Image
Comments
| Anonymous #788877 7 months ago |
DRIVE ME CLOSER
I WANT TO HIT THEM WITH MY BINOCULARS |
| Ichijoe #789005 7 months ago |
Damn you Anonymous damn you to Hell!! /jk |
| Makaan #789151 7 months ago |
Use that Beast-Killer! Smash those fascist invaders! |
| Anonymous #789510 7 months ago |
Зверобой крут! А с пони стал на 20% круче чем был! А если ещё и раскрасить...
Beastkiller is awesome! And with pony it was 20% cooler than it was. And with pony colors.. |
| Natsuke #789716 7 months ago |
I thought Tank was Rainbow's pet :\ |
| Anonymous #790063 7 months ago |
its not tank. its self propelled howitzer artillery
with big caliber, enough to break any nazy beast armor from far distance(like panthers, tigers) so soldiers called it beast killer зверобой |
| Rezak #791539 7 months ago |
Знай наших)
Good choose, Twi) |
| Makaan #802214 7 months ago |
Good to see that Twilight is one of the highest scoring tank killers of the presumed great patriot pony war. Unless she counts anti-tank guns and trucks, half-tracks, armoured cars and the like?
No, Twilight is a good and honest student so she'd only ever count enemy tank kills. |
| ObssN #817361 6 months ago |
@Picture and Anon790063: [militarynitpicking] actually, the ISU-152 isn't exactly a self-propelled howitzer artillery either. It could be (and was) used in direct-fire infantry support, direct-fire anti-tank, AND indirect fire artillery roles. The Soviets actually didn't have very many dedicated self-propelled artillery systems, since their artillery doctrine allowed for the useage of artillery guns in a direct-fire role[1]. Hence, the Soviets simply classified it (and other such multi-purpose systems like the Su-122) as Self-Propelled Guns[2]. The Su-76, Su-85, and Su-100's on the other hand were built for a dedicated anti-tank role and hence were classified as Tank Destroyers.[/military nitpicking]
[1]This carried over into the Cold War and was so endemic that every artillery battery actually always had a few rounds of HEAT shells for their guns in order to turn field pieces into impromptu anti-tank guns. [2]Both of the -152s (SU and ISU) were actually surprisingly ill-suited for the indirect fire role because of their low rate of fire. The Su-122, not so much. |