Image
Comments
| Anonymous #944122 5 months ago |
Mr and Mrs Sparkle |
| CallMeAl #944127 5 months ago |
And another division of fanon is shot down. |
| Anonymous #944128 5 months ago |
Surnames would be too restrictive of pony names anyway. |
| Dumb_Rock #944134 5 months ago |
There goes a lot of fan theories. |
| CogWeaver #944139 5 months ago |
^And then a BAJILIZILION MORE rise up to take their place. |
| BattleGT #944141 5 months ago |
I thought this was established a long time ago |
| Anonymous #944165 5 months ago |
Anyone with half a brain already knew this. |
| Fronzel #944207 5 months ago |
This just in: the writers don't give a shit about this stuff.
Many fond regards, Slowpoke News Bureau |
| Anonymous #944259 5 months ago |
But if it isn't a surname, what is it? A description? And if it's a description, why is it "Fluttershy" and not "Flutter Shy"? |
| Anonymous #944328 5 months ago |
People thought it was anything else but this, outside of a few fanfics using the idea of surnames for flavor? |
| Anonymous #944516 5 months ago |
^Well case in point the "Smith" and "Rich" families, which they were refered to in said episodes. However it is blatently clear that this is not the case with every single pony or their families. I wish there was something in the canon though to put this to rest. In the mean time we have the wonderful people on the production team. :) |
| KennyMan666 #944717 5 months ago |
My take on it is that instead of surnames, ponies mainly rely on theme naming to note family relation. See, of course, the aforementioned Apple family. Sometimes, this takes the form of what we would consider surnames, such as in the Cake family. We had Stinkin' Rich and Filthy Rich, but Diamond Tiara isn't named Rich. |
| Anonymous #946303 5 months ago |
1st Anon:
That's fan made too,you know? |