Image
Comments
| HeinousActsZX #1027272 5 months ago |
Is this anthro?
Looks more like winged, horned humans. |
| MintBerryCrunch #1027278 5 months ago |
With oddly colored skin.
I like it, but still. |
| Wooberjig #1027286 5 months ago |
I only considered it anthro because of the oddly colored skin. In the future, should I tag it as humanized if there like this, regardless of the color? |
| HeinousActsZX #1027300 5 months ago |
I would.
After all, real people come in all sorts of colors too. You can also tag anthro though. It can't hurt. |
| Step-chan #1027320 5 months ago |
O__O
Whoa... |
| Lium #1027349 5 months ago |
That is anthro. Real people aren't blue. Or that shade of white.
Nor do they have horns or wings. Or tails. |
| Anonymous #1027780 5 months ago |
^Agree with Lium. |
| fixman88 #1027867 5 months ago |
Oh wow, so pretty! |
| Anonymous #1028673 5 months ago |
I disagree with Lium. Anthro is an equal combination of human and animal in appearance and anatomy.
The body and face are completely human, adding only the horn and wings does not make them anthro. It's really well drawn, but I find it very unattractive. |
| Vinrael #1028890 5 months ago |
...two of my favourite skintones here. Noice |
| Anonymous #1030689 5 months ago |
Sorry Anonymous #1028673, anthro is a mix of human and animal that varies. Rule of thumb is if it's above 90% animal then it's feral, if it's below 10% animal it's humanized. It barely and I mean barely is within what qualifies as anthro. |
| Fendo #1031712 5 months ago |
darn! why aprons look so sexy |
| Rezak #1053260 4 months ago |
^
you mean aprons on naked bodies?) take a wild guess bro) |