Image
Comments
| MaroonBunyip #1062683 4 months ago |
 |
| Anonymous #1062686 4 months ago |
way to block the best part |
| Muffinoffun #1062687 4 months ago |
 |
| Gittonsxv #1062691 4 months ago |
Y U MAKE FOALS SO FUCKING HOT !!?? |
| Doctor_Whooves #1062713 4 months ago |
 |
| Mattatatta #1062739 4 months ago |
*Clop clop clop*
Wait... the explicit part is covered up *polc polc polC* *Goes to find the explicit version* |
| DashRaptor #1062751 4 months ago |
 |
| Anonymous #1063077 4 months ago |
@Mattatatta: Way to un-clop, I never knew there was a Ctrl+Z for masturbation! |
| Anonymous #1063151 4 months ago |
(-.-) (-.-) (-.-) (-.-) (-.-) (-.-)
We Do Not Approve |
| Anonymous #1063501 4 months ago |
Oh my god this version looks even more enticing |
| AppleJackFrost #1063521 4 months ago |
 |
| AcuteAngle #1063750 4 months ago |
Brony fandom isn't like furry fandom.
For starters, most furries hate sexually-themed art of underaged characters. |
| Django #1063773 4 months ago |
me:*hanging from a noose*
SB:*enters my room* i'm back, now we ca-AHHHH! *funeral* SB:*crying on my grave* why? WHY DID YOU DO THIS? I just wanted to have fun with you on bed *sniff* Yes, I would kill myself if a filly would be waiting in my bed to do have sex with me, problem? |
| Anonymous #1063798 4 months ago |
773: You wouldn't be interested in having your Mental Health checked first? Seems like you'd have to be Tripping Balls to see that. |
| Silversoul666 #1064492 4 months ago |
@django: Then, instead of helping save the poor little misguided soul that, by a background unknown to you, is interested in sex in such a tender age, you prefer to simply kill yourself.
Later, it will be tought you actually DID something to her and commited suicide due to guilt. And all of her action from that point onwards will be tought to be your fault. And whoever is corrupting the foal will still be out and about, robbing the young of their innocence. |
| Anonymous #1064770 4 months ago |
Oh geez, how long was this open? |
| AcuteAngle #1068084 4 months ago |
Ponibooru, where sexy underage fillies are rated 'safe' for your clopping pleasure. |
| Anonymous #1068314 4 months ago |
@Mattatatta
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/781804#search=My_Little_Pony%20sweetie_belle |
| Silversoul666 #1068873 4 months ago |
@AcuteAngle: Well, she is not showing ANYTHING she doesn't already shows usually... |
| AcuteAngle #1068959 4 months ago |
@Silversoul666: So you'd show this to a random fan of the show? |
| AcuteAngle #1069123 4 months ago |
1:04pm 2/27 -- rating image as 'questionable'; let's see how long this lasts. |
| Nebbie #1070126 4 months ago |
Safe. There's nothing showing and the only perversion is in your mind. The implication is there, but you don't hav to accept it.
Saying censored stuff is still questionable is negating the entire point of the censors. |
| Nebbie #1070145 4 months ago |
Additionally, @959, yes. Yes I would. Unless we're on EqD where a random fan has high chances of being severely against anything remotely resembling a hint of implied sexuality on ponies, let alone on fillies. |
| AcuteAngle #1070185 4 months ago |
@Nebbie: So, it's 'safe' because "the only perversion is in your mind", but it's still tagged 'sex_face'?
And if it's not implying a sexual theme with an underaged character, what is it implying? And what about these comments, from this thread: "way to block the best part" "Y U MAKE FOALS SO FUCKING HOT !!??" "*Clop clop clop* Wait... the explicit part is covered up *polc polc polC* *Goes to find the explicit version*" "Oh my god this version looks even more enticing" And finally, what does it hurt to have this marked as 'Questionable'? Do you really think anyone who has 'Questionable' turned off or thumbnailed wants to see Sweetie Belle with, as the tag says, "sex_face"? Do you really think anyone who wants to see this has 'Questionable' filtered out? |
| Nebbie #1070324 4 months ago |
sex_face is an inaccurate tag. I'd hav to search thru and chekk whether other images share this, but in general, sex face means face you hav during sex, not face you make to show you want sex. Either way, I don't see a face with implications as being itself questionable. Nothing is actually happening in this image.
You do realize that actual screencaps from the episode will get comments like that, right? Twilight standing over three fillies comes to mind here. The comments don't make the image any more or less questionable, otherwise pretty much every image I comment on would hav to be at least questionable lol. Seriously, unless you see a lot of comments complaining about the pic being rated too low (*scans.* oh look, it's AcuteAngle, a mildly disapproving anon, and a single anon implying it shouldn't be safe. I'm not exactly convinced here.). It hurts the default anon account who comes here for the first time and gets an inaccurate view of what this place is like. People usually turn questionable off to avoid nudity and gore. It doesn't hurt much to hav it safe either, except for your occasional white knight who's against anything that so much as implies a pedophilic desire. Congratulations on becoming the brave crusader who will make sure that these people who are all just like you aren't seeing an image of a kid winking at them suggestively! Come bakk with a shred of evidence you represent a significantly sized group of people on this, and you can bet this will be questionable. Also, this image (>>130145) is safe: 
I guess outright nonconsensual humping is waaaaay better than a filly being suggestive at you. |
| Nebbie #1070361 4 months ago |
Report on sex_face:
Sometimes used for faces during sex, sometimes for suggestive faces. Very rare tag actually, as usually bedroom_eyes fills the second role and people don't care much for the first. Many of the images with it being suggestive are rated safe...and are out of context screencaps. One out of context screencap was of the first type (Lesson Zero Twilight of course) and safe. Not sure what to make of that part really, other than that sex_face is probably in need of defining to avoid ambiguity, and is almost certainly either underused or unnecessary. Note: >>123293 was found during the search. It being questionable is a point in Acute's favor, but of interest are the comments which are extremely different from the ones on here. |
| Nebbie #1070373 4 months ago |
Oh and, I never said it wasn't implying a sexual theme. Just that implications don't matter.
I used to think they did, but any time I mentioned them in ratings justifications (it was what I thought questionable was primarily for, stuff that's suggestive) noone else supported the idea. Noone else seemed to care about implications, only what was actually in the image. |
| AcuteAngle #1070418 4 months ago |
I'd rate >>130145 as being about on par with this image, actually. But yeah, if it's the opinion of the community that stuff like this, that can't be interpreted as anything but a sexually-themed underaged character, is 'safe', then I think I don't belong here, and will just wind up annoying the community if I stay. |
| Nebbie #1070467 4 months ago |
>>132509
>>131005 >>133623 >>132908 >>132480 I knew I could find suggestive bed sex images with safe ratings! Considering even minor genitalia showing is questionable, and what these images imply, I think you can see the pattern. You just need to drop the idea that implications are important. For that matter, image ratings are hard to get quite right since we hav no clear distinctions. Don't even bother if nudity is involved, not many agree on its place. I tried to argue questionable unless humans, but that just won't cut it for a lot of people. I think boobs are questionable now tho, thanks to an image posted just to say that they are. |
| PonyRIG #1070481 4 months ago |
my serious business sensors are broken... |
| Nebbie #1070503 4 months ago |
You belong here, just keep your filters up and don't clikk on images that are suggestive with fillies. you can spot them easily, so that shouldn't be too much of an issue (I just had a funny realization that if you cover up questionable, you wouldnt notice this image being like that until the full thing is in front of you. the tags might need adding to). |
| TheLoneLampman #1072037 4 months ago |
Don't mind me; just leaving this here:
"If the submission might be considered inappropriate, by you or other users, rate it at least Questionable" |
| Silversoul666 #1074042 4 months ago |
This discussion is actually very logical an tame.
Meaning it doesn't excite me at all. And I personally would tag this pic as questionable. Even if I previsoulsy joked. My bad, I assumed Acute was joking and played back. |
| Django #1077951 4 months ago |
@Silversoul666....Wow thanks,you've given me a second option well fourth
1)I can kick her out of my house, lock the door and forget this ever happened 2)if the problem still continues I would help her overcome her mental sickness if this still continues I would spam the hell out of option #2 3)if repeating option #1 and #2 multiple times doesn't work to the psychologist 4)if earlier options fail repeatedly I will use "The Last Resort" hang myself Again thanks Silver. |
| Anonymous #1084555 4 months ago |
wat? :c |
| Anonymous #1117734 4 months ago |
Wow, this entire conversation is childish and immature as a whole. Overall its what, the bickering of art and where you found it? That implys you dont care to look at a thumbnail, as everything "Safe" has a thumbnail. Dont waste precious time flaming pictures, do what most are here for and get dat clopping done |
| Anonymous #1135138 4 months ago |
XD |