Image
Comments
| Giant_Neckbeard #1489532 1 week ago |
Op here, just something that popped into my head while dozing through work.
Tags, as always: fluffsplosion fluffy_pony fluffy_text for_science |
| lordanubis #1489553 1 week ago |
SCIENCE! |
| Anonymous #1489566 1 week ago |
SCIENCE |
| sigh #1489573 1 week ago |
Awesome work Neckbeard, and incorporating SCIENCE is always a welcome addition to any story. |
| NightJack #1489615 1 week ago |
What about spontaneous fluffsplosion brought on by anger.
 |
| Anonymous #1489623 1 week ago |
^pathetic attempt at spreading your shit-edit around, NightJack. |
| NightJack #1489625 1 week ago |
^ "HURR-DURR, I can't be silly!"
Shit it and have some fun will ya. |
| NightJack #1489628 1 week ago |
And my edit isn't as bad as the shit abuse edit for one thing, I'm not doing the same tired old thing. |
| Giant_Neckbeard #1489629 1 week ago |
Well, not really. Imagine Fluffsplosion is specific to Pregnant Fluffy Mares, specifically those in the final few days of their pregnancy.
The buildup of wastes, lack of calcium, highly acidic content of their stomachs and 'stress' of pregnancy all combine to make them walking bombs when stressed to the point they start to hyperventilate, and their organs, already fragile to begin with, begin to tear open and mix the various chemicals of their bodies together. |
| Anonymous #1489630 1 week ago |
Shit-edits are always shit-edits. |
| Giant_Neckbeard #1489639 1 week ago |
If a Fluffy Mare got angry enough that she entered a similar state, it's entirely possible that the 'Angry' Fluffy Momma could 'Fluffsplode', a rude shock for whatever managed to push her out of fear and into anger. |
| NightJack #1489640 1 week ago |
I'm just joking Neckbeard, I know it's used for pregnant fluffy mares, my image was just a joke, something that some Anons can't seem to understand as there seems to always be one calling it a "shit luvfag edit" just for it not being abuse. |
| Anonymous #1489645 1 week ago |
Nah, NightJack, you do make shit-edits that are as bad as all those fluff abuse-shit edits. Don't bother arguing otherwise. Shit is shit, and will always remain shit. |
| NightJack #1489651 1 week ago |
@Anon630
Funny, where are you when it's an abuse edit, I haven't seen any Anons calling the last few of them shit. |
| NightJack #1489658 1 week ago |
@Anon645
There is a difference between a shit edit and a lazy edit, shit edits are done by someone thinking they are doing something great but it's really just something done over and over and theirs is very very bad, a lazy edit is done by someone that just wants to get the idea across but don't see a point to doing more then the minimum to do so. |
| Anonymous #1489737 1 week ago |
Every fluffy story should involve the phrase "Sending in the Bears" at some point. |
| cthulhlu #1489754 1 week ago |
i dont subcribe to the fluffsplosion part of fluffy story's beacuse i think its a massivley retarded idea, but you put it in a very scentific and realistic way, good job :) |
| Ol_Dirty #1489867 1 week ago |
@cthulhlu
>massively retarded idea That sentence could be used to describe the whole concept of fluffy ponies. I don't see the problem. |
| Anonymous #1490061 1 week ago |
The science in this, especially the chemistry, is painfully bad in this. I know you're not supposed to take this shit seriously, but goddamn. |
| doomboy536 #1490128 1 week ago |
@Anon061
>says you're not supposed to take this shit seriously >takes this shit seriously |
| The_Mungoman #1490222 1 week ago |
I have a different explanation for the science behind fluffsplosion, I will explain it in my "Darwin_hates_us_but_we_don't_care" story :D
Whilst the whole chemical aspect behind the explosion is justwrong, it still is not a bad attempt to explain it. As always, good job, Neckbeard. |
| Giant_Neckbeard #1490780 6 days ago |
Science was never my forte in High School, sadly, and it's been over a decade since then, sooooo .... probably completely out of order there.
In regards to the Fluffsplosion, I'm not overly fond of the idea either, but in certain cases, it's a good way for the Pregnant Mother to exit the scene in a horrific yet mercifully quick way. I consider it 'cannon' but I also believe it should only happen in situations of extreme stress, and only during the final phases of the pregnancy when the body is basically at it's most vulnerable due to the Foals producing so much waste, the Mare's body having drained it's own resources to fuel their growth and the mental state of the Mare, all nervousness and excitement, only adding fuel to that fire. Hence the hysterical Fluffy Mummas in On The Rocks all fluffsploding in a chain reaction as first one goes, then the others getting squished by the panicking Herd and seeing Fluffy Ponies go up in miniature fireballs. |
| Ironweaver #1490950 6 days ago |
Giant Neckbeard, you're a pretty good storyteller, but this has a bunch of logical nonresistances.
Given that that it's the air in the lungs and the stomach acids that causes the fluffsplosion, the head and limbs really should have been (mostly) intact. Plus the bone fragments were going so fast they made sparks when they hit a ferrous object. That mother fluffy wasn't just a bomb, it was a deadly fragmentation weapon. The attendant fluffy is the luckiest fluffy in the world. Not to mention that the chemical reaction described in the story is going to be far from perfect, with leftover reactants splattering all over the place. I personally think you would have been better off going with the idea that blood flows into the uterus and that rupture the skin. Yes, I know I'm over thinking it. Still, it's an enjoyable read, and I hope for a sequel where the researchers brainstorm ways to prevent fluffsplosion. |