Image
Comments
| Jack-o-Lantern #1452867 1 month ago |
 |
| Saint_Braeburn #1452870 1 month ago |
Okay that was funny. |
| PonyPon #1452876 1 month ago |
okay, who's been feeding her this crap? |
| Bolan #1452880 1 month ago |
*rustle rustle* |
| Obvious #1452881 1 month ago |
 Oh boy! |
| SquiggyBomb #1452886 1 month ago |
That's hilarious. |
| Kajet #1452907 1 month ago |
Child of nightmares? That's quite accurate actually. |
| ProfessorOfHoers #1452971 1 month ago |
I still plan on giving this show a chance. I doubt it will do anything to impress but, meh, why not? |
| Shred_Hexstring #1452984 1 month ago |
lol the child of nightmares |
| Arne #1453026 1 month ago |
So much uncanny valley going on with that face... |
| symos #1453309 1 month ago |
Clever. |
| kamazeustra #1453396 1 month ago |
I honestly had higher hopes for this new care bears thing before I knew what it looked like, and I seriously doubt that it'll be good now. I will still give it a chance, though. |
| Anonymous #1453490 1 month ago |
 |
| Anonymous #1453754 1 month ago |
I have no fucking idea why Hasbro decided to go with a CG version for Care Bears. I bet if it was traditional animation or done using FiM's style, more people would give it a chance. With a few exceptions, CG humans = Uncanny Valley. Bad call, Hasbro. |
| danieltepeskraus #1453841 1 month ago |
^Because CG was all the rage back then and they wanted to cash in on it's popularity. And yes, that girl in the pic turns the Uncanny Valley dial up to 11 at least. I don't know how, but Reboot somehow did such a good job CGing humans despite how early of a CG show it was. |
| Datalink #1455590 3 weeks ago |
@Danieltepeskraus: because they spent years developing the character designs for ReBoot, and that girl was likely someone's college character design final exam...
That's wistful thinking that someone was still learning when designing that horribly disfigured human analog. |