Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Digara
#744288
7 months ago
Nope, it's a recolour.
bustoblaster
#744293
7 months ago
Kinda fucked up with this pic's size, but whatev. Here's the deal:

Last week, I spent a whole day uploading old pics because I couldn't find them using the proper (specific) tags. Also, I posted a few colored/uncolored pics of images that were already on here, yet someone tagged said pics as dupes, without even linking to the original post of said image.

aaand that's why I'm posing this question. Just wondered what you night owls thought.
FIMDiscord
#744297
7 months ago
Digara's got it right
Nebbie
#744300
7 months ago
Any change to the image qualifies as not a dupe. Edits, resizes, croppings, combinations, etc. are all able to make not a dupe.
Jackarunda
#744369
7 months ago
What is this place, filled with so many wonders,
casting its spell, that I am now under
bustoblaster
#744375
7 months ago
@Jack WHAT. What IS this?
Kein
#744381
7 months ago
Well, I consider it as a trash, junk, but since rules do not specify anything aboutthat... jusr use "cheap_recolor" tag.
bustoblaster
#744465
7 months ago
that's a bit harsh, Kein, especially when I've seen colors better than what was previously posted