Image
Comments
| Anonymous #1424846 1 month ago |
Proceed |
| Anonymous #1424847 1 month ago |
I'm here to fuck you too, you little prick! |
| NightJack #1424848 1 month ago |
K.F. coming for the guy spamming the fluffy post. |
| NightJack #1424854 1 month ago |
@Anon847: If your the guy he's after then that is a surprise, as he seems to not like when people hurt fluffies. |
| NightJack #1424855 1 month ago |
*spamming in the |
| Anonymous #1424859 1 month ago |
I'm the guy, probably. Refer to earlier posts from today: I only hate pointless abusers |
| NightJack #1424866 1 month ago |
@Anon859: If it's you then your being a little stupid, you say you hate pointless abuse but you did spam of one that wasn't abuse as well. |
| Anonymous #1424901 1 month ago |
^ Which one exactly? |
| NightJack #1424907 1 month ago |
Let's see >>187063 had no abuse, and >>186956 was a song parody. |
| Anonymous #1424919 1 month ago |
^
R u freaking blind? "No abuse" my ass! |
| NightJack #1424925 1 month ago |
Oh putting fluffies in cages and feeding them is abuse now? |
| Anonymous #1424927 1 month ago |
facepalm.jpg
I'll even bother and make exempts in a couple of minutes |
| Anonymous #1424995 1 month ago |
>>187063
1. Ghosts44 2. Collection. Of live creatures. In cages. COLLECTION 3. "Hah kid you're da newest bitch" 4. "Had kid, you're mamma is eida dead or sittin' in dat alley crying her tail off". >Nice way to bring info to a child >>186956 1. Ghosts44 2. Collection. Of live creatures. In cages. COLLECTION 3. "Hah kid you're da newest bitch" 4. "Had kid, you're mamma is eida dead or sittin' in dat alley crying her tail off". >Nice way to bring info to a child 1. "I fucking hate you" 2. wooked right in my poopie pwace 3. "When I was 13, I abused my first fluffy" 4. "She know she got me laughing cause she crying and now my heart is laughing but i just keep on hitten'" 5. Now I'm dead, I'm dead |
| Anonymous #1424998 1 month ago |
Shit, double post
Cleaner version: >>187063 1. Ghosts44 2. Collection. Of live creatures. In cages. COLLECTION 3. "Hah kid you're da newest bitch" 4. "Had kid, you're mamma is eida dead or sittin' in dat alley crying her tail off". >Nice way to bring info to a child >>186956 1. Ghosts44 2. "I fucking hate you" 3. wooked right in my poopie pwace 4. "When I was 13, I abused my first fluffy" 5. "She know she got me laughing cause she crying and now my heart is laughing but i just keep on hitten'" 5. Now I'm dead, I'm dead |
| NightJack #1425015 1 month ago |
^
187063 1. So what 2. privately owned zoos 3. Done in animal shelter as a means to make sure it won't hurt the other animals when it's new. 4. Implies the mother was no where to be found, so you just want to leave it there with the chance it could be killed by something, at let it's taken care of now. 186956 1. Who cares. 2-5. it's a song parody, who cares. |
| Anonymous #1425033 1 month ago |
^
1. Read his other fics, before saying such things 2. Spacious cages. For ANIMALS. With no actual intellect 3. Fluffy are capable of at least primitive calculus. How do you explain "my new bitch"? 4. Couldn't he rescue both? Why in such a tone? --- 1-5. Your only explanation? |
| NightJack #1425043 1 month ago |
^ But the mane point here is, even though I hate pointless abuse, I don't go around being a huge cry baby and spam large images in the comments. |
| Anonymous #1425048 1 month ago |
^ you are like a guy, thinking of himself as a veg, while feeding meat to his dog / cat |
| Anonymous #1425099 1 month ago |
>hates pointless abuse
>pointlessly abuses booru viewers by posting shock images Spamanon fails consistency for dummies. He should go die in a corner like the moralfag scum that he is. |
| Anonymous #1425156 1 month ago |
^
Your victim-playing is making less and less sense. If you perceive this image as an attack, how can you justify the things you support? Or that very message, for that matter? And how can you call him "moralfag scum"? If you condemn morals, what morals do you condemn them with? |
| Anonymous #1425168 1 month ago |
^ Don't beat yourself over him: abusefags never make any sense... |
| NightJack #1425170 1 month ago |
And now I see someone did the same on >>187204 with no abuse at all. |
| Anonymous #1425181 1 month ago |
^ That was you |
| Anonymous #1425302 1 month ago |
Faggot hater here.
Personally, my favorite fluffy pony stupidity story is that one (see below), and although it is obvious that it was written by abusefag, it's fucking funny:  |
| Anonymous #1425334 1 month ago |
@156
Alright troll, I'll give you some food. First of all, fluffy abuse images aren't spammed en masse in unrelated posts. And even when they are, they don't cause browser crashes and aren't anywhere near as disgusting as the shock images you're spamming. What's more, they're pony related, where as the spam is not. Not that I could get a look at it, what with it having the intended effect of lagging, if not outright crashing my browser. And firefox is the memory efficient one. I'd hate to be an operafag or googlefag, as they just eat up memory like a fluffy gulps down spaghetti. The point is, abuse is not only self contained, it's also marked with questional and explicit thumbnail blocks so that even the thumbnails aren't seen by luvfags. Your spam isn't thumbnails. It isn't blocked. It's disruptive to the average goings on of the site, which includes the posting and commenting on of abuse images whether you like it or not. As for calling self righteous spammers moralfag scum, it's exactly what it sounds like. It's scumbag spamming for moralfag reasons. The contradiction, the fact that it undermines the intended purpose, is the point. I'm condemning you with your own morals, or rather, the claim that you have them while providing proof of the contrary. Oftentimes, when it comes to zealots, one doesn't even need a personal set of morals to condemn someone. Those types are most easily hoist by their own petards. Abusefags may get a bad rap, but when you zoom out and look at the big picture, the way abusefags actually conduct themselves independent of the content they post is, for the most part, aside from a few exceptions, relatively well behaved. It's the luvfags and random spamanon trolls who spam about fluffy ponies mewling, how fluffy ponies ruined and a bunch of other nonsense that constantly disrupts threads with the sound of the whambulence being present at all times. If you're so butthurt by the fact that the fluffy fandom is now the western counterpart to yukkuri, then just turn off your computer, get up, go outside and be burned alive by the sunlight you haven't stepped foot in for years. If you live through it, power to ya. Go take a goddamn walk and get a fucking burger instead of sitting around whining about how horrible the suffering of nonexistant fictional creatures is. TROLL FEEDING COMPLETE! Now back to writing pointless fluffy abuse. BECAUSE I CAN LOLOL! u mad? |
| Anonymous #1425341 1 month ago |
Mr.Spammer.
Why? If you don't like fluffy gore stories, why do you visit them? All you are doing is giving anons a worse name. |
| Anonymous #1425361 1 month ago |
@1425334 he (156) is not the spammer, different anon. <I> am spammer |
| Anonymous #1425374 1 month ago |
@1425334
>firefox Shitty browser. 12th version and still lacking some of the most basic features >opera Browser of the gods. Feature-rich, crashes rarely -- Also, made you write a long post about how bad I am. Good. Your browser severely lagging. Also good. Abuse lovers are faggots, no sane person would love to inflict unnecessary harm, even to fictional creatures. |
| Anonymous #1425393 1 month ago |
...
You watch MLP, and claim to be sane? No, just no. |
| Anonymous #1425398 1 month ago |
^
>not watching MLP >still here, on Ponyboory |
| Anonymous #1425409 1 month ago |
You don't watch MLP?
... Listen, I know you don't like fluffy gore, and I have to admit, most of ghosts work is a bit far. But no-one is forcing you to look at them. So just take a chill pill, okay? |
| Anonymous #1425416 1 month ago |
Whatever.
I'll be spamming every luvfag pic too. It's on. |
| Anonymous #1425418 1 month ago |
I hate pointless luv and I hate what I don't like.
Gory gore for all. See ya, fatherless faggots ;P |
| Anonymous #1425420 1 month ago |
...
So, you the whole "Abuse lovers are faggots, no sane person would love to inflict unnecessary harm, even to fictional creatures." Just went out of the window. |
| Anonymous #1425423 1 month ago |
...
Oh you~ Also, why not use this time to write fanfics instead? |
| Anonymous #1425468 1 month ago |
@423
Because some people are untalented and mentally handicaped for that. Only thing his IQ allows is to spam the work of others. |
| Anonymous #1425480 1 month ago |
>anons trolling anons
Shit, /b/ is here again |
| Anonymous #1425512 1 month ago |
@468
Really? I like fluffy stories, am an anon, and write fics. |
| Anonymous #1425585 1 month ago |
@512
I'm talking about the autistic handicaped spammer. Well, whatever, no pic will be left untainted. |
| Anonymous #1425595 1 month ago |
Hay, I'm autistic.
Well, aspergic. And to be fair, I hate most other Autistic people. But I don't think the spammer is one. If he was, he'd be worse. |
| Anonymous #1425596 1 month ago |
#1425334
>cries "troll" at criticism and logic >admits to trolling at the end |
| Anonymous #1425640 1 month ago |
@595
>Implying autistic spammer can get any worse than spamming pictures because of his mentally challenged mind, which is unable to write or do productive work. |
| Anonymous #1425652 1 month ago |
If he's really Autistic then yes.
Also, you do know that Autistim just makes it harder for them to talk to people and understand them? The ones that can talk are normal really clever in certain fields. But yeah, the guy should stop, the gore is getting boring. |
| Anonymous #1425800 1 month ago |
^ I will, as soon as abusefags (applelooser, Ghosts44, ginger_fig etc.) stop streaming shit out of their asses.
Remember: I'd never spam truly neutral, lovefug or justified-cruelty thread. |
| Anonymous #1425853 1 month ago |
^Why?
They don't hurt you. And Ginger_fig Isn't all bad. |
| Anonymous #1425907 1 month ago |
^Yes, not all of his fics are bad and some pics are at least a bit good.
>they don't hurt you I'm Christian, and seeing how Jesus hates fags, I can't stand them either |
| Anonymous #1425933 1 month ago |
@800
I will, for now on, every fluffy pic I don't like will get shitty spam. Good luck with that. |
| Danuis #1425988 1 month ago |
Fluffies using tools may be a BIT to much... |
| Anonymous #1426199 1 month ago |
The "it doesn't hurt anyone" argument isn't very logical. For one thing, if it were true, there would be no need to say it because no one would be motivated to disagree. For another, the abusers themselves don't believe it, since they do what they do as a way of lashing out at what they see as "bad fun". Furthermore, they don't keep to themselves, despite claims to the contrary; more than a few non-abuse pics have been harassed by people for not being abused. |
| Anonymous #1426423 1 month ago |
^A few anons complain.
Where as this guy is spamming gore, human gore. Because people wrote a fic they don't like a about made up animals. |