Image
Comments
| Dark_Horst #806550 6 months ago |
actually no, explicit does not extend to nipples just because you americans are afraid of them.
moron |
| Aggressively-Pastel #806566 6 months ago |
Sigh. Rules say otherwise. Seems pretty NSFW to me. Yes, I know it's a prudish interpretation. |
| Dark_Horst #806634 6 months ago |
just read it. these rules don't say when a picture is to be marked as explicit, only when it's not to be marked as safe.
"Tags are equally important. If you're rating your image anything other than "Safe", there must be a reason why. Ensure that you've specified a tag for that. The following tags are called out by name (although this is not an exclusive list): -nudity - naked humans, or sentient nonhumans with explicitly drawn genitals/uncovered breasts. whether in a sexual context or not." nothing about nipples being explicit. |
| Aggressively-Pastel #806641 6 months ago |
"If the submission might be considered NSFW, by you or other users, rate it Explicit" → when a picture is to be marked as explicit. |
| Aggressively-Pastel #806649 6 months ago |
(Though TBH, I'd love to settle on Questionable for this too, just to bring it into line with other 'boorus.) |
| JazzGlenn #806775 6 months ago |
love the anatomy of this one... YOU GUYS! stop arguing! Its Christmas... or the day after christmas... the point issss DONT FIGHT! |
| Dark_Horst #806848 6 months ago |
whoever wrote those rules should get slapped. with a brick
"if might be considered" is dependant in the interpretation of who knows what kinda axe-murdering maniac and by no way a definite guideline. invalid in my book. also jazz, calm down. that was way to civil for a fight |
| Shpaikz #807614 6 months ago |
Are those...Penises I see wriggling on it's hooves?
+10 internets to whoever gets the ref |
| Steel_Thunder #808011 6 months ago |
^ Old World Blues |
| Anonymous #810283 6 months ago |
Well its hot so u all can shut up :p |