Image
Comments
| -_-_-_-_- #1458922 3 weeks ago |
Ok, couple of points:
-I find the shadowing of the back leg is noticeably worse than the rest (full disclosure, I hate the layered shadowing some artist do and prefer this more diffuse style, but that's just me) and could get some work, but the rest seems to be pretty spot on, although a bit more grading wouldn't kill it. -that back foreleg looks to me to be too behind and angled all weird. I am assuming the top half is stuck to the barrel, because otherwise that nub there doesn't really make sense, but then the leg is both too long, and a bit too far to the back to make sense. Again, just me. -The right hindleg is a bit too thick close to the hock and it's messing with my ability to reconsider the gaskin and the thigh. I believe he was going for a more to the side view of it, but the hock is really messing with that. -I am having a hard time considering the correct position of the hip, but I think it might be a bit too angled. Thoughts? |
| Bolan #1458925 3 weeks ago |
I see nothing wrong with it. I'm sure the shading can be fixed. |
| -_-_-_-_- #1458945 3 weeks ago |
@Bolan: Notice the way the picture is structured. From above, to make the picture make sense, she has to be in a sort of curve, leaning her weight into her right foreleg and extending out her right hind-leg to balance out while she is turning so she can look back like she is doing and keep that left foreleg where it is.
In order for the legs to be the same size, she should be tilted a bit more to her right (affecting the hips, the leg, and so on) and the right foreleg would be in that same angle but would need to be a bit further down both to make her "shoulders" be equal in both sides, and to make sure she is even balanced. Which then makes us return back to the right foreleg and it's shape. That's more or less where I am coming from in regards to that. As for the shading, yep, easy fix, specially if he kept the photoshop file. I am no expert in that, but I do not see the paper texture, so this was probably done all digitial, so a couple layers should do it. If that fails, good old second layer, remake, reshadow there. |
| Jayswing103 #1458971 3 weeks ago |
Keep your opinions to yourself. I like it to. |
| Anonymous #1458989 3 weeks ago |
^Keep your opinions about people's criticism to yourself. I like -_-'s analysis. |
| -_-_-_-_- #1459052 3 weeks ago |
@Jayswing103:
No can do, good sir, I been sent with a mission to give my opinion out everything, and in this case my opinion of this thing. Wait for more, I think I am going to go and check out pokehiddens game next to see if it works. Indie games rub my tinkers side just so. @989: Thank you for that, I try to make sure I make sense of picture like that as best as I can and then comment to see if it makes it better. Frankly, I wouldn't mind being called an ignorant idiots if they just said why, that's the fun of art, no matter what you draw, making it better and learning that you know nothing. |
| Satch #1459392 3 weeks ago |
Rather decent human vulva imo, lacking on the labia/endowment side, but they managed to show it's erection rather well. |
| Jackarunda #1459903 3 weeks ago |
yes, please, I would like fries with this |
| Hmc1 #1462055 3 weeks ago |
So, uhh, one I like this picture.
Two, apparently the site is working again, or I'm just high as fuck. |
| I_Like_Your_Mane #1463752 2 weeks ago |
-_-, opinions are fine, but why not discuss this with the artist if you're so inclined? Plus, it's just always criticism from you. It's just one sided bash-fest at some point. |
| -_-_-_-_- #1469395 2 weeks ago |
@Satch:
A vulva and vagina connoseuir I see. I personally haven't seen any particularly well-endowed women (or horses for that matter, but it isn't as if I was looking for it) so I have little of way of comparison other than less than ideal photographs, but yes, the details are proper and the construction good. I personally don't go into much detail about that because such details are easily worked on after you figured out the correct position of the rest. Plus, drawing them is kind of hard and harping people about it since the beginning is kind of a lost cause. @I_Like_Your_Mane: I would, but he doesn't have an account anywhere where I could go and contact him directly. I assure you, I try to do that if I can. Plus, all these people could use a reminder that, hello, this is a piece of art, critique as such or it becomes porn, and porn is no good. This? Piece of art. One which I can say stuff about, but piece of art still. |