Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

JP
#766803
7 months ago
Oh don't cry, I'll be gentle. I'll remove that gag if you promise not to yell, ok?
YouCloppinToFoalsBro
#766811
7 months ago
Let's see, the artist? No, I like some of these.
Porn? Bondage? Nope, some good stuff in there too.
Rainbow Dash? Not on your life.

...could we start using a "non-con" tag for filter purposes?
Simlun
#767303
7 months ago
^Just create one. I'll tag this as non-con for you.
Nebbie
#769675
7 months ago
non-con? You guys do realize that that just means rape right? There's two options: want the sex, or don't want it.
YouCloppinToFoalsBro
#769684
7 months ago
It can. The case I made with the artist was that "rape" is also a tag used in Molestia joke set-ups, or is otherwise played for ridiculous laughs.
Images like this, where sex is not occurring but the pay-off is clearly that they're terrified of what's to come, would qualify for the tag. It's a filtering courtesy, SweetHD went through and tagged a bunch of their stuff themselves after that discussion, and given the amount of useless shit tags this site uses I don't really see why you need to argue against it or remove it.