Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

Neeshoof
#724047
7 months ago
What? No official statistics?
Oh well, have some of mine.

Questions, comments, requests for raw data? Contact me through DeviantArt.
HeinousActsZX
#724068
7 months ago
You inspired me to check my personal stats.
I can't believe I've left a comment 3846 times, including this one.
Neeshoof
#724093
7 months ago
Oh, wait, clarification:
Not "mine" as "of my account", but rather "of the whole site, presented by me".
Verbose
#724103
7 months ago
It's not the easiest graph to interpret, but I guess it's hard to pull off visually appealing graph for the lay person that's easy-to-grasp. Axes should always be labeled.

But the information is good and has a nice breadth to it. It's not a bad graph by any means. It just took me a second to figure out that Ponibooru Statistics November 2011 was the title for all of the information and not labels for the axes.
Anonymous
#724111
7 months ago
What Verbose said. Labeling axes is pretty crucial, and more clarity could be afforded. Otherwise, excellent visual presentation and good compilation of statistics.
Anonymous
#724120
7 months ago
That's awesome! Thank you for your effort!
Anonymous
#724142
7 months ago
Well, it every maths and science teacher I have ever had has succeeded:

I am exceedingly bothered by the lack of proper axis labelling unit measurements, not to mention vague descriptions and titles. I wouldn't dare submit this as it is.
Anonymous
#724143
7 months ago
it seems*
Anonymous
#724485
7 months ago
It definitely needs better labeling, but still very interesting to look at all the data.
Velcro
#726080
7 months ago
Indeed, the graphs need some labeling. Perhaps a unit?
Neeshoof
#727157
7 months ago
Ok, I agree that it's missing some information, notably axis labels. Mea culpa. But on the other hand come on, if you're reading a "monthly statistic" with data at points labelled 1-30 it shouldn't be THAT hard to figure out what it means :) I
As for overall clarity - this whole thing started as data gathered for personal use, then evolved into graphs, with decorations and publishing as an afterthought. I guess after staring at it for hours I had trouble judging readability from someone else's perspective. Come back next month to reevaluate :)

As for "units" - day(date), time-of-day and number-of-posts are all unitless, so descriptions: yes, units: no.
Neeshoof
#896610
6 months ago
Stats for december 2011:

>>116364