Image
Comments
| Anonymous #804187 7 months ago |
Should be explicit. |
| Satch #804213 7 months ago |
Why? There's barely showing any crotch, and nothing really suggestive is going on. |
| Aggressively-Pastel #804314 7 months ago |
^ Because the rules about NSFW stuff are slightly stronger here than at other 'boorus. Short form: possibly inappropriate → Questionable; possibly NSFW → Explicit. |
| Pnukup #804320 7 months ago |
It doesn't have to be penetration for it to be explicit.
She's nude so therefor it's explicit. But the image itself look more like a sketch then a finished artwork, to be honest... |
| StalkerZHS #804327 7 months ago |
because nudity/porn = explicit |
| DPV111 #804914 7 months ago |
I'm explicit right now. |
| Satch #805443 6 months ago |
/\ Yes, exactly. It's nudity, not porn. That's the difference between PG15 and PG18. As long as it's tagged as nudity and not suggestive or above "artistic nudity". It should be questionable by the rules. Since if going with "what anyone might see as inappropriate", we'd have to rate ~50 % of everything explicit, underwear, views of flanks etc. Since there is always those that see that as explicit. I've stepped up all my ratings one step on this site, normally I'm used to rating females same as males if in the exact same situation and pose. But I know there's plenty that can't handle anatomy due to how they were brought up, plus there are some minors here as well, and I take them into consideration. Not need to show them breasts when they're just here for ponies. |
| Xuncu #824835 6 months ago |
Hm, considering her bangs, I woulda thought Twilight would be a trimming gal, not brillo-pad bush. |