
| Anonymous #691759 8 months ago |
I'm not even sure what to say about this one. The overall shape of the body, nose without an oil-cooler inlet under the prop and the landing gear close to the centerline say late-model Spitfire, but all Spits produced in marks late enough to feature bubble canopies had Griffon engines, not Merlins, with larger noses, bumps over the cylinder blocks and five-blade propellers, not four. Plus, the Spit never had a centerline air intake--they were under the wings. That part plus the four-blade prop says P-51. But the upper rear fuselage is clearly not a P-51; The Mustang was level, not curvy, with a promient dorsal fin running forwards from the tail. Plus, the P-51 had a hella thin wing with landing gear that folded in, not out, and that wing is clearly not the case. |
| Anonymous #691783 8 months ago |
If this is supposed to be a P51 D there is most certainly room for improvement.
![]() |