Image
Comments
| Dr_Virtue #1478934 2 weeks ago |
Would this count as anthro? Not so much the... bottom underwear, but the top is suggestive of something you would want to cover up. |
| Bristle_Brew #1478952 2 weeks ago |
I am also a bit perpuzziflexed by the top part of the...bathing suit, is it? I guess she could have a couple of perky nipples/a flat chest...
...I forgot where I was going with this. I got distracted by the thought of flat-chested Dash, and for some reason I consider it cuter/more attractive than busty/notmal chested Dash. |
| Cgeta #1478957 2 weeks ago |
I'm not sure. She has no breasts, but her shoulders and thin, short neck look a lot like as if she is drawn as an anthro. |
| Jackarunda #1478965 2 weeks ago |
HOORAY ANOTHER STEREOGRAM GOSH DAMN I LOVE THESE THINGS |
| Bristle_Brew #1478973 2 weeks ago |
*normal
Fuck |
| SyntaxBananaZ #1479104 2 weeks ago |
Blargh, again with these simple 3D images. You expect me to believe that her hooves has the same distance has her plot? |
| Lancer #1479613 1 week ago |
For a true stereogram, the two images need to be viewed from slightly different angles. Showing exactly the same image on both sides doesn't work. |
| disqord #1483552 1 week ago |
This is a true stereogram. It's comparatively simple, but the effect is there. |