Image
Comments
| Saint_Braeburn #1330241 2 months ago |
So much win. |
| Anonymous #1330245 2 months ago |
Oh God. The nostalgia. I think I'm crying. But I'm also smiling. |
| Shockblock99 #1330251 2 months ago |
Well, Calvin and Hobbes was a giant part of my childhood, and I'm not sure this does it justice. It's good, but... it's not Watterson. |
| Anonymous #1330258 2 months ago |
You know that feeling you get when you see a picture that reminds you of something you forgot you loved several years ago, and all the memories rush into your brain all at once? Yeah. |
| PowerToole #1330293 2 months ago |
I am loving this with a calm, serene kind of love. |
| PhilSrobeighn #1330687 2 months ago |
As a fan of both, I respectfully log my dislike of this.
It was not true enough to either material to be enjoyable, nor original enough to be clever. |
| Anonymous #1330810 2 months ago |
So what if this isn't that true to Calvin and Hobbes? It's a lot more accurate than how Robot Chicken did it... |
| Cerulean #1331489 2 months ago |
The reason this falls short is that they're assigned the wrong characters. Hobbes is laid back, proud of his own awesomeness as a tiger, and master of the flying tackle, and he's the straightman to Calvin's sugar-fueled wacky intertextual hijinks. |
| bronyturtle #1331594 2 months ago |
i do enjoy a good reference, but it;s not much of a cross over. Cerulean pretty much hit the nail on the head. |