Image
Comments
| DPV111 #884498 6 months ago |
Cute. Could use better anatomy, but cute. |
| Cymek #884541 6 months ago |
^ How can I improve, suggestions? |
| DPV111 #884572 6 months ago |
Eyes are too big, ears are too small, grey one is missing her tail and nostrils. Pretty good overa all though. |
| Cymek #884610 6 months ago |
Thanks for helping me out! :) |
| DPV111 #884629 6 months ago |
^ NP. Hope to see you draw more. And more than porn too. |
| Satch #885498 6 months ago |
Could also note that their vulva's are located a tad bit human here possibly, remember that the vagina follows the pelvic bone and spine, not the legs. So the vulva is located sorta near their tail between spaced between the taint and their plothole. Might be hard to show accurately in this pose, but can be worth thinking on. I can personally understand wanting to show their goods however, but comparing to human anatomy, it'd be like having the vulva pretty much around where a male has their penis. Wouldn't work too well for birth purposes. As for the anatomy design on the genitals, I can understand wanting to do human design as it might be more "familiar", but I'd suggest that you do the "candy vags" colour scheme, following the natural anatomical law when it comes to colours.
That being: They are the same hue as the upper pair of lips/any other outer flesh. So it would basically be a similar colour to their outlines. (Humans follow this "law" as well as most other animals, a blunt example would be that you might have seen that females with a bright skin tone have a more pinkish vulva while those with a dark skintone has a more brownish tone, so it's actually "not as bad" as many thinks, or doesn't want to do "feral anatomy". Anyhow, that was a tad bit long haha, hope you found any of it useful. |
| Cymek #888413 6 months ago |
@DPV, want some art? |
| DPV111 #888425 6 months ago |
Nah. I'm good.
I never request anything. |