Image
Comments
| NotAPseudonym #761186 7 months ago |
>>97010 |
| NightJack #761191 7 months ago |
^ Nope, if your isn't a dupe for being a smaller file size then so is this. |
| NotAPseudonym #761222 7 months ago |
I didn't explicitly call it a dupe, but this is half-framerate and people might want full-rate so that's what the link is. |
| NightJack #761311 7 months ago |
^ Well people tend to use that, when they don't say anything, to point out a dupe, so you have to understand someone well think your calling it's a dupe. |
| NotAPseudonym #761413 7 months ago |
I suppose. To be fair, I don't see the point in this animation when it's not actually much smaller. I'm trying to make _big_ cuts without losing quality.
I realise I'm being a bit of an ass here, but really if you're going to cut out half the frames to have a smaller file... at least make it count? 
370kb 
120kb 
55kb |
| Abou #761438 7 months ago |
How about we leave you to do all the gifs, eh NAP? |
| kuren18 #762040 7 months ago |
@abou- u talking to me? i like making gifs |
| Abou #765047 7 months ago |
Nah, not you kuren. NotAPseudonym seems to enjoy uploading smaller sizes of previously uploaded GIFs. |