Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Nebbie
#1082532
4 months ago
Not a dupe, but still looks terrible. Worse even in some ways.
LitCigarette
#1083027
4 months ago
^thanks for the amazing input, and sorry about that. i guess i'll be... less "terrible" at art? what does that even mean? are like, the colors bad? the form? you do realize "terrible" isn't a very descriptive word, right? if you're gonna even take the time to type up a criticism, could you at least fucking SAY WHAT'S SO TERRIBLE ABOUT IT? why waste your time if you're not even gonna say what it is you don't like? just so everyone can know that you specifically find this piece of art distasteful? how does that benefit anyone? this isn't your fucking blog, no one gives a shit if you personally didn't like something.

also fucking <3 whoever uploaded this. :3
Anonymous
#1083756
4 months ago
Well, although I disagree about its "terribleness", there are a few tidbits that could be handled better; for example, the torso has a "reverse balloon" shape, being thicker in the rear than in the front, and scoot's face looks kind of like a bird's - with derped eyes, too.
No biggie, but you might try to work a bit on those.
Edef
#1083882
4 months ago
@LitCigarette
Not sure if sarcasm
LitCigarette
#1091703
4 months ago
@882: tots srs. i can't stand it when people just comment and say, "that looks shitty." and then bail. it leaves me with nothing to go on, i have no idea what they think is shitty, and i can't make anything better. it doesn't help anything.

unless i'm just reading his comment wrong, and he's just voicing his opinion on the subject matter. in which case, can't be angry at that, to each his own.