Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#1371831
2 months ago
Why?
Just Why?
The_Mungoman
#1371832
2 months ago
Umm...

Ew.
Yorec
#1371835
2 months ago


I think my mind just snapped.
Bolan
#1371836
2 months ago
Dafuq with those giants fingers.
Gittonsxv
#1371839
2 months ago
oh god......just.....this is whole new levels of wtf.....
Anonymous
#1371849
2 months ago
I think the giant fingers are only showing the size difference between a normal human and the ribbon of fluffy applebloom.
Anonymous
#1371853
2 months ago
OP Kill yourself
Anonymous
#1371899
2 months ago
This actually seems relatively innocent...
Giant_Neckbeard
#1371911
2 months ago
Oh God, my heart .....

*thud*
Anonymous
#1371931
2 months ago
It's only because apple bloom looks ugly because she has no mane or tail, only individual strands of hairs coming out.
Anonymous
#1371934
2 months ago
And also because of the plancenta.
Ferrotter
#1372198
2 months ago
Yeah, no obvious violence, it just looks like the beauty of genetically engineered abominable nature.
Anonymous
#1372291
2 months ago
Um...what the fuck is going on in this image? It needs a goddamn story to go with it.
Giant_Neckbeard
#1372356
2 months ago
Basically, a 'Fluffy Pony' Applejack gave birth to a Foal that looks just like Applebloom, and the little foal is covered in birthing fluids and the placenta, and Fluffy Applejack is recovering from the labour, watching her precious baby feed, and telling it how much she loves it.

And the owner has got out a little bow, ready to put it on the Foal.

I'm calling Shenanigans in the next instalment.
PandaSennin
#1372463
2 months ago
Shitty art is shitty.
Anonymous
#1372569
2 months ago
unfortunately, someone doesn't know squat about hoofed animal anatomy, either. they're between the hind legs
Giant_Neckbeard
#1372626
2 months ago
Depending upon the artist, Fluffy Ponies either have only two tears by the hind-quarters, which often appears in more 'real' Fluffy Stories, or they have rows of teats like cats and dogs, in the more 'cartoonish' Fluffy Stories.

Either way works, I guess.
lordanubis
#1372712
2 months ago
I can't even tell what I'm looking at.
deathproofpony
#1372853
2 months ago
Needs more power tools.

Still better than I can draw.
Tabula_Rojo
#1372873
2 months ago
meh even if it is Fluffy!Applejack, I don't like perpetuating the idea that Applebloom is Secretly AJ's Sister
Tabula_Rojo
#1372877
2 months ago
fuck I meant daughter
441
#1372948
2 months ago
Get your filthy fluffy pony bullshit out of the real ponies.
Anonymous
#1372977
2 months ago
Always remember that fluffy pony-versions of the maincast are not like them, but just inferior fluffy knock-offs that everybody/pony is allowed to inflict pain upon.

Like Fluffyshy.
Appleloosa
#1372998
2 months ago
I don't see how this is Yukkuri inspired, dumb tagger is dumb.

Also, I never took Jolly shit seriously, but this must be art after all. You know what they say about art, it's a matter of perspective and experience.

Some faggots are daw'ing, some other faggots see this as abuse...
Anonymous
#1403803
2 months ago
I'm glad I looked at this again. I thought it it was like a traumatized fluffy talking to a dead baby, then I realized it was just feeding
Anonymous
#1458965
3 weeks ago
Nice

shit, this is nice

@1372998 Abusing a weaker creature for fun? Yeap, it sounds like Yukkuri to me. There is really no need to be mad.
Anonymous
#1458972
3 weeks ago
That, or Jissouseki, which fluffy ponies are far closer too.