Image
Comments
| CogWeaver #965821 5 months ago |
RD: "Wow, I never new Celestia was so batshit insane!" |
| Zincy #965830 5 months ago |
Ea, Dawkins represents a lot of what is wrong with the new atheist movement. Hitchen's was a billion times superior. |
| JP #965832 5 months ago |
HOW DARE YOU QUESTION CELESTIA'S EXISTENCE!? |
| Anonymous #965939 5 months ago |
@Zincy
i dissagree both men had their strenght and weaknesses i think that Hichens was more forceful and more *rational* philosophical talking about the morality of religion Dawkins was just more passive Both are good, just diffrent |
| Kawa #965970 5 months ago |
939: hear hear. |
| Anonymous #965982 5 months ago |
I'm an athiest,
And Dawkins and Hichens are such major assholes. |
| Anonymous #966253 5 months ago |
@982 Damn straight. Hitchens started out fairly likeable in his early work and slowly turned into a belligerent wanker, Dawkins appears to have always been that way.
They do not cast /our/ (lack of) beliefs in a good light at all. |
| Nightweaver20xx #971151 5 months ago |
The Year 2007 eh? Oh that should be a fun read. |
| Anonymous #1035306 4 months ago |
I think Dawkins name should have been more punny... |