Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Dragoon
#1341892
2 months ago
What? @_@
Yorec
#1341898
2 months ago
And they say love cannot be explained by science! Who's laughing now fools?!

Anonymous
#1341903
2 months ago
Ok, How many of you google "oxyticin" after reading this?
441
#1341905
2 months ago
Lot'sa words to say "I am alone, cold and miserable, and Am trying to make everyone else feel the same by using a cartoon horse".
Anonymous
#1341909
2 months ago
@441
Either that or they're just doing it for the lulz.
Anonymous
#1341910
2 months ago
Sapience is just electricity and chemistry. Knowing how something works doesn't make that thing any less.
Anonymous
#1341911
2 months ago
If that hormone does all that shit, then it's a good thing. I don't see the problem.
Saint_Braeburn
#1341917
2 months ago
I like the tags
Anonymous
#1341919
2 months ago
@441
Not really; understanding the functions of life doesn't make them any less significant. In my opinion, it makes them much more beautiful.
441
#1341921
2 months ago
By that logic we're just giant lumps of chemicals.
I mean, Why live? Everything you know is nothing but a meaningless cluster of numbers!
Anonymous
#1341925
2 months ago
@441
A beautiful cluster of numbers
Saint_Braeburn
#1341929
2 months ago
Anyone reminded of this

441
#1341934
2 months ago
Personally, I just think that applying theoretical science to more emotional and complicated aspects of life such as love just takes away the beauty of the mystery of the thing.
It's kinda like that woman wearing a burca that you think is a really hot lady, until you actually see her bare and it's revealed that she's just sorta 'meh.
Saint_Braeburn
#1341938
2 months ago
SHIT

WRONG IMAGE!

I MEANT THIS!

Anonymous
#1341941
2 months ago
@Saint_Braeburn
Tim Burton's version was better, at least he used the songs from the book.
Rhino
#1341944
2 months ago
Fuckin' Braeburn...
Yorec
#1341945
2 months ago
But it didn't have Gene Wilder, and therefore it is the lesser movie.
Anonymous
#1341948
2 months ago
hey look lazers
Saint_Braeburn
#1341949
2 months ago
@Anon941

Okay

Saint_Braeburn
#1341955
2 months ago
@Rhino

Anonymous
#1341960
2 months ago
@1341945
Gene's retired since 1999. I don't get the appeal of the 1971 version, maybe it's one of those things that US loves but the rest of the world just doesn't care that much.
Anonymous
#1341965
2 months ago
So if god is love, does that mean god is oxytocin?
Saint_Braeburn
#1341979
2 months ago
@Anon960

Sorta like our reaction to Soccer/Football
Saint_Braeburn
#1341995
2 months ago
I just realized we found out what love is.

Someone tell the Roxbury Boys!



Those poor bastards have been bobbing there heads since the 1990's.
Anonymous
#1342008
2 months ago
@Saint_Braeburn
And this's how one of them looks in 2012
http://media.nola.com/mardigras_impact/photo/10355647-large.jpg
Time's a bitch
ZORDON
#1342014
2 months ago
@441 The mistery in it is not what makes love tick, but who. I, personally, find joy in learning emotionally. I mean, I'm all for science. But there are things that, whatever the precision, or the instruments, or the equations, science can't make into numbers. That brings uncertainity, and I enjoy uncertainity.
ZillaOmega
#1342028
2 months ago
Anonymous
#1342262
2 months ago
OK NOW TELL HOW MAGNET WORK???
Everypony
#1342362
2 months ago
So bronies lack hormone then?
HumanaeVitae
#1342545
2 months ago
From an article in the New Scientist, I remember that they said something along the lines of Oxytocin not being strong enough to promote love or was it that it made people more susceptible to lies, I can't remember.
Solitude
#1342807
2 months ago
Definition: love is...
EricNeoMatrix
#1343188
2 months ago
Fluttershy the Science Guy hath spoken
TheShrubberyDemander
#1343555
2 months ago
Anonymous
#1344570
2 months ago
Love is a verb, not a noun.
Do not confuse the sensations produced by the hormones with the emotion-- or the emotion with the human bond which creates it.