Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Saint_Braeburn
#1224496
3 months ago
This is a Mayclover story Btw.

Also I would have killed the ringleader instead of the Mother and baby. It's more manly that way.
Saint_Braeburn
#1224552
3 months ago
I meant Mayclore not Mayclover
harpseal2
#1224616
3 months ago
that was way too far. is this Charles Manson writing this shit?
Anonymous
#1224633
3 months ago
Should have killed more adults and not the baby. Not for the thrill, but to teach the greedy little selfish bastards a lesson.
unweird
#1224640
3 months ago
I like this.

But seriously, was that really necessary?
Anonymous
#1224646
3 months ago
you forgot the part where i killed the farmer's cows and loved ones in the night, forcing him to sell the land through lack livestock and will to go on, which i then buy for next to nothing and give to the to fluffies which they use for playing, eating and enjoying their short, but happy lives.
Anonymous
#1224651
3 months ago
@#1224633

They probably wouldn't have learned. It seems in this sort of story they have to be properly traumatized or else they'll just elect a new leader to replace the last and continue to be just as annoying.
Anonymous
#1224657
3 months ago
1224646 But the fluffy ponies were at fault here. He killed the foal for insulting his family with their own stupidity.
Anonymous
#1224667
3 months ago
That was awesome!
Anonymous
#1224668
3 months ago
@657
no cawe, he could have lowered the fence, he could have scared them away some other way. no, he choose to abuse the little dumbards psychically and psychologically by killing one that was completely innocent.

and for that, i take the lives of the ones he loved, the ones who also did nothing wrong, because much like him, i don't care.
Anonymous
#1224676
3 months ago
@#1224646
So you would kill people and innocent animals to preserve the lives of these selfish, cruel and unintelligent short-lived beings?

Why? Because they're cute?

The Fluffy Ponies presented in this story aren't innocent victims, they're just too weak to be a real threat. It's the same with most pests.

They're the aggressors plain and simple, they're just too stupid to realize how truly pathetic they are. That does not excuse their actions nor make them any less petty or mean-spirited.

They were given fair warning and the farmer did much less damage then he could have. He was even allowing them to graze before they had the brilliant idea to try and steal his land.

Not to mention these are Fluffies of the Human hating variety that would likely attack you even if you were friendly.

So, think about what you posted and what that suggests of your priorities. These Fluffies were as much bastards as the farmer if not more so.
Anonymous
#1224679
3 months ago
668 He's still not as fucked up as you then.
Saint_Braeburn
#1224684
3 months ago
He did give the a warning.

And the Fluffy Ponies did attack the cows.
Anonymous
#1224695
3 months ago
@Saint_Braeburn

Which are far kinder and more noble creatures then these Fluffy Ponies here. If they weren't they would have trampled them all to death.

With most pests you wouldn't even try to reason with them, you would just shoot them all and be done with it. He left most of them alive.
Anonymous
#1224708
3 months ago
because they are truly innocent, the way they speak, the way they think. and how the fuck does eating grass and being rude = murdering an individual's baby?

also, why do it? because i can, the whole point of these 'stories' is 'because i can', because people don't care, he can murder a fictional being, i'll murder his fictional beings, because i can.
Anonymous
#1224711
3 months ago
also, if you want to hurt these
cute little individuals, then you're a massive faggot.
Anonymous
#1224716
3 months ago
Ok then let's say you have a creature that's a fluffy pony in every way except for it's form which is this and pulled this shit, would you show the same support to the offenders then?
Anonymous
#1224718
3 months ago
^
I want to crush their fucking skulls.
Anonymous
#1224719
3 months ago
Yeah use homophobic remarks that'll earn ya support buddy.
Anonymous
#1224730
3 months ago
@1224711

>Implying that abusers are faggots
>Likes to cuddle little critters to sleep

Not sure if stupid...
Anonymous
#1224733
3 months ago
yes 716, if they didn't know any better and couldn't really hurt me, i would be the bigger individual and treat it with respect, even if it didn't give me that same respect back.

just because you can, doesn't mean you have the right to.

also 719, stop being an idoiot, it's 2012, gay now means lame and faggot now means dickhead.
Anonymous
#1224738
3 months ago
@#1224708

They're cute. What does that matter?

If it makes me a faggot for not considering aesthetics alone as the value of an animals life then so be it. Crows are far more intelligent animals that you probably wouldn't be in such a hurry to defend.

Look at their actions as if they were particularly mangy rats that swore like sailors instead of using baby talk. Now consider their actions from that perspective.

We have a bunch of vicious animals attacking your livestock yelling about how they're going to take over your farm. Animals that usually won't react with enough fear to anything short of traumatizing.

If it weren't for how weakness and their looks you could see that they're hardly innocent. They're talking animals, nothing more.

As such they deserve to be treated like any other sort of animal behaving in the same manner.

If my sexuality is tied to considering their aesthetics to be irrelevant then I guess that's just the way it must be.
Anonymous
#1224740
3 months ago
also, we're on a site dedicated to images, why the fuck is this sick shit posted here? leave it in the shitpool that is /mlp/
Anonymous
#1224741
3 months ago
733 You're lucky your an anon cause the hole you're digging has just hit bedrock.
Anonymous
#1224753
3 months ago
Personally, what I would have done would have been less harsh than hurting a fluffy mom and her unborn foal...
I would simply have picked up the ringleader and spanked him. Fifty times the first time, then fifty more the following times.
Fluffies can't take "owwies" very well, after all, and seeing their "smawty fwiend" humiliated rather than mutilated would have put things in proportion for the fluffy herd.
I would also have made tighter fences and simply told them "See? Your Smarty Friend made you bad, so you can't eat grass here anymore. Good fluffies can eat my grass, but you can't. Because you're bad."
Gotta keep it simple with the fluffies :)
Anonymous
#1224755
3 months ago
@#1224733

They were treated with respect to no avail. They were quite adamant in their refusal to leave and were harassing livestock. They likely knew better since they had only recently begun acting up.

They were trying to conquer territory at the expense of the local inhabitants, they should be treated like anything else that tries that.
Anonymous
#1224757
3 months ago
They did know better, they just wiped their ass with his whole "my family owned this land since the war" statement.
Anonymous
#1224763
3 months ago
@#1224753

Depends on the Fluffy mentality in question. I've read a few of the "Smarty Friend" stories and they're usually all human haters that replace their leaders all the time and never learn proper fear until traumatized and will keep fighting until this occurs.

Doesn't mean I actually believe their couldn't have been a nicer way to solve this, but more that they're no more deserving then Crows are.
Anonymous
#1224775
3 months ago
This whole story reminds me of this Powerpuff Girls episode, Sweet n' Sour. 1224646 You make it sound like you would bend over and let these things have their way with you at their wishes.
Anonymous
#1224779
3 months ago
I would have killed the fluffy ponies anyway, because I hate them, even if they were nice and not little shits like in this story. But stories like these were the fluffy ponies are just little shits (like in the crashed plane-story) make me very happy, because the fluffy ponies there totally deserve any abuse you can inflict of them, and you would even be justified.

That, and the fluffy pony-farm where the fluffy ponies are treated without any love and only get beaten up or shocked, are the best kinds of fluffy pony-stories.
Anonymous
#1224781
3 months ago
@779

Hate isn't good for you.
Anonymous
#1224784
3 months ago
As long as it is used in a productive way (like against fluffy ponies), everything's fine.
Anonymous
#1224785
3 months ago
@1224763
Possibly. Personally, I see them more like... you know, like children who follow the new "cool friend" who actually is a little spoiled brat that won't respect anyone because he's a little dick, but since he does things that they can't do he looks "extra special" in their eyes. Put the brat in his place, the others give up because he doesn't have their respect anymore.
Still, I appreciate your style. Usually the pro-fluffy/anti-fluffy discussions are kind of like two groups of howler monkeys: a lot of screaming and throwing shit on both sides. You're being reasonable. Thank you.
Anonymous
#1224787
3 months ago
@784

Hate is never productive, only destructive.
Anonymous
#1224791
3 months ago
@#1224779

Why hate them? I can enjoy this easily without hating them.

It's a story with talking animals that doesn't raise their intellect by giving them speech and lowering the communication barrier. That's the part I find appealing in all of these stories.
Anonymous
#1224807
3 months ago
@#1224785

It depends upon the story really. The ones in charge usually are the ones that are more assertive according to the stories I've read.

And to be honest, I'm neither Pro nor Anti-Fluffy. I just like the stories in general with the behavior and reactions of the Fluffy Ponies to a variety of situations as well as their owners.

To me they're none too bright animals with a communication barrier removed without an added increase in mental capacity. This makes them interesting to me.
Anonymous
#1224850
3 months ago
@#1224791:
Because they've passed the uncanny valley-effect into the kill-it-with-fire-region.
Impious
#1225027
3 months ago
Anonymous
#1225068
3 months ago
Kill 'em all, I say.
Anonymous
#1225703
3 months ago
Should've killed them all. They make for good compost, I hear.
Anonymous
#1225832
3 months ago
@1224755
@1224781
@1224787

Your manchild butthurt will only make it worse.

There's no way to stop us, you filthy second class wiener sucking luv faggots.
Anonymous
#1225833
3 months ago
I really like these wild fluffy herd stories
Anonymous
#1225836
3 months ago
I R A FAGGOT ANON LOL IMA CHANGE DIS SHIT.

> I SEE DIS
>LOL I M LEIK NO
> I KILL A HOOMAN TO SAVE DA FUKIN USELESS SHTIOTY NIGGER FLUFFYCUNTS
>DEY JUG ME
>LOLOL HUGS
>DEY ALL DROWN
>NOOOOOOO FUK FUK FUK
>MY BUTT HURTS
CodenameOne
#1226073
3 months ago
Oh my fucking God, how the fuck can you try to apply morality and ethics to something like killing the Fluffies?

I would've tortured all those insolent little cunts for thinking they're hot shit and trying to take my land.

They deserve all suffering bestowed upon them.
Mayclore
#1226229
3 months ago
...if stories like this piss people off, why do they keep reading them?

I don't get it.
Saint_Braeburn
#1226242
3 months ago
Someone get me Anon836's business card! I smell a future Pulizer and Newberry prize winner
Mayclore
#1226257
3 months ago
^ Say, you wouldn't be that BallsOfFluff person that collects all my Pastebin work, would you?
Anonymous
#1226384
3 months ago
nice story
Anonymous
#1226417
3 months ago
Why do people read stuff that pisses them off? Ignorance of the filter feature, stupidity, or trolls raising drama. I think this is very well written and doesn't really have senseless violence like most stories, just someone showing these little sacks of shit that they better be prepared to pay the price for insulting his family with their selfish behavior.
FeralSocks018
#1226597
3 months ago
Wild fluffies suck. Domestic fluffies wouldn't dream of defying a human.
Anonymous
#1226638
3 months ago
@FeralSocks018

Unless they thought it was a game...

But I suppose you're right, they wouldn't do so as to consciously defy their masters most of the time.
Anonymous
#1226640
3 months ago
@FeralSocks018

Unless they thought it was a game...

But I suppose you're right, they wouldn't do so as to consciously their masters most of the time.
Dramatic_spoon
#1227478
3 months ago
Don't matter how cute you are.
You do not fuck with a man's Livelihood.
Appleloosa
#1227723
3 months ago
@1227478

Yeah, these butthurts are the kind of "men" that are pawns of their girlfriends/wives (considering they ever get a gf/wife).

Those "men" are so blind because of their woman's appearance that those women can get away with anything wrong they do. (Also because it's probably the first girl they ever dated, but that's not the point)

They move to your appartment, change your stuff, dictates the way you have to live and things you have to do on your spare time, and if they're not happy with you (even though you're the person that put the most effort on the relationship), they just divorce you and get 50% of everything you have. But it's ok, they're "cute".

A dark fate these "men" have, a grim dark fate under the heels of some woman.
Anonymous
#1230398
3 months ago
You realize this is a story, right?

Like, the authour chose to have the fluffy ponies be "unreasonable" so he could be "justified" in taking out violence upon them.

It's just another variation of the abuse fantasy, only now the fluffy ponies "have it coming" in such a way that anyone who complains about the fantasy is obviously a weak willed "girly "man"".

You might as well write a story about a filthy nigger breaking into your house and after being so reasonable about it he threatens you with a knife so you have no choice but to shoot out his knees, break his arms, and dangle him over a river by a fraying rope.
Sjogre
#1230562
3 months ago
Aside from the question of where feral fluffies keep being portrayed as hostile, two weird things.

One, what the hell kind of fence lets the fluffies just stroll through? The narration implies that it stops before reaching the ground, but why? Anything that would let a herd of fluffy ponies through would also let in a bunch of other vermin.

And second, why do the cows just let the fluffies push them around? Cows don't pick fights, as a rule, but they will fight back. Those fluffies should have been trampled to death before the farmer even knew that they were there.
Dramatic_spoon
#1230909
3 months ago
^ Why would you waste Fencing when it might be covered over by the grass, and the cows might injure themselves?

My neighbor raises cattle, and her fencing doesn't reach all the way down, just enough so that the cows can't get out. and the Mongeese and rats do run into the fields, but that's minor.

second, I don't think the cows see the Fluffy ponies as a threat, just an annoyance.
Anonymous
#1410100
2 months ago
Anonymous
#1410106
2 months ago
^thank you for bringing this story up again. Now I can read it once more and enjoy the suffering and deaths of fluffy ponies.
Anonymous
#1410110
2 months ago
Reminds me of this
Anonymous
#1410120
2 months ago
>1410110

That would be OP's family
Anonymous
#1410127
2 months ago
^His family burned fluffy ponies and then hammered them to a bloody pulp? He has a good family.
Anonymous
#1410372
2 months ago
I wish fluffy ponies were real. Then I could brutally murder them myself.
Anonymous
#1416004
1 month ago
1410372 and 1410127 got spanked way too often when they were kids

[hr]

>His family burned fluffy ponies and then hammered them to a bloody pulp? He has a good family.

No, there ponies ARE his family. He is the surviving of a retard
Anonymous
#1416007
1 month ago
He is the surviving child of a retard
Anonymous
#1461550
3 weeks ago
This is well written, but he should've killed adults instead of a new born foal. Other than that I don't see why moralfags are so buttmad about this though.