
| Shockblock99 #1481221 1 week ago |
Wat. |
| PPPP #1481226 1 week ago |
![]() |
| Van_Horsing #1481235 1 week ago |
Huh. It's some random dumbass's opinion, on a site I never go to and don't care about. |
| Professor_of_hoers #1481244 1 week ago |
Eqd whining about any kind of risque content? Well now I've seen everything. :P |
| Anonymous #1481249 1 week ago |
I just think it's hilarious that they've reached the point where socks = softcore porn. |
| Anonymous #1481261 1 week ago |
Professor_of_hoers@1481244 said: Well, it is a site for kids and parent's to go to. Anonymous@1481249 said: It doesn't? Are you sure? Because I'm sure if this was a human all laced up like this, it would be pornographic. Yeah, I know they don't were close, but they're covered in fur, which acts like their clothing. |
| Spitfire #1481267 1 week ago |
Clearly we have very different views on what qualifies as softcore porn, m1nt3a. |
| Professor_of_hoers #1481285 1 week ago |
I take it back. Clearly it is scandalous for some.
![]() |
| Arne #1481303 1 week ago |
How can you seriously call that porn? Even softcore... You can't see anything! Now, you can make the comment that it is a little risque, and would have a bit of a point. But by out right saying that it's porn... you instantly lose any credibility that you had, if you had any to begin with. |
| Anonymous #1481306 1 week ago |
Professor_of_hoers@1481285 said: The site is for little kids, what did you expect? |
| Professor_of_hoers #1481309 1 week ago |
I don't recall any of the people running the site ever saying it's for kids. |
| Anonymous #1481310 1 week ago |
Arne@1481303 said: How to make MLP porn: draw a slit. That's all that stops this from being viewed as pornography to the general public, you know that most haven't been desensitized as much as the rest of us. |
| Anonymous #1481315 1 week ago |
Professor_of_hoers@1481309 said: The site is the epicenter for every MLP fan, including the audience it was meant for. It's a MLP site, of course it's for kids, like the show. Arne@1481303 said: Pretend it's a person wearing that. |
| Anonymous #1481320 1 week ago |
Professor_of_hoers@1481309 said: Someone needs to tell you that a My Little Pony site is for kids and parents? Wow. |
| Anonymous #1481321 1 week ago |
saddlesore |
| Arne #1481322 1 week ago |
@315
But that's the thing... it's not a person. If it was, I would understand... but it isn't. |
| Professor_of_hoers #1481329 1 week ago |
Funny, because the people that admin and own the site are the only ones that can post images or topics and they have been continually posting this kind of thing for years.
So obviously that's always been their biggest concern. How silly. |
| Anonymous #1481340 1 week ago |
Professor_of_hoers@1481329 said: That just makes them stupid, that's all. They constantly change the rules to allow that peice of shit "Cupcakes," so they're trying to appease every fan, which they can't, and shit like this passes the cracks. They're not perfect, they're just admins. Arne@1481322 said: Except the characters are viewed as people, though. And only someone who was getting frisky would ever wear that in the first place. You know that the guy drawing it got a boner. |
| Anonymous #1481342 1 week ago |
@320 Seriously? Why not say the same thing about Ponibooru?
No one on ever said it was a site meant for kids. It is a brony site, bronies are mainly adults. Kids have other places they can go, like the Hub and Hasbro sites. |
| Anonymous #1481350 1 week ago |
Anonymous@1481342 said: This site has a filtering system, and it blocks images that are questionable, like that Fluttershy picture, and it gives warnings before you click on it. |
| Anonymous #1481351 1 week ago |
Also, so what if a child sees this? The only reason it looks even slightly risque to you is because of your dirty adult mind. I child would see a pony wearing socks.
"You know that the guy drawing it got a boner." WE know, the (supposed) children won't. |
| Anonymous #1481354 1 week ago |
Anonymous@1481342 said: On default, I meant, it blocks questionable images on default, and it doesn't even show explicit images at all. |
| Arne #1481355 1 week ago |
@340
They are viewed as people? By who?! I sure as hell don't view them as people. I view as what they are, sentient equines that are capable of speech. They are very different than a person and anyone that views them as such has problems. |
| Anonymous #1481357 1 week ago |
Anonymous@1481351 said: You could say that about anything, really. They wouldn't even know what sex looks like and wouldn't know how to react. |
| Anonymous #1481360 1 week ago |
Anonymous@1481351 said: A pony wearing laced sock with matching panties. She's about to get her sex on, anyone over the age of 12 will think that. Arne@1481355 said: You'd be surprised. This is a big fanbase, and allot of... interesting people inhabited it. Some people think they're married ( not waifu-ness, having papers to back it up and everything) to the characters, or think they are the characters. |
| Anonymous #1481364 1 week ago |
As much as I don't support the way EqD commenters treat those who like sexy stuff, I have to give it to him. This can be considered sexy(at least he take the time to write softcore) and it go against most of EqD members so pic like this are better not being feature or it will become impossible to keep the peace there.
But of course I don't go ''blame the idiot who put this''. Someone just wrongly think it could be good without thinking of how the place work and we should forgive him that. |
| Arne #1481368 1 week ago |
@360
Actually, no... that doesn't surprise me at all. I've been around the internet, I've seen plenty of... strange things. |
| Anonymous #1481370 1 week ago |
The panties put this picture on the more risque side of the spectrum, but no child is going to be traumatized by this. It's fine as long as you don't think about it too hard. |
| Anonymous #1481371 1 week ago |
Anyone over the age of 12? And what exactly is the problem of a 13 year old seeing a picture like this?
The "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" doesn't make sense for this pic no matter how you twist it. If they're not old enough to see it sexually, no harm done. If they are, then they're old enough to take it. |
| Anonymous #1481379 1 week ago |
Anonymous@1481371 said: All I'm saying is that this can be viewed as softcore, that's all. The picture point's to everything to being softcore. |
| Anonymous #1481384 1 week ago |
Anonymous@1481370 said: But I thought that wasn't a kids site, like what that professor guy said. Not everyone likes seeing characters they like getting sexed up and wearing fetish gear, even "mild" ones like this picture. |
| Anonymous #1481402 1 week ago |
384: Right EqD have the responsibility to protect the mature people who don't want to see that wether they like it or not their site is followed by this kind of people.
It's not because they are adult that they have to be exposed to this when they explicitly claim their desire to don't see it. It's not being prude or anything (afterall the fact that I am on ponibooru mean the opposit) it's being polite with people who don't share my opinion on this matter. Maybe one day they will learn politeness too and stop bashing us. |
| Anonymous #1481907 1 week ago |
Guys, she's drawn in lingerie. It's softcore. Figure it out. |
| SeraphimDawn #1482118 1 week ago |
Its part of society... |
| DoctorDreidal #1482129 1 week ago |
>Softcore porn
something about that makes me think this guy has never seen softcore porn. |
| Anonymous #1482270 1 week ago |
regardless of what it is, i could clop to this. |