Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

PonyFlea
#1400479
2 months ago
They started that way...
DaxRattler
#1400485
2 months ago

Fluffy pony spam was juvenile crap when it first started, no point getting worked up over it, it's not worth the effort.
Just ignore it like half the other crap you don't like.
The_Mungoman
#1400547
2 months ago
Anonymous
#1400705
2 months ago
We the people ruined fluffy ponies. u mad?
Anonymous
#1400766
2 months ago
My suggestion is that True Bronies turn this around by using Fluffy-Pony as a kind of Mascot or Inspiration fuel to spread awareness of Real-Life Animal Abuse. For example, point to the Fact that Real-Bronies do not approve of Animal Abuse and that this is a very Masculine stance to take. Real-Men experience the Full-ness of life without reservation; they don't write an experience or expression off because Society says that to do so is a sign of Weakness. Bullshit! Choosing to Love something even when you might be looked down on for it is the highest duty and it means standing up for what you Feel and Know to be True. What is more Manly than that?
Giant_Neckbeard
#1400963
2 months ago
Not entirely certain how I can help, but hell, I'll give it a shot!
MP
#1400964
2 months ago
^I have to shave my knuckles.
Anonymous
#1401042
2 months ago
@766

Because blindly following political correctness and not ever having the courage to write about anything different is the very definition of manliness, amirite?

Apparently, in this new day and age, awesomeness and manliness have become mutually exclusive. Which is THE. WORST. POSSIBLE. THING. that could ever happen. I am ashamed of my gender for letting that happen.
Anonymous
#1401517
2 months ago
042: Ah, Political Correctness, sighted by Conservatives whenever they get called on slanderous and back-wards statements. No where did I state that People have to stop producing Fluffy-Pony Material: I'm proposing that it be turned to a good cause. Why would you object to that?
Anonymous
#1402052
2 months ago
@17

Conservatives also associate personal causes with "True (noun)" and manliness, which is intended to be a backhanded insult to those who simply don't agree.

Manliness is doing what you want. Not expecting others to do so as well. Anonymous is not your personal army. Fluffy ponies are not a vehicle for some pet issue (puntastic!). There are no "True Bronies," "Real-Bronies" or "MASCULINE STANCES" (aside from those made by Hulk Hogan). Manliness isn't advocating conformity. In fact, manliness is saying TO HELL WITH IT.

So here I say, to hell with your attempt to co-opt the fluffy fandom. If you want to go crusade against animal abuse, POWER TO YA! Just don't try to drag the rest of us into it. And typing what can be interpreted as backhanded insults to those who don't want to be dragged into it, intentionally or not, well, fuck you, too. You want real men? Go to a gay pride parade. Lots of men there.

Besides, a common theme in fluffy stories is that animal activists are the assholes who started the fluffy problem in the first place. So yeah. The only fuel fluffies should be is for the bonfire an OC started to roast them all.
Anonymous
#1402716
2 months ago
^

That's a very roundabout way of supporting animal abuse. But no matter how much you demonize goodness and decency, it doesn't change the fact that you hypocritically demand your own hypocritical version of them.
Anonymous
#1403894
2 months ago
Food for Thought: It's a Shame We haven't figured out how to Live on it.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/vickeryeckhoff/2012/05/11/wsj-serves-up-tainted-journalism-on-horse-slaughter-plate/
Anonymous
#1404261
2 months ago
1402052 so essentially your saying that robbers, serial killers and or serial rapist are manly because they do give two shits about their victims, please clarify, am i getting that right? what the hell is wrong with you?
Anonymous
#1405204
2 months ago
052: Yet in stating that, you yourself are advocating a stance that requires Conformity: Conformity to shallow, one-dimensional caricatures of Men. How did Society suddenly get to the point where a Grotesque Tulpa out of 300 become lauded by anyone as the only way to Be? King Leonidas and Hulk-Hogan? Really? Oh wait, wait, I get it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQRS1Ryh9HU&feature=fvst My Role-Model was my Grandfather, World-War II Vet. I wish you could have known Him, you may have been surprised.

Censorship isn't the answer and I really don't have anything against artists and writers who produce Fluffy Pony Material who do so to explore complex themes and emotions. Yet We also know that a lot of this material is intended to bait and troll anyway. It's actually not that hard to differentiate between things that have a redeeming aspects and are tastefully composed and the latter. Anything We could do to in order to channel this into a Positive thing would only reflect well upon The Internet Community. So when you see Fluffy-Pony Abuse, keep in mind that all over the World right now, there are Animals suffering in the exact same way as Fluffy-Ponies. The only real differences in a lot of cases is that they are real and they cannot talk. That feeling of disgust and revulsion that Fluffy-Pony Abuse inspires in those possessing fully-functioning Empathy Capacity could be channeled into something redeeming. I know that The Brony Community has come together to work with Charities before, so this wouldn't even have to be a stretch if approached tastefully.