Image
Comments
| lordanubis #1253833 3 months ago |
Seriously. Seems like a lot of stories involving mass fluffy care involve pointless negligence and abuse. |
| PhilSrobeighn #1253849 3 months ago |
An interesting look at fluffy pony mills versus quality breeding
But on movie night, is it the best idea to serve Fluffies carbonated, sugary, caffinated beverages? |
| FeralSocks018 #1253856 3 months ago |
Nice. |
| Anonymous #1253858 3 months ago |
Ginger Ale. Problem solved! |
| Anonymous #1253861 3 months ago |
Shitty writing comparing to the original fluffy farm story. |
| Ghosts44 #1253870 3 months ago |
@861
>Implying that's the only story about farms. Stop editing the tags you fuck. I upload for both abusers and lovers. I have an abuse thing being edited at the moment, expect it soon. |
| benger #1253875 3 months ago |
@lordnabis
These descriptions would work perferctly with modern slaughter houses. if you eat meat (at least in the USA) that is what the cow / chicken / pig / lamb / whatever probubly went through. I have worked in a slaughterhouse before, i am not exagerating when i say this is farely standard. |
| Anonymous #1253876 3 months ago |
@1253870
I don't care. This shitty story makes clear references to the most well-written fluffy farm story. |
| PhilSrobeighn #1253878 3 months ago |
@858 I am still worried about fluffies and carbonation |
| PhilSrobeighn #1253883 3 months ago |
@876 Correlation does not imply causation |
| Ghosts44 #1253896 3 months ago |
@Phil
Keep the bottles on their side for months. Problem=solved |
| PhilSrobeighn #1253917 3 months ago |
Horray! The fluffies can have soda.
But now I want to write a story where fluffy accidentily gets carbonated, sugary, caffinated soda. |
| Ghosts44 #1253919 3 months ago |
Inb4 coke and mentos |
| PhilSrobeighn #1253968 3 months ago |
^Oh god yes |
| Mayclore #1254063 3 months ago |
...considering writing about a fluffy pony mill now. |
| NightJack #1254064 3 months ago |
^^ Do it, that would be funny, but don't have them all die from it... |
| CranialHeartache #1254120 3 months ago |
This is one of my favorite stories. |
| Anonymous #1255563 3 months ago |
not bad i like common sense is strong with this one |
| Anonymous #1257092 3 months ago |
The fluffy pony-farm of Farmer Bob is the best fluffy-pony story, and nothing can change it, not even when you apply real world logic to it.
The "happy-free-range-fluffy pony"-farm however is just bad even without applying real world logic to it. Abusive farms where the conditions are bad for animals in the real world are a lot more profitable than the "free-range-healthy-animals"-farms, which is why they are used in all countries until some stupid animal-protection group like PETA cries around, making things just expensive. There is absolutely no way for this "happy-free-range-fluffy pony"-farm to ever be profitable, and it will never be. |
| Anonymous #1257262 3 months ago |
This story seems to make sense, but it actually doesn't. The farm would have increased costs due to the higher quality of care, which would inevitably be passed on to the consumer. Due to a complete lack of fluffy oversight and regulation due to the government not caring, other farms could get away with treating them like shit and selling them for beans. Buyers wouldn't pay an inflated price for something with a market value of 0, a high mortality rate and suicidal stupidity when there are far cheaper alternatives.
Since the ponies at this farm were treated well, they would become accustomed to that kind of thoughtful care. When the buyers bring them home and treat them like mere pets, which most would undoubtedly do, the fluffies would incessantly whine, moan and complain about wanting to go back to the farm. The new owner would be insulted and either bring them back, start abusing them or just kill the damn things on the spot. Congrats, your spoiled fluffies just lost you a bunch of customers. Inflating the self esteem of fluffies by caring for them better than most owners would only facilitates an intolerable level of unwarranted self importance that's detrimental to the long term survival of the fluffies post-adoption. It only serves as a selfish ego boost for the farmer, who would go out of business from buyers switching to cheaper farms. Fluffies at abusive farms idolize their owners for saving them from distress, and they'd be far more obedient due to having nowhere else to go. That's why they'd stay in business, and OP's farm would be shit outta luck. Sorry OP, but this story is nothing but nonsensical wish fulfillment that has no basis in the actual economics of fluffies. Suspension of disbelief is hard for anyone who knows anything about fluffies. Seriously, no owner would want to go through the trouble of adopting a fluffy and giving it some food only for the fluffy to refuse it and inquire about the toys, cartoons, sketties, movies and snacks they were provided at the farm. The farm effectively makes them too stupid to be loved, and that's terrible. This farm, and all like it, should be shut down immediately and burned to the ground for doing a disservice to customers. |
| Anonymous #1285489 2 months ago |
@092/262 Maybe the author just couldn't be arsed to prescribe to someone else's little universe? He stated point-blank in the beginning that it wasn't expensive taking care of even their most basic needs; the only reason for them to suffer is simple human laziness, stupidity and sadism. These fluffies are obviously meant to be more innocent than the shits populating the current 'canon'.
And honestly, isn't this whole sub-genre/circle-jerk of torture and wub "wish-fulfillment" no matter how you slice it? It's fucking FANFICTION. |
| Anonymous #1285508 2 months ago |
It's absolutely referencing the best fluffy pony story. With some wish-fullfillment about happy fluffy ponies being bred in a magical bullshit-farm that makes more money than a farm that absolutely doesn't try to bother with keeping shitty pony-pig-sheep-hybrids happy, which is complete bullshit in a suspension-of-disbelief-shattering-way, and that's quite a feat considering we're talking about talking retard-horses with lots of fluff.
But fortunately, Ghost44 doesn't write such bullshit anymore. |
| Anonymous #1387066 2 months ago |
Great Story! At least something less gore... |
| Anonymous #1404401 2 months ago |
it wouldn't be hard to keep fluffy ponies happy. Show them a movie on an old TV with an old VCR and old tapes. Feeding them mostly human stuff means you buy can buy in bulk at Costco or Sam's Club so there's less additional food budget. Larger cages means less material needed to build cages. There's no need to buy the machines to get the fluffies breeding as they'd do it naturally and less spent disposing of dead fluffy bodies. |
| fluff474 #1458477 3 weeks ago |
@262
>Congrats, your spoiled fluffies just lost you a bunch of customers. >fluffies >spoiled Read some stories before the invention of smarty friends sometime. @401 >Larger cages means less material needed to build cages. And the building the cages go in comes fre.e >There's no need to buy the machines to get the fluffies breeding Except in all the settings where they can't or don't want to breed on their own. |