Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

rainbowcrash93
#1155134
4 months ago
Images broken again?
Anonymous
#1155153
4 months ago
TobiasKazama
#1155161
4 months ago
"Drive closer! I want to poke them with my horn!"
rainbowcrash93
#1155162
4 months ago
Shitty Russian military engineering to the rescue!
Saint_Braeburn
#1155194
4 months ago
^ Dammit Rainbow, are you trying to cause a flame war!
rainbowcrash93
#1155211
4 months ago
^ No, was just pointing out the obvious
Anonymous
#1155221
4 months ago
^ too fat
Rezak
#1155226
4 months ago
^
yes she does))

"Just give us those ones who did the (russian) dub - and (then) no one will be hurt!"
Saint_Braeburn
#1155235
4 months ago
^ and ^^

what?
Rezak
#1155239
4 months ago
^
what do you mean by "what" Braeburn?
Saint_Braeburn
#1155270
4 months ago
^ Your comments lack context.

Why did Anon221 call Rainbow's comment fat?

And why did you respond with, "Just give us those ones who did the (russian) dub - and (then) no one will be hurt!"

Is their a joke I'm not getting?
Rezak
#1155288
4 months ago
^Saint_Braeburn, Anon 221 said that rainbowcrash93 is trolling too hard (hurr durr, I haet all russian stuff becuz they luuk stoopid), and I agree with anon here. As for me - I just translated the Twi's text.
Anonymous
#1155294
4 months ago
I'm gonna fuck your ass and shit down your mouth saint Braeburn
Lium
#1155322
4 months ago
You damn russians use the stupidest of alphabets. Why you gotta be different?
Anonymous
#1155323
4 months ago
^ вот из-за таких как ты, анон294, все заборы в России хуями и разрисованы.
rainbowcrash93
#1155326
4 months ago
@Rezak Hurr durr, Russians steal other country's designs and when they do design their own shit, it's usually sub-par. I'm not trolling, just pointing out the obvious
Saint_Braeburn
#1155328
4 months ago
^ MY REACTION TO YOUR COMMENT



Btw the OP is right the Russian Dub is terrible,
But in my opinion the Romanian dub is still the worst.
Saint_Braeburn
#1155332
4 months ago
NInja'd

That comment was directed to Anon294
Anonymous
#1155334
4 months ago
@rainbowcrash93 prove it or gtfo
Anonymous
#1155336
4 months ago
I AM FUCKING YOU BRAE, soaking your face with my hate juice. I will show no mercy for your puckered gate of regret. I shall force onward, slowly.
Anonymous
#1155337
4 months ago
Who let those filthy thirdworlders into the civilized parts of the internet? GTFO commies, shouldn't you be busy with drinking vodka and attacking small defenseless countries like Georgia?
Anonymous
#1155343
4 months ago
^ we Russians steals the designs of your inetrnets, lol. all your base are belong to us.
Anonymous
#1155345
4 months ago
I will force boiling hotsause and wasabi into your eye holes after I please myself, fakelander.
Saint_Braeburn
#1155346
4 months ago
Given the direction these comments are going.....
Might I suggest that all sane people

Rezak
#1155349
4 months ago
^rainbowcrash93

Aww, yankee, you don't want to start Political Shitstorm on ponibooru, don't you? If your mind is That narrow - I can make some things clear for ya in private. Otherwise, I'll have to accept your, errr,
"challenge". So, what do you gonna choose? Should we stay civil, or just start to throw shit at each other like apes?
Anonymous
#1155351
4 months ago
There is no peace form you, harlot whore of St. Braeburn. Your holes will open, your folds will part and nothing will remain after we/me/all clean your flesh.
Anonymous
#1155362
4 months ago
@Rezak, my drunken soviet comrade, the inferiority of russian designs was proven many, many times. Ever read about Yom Kippur War? Centurions were vastly superior to anything soviets could build.
Saint_Braeburn
#1155367
4 months ago
^^ Are you happy Anon351? You mad President Nixon upset

Saint_Braeburn
#1155370
4 months ago
^ *made*
Anonymous
#1155373
4 months ago
We will force it. You are nothing, but. Soon you will be free. You require the barbs of freedom, only then in tearing can your ass be free.
Anonymous
#1155374
4 months ago
@anon362 hitech+arabian=fail, no exceptions. your argument is invalid.
Rezak
#1155377
4 months ago
^55362

There is no Soviet Union for 20 years. How did you oversleep that? If it was proven - give me the links first.
I don't know what "Yom Kippur War" is. Care to explain please?

(oh, and by the way yankee - I don't drink C2H5OH at all. Half of my family doing the same, other half know the border line, just as all other civil folks around the world. You really should refresh your worldview)
Saint_Braeburn
#1155383
4 months ago
To Anon373
Anonymous
#1155389
4 months ago
You attempts at logic fail before my unbending sword, Rezaks hopes for the day that his spear will support him but he waits forever, his flesh betraying. I gloat, my meat a heavy weight, loosening his teeth as I slap. My meat.

Slap.
Slap.
Slap.
Anonymous
#1155392
4 months ago
^ somepony call the ambulance. Heavy halluciantions here.
Anonymous
#1155395
4 months ago
Forever Will I Fuck You.
xuitarius
#1155396
4 months ago
Заебца.
Rezak
#1155399
4 months ago
Anon 55389 just went to the astral dimension. Damn son, you shouldn't do drags!
Anonymous
#1156299
3 months ago
Rezak: I'm not the anon you've been arguing with, but the Yom Kippur war was a brief war in 1973 between Israel (using U.S. designed equipment) and several Arab countries (using Soviet designed equipment). Israel wrecked their shit.
Stank
#1156312
3 months ago
I'm no Russophile, but the T-34 saved Europe's ass. No "inferior Russian design" there. The Panzer I, II, and III couldn't hold a candle to it during Barbarossa. Really, all modern tank designs come from the T-34 - so who's stealing from who?

The performance of Russian designed tanks in the Yom Kippur War had more to do with the superior targeting and jamming systems of the Israelis than the allegedly poor construction of the Soviet made tanks. Not to mention the Israeli's superior training.

Having said that, I do consider the Centurion to be the best tank of that war.
Anonymous
#1156604
3 months ago
"Inferior" ancient Soviet technology like the AK-47 and RPG is responsible for most American casualties even in the 21st century. Meanwhile American high-technology still jams cause of sand...
zibbity
#1157200
3 months ago
How in the crap did this thread turn into a Serious Discussion? Come on, people, less pointless ranting and more laughing at the fact that this pic is hilarious.
Rezak
#1157270
3 months ago
it's 01:17 on my clocks, and for some reason I'm typing this words. I need to get a live, shouldn't I? ))

Okay. First, Anon 56299.
Stank already told you why the Israel destroyed arabian armies. Arabs indeed had soviet armor, BUT they haven't soviet tankers (the guys who drive tanks, who must learn A LOT about using their armor before go to battlefield). I assume that Syria and Egypt had, lets say, not the best tankers they could get. Not only tankers, mind you, but also jet pilots and other military staff. As far as I know, arabs had much more men AND armor\jets in that war, yet they lost. Why? Heck, if only I was there back then so I could tell you the answer. But, as wiki (and Stank) says - quality won over quantity. That's the first thing. The second thing - Israelis had and still has far superiour trainings, and thus the Israel still exist. Did Sirians and Egyptians have as good training as Israelis? I honestly don't know myself, but I think we both can guess the answer. Seriously, it was about 1 against 2.5 man back there. And losses were awful on both sides.

Now Stank, I honestly don't know about "all modern tank designs come from the T-34", but humanity always took and still takes good ideas from each other, so your words are likely true.

Oh, and please anons - don't start your "the commies always steal our neat tech because they can't build shit without it!". You guys do realise that industrial espionage wasn't think up by russians at the beginning of 20th century, do you? It's not like I'm saying that we, russians, didn't do that (actually - I simply don't know much about it). I just don't believe that NATO, China or whoever else weren't \ aren't doing so.

Anon 56604, if M-16 was as cheap and reliable as AK rifles - most of NATO's casualties could be caused by M-16. I think that terrorists simply can't\don't want to buy expensive (and complicated) firearms.
And I do hope that you guys will fix your neat looking firearms in future so they won't be afraid of sand, dust or dirt))

01:51. I'm going to get some coffee. Can we all close this unnecessary political thingy here please? I don't come on poniboodu for that, and I'm sure nobody does either.
ObssN
#1170266
3 months ago
The various Arab armies are horrid at modern conventional war. Syrian and Egyptian officers constantly frustrated both their Soviet and (in the case of Egypt post-1975) American trainers by their pigheadedness and refusal to work together in a manner that would effectively work on the modern battlefield. Most notably the Iraqis were stalemated by the Iranians for years, despite the former having overwhelming superiority in armor and artillery, while an entire Libyan mechanized corps was once routed by a force of Chad guerrillas in technicals (ie: civilian pick-up trucks with heavy weapons strapped to them) that was outnumbered 3:1! And the less said about the attitude of those in the Saudi military, the better. By all acounts, the only Arab army which is remotely decent in terms of troop quality was the Jordanian Army...

Soviet equipment which was sent to their client states also suffered from the Soviet practice of creating special export models of their tanks, often referred to derisively as "Monkey Models" (so called because they often recieved the 'M' designation, for example: the T-55M, which is rather ubiquitous among Arab armies). Now it is a rather common practice among major arms exporter to downgrade the stuff they hand over to their clients in some manner. The M1A2s the United States sold to Saudi Arabia, for instance, has a downgraded fire control systems the M1A2s used by the US Army does. The thing is, the Soviets took it a step further...

For comparison, lets take the Soviet workhorse of the 1970s: the T-72. The model that was commonly used among the Red Army for the time was the T-72A, which had a 125mm 2A46M main gun and an average of roughly 600mm of frontal armor. On the other hand, the T-72M commonly found among the Arab armies and other Soviet export states was armed with the older 2A26 gun and had an average of roughly 300mm of frontal armor!

It was actually a rather brilliant move on the Soviets part, since the West would look at the equipment they destroyed fighting Soviet proxies and assume that was the same kind of equipment they would face if they fought the Soviets in Central Europe... which was actually a radical underestimation!

One final note: the T-72, like the T-55 and T-62, was a Soviet "quantity tank"... a design primarily optimized for mass production and to "fill the ranks" (so to speak) while still remaining capable combatants. The two Soviet "quality tanks", the T-64 and T-80, were never exported outside the Soviet Union...