Image
Comments
| Shaggy #1263282 3 months ago |
This anon's comment goes well with my blue print for fluffy ponies in my stories. |
| MaroonBunyip #1263288 3 months ago |
posting people's comments?...
we are going down a bad track here, you lot... one we can't come back from... |
| Shaggy #1263295 3 months ago |
But it's a great explanation.
 |
| MaroonBunyip #1263302 3 months ago |
yeah... I agree with ya... it is a good explination... just thinking about the possible uses of this in the near future... with angrier users and certain touchy topics... |
| Appleloosa #1263344 3 months ago |
Damn, I should've loged in when I posted that if I knew it would be posted by Shaggy.
You can believe that was me. 94% of world population is theistic anyway. But the 6% are right. |
| NightJack #1263346 3 months ago |
I have only one thing to say to this, they are FICTIONAL, they can be whatever you want, so stop trying to get everyone to do the same thing in all the stories, it's more fun to have variety. |
| Appleloosa #1263351 3 months ago |
But if you don't believe it was me, you can just recognize via the bad english both on my comments and the picture. I'm not desperate for recognition though, sort of. |
| NightJack #1263360 3 months ago |
Also what I would really like to see is an actual intelligent fluffy smack around some dumb ones and not get abused/killed/in danger because it's smart enough to know what not to do. |
| Appleloosa #1263371 3 months ago |
@1263360
Great idea, a story about a slighly more intelligent fluffy herd/tribe overcoming and abusing a dumber herd/tribe would be fun to read. Also a good development and explanation about the difference of intelligence between them would be good. |
| Anonymous #1263377 3 months ago |
This would be the best story yet, but it fails to mention their severe incontinence and mortality, or that there are no storyverse laws against abuse.
I was reading a few fluffy stories last night where the fluffies weren't trained to go in the litter box, never actually needed to use one and survived both drowning and getting hit by lightning. One owner even got arrested for disciplining his fluffy. Suffice it to say, I was utterly appalled. The fluffyverse needs some core canon to abide by. Preferably without fluffsplosion or death by climax, as funny as those are, because foal abuse is just that much more satisfying if the parents are around to see it. This is a start, but the wiki page itself could use some touching up. |
| NightJack #1263389 3 months ago |
Another thing I would love to see is a fluffy kill a person, the fluffy doesn't have to be smart or do it on purpose, you can't have it do so without knowing what it did. |
| Anonymous #1263408 3 months ago |
its from image >>166054 |
| Anonymous #1263463 3 months ago |
The reckless part can be seen in the stories where the owner tells the fluffy to not do something and it says how it wants to do that thing really bad so it just does it anyway, it doesn't give a fuck |
| PonyFlea #1263984 3 months ago |
Just kindly tag them with fluffy_pony_abuse or fluffy_abuse so the rest of us don't have to read them.
Wer'e actually using fluffy ponies to bring about a new world order... |
| Anonymous #1264410 3 months ago |
@appleloosa Read the bit and smidget series |
| Anonymous #1264680 3 months ago |
@1263377 - As big a faggot as NightJack is, I'm with him. The last thing this needs is "core canon," because... who the fuck is gonna decide it?
You assume that everyone wants to see the same thing as you. And I certainly don't. Fluffy ponies started out as cute, dumb and accident-prone small animals. Those are the only things that need be constant. Everything else, good and bad, is just... fluff. That includes "sketties" "Nwo smweeww pwettwy!" fluffsplosions death by climax electric shocks resetting their memory amputation Bruno, the Rainbow Riders and the FPPA halfanickelhalfanickelhalfanickel and sorry sticks pony parks safe rooms "no laws against killing them lol" rabbit-like reproduction feral herds w-laden babytalk "why no wun where weggies go" "Wah nuu" shitting and pissing like regular-sized horses huggies make everwythwing bwettwa bones like balsa wood and no ability to survive outside a domestic environment only learning by positive reinforcement instinctively being drawn to anyone who shows them kindness calling their owner "daddy" or "momma" being genetically incapable of aggression or anger "Smarty Friends" "Wan' Pway!" even drowning. All of that is shit we made up and can apply or ignore as we choose - that's part of why everyone here latched onto it like they did. And that's fine. I like cute fics of fluffy ponies and their owners, abuse-rescues and feels, but I can stand knowing people write abuse stories and gore shit as long as I don't have to worry about those people shoving it into the stuff I want to read, just like I'm sure you can't stand the thought of laws preventing you from carrying out your little fantasies or adoption centers that are clean and well-run, or people who are appalled by the way you treat animals and don't take their numbers or low cost as a reason to torture them to death for pooping on your rug. So, why not compromise? I won't push any of my stuff into your stories if you don't push any of yours into mine? Sound good to you? |
| Anonymous #1265121 3 months ago |
@680
Aside from a few exceptions that adhere to the rule of cool, rule of funny or rule of nothing being impossible for heroic badasses, this is a general and logical assessment of things being canon and not canon. Canon (all justified by the rule of funny): "sketties" "Nwo smweeww pwettwy!" electric shocks resetting their memory amputation halfanickelhalfanickelhalfanickel and sorry sticks pony parks safe rooms "no laws against killing them lol" rabbit-like reproduction feral herds w-laden babytalk "why no wun where weggies go" "Wah nuu" shitting and pissing like regular-sized horses huggies make everwythwing bwettwa bones like balsa wood and no ability to survive outside a domestic environment instinctively being drawn to anyone who shows them kindness calling their owner "daddy" or "momma" "Smarty Friends" "Wan' Pway!" even drowning. Non-canon/Hugbox Fantasies: *Bruno, the Rainbow Riders and the FPPA - An organization dedicated to raping and killing humans? Now THAT'S obviously illegal in any even remotely realistic story, and there would always be laws against that in anything other than a post apocalyptic world where the downfall of mankind was caused by fluffies. There would no longer be any laws in such a setting, but it would still infuriate the sane majority of people who didn't want the world to end. In fact, it stands to reason that they'd all be branded and hunted down as terrorists. With assassination of citizens now legal IRL, it wouldn't take long for plot powered story drones to wipe them off the face of the fictional Earth. *only learning by positive reinforcement - What. If a dog shits on the rug and you give it a treat, or give it no treats and simply do nothing at all, it's just going to keep misbehaving because there's no consequence to it following its instinct. Fluffies, despite having the ability to grow slightly in intelligence, are still animals driven mostly by instinct. If they're not taught to use their heads instead of their asses, it's a matter of course that they wouldn't. Their basic level of intelligence also gives them some semblance of an ego, making them prone to entitlement and thinking they're always good. If they're never told otherwise or punished for doing bad, they'll just keep thinking they're good and won't understand why they're not being rewarded. Trying to explain to them the difference between "good" and good would be unpossible, especially without negative reinforcement, since the concept of nuance is far too complex for such simpletons. Which is why many stories instead have fluffies being taught good from bad. It's simple and easy to understand, which is why most sensible stories use it not just as canon but also common sense. Even IRL, there are times negative reinforcement is needed for even the most sentient of species. Prison and the death penalty, anyone? Only in hugbox fantasies do fluffies magically behave all the time every time without rhyme, reason nor explanation while still prone to stupidity and instinct. It's even worse if they're smart and disciplined, as "learning" is something that only comes from both success and failure. Failure is negative, BTW. *being genetically incapable of aggression or anger - Even non sentient animals are capable of such emotions. Sentient animals like humans even more so. Aside from a few exceptions intelligence rises, so does emotion induced brutality, until you're building machines solely to devastate the planet and kill everyone on it. As fluffies are animals with some sentience, even if they're not instinctually aggressive, they'd understand if someone does bad things to them and, if properly motivated by something like a mate or foals in danger, it's a matter of course that they'd grow a pair when the situation called for it. Or when their ego grows from positive reinforcement, since they'd be angry that they're not getting what they want despite being "making good poopies" all over the couch. Because they wouldn't know they're actually being bad. Ignorance is both blissful, but also makes one increasingly prone to frustration and as a result, aggression and anger. And there aren't any animals more ignorant than fluffies. It's not a genetic or physical matter at all, It's a psychological one. Only the fluffies emotionally broken or traumatized into being all but vegetables would be incapable of feeling aggression or anger. And that would come from negative reinforcement. Or a crossbone induced lobotomy. Take your pick. Non-canon/Throwaway Gag/Retired by GREAT DARWINISM: *death by climax/fluffsplosions (clearly caused by orgasm-esque labor contractions) - Widespread in early stories, but an increasing number no longer use these concepts. One can infer that the most of the fluffies who suffered from this died from natural causes, predators, abuse or immediately after fulfilling their role in reproduction, with their foals soon being killed off since they wouldn't have parents to protect them. Darwinism at work. This is now nothing more than a throwaway gag used for drama or lolz, because such fluffies would normally die as foals before ever becoming the subject of a story. |
| Anonymous #1265144 3 months ago |
*crossbone > crossbow
Damn typo, but I regret nothing! Tobia Arronax is best gundam character. |
| Tabula_Rojo #1265258 3 months ago |
@Anon#1265121
I don't know bro I enjoy these recent stories in which Feral herds manage to survive fairly well outside of a domestic environment, particularly when they have an experienced Smarty Friend And I'm not super found of the idea that animal abuse laws don't apply to them simply because they are man made. I understand it would be difficult to enforce the law in this regard but that doesn't mention fluffy abuse should be legal although dispite this I am working on a story where fluffabuse is not illegal... but whateves |
| Tabula_Rojo #1265265 3 months ago |
*that doesn't MEAN fluffy abuse shouldn't be illegal |
| Anonymous #1265633 3 months ago |
@1265121:
>Nobody can agree on a canon, so how about we use the fact there is nothing hard and fast about these stories to let each other do our own thing and just agree we don't find the same things appealing or funny? >"Fuck you all my justifications that I just made up are appealing and funny to me, so they're canon!" Way to completely miss his point. Also on the subject of positive reinforcement: Ever had a bird as a pet? They don't learn by negative reinforcement. They do something bad, you yell at them, and they think "That was interesting! Let's do that again!" You give them a treat for good behavior and they start associating that behavior with it, and repeat it in favour of bad behavior. |
| Shaggy #1266177 3 months ago |
I just want to say that this just has to do with my head cannon and no one else. If you want to make a story where a fluffy pony is a macho super smart bad ass then go for it. |
| sigh #1266392 3 months ago |
@Anon633
Parrots don't understand Human language. Your analogy is a fail. |
| Anonymous #1266502 3 months ago |
^Your comprehension, more like. Are you sure you're not a fluffy pony yourself? |
| Anonymous #1266508 3 months ago |
^^Also, African Grey Parrots. |
| Anonymous #1269466 2 months ago |
@258
Fluffies are as stupid, entitled and self destructive as investment bankers. Only there's more of them and they're vulnerable. They don't receive abuse, they inspire it. That's why laws against fluffy abuse would be costly and impossible to enforce. Law enforcement would go bankrupt from the cost of hunting down abusers, while real criminals start becoming more and more common until society crumbles under the weight of the moralfags delusional adherence to the idea that fuzzy talking rats are a national treasure. |
| Anonymous #1269561 2 months ago |
^There are people who say that about real animals. |
| Anonymous #1269579 2 months ago |
@#1269561: Yeah. People like fluffy pony-luvfags. They want to protect imaginary retarded mutant creatures, while caring not one iota about the plight of real animals. |
| Anonymous #1276289 2 months ago |
^You sound upset. |
| Anonymous #1276294 2 months ago |
^your comment is two days too late. Better luck next time. |
| benger #1276303 2 months ago |
^yours is too |
| Anonymous #1276315 2 months ago |
7 minutes is two days too late, amirite? |
| Anonymous #1276396 2 months ago |
#1269561
Those same people would probably say the same about anyone they don't like, which will quickly expand to include any dissenters. |
| Anonymous #1294116 2 months ago |
This shit's stupid and creepy. The argument in the image better be a troll, if someone believed it in real life they'd just be a pathetic creep. |
| Anonymous #1294136 2 months ago |
You're so cute, #1294116. One would almost believe that you were really angry about what people think about fluffy ponies. |