Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Anonymous
#1035940
4 months ago
It actually looks like the show.
I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Dumb_Rock
#1035941
4 months ago
Isn't he still a baby dragon?
Anonymous
#1035955
4 months ago
Why does Hasbro insist on churning out absolutely horrible products when they have massive amounts of money and have shown that they are capable of amazing quality? Just look at Transformers. There have been some amazing figures over the years, but lately it feels like they're packaging a small robot with a big ass ugly faggot of an accessory. And whenever they're ready to release quality, they cancel the line.

Because Hasbro is a bunch of asshole wankers, that's why.
CottonTales
#1035965
4 months ago
@anon do both it's the only logical conclusion
Anonymous
#1035983
4 months ago
How can a spike be soft
imnotgivingmynametoamachine
#1036033
4 months ago
Spike would qualify as 7-9 years old in show. The doll would be equivalent to his appearence during Twilight's cutie mark story.

Though I don't care too much for it, you have to understand that there are probably 3-5 year old girls who would want a baby Spike doll.
PowerToole
#1036069
4 months ago
Kill the world. Seriously.
Anonymous
#1036125
4 months ago
It's better than the other newbern quties.
Rostam
#1036218
4 months ago
good to see no newborn rule34...spike and pinkie
BackgroundPony17
#1036420
4 months ago
Does it breath fire?

Seriously, if it did I'd buy one.
Forestman
#1049926
4 months ago
@BackgroundPony17: Rubeus Hagrid would also