
| Fronzel #1469231 2 weeks ago |
Just make your own filter list, geez. |
| Rhino #1469234 2 weeks ago |
There's already a filter, spam.
I will try to tag them if they pop up again, keep me busy -_- |
| Anonymous #1469236 2 weeks ago |
And who decides what "most users" think about what is annoying and what isn't? Making a "one size fits all" tag kind of defeats the purpose of tags in the first place, to pick and choose what you see. |
| Harlequin_Jester #1469239 2 weeks ago |
uhhh I don't know if you know this or not, but this site is comprised of people with a variation of tastes, heretofore your suggestion is retarded. |
| The_Baron #1469240 2 weeks ago |
Because that's a stupid idea. |
| Zincy #1469242 2 weeks ago |
That would just make it easier for a single troll to systematically go through and remove said tag. If you want something specifically filtered, do that. |
| Anonymous #1469247 2 weeks ago |
#1469236
This is the reason why i wrote that i' m not suggesting to replace all the tags. Not using this common filter allow you to filter everything you want as you want. |
| Theopticals #1469254 2 weeks ago |
Eh. |
| Zincy #1469265 2 weeks ago |
Your idea is still fail as it would require a mass consensus. What if we have something tagged by this that I want to see, but can't because I have that in my filter settings. This idea doesn't work. |
| SquiggyBomb #1469268 2 weeks ago |
I like puns. |
| Anonymous #1469273 2 weeks ago |
I second this |
| AppleDash #1469278 2 weeks ago |
@Zincy
Even worse, a troll could go about and add that tag to awesome pictures and people wouldn't see it. |
| -Lunacy #1469279 2 weeks ago |
filter_this or filterme seems kay, i suppose |
| Anonymous #1469281 2 weeks ago |
@AppleDash
This would not change nothing. A troll could do the same adding the commonly filtered tags. |
| Nebbie #1469300 2 weeks ago |
forced_meme troll not_pony_related fluffy_pony
That takes care of about 90% of what annoys most people. |
| BattleGT #1469306 2 weeks ago |
Filters are Subjective |
| Anonymous #1469319 2 weeks ago |
Is true that would not be an accurate tag and cannot accomodate everyone tastes, but it would have some good feature.
Example: Nyx. Mostly pics made by trolls and haters, but many other are more than decent arts. With just a "nyx" tag you would filter everything related to her, good and bad things together. |
| Glord #1469323 2 weeks ago |
@Nebbie
What annoys me isn't Fluffy_Pony, it's the retards that are in the comments of fluffy_pony. Also, thread derail. ![]() |
| Capt-Nemo #1469325 2 weeks ago |
The only problem with this is that not everybody finds the same things annoying. |
| Feral_Socks #1469332 2 weeks ago |
@319
If it can't accommodate everyone's tastes (which it can't), then the entire point is moot. Just let people maintain their own filters, and if they're too lazy or ignorant to do so, that's on them. We don't need you or anyone else to hold our hands and tell us what's annoying. |
| Saint_Braeburn #1469352 2 weeks ago |
@Glord
I wouldn't mind it so much if they kept to there images. But they occasionally get bored and act like asses in the comment sections of non-fluffy images Also @Anon281 >This would not change nothing. |
| Anonymous #1469357 2 weeks ago |
@Feral_Socks
I cannot even imagine a way to force everyone to add this common tag to their filter list. Of course i don' t wanna hold anyone' s hand. If for some strange reason this idea is gonna be liked by the community the only thing you should do is to not add the tag to your filter list. Basically nothing would change for you. |
| Saint_Braeburn #1469364 2 weeks ago |
@Anon357
So, what does the majority of this site find annoying? |
| Glord #1469378 2 weeks ago |
anons |
| Anonymous #1469382 2 weeks ago |
@Saint_Braeburn
I' m not falling for it. You are someone i' ve seen many times in the comment section, so i suppose you lurk this site very often. You are bound to know what i' m talking about. |
| Zincy #1469385 2 weeks ago |
This is all a moot point to me anyhow, never bothered to use filters. Not being a pussy and all really helps, just kiddin. No, really, I'm just really really hard to frazzle. It takes a lot to offend my sensibilities...since I have very few. |
| TheLoneLampman #1469610 2 weeks ago |
The problem with a filter_this tag is that you'd need different levels of it, from restricting results from just 'pure art', down to comics and such, then meta and memes, edits, then spam and garbage. I don't think it would be a bad system to have available, to be honest.
I can completely understand the need to seperate regular art from general images without a hundred different filters, but unfortunatly it's just a bit too subjective to really work. |
| TheLoneLampman #1469618 2 weeks ago |
I sort of went off mark there but I think it still gets the point accross. |
| Anonymous #1469773 2 weeks ago |
![]() |