Image
Comments
| Anonymous #996086 5 months ago |
How is this not explicit? |
| fonypag #996104 5 months ago |
Some posters consider nudity by itself to be insufficient for an explicit rating. I'm not sure how I feel about that, but you can always just filter out "nudity," so... |
| PonyRIG #996110 5 months ago |
uh...we can see her vag, this is clearly explicit, or you want annoying moral guardians over here? |
| Gittonsxv #996125 5 months ago |
just noticed this is anthro, such a good image as well but the hands just killed it for me |
| Liberion #996621 5 months ago |
>but the hands just killed it for me
Same here. |
| Anonymous #997023 5 months ago |
>but the hands just killed it for me
Interesting. For me it was those numbers. Why are they there? What do they mean? Why do they distract me and draw my attention so much? |
| Kush420killa #997295 5 months ago |
Questions questions questions I find this image ok :D |
| Takino #998424 5 months ago |
Damn it, Gitton. I might not have noticed the hands if you hadn't pointed them out, and now I can't stop looking at them. |
| Lurks-no-More #1004437 5 months ago |
I'm baffled that people find a cartoon pony drawn in a very explicit pose fine, but suddenly freak out when that pony is anthropomorphised enough to walk on back legs and to have fingers... |
| Anonymous #1012352 5 months ago |
@Anonymous, re: numbers
that's the artist's signature. |