Image
Comments
| Anonymous #1290768 2 months ago |
Now all we need is to see his genitalia for this to be a semi-accurate depiction of the little fluffy sex-god. |
| FeralSocks018 #1290774 2 months ago |
Wow, I didn't realize how stupid that shaved area looks.
Final version will have a separation of depth, as though the fluff is growing back, so that it doesn't seem that his body is the same shape as his fluff. |
| Anonymous #1290780 2 months ago |
the shaved section doesn't look deep enough. |
| MeteorVenture #1290925 2 months ago |
But it's getting closer. You'll get it eventually. |
| deathproofpony #1290950 2 months ago |
That's awesome, man.
But I agree with Anon 780 - you've got to remember that the fluffy has several inches of fluff (unless they're truly super-overweight fluffies) Here's sort of a "breeder's cut" as I imagine it:  |