
| Danuis #1479315 1 week ago |
Ahahhaha!
But go with this FMC stuff! ESPECIALLY SCOOTAFLUFF! |
| Ol_Dirty #1479319 1 week ago |
"Fwuffy mawk akwasishun pwogwam!" |
| sigh #1479347 1 week ago |
I laughed harder than I should. |
| NightJack #1479361 1 week ago |
I keep saying it, the idea of fluffy marks is stupid for the fact they have no point, stop adding more stuff from MLP to fluffies. |
| Tabula_Rojo #1479369 1 week ago |
this is another reason I support Fluffy Marks |
| NightJack #1479382 1 week ago |
But this one is a better one, the FMC try earning their marks, they don't just have them for nothing. |
| Feral_Socks #1479497 1 week ago |
I love the idea of fluffy marks. |
| Feral_Socks #1479511 1 week ago |
Especially if it's for something a fluffy can actually accomplish, like learning a new word or finding a trivial task they're good at. |
| Strobe_Orion #1479607 1 week ago |
Nobody cares about the fluffy ponies. |
| lordanubis #1479903 1 week ago |
This right here is the main problem I have with abuse: Most of the people who abuse their fluffies would never have gotten the fluffies in the first place. They're clearly not the kind of people who would voluntarily take on that burden. |
| Danuis #1479926 1 week ago |
@lordanubis
But this one is warning them, verbally abusing them, having not hurt them yet physically. Most abusers take them home and once inside kill them/abuse them. And some are patient enough to utterly wreck a fluffy. |
| Danuis #1479948 1 week ago |
Edit: Andsome toilet hazing.
He's better than most. Maybe a drunk. |
| Cyrus #1480125 1 week ago |
Agree with @lordanubis |
| Ferrotter #1480322 1 week ago |
For some of the abuse characters it's not a burden. The fluffies won't live long enough to need feeding, certainly not veterinary care. And that's assuming they weren't brought home specifically to abuse. Torturing a fluffy to death would be cheaper than a movie. |