Image
Comments
| Anonymous #774304 7 months ago |
do not want |
| Rainbow_Slash #774321 7 months ago |
It's the man face. |
| Acid55 #774324 7 months ago |
| cromwell15 #774325 7 months ago |
lesbian body is manly |
| 7Nights #774328 7 months ago |
Yes it's intentional androgyny. Novel, I know. |
| Capt-Nemo #774348 7 months ago |
>Full-on human nudity is "questionable"
>Pony crotchboobs are "explicit" wat |
| Dan50 #774361 7 months ago |
Make her less butch. Bleh |
| Scootsmod #774377 7 months ago |
I think the face looks off for some reason, maybe it's the eyes. |
| YouCloppinToFoalsBro #774381 7 months ago |
You beat me here by three seconds. I feel compelled to address your point. The eyes are a little off-kilter, like if you saw her straight on they wouldn't line up.
That said... ಠ◡ಠ Crazy, crazy people up in here. 's a hot human!Dash. |
| Anonymous #774435 7 months ago |
its the gap between mouth and nose |
| Satch #774510 7 months ago |
@Capt: Actually, from what I know of the rating, "general nudity" is questionable. And "suggestive nudity" is explicit. |
| Liariv #774518 7 months ago |
Vulva = explicit, I think. |
| Stank #774520 7 months ago |
I'm calling out this artist for drawing shaved vulvas that look like they belong on a little girl. They only look like that on grown women if they get plastic surgery. |
| strawberry_mask #774541 7 months ago |
Are you an vagina expert ? |
| Stank #774545 7 months ago |
^
Yes, and I have the diploma on my wall to prove it. |
| Lurks-no-More #774582 7 months ago |
Dan50:Human Dash - straight, lesbian, bi, whatever - *would* look kind of butch in any case. |
| Cipher #774653 7 months ago |
ITS A TRAP I JUST KNOW IT |
| Scootsmod #774732 7 months ago |
#774653:
You can see EVERYTHING. How can it be a trap? |
| strawberry_mask #774745 7 months ago |
Maybe he thinks the penis is invisible |
| Anonymous #775442 7 months ago |
 |
| Satch #775485 7 months ago |
@Stank: You do know that is the "preferred" look in porn right? Almost every guy I've seen (mention it) online prefers child vulva's/surgically slimmed down. Most don't know it thou, and seem to think that is how they are supposed to look. Can't blame them to much thou, the porn industry made it the "beauty standard", or "norm" so to speak. |
| Xuncu #775553 7 months ago |
@Stank: Huh, knew there were morphological diffrences in vagainas, but never thought about why. |
| Satch #776744 7 months ago |
@Xuncu: Well, the difference I know of is mainly to 1: keep dirt and whatnot out of it when it's not ready to "be utilized". 2: Likely show if the female is ready to mate. So technically, drawing females in this way sorta encourages undersage sex as they are shown as the "preferred models" (not counting the huge rack norm ofc). 3: The hymen acts as a "wall" before the females body is ready to breed, with age it stretches and grown along with the body. In 20-30 % it fails to do this properly and doesn't properly stretch, thus those are what caused the hymen myth. Technically only about 5-10 % should fail with this hymen thing, but due to parents often forcing their daughters to not exercise and whatnot (since that is male activity) their vagina can suffer from not being able to get the "movement" it would need. 4: If I recall correctly, the labia and whatnot that develops from the vulva helps with the mucus, pheromones and lubricant. That was probably explained a bit iffy, but should be fine hopefully. |
| YouCloppinToFoalsBro #776753 7 months ago |
Sometimes I think you're only here to talk about vaginas. |
| Satch #780184 7 months ago |
Nah, not only (and as said, it's vulva. Or do you refer to your penis as "urethra"?) xP But there is allot of opportunities to talk about em. And heck, there's allot of people here that just talk about "flank", dicks or "sexy stuff". I'm at least trying to educate/enlighten people about something. And honestly, when you're at the internet, many of the random people you met are likely to have the wrong assumptions about allot. Especially due to the porn. |