not – but the European Parliament seems to have rules of its own.

 

Continued:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/european-parliament-member-promotes-pedophilia-as-part-of-the-sexual-revolu

 

Oliver, by the time of this writing, had long abandoned conservatism as a cause both lost and unworthy, so this essay is instead, a call for clear vision and an acceptance of the world as it is and human life as it is: material, biological, evolutionary, and governed by absolute natural laws which we must accept no matter how “unfair” they may seem or how difficult and daunting the tasks they ordain for us.

 

_______________________________________________

 

What Is ‘Liberalism’?

By Revilo P. Oliver, 1981

 

[excerpts]

 

“LIBERALISM” IS A succedaneous religion that was devised late in the Eighteenth Century and it originally included a vague deism. Like the Christianity from which it sprang, it split into various sects and heresies, such as Jacobinism, Fourierism, Owenism, Fabian Socialism, Marxism, and the like. The doctrine of the “Liberal” cults is essentially Christianity divested of its belief in supernatural beings, but retaining its social superstitions, which were originally derived from, and necessarily depend on, the supposed wishes of a god. This “Liberalism,” the residue of Christianity, is, despite the fervor with which its votaries hold their faith, merely a logical absurdity, a series of deductions from a premise that has been denied.

 

The dependence of the “Liberal” cults on a blind and irrational faith was long obscured or concealed by their professed esteem for objective science, which they used as a polemic weapon against orthodox Christianity, much as the Protestants took up the Copernican restoration of heliocentric astronomy as a weapon against the Catholics, who had imprudently decided that the earth could be stopped from revolving about the sun in defiance of Holy Writ by burning intelligent men at the stake or torturing them until they recanted. Pious Protestants would naturally have preferred a cozy little earth, such as their god described in their holy book, but they saw the advantage of appealing to our racial respect for observed reality to enlist support, while simultaneously stigmatizing their rivals as ignorant obscurantists and ridiculous ranters.

 

The votaries of “Liberalism” would have much preferred to have the various human species specially created to form one race endowed with the fictitious qualities dear to “Liberal” fancy, but the cultists saw the advantage of endorsing the findings of geology and biology, including the evolution of species, in their polemics against orthodox Christianity to show the absurdity of the Jewish version of the Sumerian creation-myth. The hypocrisy of the professed devotion to scientific knowledge was made unmistakable when the “Liberals” began their frantic and often hysterical efforts to suppress scientific knowledge about genetics and the obviously innate differences between the different human species and between the individuals of any given species. At present, the “Liberals” are limited to shrieking and spitting when they are confronted with inconvenient facts, but no one who has heard them in action can have failed to notice how exasperated they are by the limitations that have thus far prevented them from burning wicked biologists and other rational men at the stake.

 

It is unnecessary to dilate on the superstitions of “Liberalism.” They are obvious in the cult’s holy words. “Liberals” are forever chattering about “all mankind,” a term which does have a specific meaning, as do parallel terms in biology, such as “all marsupials” or “all species of the genus Canis,” but the fanatics give to the term a mystic and special meaning, derived from the Zoroastrian myth of “all mankind” and its counterpart in Stoic speculation, but absurd when used by persons who deny the existence of Ahuru Mazda or a comparable deity who could be supposed to have imposed a transcendental unity on the manifest diversity of the various human species. “Liberals” rant about “human rights” with the fervor of an evangelist who appeals to what Moses purportedly said, but a moment’s thought suffices to show that, in the absence of a god who might be presumed to have decreed such rights, the only rights are those which the citizens of a stable society, by agreement or by a long usage that has acquired the force of law, bestow on themselves; and while the citizens may show kindness to aliens, slaves, and horses, these beings can have no rights. Furthermore, in societies that have been so subjugated by conquest or the artful manipulation of masses that individuals no longer have constitutional rights that are not subject to revocation by violence or in the name of “social welfare,” there are no rights, strictly speaking, and therefore no citizens — only masses existing in the state of indiscriminate equality of which “Liberals” dream and, of course, a state of de facto slavery, which their masters may deem it expedient, as in the United States at present, to make relatively light until the animals are broken to the yoke.

 

“Liberals” babble about “One World,” which is to be a “universal democracy” and is “inevitable,” and they thus describe it in the very terms in which the notion was formulated, two thousand years ago, by Philo Judaeus, when he cleverly gave a Stoic coloring to the old Jewish dream of a globe in which all the lower races would obey the masters whom Yahweh, by covenant, appointed to rule over them. And the “Liberal” cults, having rejected the Christian doctrine of “original sin,” which, although based on a silly myth about Adam and Eve, corresponded fairly well to the facts of human nature, have even reverted to the most pernicious aspect of Christianity, which common sense had held in check in Europe until the Eighteenth Century; and they openly exhibit the morbid Christian fascination with whatever is lowly, proletarian, inferior, irrational, debased, deformed, and degenerate. This maudlin preoccupation with biological refuse, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as ‘underprivileged [!]" would make sense, if it had been decreed by a god who perversely chose to become incarnate among the most pestiferous of human races and to select his disciples from among the illiterate dregs of even that peuplade, but since the “Liberals” claim to have rejected belief in such a divinity, their superstition is exposed as having no basis other than their own resentment of their betters and their professional interest in exploiting the gullibility of their compatriots.

 

What Is Liberalism - Part 2

 

In the Eighteenth Century, Christians whose thinking was cerebral rather than glandular, perceived that their faith was incompatible with observed reality and reluctantly abandoned it. A comparable development is taking place in the waning faith of “Liberalism,” and we may be sure that, despite the cult’s appeal to masses that yearn for an effortless and mindless existence on the animal level, and despite the prolonged use of public schools to deform the minds of all children with “Liberal” myths, the cult would have disappeared, but for the massive support given it today, as to the Christian cults in the ancient world, by the Jews, who have, for more than two thousand years, battened on the venality, credulity, and vices of the races they despise.

 

There is one crucial fact that we must not overlook, if we are to see the political situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some ‘ideology,’ i.e., propaganda-line, whether “Liberal” or “conservative.” The real fulcrum of power in our society is neither the votaries of an ideological sect nor the Jews, clear-sighted and shrewd as they are, but the intelligent members of our own race whose one principle is an unmitigated and ruthless egotism, an implacable determination to satisfy their own ambitions and lusts at whatever cost to their race, their nation, and even their own progeny. And with them we must reckon the bureaucrats, men who, however much or little they may think about the predictable consequences of the policies they carry out, are governed by a corporate determination to sink their probosces ever deeper into the body politic from which they draw their nourishment. Neither of these groups can be regarded as being “Liberal” or as having any other political attitude from conviction. The first are guarded by the lucidity of their minds, and the second by their collective interests, from adhesion to any ideology or other superstition.

 

Bureaucracies contain, of course, ambitious men who are climbing upward. One thinks of the bureaucrats who, shortly before the “Battle of the Bulge” in the last days of 1944, were openly distressed “lest a premature victory in Europe compromise our social gains at home,” meaning, of course, that they were afraid that peace might break out before they had climbed another rung on their way to real power. After the defeat of Japan, one of them, a major in the ever-growing battalions of chair-borne troops, too precious to be distressed by such nasty things as fighting battles, frankly lamented his hard luck: if only the war had lasted another three months, and a suitable number of Americans been killed, he would have been promoted to colonel and would also have a “command” that would have qualified him as the foremost expert in his field and thus assured his prosperity after the evil day on which he would have to face the hardships of peace. This attitude may not be admirable, but it is quite common and a political force of the first magnitude, which it would be childish to ignore. It is not, of course, peculiar to the United States. When the National Socialists came to power in Germany, they had many enthusiastic adherents of the same type, who, after the defeat of their nation, did not have to be tortured to become witnesses to the “evils of Nazism” and endorse any lie desired by the brutal conquerors. The attitude, furthermore, though especially prevalent in our demoralized age, is not peculiar to it. One thinks of the Popes who are reported to have told their intimates, “How much profit this fable of Christ has brought us!” And the same realistic appraisal of the main chance was doubtless present in many ecclesiastics who did not reach the top or did not have so much confidence in the discretion of their immediate associates.

 

Unmitigated egotism, which is necessarily a prime factor on all the higher levels of society in a “democracy,” is a political force with which one cannot cope directly; one can only attack the masks that are worn in public. It is, however, an obstacle that can be circumvented and one which could become an asset. The only strategic consideration here is represented by the truism, “nothing succeeds like success” — a crude statement, which you may find elaborated with elegance and sagacity in the Or culo manual of the great Jesuit, Baltasar Gracián. Our formidable enemies today will become our enthusiastic allies tomorrow, if it appears that we are likely to succeed. I speak, of course, only of members of our race, but the most competent and acute “Liberals,” who today declaim most eloquently about the “underprivileged” and “world peace,” could become tomorrow the most eloquent champions of the hierarchical principle (with which they secretly agree) and a guerre l’outrance against our enemies, if their calculations of the probable future were changed. And, as the Jews well know, the great humanitarian, whose soul shudders today at the very thought of insufficient veneration of the Jews, could become tomorrow grateful to the Jews only for the wonderful idea about gas chambers that was incorporated in the hoax about the “six million,” and he would probably find a real personal satisfaction in putting the idea into practice at last. As Gracián says, the prudent man will ascertain where power really lies, in order to use those who have it and to spurn those who have it not.

 

If one wishes to talk about principles or even long-range objectives to the representatives of this extremely powerful political force, one should wear motley and cap with bells; the only arguments that will be cogent to them are of the kind that always taught the Reverend Bishop Talleyrand precisely when it would be profitable to kick his less nimble associates in the teeth. Some historians claim, and it may be true, that Talleyrand had principles. If so, he never let them interfere with his conduct. He was a man of great talent and perspicacity, and he always found the right moment and right way to join the winning side in time for it to boost him yet higher. When age at last forced his retirement, he was equally adroit in conciliating impressionable historians by simulating regret for the methods by which he had attained eminence. He is one of the comparatively few perfect models for brilliant and pragmatic young men today.

 

Many of my conservative readers will find this fact disagreeable or even depressing, but I trust they will not dream of resuscitating an etiolated religion, and will not count too heavily on the spiritual effects of a possible restoration of racial self-respect and sanity. If the fact is unpleasant per se, it is also the basis for some cautious optimism, since it leaves open the possibility that movement on behalf of our race, if it ever seems likely to succeed, could quickly become an avalanche. In certain circumstances — not likely, perhaps, but possible — the despised “racist” of today could be astounded by the discovery that an overwhelming majority of the bureaucracy and of the White men in power above it had always been with him in heart. The sudden conversions will not necessarily be hypocritical, for it is quite likely that there is now such a majority which, ceteris paribus, would prefer to belong to a virile race rather than a dying one. But remember the proviso, ceteris paribus: no personal sacrifices, no risks.

 

The Third Wave

The Third Wave was an experiment to demonstrate that even democratic societies are not immune to the appeal of fascism. It was undertaken by history teacher Ron Jones with sophomore high school students attending his “Contemporary World” history class as part of a study of Nazi Germany.

 

The experiment took place at Cubberley High School in Palo Alto, California, during the first week of April 1967.

 

Jones started a movement called “The Third Wave” and told his students that the movement aimed to eliminate democracy. The idea that democracy emphasizes individuality was considered as a drawback of democracy, and Jones emphasized this main point of the movement in its motto: “Strength through discipline, strength through community, strength through action, strength through pride.”

 

Chronology

Jones writes that he started the first day of the experiment with simple things like proper seating, drilling the students until they were able to move from outside the classroom to their seats and take the proper seating position in less than 30 seconds without making a sound. He then proceeded to enforce strict classroom discipline by emerging as an authoritarian figure and dramatically improving the efficiency of the class.

 

The first day’s session was closed with only a few rules, intending to be a one day experiment. Students had to be sitting at attention before the second bell, had to stand up to ask or answer questions and had to do it in three words or fewer, and were required to preface each remark with “Mr. Jones”.

 

On the second day he managed to meld his history class into a group with a supreme sense of discipline and community. Jones made up a salute resembling that of the Nazi regime and ordered class members to salute each other even outside the class. They all complied with this command.

 

The experiment took on a life of its own, with students from all over the school joining in: on the third day the class expanded from initial 30 students to 43 attendees. All of the students showed drastic improvement in their academic skills and tremendous motivation. All of the students were issued a member card and each of them received a special assignment (like designing a Third Wave Banner, stopping non-members from entering the class, etc). Jones instructed the students on how to initiate new members, and by the end of the day the movement had over 200 participants. Jones was surprised that some of the students started reporting to him when other members of the movement failed to abide by the rules.

 

On Thursday, the fourth day of the experiment, Jones decided to terminate the movement because it was slipping out of his control. The students became increasingly involved in the project and their discipline and loyalty to the project was outstanding. He announced to the participants that this movement was a part of a nationwide movement and that on the next day a presidential candidate of the movement would publicly announce existence of the movement. Jones ordered students to attend a noon rally on Friday to witness the announcement.

 

Instead of a televised address of their leader, the students were presented with an empty channel. After a few minutes of waiting, Jones announced that they had been a part of an experiment in fascism and that they all willingly created a sense of superiority that German citizens had in the period of Nazi Germany. He then played them a film about the Nazi regime to conclude the experiment.

 

Two years after the experiment Jones was fired from the school. The experiment was neither stated, nor denied to be the reason for his termination.

 

In psychology

The psychology involved has been extensively studied in terms of youth gang behaviour and peer pressure, of which this experiment was a variant. There have been many analogies to youth terrorist organisations in Africa and the Middle East, organised by similar methods, in addition to the original Hitler Youth movement (on which the experiment was modelled).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Wave

 

_____________________________________________

 

Die Welle (2008)

 

This was a film based on the experiment, but it largely denounced it. Essentially the propaganda move used at the end of the film was that the crazy, unstable nationalist-type kid GOES TOO FAR!! And thus the movement was a “failure,” after all…

 

 

    I'd just like to add this, it's in French, but I'll provide translation. The black man talking was a candidate for the Togo presidency. The journalist asks what Africa did with 50 years of independance.

 

    http://youtu.be/X3Hf-GgNcOw

 

 

    "I cannot generalise about the entirety of french speaking countries having accessed independance in 1950 and the following years. However, I can say that Togo, my native country has done nothing in these 50 years. Those 50 years were worthless. Nowadays, the elders in the villages, (I had the occasion to tour many villages in Togo) and the elders admitted "It was better during the white man's time." That's an extraordinary way to admit defeat. "Yes it really was better when the white man gouverned." In our clinics we didn't have a single flask of Merbromin, the whites gave them to us. We were vaccined, not anymore. Schools were efficient, there are none left today. There were tracks cared after, not anymore. It's really... when we see, it brings tears to our eyes, indeed..."

 

 

Based Ali says in this video:

 

"it aint sad because i want my child to look like me, im sad because i dont want to blot out my race and lose my identity?"

 

"who wants to kill their race?"

 

"no intelligent white person wants black boys and girls marrying their white kids and in turn to introduce their grandchildren as half brown, kinky haired, black people"

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi6fvwxB2Bg

 

 

Public school has certainly changed

since anyone reading this was a student.

I have a friend who teaches elementary

school and she tells me that every week

the students get a new diversity lesson,

shipped in fresh from some bureaucrat’s

office in Washington or the state

capital.

 

She showed me the materials

for one week: a large poster,

about the size of a forty-two inch

flat-screen television. It shows

an utterly diverse group—I mean

diverse: handicapped, Muslim,

Jewish, effeminate, poor, rich,

brown, slightly brown, yellow,

etc.—sitting at a table, smiling

gaily, accomplishing some undefined

task. The poster comes with

a sheet of questions the teacher is

supposed to ask. One might be: “These

kids sure look different, but they look

happy. Can you tell me which one in

the picture is an American?”

 

Some eight-year-old, mired in ignorance,

will point to a white child like

himself. “That one.”

 

The teacher reads from the answer,

conveniently printed along with the

question. “No, Billy, all these children

are Americans. They are just as American

as you.”

 

 

Racial reality Redpill Quote

"I want you to look outside your shitty sheltered white suburb and western world into the rest of the world. Look at how spics are ethnically cleansing niggers right now (Google "Hispanics Ethnic Cleanse") and fucking own places like Compton now which were former nigger territory before the spics genocided them while having strong patriarchal Catholic Latino values, look at how Asians have probably have the most homogeneous racist and sexist society in the world that actively keeps women in their place aka Asian Values, look at how in Africa there is nothing but racism/genocide caused by their strong African tribalism, look at how the Middle East sandniggers still ENSLAVE niggers and are racist as fuck, EXECUTE HOMOSEXUALS/women by stoning them to death, plus they are absolutely among the most sexist people on earth with their Sharia/Muslim values, then finally we have the jews who are so racist like you wouldn't believe here.

http://thebilzerianreport.com/why-do-so-many-jews-hate-black-people/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseknutsen/2013/01/28/israel-foribly-injected-african-immigrant-women-with-birth-control/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israel-kicks-out-migrants--by-changing-their-nationality-and-sending-them-to-another-country-8057342.html

 

Face reality, kid. The west and white people are by far the minority in all the anti-racist and progressive faggotry.

 

Only a progressive liberal could be so delusional as to believe in his retarded progressive society free of hate faggotry."

 

 

+

"The promotion and indoctrination of degeneracy among the goyim will ensure the survival of the choosen people and race for eternity, as masters of this world."

+

 

##############################END OF CULTURAL MARXIST SECTION##############################

 

 

 

-+++Some Jewish Anti-Gentilism from holy text+++-

 

AS EXPLAINED in Chapter 3, the Halakhah, that is the legal system of classical Judaism - as practiced by virtually all Jews from the 9th century to the end of the 18th and as maintained to this very day in the form of Orthodox Judaism - is based primarily on the Babylonian Talmud. However, because of the unwieldy complexity of the legal disputations recorded in the Talmud, more manageable codifications of talmudic laws became necessary and were indeed compiled by successive generations of rabbinical scholars. Some of these have acquired great authority and are in general use. For this reasons we shall refer for the most part to such compilations (and their most reputable commentaries) rather than directly to the Talmud. It is however correct to assume that the compilation referred to reproduces faithfully the meaning of the talmudic text and the additions made by later scholars on the basis of that meaning.

 

   The earliest code of talmudic law which is still of major importance is the Misbneh Tarab written by Moses Maimonides in the late 12th century. The most authoritative code, widely used to date as a handbook, is the Shulhan 'Arukh composed by R. Yosef Karo in the late 16th century as a popular condensation of his own much more voluminous Beys Yosef which was intended for the advanced scholar. The Shulhan 'Arukh is much commented upon; in addition to classical commentaries dating from the 17th century, there is an important 20th century one, Mishnab Berurab. Finally, the Talmudic Encyclopedia - a modern compilation published in Israel from the 1950s and edited by the country's greatest Orthodox rabbinical scholars - is a good compendium of the whole talmudic literature.

 

 

 

 

 

Murder and Genocide

 

ACCORDING TO THE JEWISH religion, the murder of a Jew is a capital offense and one of the three most heinous sins (the other two being idolatry and adultery). Jewish religious courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish, even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew. A Jew who indirectly causes the death of another Jew is, however, only guilty of what talmudic law calls a sin against the 'laws of Heaven', to be punished by God rather than by man.

 

   When the victim is a Gentile, the position is quite different. A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court.1 To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.2

 

   Thus, one of the two most important commentators on the Shulhan Arukh explains that when it comes to a Gentile, 'one must not lift one's hand to harm him, but one may harm him indirectly, for instance by removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice .., there is no prohibition here, because it was not done directly:3 He points out, however, that an act leading indirectly to a Gentile's death is forbidden if it may cause the spread of hostility towards Jews.4

 

   A Gentile murderer who happens to be under Jewish jurisdiction must be executed whether the victim was Jewish or not. However, if the victim was Gentile and the murderer converts to Judaism, he is not punished.5

 

   All this has a direct and practical relevance to the realities of the State of Israel. Although the state's criminal laws make no distinction between Jew and Gentile, such distinction is certainly made by Orthodox rabbis, who in guiding their flock follow the Halakhah. Of special importance is the advice they give to religious soldiers.

 

   Since even the minimal interdiction against murdering a Gentile outright applies only to 'Gentiles with whom we [the Jews] are not at war', various rabbinical commentators in the past drew the logical conclusion that in wartime all Gentiles belonging to a hostile population may, or even should be killed.6 Since 1973 this doctrine is being publicly propagated for the guidance of religious Israeli soldiers. The first such official exhortation was included in a booklet published by the Central Region Command of the Israeli Army, whose area includes the West Bank. In this booklet the Command's Chief Chaplain writes:

 

 

 

    When our forces come across civilians during a war or in hot pursuit or in a raid, so long as there is no certainty that those civilians are incapable of harming our forces, then according to the Halakhah they may and even should be killed ... Under no circumstances should an Arab be trusted, even if he makes an impression of being civilized ... In war, when our forces storm the enemy, they are allowed and even enjoined by the Halakhah to kill even good civilians, that is, civilians who are ostensibly good.7

 

 

 

   The same doctrine is expounded in the following exchange of letters between a young Israeli soldier and his rabbi, published in the yearbook of one of the country's most prestigious religious colleges, Midrashiyyat No'am, where many leaders and activists of the National Religious Party and Gush Emunim have been educated.8

 

   Letter from the soldier Moshe to Rabbi Sbipn 'on Weiser '

 

 

 

    With God's help, to His Honor, my dear Rabbi,

 

    'First I would like to ask how you and your family are. I hope all is well. I am, thank God, feeling well. A long time I have not written. Please forgive me. Sometimes I recall the verse "when shall I come and appear before God?'9 I hope, without being certain, that I shall come during one of the leaves. I must do so.

 

    'In one of the discussions in our group, there was a debate about the "purity of weapons" and we discussed whether it is permitted to kill unarmed men - or women and children? Or perhaps we should take revenge on the Arabs? And then everyone answered according to his own understanding. I could not arrive at a clear decision, whether Arabs should be treated like the Amalekites, meaning that one is permitted to murder [sic ] them until their remembrance is blotted out from under heaven,10 or perhaps one should do as in a just war, in which one kills only the soldiers?

 

    'A second problem I have is whether I am permitted to put myself in danger by allowing a woman to stay alive? For there have been cases when women threw hand grenades. Or am I permitted to give water to an Arab who put his hand up? For there may be reason to fear that he only means to deceive me and will kill me, and such things have happened.

 

    'I conclude with a warm greeting to the rabbi and all his family. - Moshe.'

 

 

 

   Reply of Shim'on Weiser' to Moshe

 

 

 

    'With the help of Heaven. Dear Moshe, Greetings.

 

    'I am starting this letter this evening although I know I cannot finish it this evening, both because I am busy and because I would like to make it a long letter, to answer your questions in full, for which purpose I shall have to copy out some of the sayings of our sages, of blessed memory, and interpret them.11

 

    'The non-Jewish nations have a custom according to which war has its own rules, like those of a game, like the rules of football or basketball. But according to the sayings of our sages, of blessed memory, [ ... ] war for us is not a game but a vital necessity, and only by this standard must we decide how to wage it. On the one hand .... ] we seem to learn that if a Jew murders a Gentile, he is regarded as a murderer and, except for the fact that no court has the right to punish him, the gravity of the deed is like that of any other murder. But we find in the very same authorities in another place [ ... that Rabbi Shim'on used to say: "The best of Gentiles - kill him; the best of snakes dash out its brains."

 

    'It might perhaps be argued that the expression "kill" in the saying of R. Shim'on is only figurative and should not be taken literally but as meaning "oppress" or some similar attitude, and in this way we also avoid a contradiction with the authorities quoted earlier. Or one might argue that this saying, though meant literally, is [merely] his own personal opinion, disputed by other sages [quoted earlier]. But we find the true explanation in the Tosalot.12 There [ .... ] we learn the following comment on the talmudic pronouncement that Gentiles who fall into a well should not be helped out, but neither should they be pushed into the well to be killed, which means that they should neither be saved from death nor killed directly. And the Tosafot write as follows:

 

    "And if it is queried [because] in another place it was said The best of Gentiles - kill him, then the answer is that this [saying] is meant for wartime." [ ... ]

 

    'According to the commentators of the Tosafot, a distinction must be made between wartime and peace, so that although during peace time it is forbidden to kill Gentiles, in a case that occurs in wartime it is a mitzvah [imperative, religious duty] to kill them.[...]

 

    'And this is the difference between a Jew and a Gentile: although the rule "Whoever comes to kill you, kill him first" applies to a Jew, as was said in Tractate Sanhedrin [of the Talmud], page 72a, still it only applies to him if there is [actual] ground to fear that he is coming to kill you. But a Gentile during wartime is usually to be presumed so, except when it is quite clear that he has no evil intent. This is the rule of "purity of weapons" according to the Halakhah - and not the alien conception which is now accepted in the Israeli army and which has been the cause of many [Jewish] casualties. I enclose a newspaper cutting with the speech made last week in the Knesset by Rabbi Kalman Kahana, which shows in a very lifelike - and also painful - way how this "purity of weapons" has caused deaths.

 

    'I conclude here, hoping that you will not find the length of this letter irksome. This subject was being discussed even without your letter, but your letter caused me to write up the whole matter.

 

    'Be in peace, you and all Jews, and [I hope to] see you soon, as you say. Yours - Shim'on.

 

 

 

   Reply of Moshe to R. Shim'on Weiser

 

 

 

    'To His Honor, my dear Rabbi,

 

    'First I hope that you and your family are in health and are all right.

 

    'I have received your long letter and am grateful for your personal watch over me, for I assume that you write to many, and most of your time is taken up with your studies in your own program.

 

    'Therefore my thanks to you are doubly deep.

 

    'As for the letter itself, I have understood it as follows:

 

    'In wartime I am not merely permitted, but enjoined to kill every Arab man and woman whom I chance upon, if there is reason to fear that they help in the war against us, directly or indirectly. And as far as I am concerned I have to kill them even if that might result in an involvement with the military law. I think that this matter of the purity of weapons should be transmitted to educational institutions, at least the religious ones, so that they should have a position about this subject and so that they will not wander in the broad fields of "logic", especially on this subject; and the rule has to be explained as it should be followed in practice. For, I am sorry to say, I have seen different types of "logic" here even among the religious comrades. I do hope that you shall be active in this, so that our boys will know the line of their ancestors clearly and unambiguously.

 

    'I conclude here, hoping that when the [training] course ends, in about a month, I shall be able to come to the yeshivah [talmudic college]. Greetings - Moshe.'

 

 

 

   Of course, this doctrine of the Halakhah on murder clashes, in principle, not only with Israel's criminal law but also - as hinted in the letters just quoted - with official military standing regulations. However, there can be little doubt that in practice this doctrine does exert an influence on the administration of justice, especially by military authorities. The fact is that in all cases where Jews have, in a military or paramilitary context, murdered Arab non-combatants - including cases of mass murder such as that in Kafr Qasim in 1956 - the murderers, if not let off altogether, received extremely light sentences or won far-reaching remissions, reducing their punishment to next to nothing.13

 

 

 

 

 

Saving of Life

 

THIS SUBJECT - the supreme value of human life and the obligation of every human being to do the outmost to save the life of a fellow human - is of obvious importance in itself. It is also of particular interest in a Jewish context, in view of the fact that since the Second World War Jewish opinion has - in some cases justly, in others unjustly - condemned 'the whole world' or at least all Europe for standing by when Jews were being massacred. Let us therefore examine what the Halakhah has to say on this subject.

 

   According to the Halakhah, the duty to save the life of a fellow Jew is paramount.14 It supersedes all other religious obligations and interdictions, excepting only the prohibitions against the three most heinous sins of adultery (including incest), murder and idolatry.

 

   As for Gentiles, the basic talmudic principle is that their lives must not be saved, although it is also forbidden to murder them outright. 15 The Talmud itself expresses this in the maxim 'Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down [into it]'. Maimonides16 explains:

 

 

 

       "As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war ... their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: 'neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow'17 - but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow."

 

 

 

   In particular, a Jewish doctor must not treat a Gentile patient. Maimonides - himself an illustrious physician - is quite explicit on this; in another passage18 he repeats the distinction between 'thy fellow' and a Gentile, and concludes: 'and from this learn ye, that it is forbidden to heal a Gentile even for payment...'

 

   However, the refusal of a Jew - particularly a Jewish doctor - to save the life of a Gentile may, if it becomes known, antagonize powerful Gentiles and so put Jews in danger. Where such danger exists, the obligation to avert it supersedes the ban on helping the Gentile. Thus Maimonides continues: ' ... but if you fear him or his hostility, cure him for payment, though you are forbidden to do so without payment.' In fact, Maimonides himself was Saladin's personal physician. His insistence on demanding payment - presumably in order to make sure that the act is not one of human charity but an unavoidable duty - is however not absolute. For in another passage he allows Gentile whose hostility is feared to be treated 'even gratis, if it is unavoidable'.

 

   The whole doctrine - the ban on saving a Gentile's life or healing him, and the suspension of this ban in cases where there is fear of hostility - is repeated (virtually verbatim) by other major authorities, including the 14th century Arba'ah Turirn and Karo's Beyt Yosef and Shulhan 'Arukh.19 Beyt Yosef adds, quoting Maimonides: 'And it is permissible to try out a drug on a heathen, if this serves a purpose'; and this is repeated also by the famous R. Moses Isserles.

 

   The consensus of halakhic authorities is that the term 'Gentiles' in the above doctrine refers to all non-Jews. A lone voice of dissent is that of R. Moses Rivkes, author of a minor commentary on the Shulhan Arukh, who writes.20

 

   Our sages only said this about heathens, who in their day worshipped idols and did not believe in the Jewish Exodus from Egypt or in the creation of the world ex nihilo. But the Gentiles in whose [protective] shade we, the people of Israel, are exiled and among whom we are scattered do believe in the creation of the world ex nihilo and in the Exodus and in several principles of our own religion and they pray to the Creator of heaven and earth ... Not only is there no interdiction against helping them, but we are even obliged to pray for their safety.

 

   This passage, dating from the second half of the 17th century, is a favorite quote of apologetic scholars.21 Actually, it does not go nearly as far as the apologetics pretend, for it advocates removing the ban on saving a Gentile's life, rather than making it mandatory as in the case of a Jew; and even this liberality extends only to Christians and Muslims but not the majority of human beings. Rather, what it does show is that there was a way in which the harsh doctrine of the Halakhah could have been progressively liberalized. But as a matter of fact the majority of later halakhic authorities, far from extending Rivkes' leniency to other human groups, have rejected it altogether.

 

 

 

 

 

Desecrating the Sabbath to Save Life

 

DESECRATING THE SABBATH - that is, doing work that would otherwise be banned on Saturday - becomes a duty when the need to save a Jew's life demands it.

 

   The problem of saving a Gentile's life on the sabbath is not raised in the Talmud as a main issue, since it is in any case forbidden even on a weekday; it does however enter as a complicating factor in two connections.

 

   First, there is a problem where a group of people are in danger, and it is possible (but not certain) that there is at least one Jew among them: should the sabbath be desecrated in order to save them? There is an extensive discussion of such cases. Following earlier authorities, including Maimonides and the Talmud itself, the Shulhan Arukh 22 decides these matters according to the weight of probabilities. For example, suppose nine Gentiles and one Jew live in the same building. One Saturday the building collapses; one of the ten - it is not known which one - is away, but the other nine are trapped under the rubble. Should the rubble be cleared, thus desecrating the sabbath, seeing that the Jew may not be under it (he may have been the one that got away)? The Shulhan 'Arukh says that it should, presumably because the odds that the Jew is under the rubble are high (nine to one). But now suppose that nine have got away and only one - again, it is not known which one - is trapped. Then there is no duty to clear the rubble, presumably because this time there are long odds (nine to one) against the Jew being the person trapped. Similarly: 'If a boat containing some Jews is seen to be in peril upon the sea, it is a duty incumbent upon all to desecrate the sabbath in order to save it.' However, the great R. 'Aqiva Eiger (died 1837) comments that this applies only 'when it is known that there are Jews on board. But ... if nothing at all is known about the identity of those on board, [the sabbath] must not be desecrated, for one acts according to [the weight of probabilities, and] the majority of people in the world are Gentiles.23 Thus, since there are very long odds against any of the passengers being Jewish, they must be allowed to drown.

 

   Secondly, the provision that a Gentile may be saved or cared for in order to avert the danger of hostility is curtailed on the sabbath. A Jew called upon to help a Gentile on a weekday may have to comply because to admit that he is not allowed, in principle, to save the life of a non-Jew would be to invite hostility. But on Saturday the Jew can use sabbath observance as a plausible excuse. A paradigmatic case discussed at length in the Talmud24 is that of a Jewish midwife invited to help a Gentile woman in childbirth. The upshot is that the midwife is allowed to help on a weekday 'for fear of hostility', but on the sabbath she must not do so, because she can excuse herself by saying: 'We are allowed to desecrate the sabbath only for our own, who observe the sabbath, but for your people, who do not keep the sabbath, we are not allowed to desecrate it.' Is this explanation a genuine one or merely an excuse? Maimonides clearly thinks that it is just an excuse, which can be used even if the task that the midwife is invited to do does not actually involve any desecration of the sabbath. Presumably, the excuse will work just as well even in this case, because Gentiles are generally in the dark as to precisely which kinds of work are banned for Jews on the sabbath. At any rate, he decrees: 'A Gentile woman must not be helped in childbirth on the sabbath, even for payment; nor must one fear hostility, even when [such help involves] no desecration of the sabbath.' The Shulhan 'Arukh decrees likewise.25

 

   Nevertheless, this sort of excuse could not always be relied upon to do the trick and avert Gentile hostility. Therefore certain important rabbinical authorities had to relax the rules to some extent and allowed Jewish doctors to treat Gentiles on the sabbath even if this involved doing certain types of work normally banned on that day. This partial relaxation applied particularly to rich and powerful Gentile patients, who could not be fobbed off so easily and whose hostility could be dangerous.

 

   Thus, R. Yo'el Sirkis, author of Bayit Hadash and one of the greatest rabbis of his time (Poland, 17th century), decided that 'mayors, petty nobles and aristocrats' should be treated on the sabbath, because of the fear of their hostility which involves 'some danger'. But in other cases, especially when the Gentile can be fobbed off with an evasive excuse, a Jewish doctor would commit 'an unbearable sin' by treating him on the sabbath. Later in the same century, a similar verdict was given in the French city of Metz, whose two parts were connected by a pontoon bridge. Jews are not normally allowed to cross such a bridge on the sabbath, but the rabbi of Metz decided that a Jewish doctor may nevertheless do so 'if he is called to the great governor': since the doctor is known to cross the bridge for the sake of his Jewish patients, the governor's hostility could be aroused if the doctor refused to do so for his sake. Under the authoritarian rule of Louis XIV, it was evidently important to have the goodwill of his intendant; the feelings of lesser Gentiles were of little importance.26

 

   Hokhrnat Shloinoh, a 19th century commentary on the Shulhan 'Arukh, mentions a similarly strict interpretation of the concept 'hostility' in connection with the Karaites, a small heretical Jewish sect. According to this view, their lives must not be saved if that would involve desecration of the sabbath, 'for "hostility" applies only to the heathen, who are many against us, and we are delivered into their hands .. But the Karaites are few and we are not delivered into their hands, [so] the fear of hostility does not apply to them at all.'27 In fact, the absolute ban on desecrating the sabbath in order to save the life of a Karaite is still in force today, as we shall see.

 

   The whole subject is extensively discussed in the responsa of R. Moshe Sofer - better known as 'Ilatam Sofer' - the famous rabbi of Pressburg (Bratislava) who died in 1832. His conclusions are of more than historical interest, since in 1966 one of his responsa was publicly endorsed by the then Chief Rabbi of Israel as 'a basic institution of the Halakhah'.28 The particular question asked of Ratam Sofer concerned the situation in Turkey, where it was decreed during one of the wars that in each township or village there should be midwives on call, ready to hire themselves out to any woman in labor. Some of these midwives were Jewish; should they hire themselves out to help Gentile women on weekdays and on the sabbath?

 

   In his Tesponsum,29 Hatam Sofer first concludes, after careful investigation, that the Gentiles concerned - that is, Ottoman Christians and Muslims - are not only idolators 'who definitely worship other gods and thus should "neither be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down",' but are likened by him to the Amalekites, so that the talmudic ruling 'it is forbidden to multiply the seed of Amalek' applies to them. In principle, therefore, they should not be helped even on week- days. However, in practice it is 'permitted' to heal Gentiles and help them in labor, if they have doctors and midwives of their own, who could be called instead of the Jewish ones. For if Jewish doctors and midwives refused to attend to Gentiles, the only result would be loss of income to the former - which is of course undesirable. This applies equally on weekdays and on the sabbath, provided no desecration of the sabbath is involved. However, in the latter case the sabbath can serve as an excuse to 'mislead the heathen woman and say that it would involve desecration of the sabbath'.

 

   In connection with cases that do actually involve desecration of the sabbath, Hatam Sofer - like other authorities - makes a distinction between two categories of work banned on the sabbath. First, there is work banned by the Torah, the biblical text (as interpreted by the Talmud); such work may only be performed in very exceptional cases, if failing to do so would cause an extreme danger of hostility towards Jews. Then there are types of work which are only banned by the sages who extended the original law of the Torah; the attitude towards breaking such bans is generally more lenient.

 

   Another response of Hatam Sofer deals with the question whether it is permissible for a Jewish doctor to travel by carriage on the sabbath in order to heal a Gentile. After pointing out that under certain conditions traveling by horse-drawn carriage on the sabbath only violates a ban imposed 'by the sages' rather than by the Torah, he goes on to recall Maimonides' pronouncement that Gentile women in labor must not be helped on the sabbath, even if no desecration of the sabbath is involved, and states that the same principle applies to all medical practice, not just midwifery. But he then voices the fear that if this were put into practice, 'it would arouse undesirable hostility,' for 'the Gentiles would not accept the excuse of sabbath observance,' and 'would say that the blood of an idolator has little worth in our eyes'. Also, perhaps more importantly, Gentile doctors might take revenge on their Jewish patients. Better excuses must be found. He advises a Jewish doctor who is called to treat a Gentile patient out of town on the sabbath to excuse himself by saying that he is required to stay in town in order to look after his other patients, 'for he can use this in order to say, "I cannot move because of the danger to this or that patient, who needs a doctor first, and I may not desert my charge"

 

   With such an excuse there is no fear of danger, for it is a reasonable pretext, commonly given by doctors who are late in arriving because another patient needed them first.' Only 'if it is impossible to give any excuse' is the doctor permitted to travel by carriage on the sabbath in order to treat a Gentile.

 

   In the whole discussion, the main issue is the excuses that should be made, not the actual healing or the welfare of the patient. And throughout it is taken for granted that it is all right to deceive Gentiles rather than treat them, so long as 'hostility' can be averted.31

 

   Of course, in modern times most Jewish doctors are not religious and do not even know of these rules. Moreover, it appears that even many who are religious prefer to their credit - to abide by the Hippocratic oath rather than by the precepts of their fanatic rabbis.32 However, the rabbis' guidance cannot fail to have some influence on some doctors; and there are certainly many who, while not actually following that guidance, choose not to protest against it publicly.

 

   All this is far from being a dead issue. The most up-to-date halakhic position on these matters is contained in a recent concise and authoritative book published in English under the title Jewish Medical Law.33 This book, which bears the imprint of the prestigious Israeli foundation Mossad Harav Kook, is based on the response of R. Eli'ezer Yehuda Waldenberg, Chief Justice of the Rabbinical District Court of Jerusalem. A few passages of this work deserve special mention.

 

   First, 'it is forbidden to desecrate the sabbath ... for a Karaite.'34 This is stated bluntly, absolutely and without any further qualification. Presumably the hostility of this small sect makes no difference, so they should be allowed to die rather than be treated on the sabbath.

 

   As for Gentiles: 'According to the ruling stated in the Talmud and Codes of Jewish Law, it is forbidden to desecrate the Sabbath - whether violating Biblical or rabbinic law - in order to save the life of a dangerously ill gentile patient. It is also forbidden to deliver the baby of a gentile women on the Sabbath.'35

 

   But this is qualified by a dispensation: 'However, today it is permitted to desecrate the Sabbath on behalf of a Gentile by performing actions prohibited by rabbinic law, for by so doing one prevents ill feelings from arising between Jew and Gentile.'36

 

   This does not go very far, because medical treatment very often involves acts banned on the sabbath by the Torah itself, which are not covered by this dispensation. There are, we are told, 'some' halakhic authorities who extend the dispensation to such acts as well - but this is just another way of saying that most halakhic authorities, and the ones that really count, take the opposite view. However, all is not lost. Jewish Medical Law has a truly breathtaking solution to this difficulty.

 

   The solution hangs upon a nice point of talmudic law. A ban imposed by the Torah on performing a given act on the sabbath is presumed to apply only when the primary intention in performing it is the actual outcome of the act. (For example. grinding wheat is presumed to be banned by the Torah only if the purpose is actually to obtain flour.) On the other hand, if the performance of the same act is merely incidental to some other purpose (melakhah seh'eynah tzrikhah legufah) then the act changes its status - it is still forbidden, to be sure, but only by the sages rather than by the Torah itself. Therefore: In order to avoid any transgression of the law, there is a legally acceptable method of rendering treatment on behalf of a gentile patient even when dealing with violation of Biblical Law. It is suggested that at the time that the physician is providing the necessary care, his intentions should not primarily be to cure the patient, but to protect himself and the Jewish people from accusations of religious discrimination and severe retaliation that may endanger him in particular and the Jewish people in general. With this intention, any act on the physician's part becomes an act whose actual outcome is not its primary purpose' ... which is forbidden on Sabbath only by rabbinic law.37

 

   This hypocritical substitute for the Hippocratic oath is also proposed by a recent authoritative Hebrew book.38

 

   Although the facts were mentioned at least twice in the Israeli press,39 the Israeli Medical Association has remained silent.

 

   Having treated in some detail the supremely important subject of the attitude of the Halakhah to a Gentile's very life, we shall deal much more briefly with other halakhic rules which discriminate against Gentiles. Since the number of such rules is very large, we shall mention only the more important ones.

 

 

 

 

 

Sexual Offenses

 

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE between a married Jewish woman and any man other than her husband is a capital offense for both parties, and one of the three most heinous sins. The status of Gentile women is very different. The Halakhah presumes all Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the verse 'whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue [of semen] is like the issue of horses'40 is applied to them. Whether a Gentile woman is married or not makes no difference, since as far as Jews are concerned the very concept of matrimony does not apply to Gentiles ('There is no matrimony for a heathen'). Therefore, the concept of adultery also does not apply to intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman; rather, the Talmud41 equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality. (For the same reason, Gentiles are generally presumed not to have certain paternity.)

 

   According to the Talmudic Encyclopedia: 42 'He who has carnal knowledge of the wife of a Gentile is not liable to the death penalty, for it is written: "thy fellow's wife"43 rather than the alien's wife; and even the precept that a man "shall cleave unto his wife"44 which is addressed to the Gentiles does not apply to a Jew, just there is no matrimony for a heathen; and although a married Gentile woman is forbidden to the Gentiles, in any case a Jew is exempted.'

 

   This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman is permitted - quite the contrary. But the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew: 'If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman, whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or unmarried, and even if he is a minor aged only nine years and one day - because he had willful coitus with her, she must be killed, as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into trouble'45 The Jew, however, must be flogged, and if he is a Kohen (member of the priestly tribe) he must receive double the number of lashes, because he has committed a double offense: a Kohen must not have intercourse with a prostitute, and all Gentile women are presumed to be prostitutes.46

 

 

 

 

 

Status

 

ACCORDING TO THE HALAKHAH, Jews must not (if they can help it) allow a Gentile to be appointed to any position of authority, however small, over Jews. (The two stock examples are commander over ten soldiers in the Jewish army' and 'superintendent of an irrigation ditch'.) Significantly, this particular rule applies also to converts to Judaism and to their descendants (through the female line) for ten generations or 'so long as the descent is known'.

 

   Gentiles are presumed to be congenital liars, and are disqualified from testifying in a rabbinical court. In this respect their position is, in theory, the same as that of Jewish women, slaves and minors; but in practice it is actually worse. A Jewish woman is nowadays admitted as a witness to certain matters of fact, when the rabbinical court 'believes' her; a Gentile - never.

 

   A problem therefore arises when a rabbinical court needs to establish a fact for which there are only Gentile witnesses. An important example of this is in cases concerning widows: by Jewish religious law, a woman can be declared a widow - and hence free to remarry - only if the death of her husband is proven with certainty by means of a witness who saw him die or identified his corpse. However, the rabbinical court will accept the hearsay evidence of a Jew who testifies to having heard the fact in question mentioned by a Gentile eyewitness, provided the court is satisfied that the latter was speaking casually ('goy mesiah left tummd) rather than in reply to a direct question; for a Gentile's direct answer to a Jew's direct question is presumed to be a lie.47 If necessary, a Jew (preferably a rabbi) will actually undertake to chat up the Gentile eyewitness and, without asking a direct question, extract from him a casual statement of the fact at issue.

 

 

 

Money and Property

 

(1) Gifts. The Talmud bluntly forbids giving a gift to a Gentile. However, classical rabbinical authorities bent this rule because it is customary among businessmen to give gifts to business contacts. It was therefore laid down that a Jew may give a gift to a Gentile acquaintance, since this is regarded not as a true gift but as a sort of investment, for which some return is expected. Gifts to 'unfamiliar Gentiles' remain forbidden. A broadly similar rule applies to almsgiving. Giving alms to a Jewish beggar is an important religious duty. Alms to Gentile beggars are merely permitted for the sake of peace. However there are numerous rabbinical warnings against allowing the Gentile poor to become 'accustomed' to receiving alms from Jews, so that it should be possible to withhold such alms without arousing undue hostility.

 

(2) Taking of interest. Anti-Gentile discrimination in this matter has become largely theoretical, in view of the dispensation (explained in Chapter 3) which in effect allows interest to be exacted even from a Jewish borrower. However, it is still the case that granting an interest-free loan to a Jew is recommended as an act of charity, but from a Gentile borrower it is mandatory to exact interest. In fact, many - though not all - rabbinical authorities, including Maimonides, consider it mandatory to exact as much usury as possible on a loan to a Gentile.

 

(3) Lost property. If a Jew finds property whose probable owner is Jewish, the finder is strictly enjoined to make a positive effort to return his find by advertising it publicly. In contrast, the Talmud and all the early rabbinical authorities not only allow a Jewish finder to appropriate an article lost by a Gentile, but actually forbid him or her to return it.48 In more recent times, when laws were passed in most countries making it mandatory to return lost articles, the rabbinical authorities instructed Jews to do what these laws say, as an act of civil obedience to the state - but not as a religious duty, that is without making a positive effort to discover the owner if it is not probable that he is Jewish.

 

(4) Deception in business. It is a grave sin to practice any kind of deception whatsoever against a Jew. Against a Gentile it is only forbidden to practice direct deception. Indirect deception is allowed, unless it is likely to cause hostility towards Jews or insult to the Jewish religion. The paradigmatic example is mistaken calculation of the price during purchase. If a Jew makes a mistake unfavorable to himself, it is one's religious duty to correct him. If a Gentile is spotted making such a mistake, one need not let him know about it, but say 'I rely on your calculation', so as to forestall his hostility in case he subsequently discovers his own mistake.

 

(5) Fraud. It is forbidden to defraud a Jew by selling or buying at an unreasonable price. However, 'Fraud does not apply to Gentiles, for it is written: "Do not defraud each man his brother";49 but a Gentile who defrauds a Jew should be compelled to make good the fraud, but should not be punished more severely than a Jew [in a similar case].'50

 

(6) Theft and robbery. Stealing (without violence) is absolutely forbidden - as the Shulhan 'Arukh so nicely puts it: 'even from a Gentile'. Robbery (with violence) is strictly forbidden if the victim is Jewish. However, robbery of a Gentile by a Jew is not forbidden outright but only under certain circumstances such as 'when the Gentiles are not under our rule', but is permitted 'when they are under our rule'. Rabbinical authorities differ among themselves as to the precise details of the circumstances under which a Jew may rob a Gentile, but the whole debate is concerned only with the relative power of Jews and Gentiles rather than with universal considerations of justice and humanity. This may explain why so very few rabbis have protested against the robbery of Palestinian property in Israel: it was backed by overwhelming Jewish power.

 

 

 

 

 

Gentiles in the Land of lsrael

 

IN ADDITION TO THE GENERAL anti-Gentile laws, the Halakhah has special laws against Gentiles who live in the Land of Israel (Eretz Yisra'el) or, in some cases, merely pass through it. These laws are designed to promote Jewish supremacy in that country.

 

   The exact geographical definition of the term 'Land of Israel' is much disputed in the Talmud and the talmudic literature, and the debate has continued in modern times between the various shades of zionist opinion. According to the maximalist view, the Land of Israel includes (in addition to Palestine itself) not only the whole of Sinai, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, but also considerable parts of Turkey.51 The more prevalent 'minimalist' interpretation puts the northern border 'only' about half way through Syria and Lebanon, at the latitude of Homs. This view was supported by Ben Gurion. However, even those who thus exclude parts of Syria-Lebanon agree that certain special discriminatory laws (though less oppressive than in the Land of Israel proper) apply to the Gentiles of those parts, because that territory was included in David's kingdom. In all talmudic interpretations the Land of Israel includes Cyprus.

 

   I shall now list a few of the special laws concerning Gentiles in the Land of Israel. Their connection with actual zionist practice will be quite apparent.

 

   The Halakhah forbids Jews to sell immovable property - fields and houses - in the Land of Israel to Gentiles. In Syria, the sale of houses (but not of fields) is permitted.

 

   Leasing a house in the Land of Israel to a Gentile is permitted under two conditions. First, that the house shall not be used for habitation but for other purposes, such as storage. Second, that three or more adjoining houses shall not be so leased.

 

   These and several other rules are explained as follows: ... 'so that you shall not allow them to camp on the ground, for if they do not possess land, their sojourn there will be temporary.'52 Even temporary Gentile presence may only be tolerated 'when the Jews are in exile, or when the Gentiles are more powerful than the Jews,' but when the Jews are more powerful than the Gentiles we are forbidden to let an idolator among us; even a temporary resident or itinerant trader shall not be allowed to pass through our land unless he accepts the seven Noahide precepts,53 for it is written: 'they shall not dwell in thy land'54 that is, not even temporarily. If he accepts the seven Noahide precepts, he becomes a resident alien (ger toshav) but it is forbidden to grant the status of resident alien except at times when the Jubilee is held [that is, when the Temple stands and sacrifices are offered]. However, during times when Jubilees are not held it is forbidden to accept anyone who is not a full convert to Judaism (ger tzedeq).55

 

   It is therefore clear that - exactly as the leaders and sympathizers of Gush Emunim say - the whole question to how the Palestinians ought to be treated is, according to the Halakhah, simply a question of Jewish power: if Jews have sufficient power, then it is their religious duty to expel the Palestinians.

 

   All these laws are often quoted by Israeli rabbis and their zealous followers. For example, the law forbidding the lease of three adjoining houses to Gentiles was solemnly quoted by a rabbinical conference held in 1979 to discuss the Camp David treaties. The conference also declared that according to the Halakhah even the 'autonomy' that Begin was ready to offer to the Palestinians is too liberal. Such pronouncements - which do in fact state correctly the position of the Halakhah - are rarely contested by the Zionist 'left'.

 

   In addition to laws such as those mentioned so far, which are directed at all Gentiles in the Land of Israel, an even greater evil influence arises from special laws against the ancient Canaanites and other nations who lived in Palestine before its conquest by Joshua, as well as against the Amalekites. All those nations must be utterly exterminated, and the Talmud and talmudic literature reiterate the genocidal biblical exhortations with even greater vehemence. Influential rabbis, who have a considerable following among Israeli army officers, identify the Palestinians (or even all Arabs) with those ancient nations, so that commands like 'thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth'56 acquire a topical meaning. In fact, it is not uncommon for reserve soldiers called up to do a tour of duty in the Gaza Strip to be given an 'educational lecture' in which they are told that the Palestinians of Gaza are 'like the Amalekites'. Biblical verses exhorting to genocide of the Midianite57 were solemnly quoted by an important Israeli rabbi in justification of the Qibbiya massacre,58 and this pronouncement has gained wide circulation in the Israeli army. There are many similar examples of bloodthirsty rabbinical pronouncements against the Palestinians, based on these laws.

 

 

 

 

 

Abuse

 

UNDER THIS HEADING I would like to discuss examples of halakhic laws whose most important effect is not so much to prescribe specific anti-Gentile discrimination as to inculcate an attitude of scorn and hatred towards Gentiles. Accordingly. in this section I shall not confine myself to quoting from the most authoritative halakhic sources (as I have done so far) but include also less fundamental works, which are however widely used in religious instruction.

 

   Let us begin with the text of some common prayers. In one of the first sections of the daily morning payer, every devout Jew blesses God for not making him a Gentile.59 The concluding section of the daily prayer (which is also used in the most solemn part of the service on New Year's day and on Yom Kippur) opens with the statement: 'We must praise the Lord of all ... for not making us like the nations of [all] lands ... for they bow down to vanity and nothingness and pray to a god that does not help.'60 The last clause was censored out of the prayer books. but in eastern Europe it was supplied orally, and has now been restored into many Israeli-printed prayer books. In the most important section of the weekday prayer - the 'eighteen blessings' - there is a special curse, originally directed against Christians, Jewish converts to Christianity and other Jewish heretics: 'And may the apostates'61 have no hope, and all the Christians perish instantly'. This formula dates from the end of the 1st century, when Christianity was still a small persecuted sect. Some time before the 14th century it was softened into: 'And may the apostates have no hope. and all the heretics62 perish instantly', and after additional pressure into: 'And may the informers have no hope, and all the heretics perish instantly'. After the establishment of Israel. the process was reversed, and many newly printed prayer books reverted to the second formula, which was also prescribed by many teachers in religious Israeli schools. After 1967, several congregations close to Gush Emunim have restored the first version (so far only verbally, not in print) and now pray daily that the Christians may perish instantly'. This process of reversion happened in the period when the Catholic Church (under Pope John XXIII) removed from its Good Friday service a prayer which asked the Lord to have mercy on Jews, heretics etc. This prayer was thought by most Jewish leaders to be offensive and even antisemitic.

 

    Apart from the fixed daily prayers, a devout Jew must utter special short blessings on various occasions, both good and bad (for example, while putting on a new piece of clothing. eating a seasonal fruit for the first time that year, seeing powerful lightning, hearing bad news, etc.) Some of these occasional prayers serve to inculcate hatred and scorn for all Gentiles, We have mentioned in Chapter 2 the rule according to which a pious Jew must utter a curse when passing near a Gentile cemetery, whereas he must bless God when passing near a Jewish cemetery. A similar rule applies to the living; thus, when seeing a large Jewish population a devout Jew must praise God, while upon seeing a large Gentile population he must utter a curse. Nor are buildings exempt: the Talmud lays down63 that a Jew who passes near an inhabited non-Jewish dwelling must ask God to destroy it, whereas if the building is in ruins he must thank the Lord of Vengeance. (Naturally, the rules are reversed for Jewish houses.) This rule was easy to keep for Jewish peasants who lived in their own villages or for small urban communities living in all-Jewish townships or quarters. Under the conditions of classical Judaism, however, it became impracticable and was therefore confined to churches and places of worship of other religions (except Islam).64 In this connection, the rule was further embroidered by custom: it became customary to spit (usually three times) upon seeing a church or a crucifix, as an embellishment to the obligatory formula of regret.65 Sometimes insulting biblical verses were also added.66

 

   There is also a series of rules forbidding any expression of praise for Gentiles or for their deeds, except where such praise implies an even greater praise of Jews and things Jewish. This rule is still observed by Orthodox Jews. For example. the writer Agnon, when interviewed on the Israeli radio upon his return from Stockholm, where he received the Nobel Prize for literature, praised the Swedish Academy, but hastened to add: 'I am not forgetting that it is forbidden to praise Gentiles, but here there is a special reason for my praise' - that is, that they awarded the prize to a Jew.

 

   Similarly, it is forbidden to join any manifestation of popular Gentile rejoicing, except where failing to join in might cause 'hostility' towards Jews, in which case a 'minimal' show of joy is allowed.

 

   In addition to the rules mentioned so far, there are many others whose effect is to inhibit human friendship between Jew and Gentile. I shall mention two examples: the rule on 'libation wine' and that on preparing food for a Gentile on Jewish holy days.

 

   A religious Jew must not drink any wine in whose preparation a Gentile had any part whatsoever. Wine in an open bottle, even if prepared wholly by Jews, becomes banned if a Gentile so much as touches the bottle or passes a hand over it. The reason given by the rabbis is that all Gentiles are not only idolators but must be presumed to be malicious to boot, so that they are likely to dedicate (by a whisper, gesture or thought) as 'libation' to their idol any wine which a Jew is about to drink. This law applies in full force to all Christians, and in a slightly attenuated form also to Muslims. (An open bottle of wine touched by a Christian must be poured away, but if touched by a Muslim it can be sold or given away, although it may not be drunk by a Jew.) The law applies equally to Gentile atheists (how can one be sure that they are not merely pretending to be atheists?) but not to Jewish atheists.

 

   The laws against doing work on the sabbath apply to a lesser extent on other holy days. In particular, on a holy day which does not happen to fall on a Saturday it is permitted to do any work required for preparing food to be eaten during the holy days or days. Legally, this is defined as preparing a 'soul's food' (okhel nefesh); but 'soul' is interpreted to mean 'Jew', and 'Gentiles and dogs' are explicitly excluded.67 There is, however, a dispensation in favor of powerful Gentiles, whose hostility can be dangerous: it is permitted to cook food on a holy day for a visitor belonging to this category, provided he is not actively encouraged to come and eat.

 

   An important effect of all these laws - quite apart from their application in practice - is in the attitude created by their constant study which, as part of the study of the Halakhah, is regarded by classical Judaism as a supreme religious duty. Thus an Orthodox Jew learns from his earliest youth, as part of his sacred studies, that Gentiles are compared to dogs, that it is a sin to praise them, and so on and so forth. As a matter of fact, in this respect textbooks for beginners have a worse effect than the Talmud and the great talmudic codes. One reason for this is that such elementary texts give more detailed explanations, phrased so as to influence young and uneducated minds. Out of a large number of such texts, I have chosen the one which is currently most popular in Israel and has been reprinted in many cheap editions, heavily subsidized by the Israeli government. It is The Book of Education, written by an anonymous rabbi in early 14th century Spain. It explains the 613 religious obligations (mitzvot) of Judaism in the order in which they are supposed to be found in the Pentateuch according to the talmudic interpretation (discussed in Chapter 3). It owes its lasting influence and popularity to the clear and easy Hebrew style in which it is written.

 

   A central didactic aim of this book is to emphasize the 'correct' meaning of the Bible with respect to such terms as 'fellow', 'friend' or 'man' (which we have referred to in Chapter 3). Thus §219, devoted to the religious obligation arising from the verse 'thou shalt love thy fellow as thyself', is entitled: 'A religious obligation to love Jews', and explains:

 

   To love every Jew strongly means that we should care for a Jew and his money just as one cares for oneself and one's own money, for it is written: 'thou shalt love thy fellow as thyself' and our sages of blessed memory said: 'what is hateful to you do not do to your friend' ... and many other religious obligations follow from this, because one who loves one's friend as oneself will not steal his money, or commit adultery with his wife, or defraud him of his money, or deceive him verbally, or steal his land, or harm him in any way. Also many other religious obligations depend on this, as is known to any reasonable man.

 

   In §322, dealing with the duty to keep a Gentile slave enslaved for ever (whereas a Jewish slave must be set free after seven years), the following explanation is given:

 

   And at the root of this religious obligation [is the fact that] the Jewish people are the best of the human species, created to know their Creator and worship Him, and worthy of having slaves to serve them. And if they will not have slaves of other peoples, they would have to enslave their brothers, who would thus be unable to serve the Lord, blessed be He. Therefore we are commanded to possess those for our service, after they are prepared for this and after idolatory is removed from their speech so that there should not be danger in our houses,68 and this is the intention of the verse 'but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigor',69 so that you will not have to enslave your brothers, who are all ready to worship God.

 

   In §545, dealing with the religious obligation to exact interest on money lent to Gentiles, the law is stated as follows: 'That we are commanded to demand interest from Gentiles when we lend money to them, and we must not lend to them without interest,' The explanation is:

 

   And at the root of this religious obligation is that we should not do any act of mercy except to the people who know God and worship Him; and when we refrain from doing merciful deed to the rest of mankind and do so only to the former, we are being tested that the main part of love and mercy to them is because they follow the religion of God, blessed be He. Behold, with this intention our reward [from God] when we withhold mercy from the others is equal to that for doing [merciful deeds] to members of our own people.

 

   Similar distinctions are made in numerous other passages. In explaining the ban against delaying a worker's wage (§238) the author is careful to point out that the sin is less serious if the worker is Gentile. The prohibition against cursing (§239) is entitled 'Not to curse any Jew, whether man or woman. Similarly, the prohibitions against giving misleading advice, hating other people, shaming them or taking revenge on them (§§240, 245, 246, 247) apply only to fellow-Jews.

 

   The ban against following Gentile customs (§262) means that Jews must not only 'remove themselves' from Gentiles, but also 'speak ill of all their behavior, even of their dress'.

 

   It must be emphasized that the explanations quoted above do represent correctly the teaching of the Halakhah. The rabbis and, even worse, the apologetic 'scholars of Judaism' know this very well and for this reason they do not try to argue against such views inside the Jewish community; and of course they never mention them outside it. Instead, they vilify any Jew who raises these matters within earshot of Gentiles, and they issue deceitful denials in which the art of equivocation reaches its summit. For example, they state, using general terms, the importance which Judaism attaches to mercy; but what they forget to point out is that according to the Halakhah 'mercy' means mercy towards Jews.

 

   Anyone who lives in Israel knows how deep and widespread these attitudes of hatred and cruelty to towards all Gentiles are among the majority of Israeli Jews. Normally these attitudes are disguised from the outside world, but since the establishment of the State of Israel, the 1967 war and the rise of Begin, a significant minority of Jews, both in Israel and abroad, have gradually become more open about such matters. In recent years the inhuman precepts according to which servitude is the 'natural' lot of Gentiles have been publicly quoted in Israel, even on TV, by Jewish farmers exploiting Arab labor, particularly child labor. Gush Emunim leaders have quoted religious precepts which enjoin Jews to oppress Gentiles, as a justification of the attempted assassination of Palestinian mayors and as divine authority for their own plan to expel all the Arabs from Palestine.

 

   While many zionists reject these positions politically, their standard counter-arguments are based on considerations of expediency and Jewish self-interest, rather than on universally valid principles of humanism and ethics. For example, they argue that the exploitation and oppression of Palestinians by Israelis tends to corrupt Israeli society, or that the expulsion of the Palestinians is impracticable under present political conditions, or that Israeli acts of terror against the Palestinians tend to isolate Israel internationally. In principle, however, virtually all zionists - and in particular 'left' zionists - share the deep anti-Gentile attitudes which Orthodox Judaism keenly promotes.

 

 

 

 

 

Attitudes to Christianity and Islam

 

IN THE FOREGOING, several examples of the rabbinical attitudes to these two religions were given in passing. But it will be useful to summarize these attitudes here.

 

   Judaism is imbued with a very deep hatred towards Christianity, combined with ignorance about it. This attitude was clearly aggravated by the Christian persecutions of Jews, but is largely independent of them. In fact, it dates from the time when Christianity was still weak and persecuted (not least by Jews), and it was shared by Jews who had never been persecuted by Christians or who were even helped by them. Thus, Maimonides was subjected to Muslim persecutions by the regime of the Almohads and escaped from them first to the crusaders' Kingdom of Jerusalem, but this did not change his views in the least. This deeply negative attitude is based on two main elements.

 

   First, on hatred and malicious slanders against Jesus. The traditional view of Judaism on Jesus must of course be sharply distinguished from the nonsensical controversy between antisemites and Jewish apologists concerning the 'responsibility' for his execution. Most modern scholars of that period admit that due to the lack of original and contemporary accounts, the late composition of the Gospels and the contradictions between them, accurate historical knowledge of the circumstances of Jesus' execution is not available. In any case, the notion of collective and inherited guilt is both wicked and absurd. However, what is at issue here is not the actual facts about Jesus, but the inaccurate and even slanderous reports in the Talmud and post-talmudic literature - which is what Jews believed until the 19th century and many, especially in Israel, still believe. For these reports certainly played an important role in forming the Jewish attitude to Christianity.

 

   According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.

 

   The more popular accounts - which were nevertheless taken quite seriously - such as the notorious Toldot Yesbu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name 'Jesus' was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable, and this popular tradition still persists.70 The Gospels are equally detested, and they are not allowed to be quoted (let alone taught) even in modern Israeli Jewish schools.

 

   Secondly, for theological reasons, mostly rooted in ignorance, Christianity as a religion is classed by rabbinical teaching as idolatry. This is based on a crude interpretation of the Christian doctrines on the Trinity and Incarnation. All the Christian emblems and pictorial representations are regarded as 'idols' - even by those Jews who literally worship scrolls, stones or personal belongings of 'Holy Men'.

 

   The attitude of Judaism towards Islam is, in contrast, relatively mild. Although the stock epithet given to Muhammad is 'madman' ('meshugga'), this was not nearly as offensive as it may sound now, and in any case it pales before the abusive terms applied to Jesus. Similarly, the Qur'an - unlike the New Testament - is not condemned to burning. It is not honored in the same way as Islamic law honors the Jewish sacred scrolls, but is treated as an ordinary book. Most rabbinical authorities agree that Islam is not idolatry (although some leaders of Gush Emunim now choose to ignore this). Therefore the Halakhah decrees that Muslims should not be treated by Jews any worse than 'ordinary' Gentiles. But also no better. Again, Maimonides can serve as an illustration. He explicitly states that Islam is not idolatry, and in his philosophical works he quotes, with great respect, many Islamic philosophical authorities. He was, as I have mentioned before, personal physician to Saladin and his family, and by Saladin's order he was appointed Chief over all Egypt's Jews. Yet, the rules he lays down against saving a Gentile's life (except in order to avert danger to Jews) apply equally to Muslims. jewhist5.htm

 

 

 

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jewhis5.htm#The%20Laws%20Against%20Non-Jews

 

#####Some redpill reading/video material######

 

+

 

The International Jew (Obviously)

 

The Protocols of Zion (Which have all come true except the World Government one)

 

It will explain about 1/4 of 19th/20th/21st century Zionist Judaism led by the Rothschilds.

 

For Jewish crimes hundreds and thousands of years ago, you need to study the big events in history with your eyes wide open and Jew-radar running.

 

Spanish Conquistadors (Cortez & Columbus both Jews):

http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Truth_Hertz/Truth_Hertz.2012-05-30_16k.mp3

 

Part 2: http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Truth_Hertz/Truth_Hertz.2012-06-01_16k.mp3

 

Read the free pages on this site: http://www.tomatobubble.com/fh2.html

 

Read the Bible, the Protocols of Zion, then read Eustace Mullins books like Curse of Canaan and Biological Jew while you stumble upon other things.

 

Small bits:

- http://www.subvertednation.net/general-patton-discovered-the-truth/

 

 

And once you've thoroughly explored those two you may start to look at WWII in a different light. In which case you'll be interest in this:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lejfGhWeakY

(and it's sequels)

 

After getting a different point of view on WWII you might be interested in the truth about the Holocaust:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw9kqR3RsqU

 

And at some stage you may be interested in Hitlers own personal writings

 

hitler's story

 

Part 1 is worth it alone for the info on Hitler's world war 1 experience

part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lejfGhWeakY

 

part2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VisqRp_RGl4&feature=relmfu

 

part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl6lC7To-jA&feature=relmfu

 

part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTzGznIb6Cs&feature=relmfu

 

part 5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSJfjM0BfD0&feature=relmfu

 

part 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DqJXgboalY&feature=relmfu

 

Urban Law 101: Adventures with Black Clients

http://www.amren.com/ar/2003/09/index.html

A White Teacher Speaks Out

http://www.amren.com/ar/2009/07/index.html

Morality and Abstract Thinking – How Africans may differ from Westerners

https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

 

http://archive.org/details/UnderTheSignOfTheScorpion

 

Under The Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina

 

The protocols, they are claimed to be a fraud, but everything in the protocols has come to pass except for the establishment for their world government

 

here it is in spoken form in modern english

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOEf0CRa54A

 

here is her reading the protocols http://www.spingola.com/LindseyProtocolsComplete.mp3

 

also this is other stuff with her: http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/03/06/deanna-spingola-and-keith-johnson-dissect-the-idiotic-invocations-of-hitler-and-the-nazis-by-paytriotards/

 

http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/05/27/zcf-and-deanna-spingola-podcast-may-27-2012/

 

Dr. William Pierce's radio shows cover a lot of ground:

 

http://archive.org/details/DrWilliamPierceAudioArchive308RadioBroadcasts

 

The White Nationalist debate pdf.

 

http://www.mediafire.com/?mpq32y4e804ixqd

 

I can recommend David Duke's "My Awakening" which both cites tons of scientific studies on racial differences and has a great treatment of the Jewish Question. It's on archive.org as both a .pdf and as an audiobook:

http://archive.org/details/MyAwakeningAPathToRacialUnderstanding

 

Another great site is http://jewishracism.blogspot.com by Christopher Jon Bjerknes and also the books he wrote (which you can find on wnlibrary.com) as well as the interviews he gave ( http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=277516189423072580 ). Shit might sound a bit crazy at first, but he actually has plenty of evidence for most of the claims he makes.

Apart from that, check these out:

 

Jews in the media

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

http://www.davidduke.com/?p=503

http://www.natvan.com/leaflets/WRA.pdf

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/culture/2/Film/American_and_European/Hollywood_and_Judaism.shtml

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/culture/2/Literature/Jewish_American_Literature/Into_the_Literary_Mainstream/Comic_Books.shtml

http://radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/hollyjew.htm

http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/jews-in-the-media-hollywood/

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-big-media/

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-hollywood/

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-television/

http://www.lukeford.net/essays/contents/Hollywood_Jews.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Empire_Of_Their_Own:_How_the_Jews_Invented_Hollywood

 

The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish:

http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/white-man-s-burden-1.14110

 

Jews and Communism

Winston Churchill: Zionism versus Bolshevism

http://www.youtu.be/Jg0DAvMNw6c

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism

Stalin's Jews:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Jews in Communist China's government:

http://jewishfaces.com/china.html

 

The Jewish Path to Success: Nepotism

http://www.forward.com/articles/7806/

 

Jewish Australian MP: "Bring Israel’s African Immigrants to Australia!"

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/07/jewish-australian-mp-bring-israels-african-immigrants-to-australia/

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=227332

 

Stephen Steinlight, Head of American Jewish Congress: The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demography

http://youtu.be/srq3oaXrYXU

http://www.cis.org/ChangingDemography-JewishInterestImmigrationPolicy

 

The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

 

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Madagascar_plan

 

Virtually all Jews are Pro-Israel/Zionists:

http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?ID=221750&R=R1

http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/about/visitorcomments/comment_details.cfm?ItemNo=1048

 

Israeli students to get $2,000 to spread state propaganda on Facebook

http://electronicintifada.net/comment/2626

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasbara_fellowships

Israelis taking courses on how to plant Zionist propaganda on Wikipedia:

http://youtu.be/t52LB2fYhoY

 

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/exclusive-hate-all-non-jews-skvere-rabbis-say/

 

 

++Skeptical Birther Controversial Material++

 

Obamas grandmother says he was born in Kenya.

 

Michelle has said twice that he was born in Kenya:

 

http://youtu.be/6M7Rp_Ghv6k

http://youtu.be/fKoWoEHQMHs

 

He published best sellers for 16 years saying he was born in Kenya.

 

Kenya was a British colony when he was born, making him a British subject.

 

 

 

[IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE FOR FORUMS]

 

|@@@@@@@+++=!WHY & HOW FORUM SLIDING HAS BEEN HAPPENING EXPLAINED!=+++@@@@@@@|

 

1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum

2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)

5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

 

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'

 

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'

 

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

 

Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'

 

A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'

 

Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'

 

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

 

Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'

 

Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

 

Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'

 

Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

 

Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'

 

It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

 

Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

 

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

 

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.

 

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

 

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

 

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

 

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

 

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

 

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

 

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

 

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

 

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

 

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

 

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

 

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

 

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

 

16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.

 

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

 

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

 

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

 

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

 

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.

 

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

 

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

 

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.

 

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

 

1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

 

2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

 

3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

 

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

 

5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

 

6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.

 

Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo.

 

With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.

 

7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.

 

I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.

 

8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

 

a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

 

b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command.

 

c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.

 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)

 

One way to neutralize a potential activist is to get them to be in a group that does all the wrong things. Why?

 

1) The message doesn't get out.

2) A lot of time is wasted

3) The activist is frustrated and discouraged

4) Nothing good is accomplished.

 

FBI and Police Informers and Infiltrators will infest any group and they have phoney activist organizations established.

 

Their purpose is to prevent any real movement for justice or eco-peace from developing in this country.

 

Agents come in small, medium or large. They can be of any ethnic background. They can be male or female.

 

The actual size of the group or movement being infiltrated is irrelevant. It is the potential the movement has for becoming large which brings on the spies and saboteurs.

 

This booklet lists tactics agents use to slow things down, foul things up, destroy the movement and keep tabs on activists.

 

It is the agent's job to keep the activist from quitting such a group, thus keeping him/her under control.

 

In some situations, to get control, the agent will tell the activist:

 

"You're dividing the movement."

 

[Here, I have added the psychological reasons as to WHY this maneuver works to control people]

 

This invites guilty feelings. Many people can be controlled by guilt. The agents begin relationships with activists behind a well-developed mask of "dedication to the cause." Because of their often declared dedication, (and actions designed to prove this), when they criticize the activist, he or she - being truly dedicated to the movement - becomes convinced that somehow, any issues are THEIR fault. This is because a truly dedicated person tends to believe that everyone has a conscience and that nobody would dissimulate and lie like that "on purpose." It's amazing how far agents can go in manipulating an activist because the activist will constantly make excuses for the agent who regularly declares their dedication to the cause. Even if they do, occasionally, suspect the agent, they will pull the wool over their own eyes by rationalizing: "they did that unconsciously... they didn't really mean it... I can help them by being forgiving and accepting " and so on and so forth.

 

The agent will tell the activist:

 

"You're a leader!"

 

This is designed to enhance the activist's self-esteem. His or her narcissistic admiration of his/her own activist/altruistic intentions increase as he or she identifies with and consciously admires the altruistic declarations of the agent which are deliberately set up to mirror those of the activist.

 

This is "malignant pseudoidentification." It is the process by which the agent consciously imitates or simulates a certain behavior to foster the activist's identification with him/her, thus increasing the activist's vulnerability to exploitation. The agent will simulate the more subtle self-concepts of the activist.

 

Activists and those who have altruistic self-concepts are most vulnerable to malignant pseudoidentification especially during work with the agent when the interaction includes matter relating to their competency, autonomy, or knowledge.

 

The goal of the agent is to increase the activist's general empathy for the agent through pseudo-identification with the activist's self-concepts.

 

The most common example of this is the agent who will compliment the activist for his competency or knowledge or value to the movement. On a more subtle level, the agent will simulate affects and mannerisms of the activist which promotes identification via mirroring and feelings of "twinship". It is not unheard of for activists, enamored by the perceived helpfulness and competence of a good agent, to find themselves considering ethical violations and perhaps, even illegal behavior, in the service of their agent/handler.

 

The activist's "felt quality of perfection" [self-concept] is enhanced, and a strong empathic bond is developed with the agent through his/her imitation and simulation of the victim's own narcissistic investments. [self-concepts] That is, if the activist knows, deep inside, their own dedication to the cause, they will project that onto the agent who is "mirroring" them.

 

The activist will be deluded into thinking that the agent shares this feeling of identification and bonding. In an activist/social movement setting, the adversarial roles that activists naturally play vis a vis the establishment/government, fosters ongoing processes of intrapsychic splitting so that "twinship alliances" between activist and agent may render whole sectors or reality testing unavailable to the activist. They literally "lose touch with reality."

 

Activists who deny their own narcissistic investments [do not have a good idea of their own self-concepts and that they ARE concepts] and consciously perceive themselves (accurately, as it were) to be "helpers" endowed with a special amount of altruism are exceedingly vulnerable to the affective (emotional) simulation of the accomplished agent.

 

Empathy is fostered in the activist through the expression of quite visible affects. The presentation of tearfulness, sadness, longing, fear, remorse, and guilt, may induce in the helper-oriented activist a strong sense of compassion, while unconsciously enhancing the activist's narcissistic investment in self as the embodiment of goodness.

 

The agent's expresssion of such simulated affects may be quite compelling to the observer and difficult to distinguish from deep emotion.

 

It can usually be identified by two events, however:

 

First, the activist who has analyzed his/her own narcissistic roots and is aware of his/her own potential for being "emotionally hooked," will be able to remain cool and unaffected by such emotional outpourings by the agent.

 

As a result of this unaffected, cool, attitude, the Second event will occur: The agent will recompensate much too quickly following such an affective expression leaving the activist with the impression that "the play has ended, the curtain has fallen," and the imposture, for the moment, has finished. The agent will then move quickly to another activist/victim.

 

The fact is, the movement doesn't need leaders, it needs MOVERS. "Follow the leader" is a waste of time.

 

A good agent will want to meet as often as possible. He or she will talk a lot and say little. One can expect an onslaught of long, unresolved discussions.

 

Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:

 

1) To disrupt the agenda

2) To side-track the discussion

3) To interrupt repeatedly

4) To feign ignorance

5) To make an unfounded accusation against a person.

 

Calling someone a racist, for example. This tactic is used to discredit a person in the eyes of all other group members.

 

Saboteurs

 

Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ....

 

1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in the present day, websites)

2) Print flyers in English only.

3) Have demonstrations in places where no one cares.

4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support

5) Display banners with too many words that are confusing.

6) Confuse issues.

7) Make the wrong demands.

Cool Compromise the goal.

9) Have endless discussions that waste everyone's time. The agent may accompany the endless discussions with drinking, pot smoking or other amusement to slow down the activist's work.

 

Provocateurs

 

1) Want to establish "leaders" to set them up for a fall in order to stop the movement.

2) Suggest doing foolish, illegal things to get the activists in trouble.

3) Encourage militancy.

4) Want to taunt the authorities.

5) Attempt to make the activist compromise their values.

6) Attempt to instigate violence. Activisim ought to always be non-violent.

7) Attempt to provoke revolt among people who are ill-prepared to deal with the reaction of the authorities to such violence.

 

Informants

 

1) Want everyone to sign up and sing in and sign everything.

2) Ask a lot of questions (gathering data).

3) Want to know what events the activist is planning to attend.

4) Attempt to make the activist defend him or herself to identify his or her beliefs, goals, and level of committment.

 

Recruiting

 

Legitimate activists do not subject people to hours of persuasive dialog. Their actions, beliefs, and goals speak for themselves.

 

Groups that DO recruit are missionaries, military, and fake political parties or movements set up by agents.

 

Surveillance

 

ALWAYS assume that you are under surveillance.

 

At this point, if you are NOT under surveillance, you are not a very good activist!

 

Scare Tactics

 

They use them.

 

Such tactics include slander, defamation, threats, getting close to disaffected or minimally committed fellow activists to persuade them (via psychological tactics described above) to turn against the movement and give false testimony against their former compatriots. They will plant illegal substances on the activist and set up an arrest; they will plant false information and set up "exposure," they will send incriminating letters [emails] in the name of the activist; and more; they will do whatever society will allow.

 

This booklet in no way covers all the ways agents use to sabotage the lives of sincere an dedicated activists.

 

If an agent is "exposed," he or she will be transferred or replaced.

 

COINTELPRO is still in operation today under a different code name. It is no longer placed on paper where it can be discovered through the freedom of information act.

 

The FBI counterintelligence program's stated purpose: To expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and otherwise neutralize individuals who the FBI categorize as opposed to the National Interests. "National Security" means the FBI's security from the people ever finding out the vicious things it does in violation of people's civil liberties.

 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

 

Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.

 

1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.

 

2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "How dare you?" gambit.

 

3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.")

 

4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.

 

5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nutcase," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and, of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down.

 

6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).

 

7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.

 

8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."

 

9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hangout route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.

 

10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.

 

11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. E.g. We have a completely free press. If evidence exists that the Vince Foster "suicide" note was forged, they would have reported it. They haven't reported it so there is no such evidence. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press who would report the leak.

 

12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why?

 

13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.

 

14. Lightly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as "bump and run" reporting.

 

15. Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the "facts" furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.

 

16. Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges "expose" scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.

 

17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.

 

 

 

 

-FINAL-

The Jews are a clannish tribal inbred minority group riddled with nepotism and a literal despotic racist policy/belief (read their talmud) against non-jews or "goyim". In a racially cohesive state where another group is the majority, they usurp power and wealth while manipulating public opinion to their advantage using propaganda, victim complex, and appealing to emotions especially to invoke sympathy for their "downtrodden" kind, as well as extensive use of revisionist history as they have for thousands of years.

 

Historically, the Jews have been subject to oppression, repression, and various crackdowns and isolations which they brought upon themselves as a result of their actions, sometimes right after being welcomed until people caught on. As a response the Jews have historically followed two policies...

1) pretend to be part of the majority

and

2) cooperate with other "out-of favor" groups (Also see "Cultural Marxism" and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_measures).

 

In areas where there were few non-whites, they allied with political factions in conflict with the power that be. Workers against Management (Marxism) & Woman against Men (Feminism) etc. In the U.S. the natural allies for the Jews were the Blacks. Its not so much that the Jews like blacks, or even care about blacks, but that Blacks being outsiders were useful for taking on the majority...whites. Later on jews would later ally themselves with homosexuals and transgenders and all those against the "CIS" scum.

 

Its always about keeping the majority off balance, and using that to benefit the Jews a group while destroying their host nation like a parasite. Even now, they live as parasites in the pariah state they call a homeland.

 

The jews believe that "the world is broken."

 

According to them, when God made the earth, He made one race, with one culture. After the Tower of Babel incident, He dispersed mankind into all corners of the earth and made them different--different languages, different cultures, different races.

 

When He realized His error, he asked all the races to help Him fix it, and only the jews agreed to do so...They believed to help them, He gave them special powers of intellect and spirituality, to rule over/control the others, in order to facilitate their (the Gentiles') reduction to "humanity", as God intended.

 

They know full well that "multiculturalism" will lead to a single culture, without racial distinctions, and that racial tolerance and "diversity" will lead to a single race, without cultural distinctions. This "single race" will not include jewish people, but will be dominated by them.

 

This is their goal, this is why they are the "Chosen."

 

Although there are "religious" jews and "atheist" jews, all share in this goal, and all will protect each other. Some don't use Torah/Talmud teachings, they use jewish approved "science" to back up their desires ("there's no such thing as race, according to DNA", etc) but the end result is the same.

 

The extinction of all Gentile Civilizations.

 

-END OF REDPILL-