Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

CodenameOne
#1435203
1 month ago
Nah, nah, nah, see you got the shades wrong. Luna's supposed to be pale as hell while Celestia's suppose to have the tan.
Posey
#1435290
1 month ago
There's no correct shade, also it's racist to call someone who is brown "tanned".

...
Why did I come onto this picture?
CodenameOne
#1437238
1 month ago
If she IS brown then she shouldn't be, if you know what I'm saying. If one's black/brown then other has to be such as well, unless they had different fathers.
CottonTales
#1437244
1 month ago
@CodenameOne
I could explain how you are wrong through biology
NastumiSama
#1438047
1 month ago
They're sisters. They're the same goddamned race (since there's no reason to suspect they're half-siblings).
Anonymous
#1439239
1 month ago
No need for them to have the same skin color. It's a simple matter of what genes they get from their parents. As the parents might have a variety of genes for skin color, the results can be mixed from offspring to offspring, resulting in different skin colors. Therefore, it is fully possible for two children with the same parents to have totally different skin colors, it's just not very normal.
Veya
#1475054
2 weeks ago
There is also the minor point of then being, y'now, GODS, Luna could have darker skin tone to represent the night, while Celestia could have lighter skin tone to represent the day.