Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Dark_Horst
#806550
6 months ago
actually no, explicit does not extend to nipples just because you americans are afraid of them.
moron
Aggressively-Pastel
#806566
6 months ago
Sigh. Rules say otherwise. Seems pretty NSFW to me. Yes, I know it's a prudish interpretation.
Dark_Horst
#806634
6 months ago
just read it. these rules don't say when a picture is to be marked as explicit, only when it's not to be marked as safe.

"Tags are equally important. If you're rating your image anything other than "Safe", there must be a reason why. Ensure that you've specified a tag for that. The following tags are called out by name (although this is not an exclusive list):
-nudity - naked humans, or sentient nonhumans with explicitly drawn genitals/uncovered breasts. whether in a sexual context or not."

nothing about nipples being explicit.
Aggressively-Pastel
#806641
6 months ago
"If the submission might be considered NSFW, by you or other users, rate it Explicit" → when a picture is to be marked as explicit.
Aggressively-Pastel
#806649
6 months ago
(Though TBH, I'd love to settle on Questionable for this too, just to bring it into line with other 'boorus.)
JazzGlenn
#806775
6 months ago
love the anatomy of this one... YOU GUYS! stop arguing! Its Christmas... or the day after christmas... the point issss DONT FIGHT!
Dark_Horst
#806848
6 months ago
whoever wrote those rules should get slapped. with a brick
"if might be considered" is dependant in the interpretation of who knows what kinda axe-murdering maniac and by no way a definite guideline. invalid in my book.

also jazz, calm down. that was way to civil for a fight
Shpaikz
#807614
6 months ago
Are those...Penises I see wriggling on it's hooves?
+10 internets to whoever gets the ref
Steel_Thunder
#808011
6 months ago
^ Old World Blues
Anonymous
#810283
6 months ago
Well its hot so u all can shut up :p