Image
Comments
| ThePowerofANON #896820 6 months ago |
Tried that once, didn't work. |
| SenatorSufficient #896821 6 months ago |
He will. |
| Harlequin_Jester #896827 6 months ago |
 |
| PikaRobo #896829 6 months ago |
Damn it guys! If it has anything to do with Roboshi, he WILL fave it! >:( Show me an exception. |
| Anonymous #896832 6 months ago |
If he faves this I will go out and kill no less than 10 innocent people. Their blood will be on your hands Roboshi! |
| RedshirtZombie #896856 6 months ago |
@PikaRobo: Roboshi cannot fave this comment. He can fave the picture connected to its thread, but he cannot fave this comment.
Counterexample demonstrated; your argument is invalid. :) |
| PikaRobo #896926 6 months ago |
^"It" as in the picture. I REALLY thought I didn't need to say that. :|
(And now it looks like Sweetiepoo is one of the few exceptions.) |
| Shad0will #897019 6 months ago |
Roboshi favs everything. |
| biojal #897061 6 months ago |
Yes! I win! |
| Nebbie #897078 6 months ago |
Roboshi has favorited this. /thread |
| Anonymous #897084 6 months ago |
guess from now on we need to only post sweetie poo pics. |
| RedshirtZombie #897117 6 months ago |
PikaRobo: Your initial statement lacked any context clarifying your statement to refer to ONLY Ponibooru pictures; Roboshi exists elsewhere on the Internet. No moving the goalposts!
Relax, I'm only snarking because I saw an obvious hole in the written logic; besides, Ponibooru already figured out that Roboshi faves (almost) every image on Ponibooru, except the subset of Sweetiepoo images, and he'll even fave those if they also mention him/her/it. There's probably a 'meta' requirement too. (Pronoun variability is because I think that Roboshi is an android custom-made to fave everything on the internet, starting with Ponibooru. :) ) TLDR: Perceived fallacy denied, but I'm amusing myself at your post's expense, not yours. Peace? (Also, Roboshi is robot,shee?) |
| RedshirtZombie #897204 6 months ago |
Update: My counterexample is potentially disproven, depending on whether or not a screencap of it qualifies. >>116409
So, PikaRobo's claim may still be true. Also, I need to shut up now. |
| Redge #899043 6 months ago |
inb4 double dare you, double dog dare you, etc. |
| Anonymous #1023968 5 months ago |
in other news there has been a random attack on ten civilians suspect is still at large |