Image
Comments
| Lupal_Fillyus #686953 8 months ago |
An edited version of:
http://www.ponibooru.org/post/view/85648 To clarify that even with the great imagination anons have, no foals were harmed in the making of this picture. |
| Anonymous #686966 8 months ago |
nice try
>>72647 |
| Lupal_Fillyus #686999 8 months ago |
The point isn't the size of the dick dammit.
Even in your "counterpic" that dick isn't quite parallel with her stomach, which it kinda needs to be to reach just Sunkist's anus, let alone her vagina. That's the point. |
| NightJack #687007 8 months ago |
There is nothing explicit is this image, I know some people don't like cartoonlion but that's no reason to mark it all explicit. |
| Dark_Horst #687008 8 months ago |
it could be already int here and held down by sunkist |
| Gittonsxv #687018 8 months ago |
guys....it might reach her back if futashy was erect.....if she was flaccid then no, why carnt we ever have a innocent, safe, 100% nothing happening pic with genitals -.- |
| NightJack #687021 8 months ago |
^ Yes. |
| Lupal_Fillyus #687031 8 months ago |
NJ: My guess is my awesome MSPenis made it explicit? Dunno lol. |
| LitCigarette #687049 8 months ago |
people don't seem to get that a horse dick up the butt would probably make a foal react slightly differently. like, maybe crying, or (at the very least) SLIGHT discomfort?
i mean, i'm an adult doing it with humans, and i usually don't have THAT face when it's happening to me. :/ |
| Spiffy #687082 8 months ago |
soo... since it doesn't have a penis, it shouldn't be marked explicit?
ooooh okay, so let's leave it safe for the people who have ponibooru on "SAFE" mode explain to anybody who may be browsing the site. "Hey! You may have seen balls and an anus, but at least you didn't see a dick, right?" |
| Lupal_Fillyus #687088 8 months ago |
Spiffy: Also a vagina.
That aside, there is also "questionable", for the cases where it's not meant as porn, but they are simply naked with genitalia. I wouldn't rate a sauna as explicit. |
| Dark_Horst #687152 8 months ago |
@LitCgarette:
you are forgetting that we are talking about drawn vaginas in this case, which are the definition of hammerspace |
| NightJack #687276 8 months ago |
@Lupal_Fillyus that's what I mean, it's like so few on this site have herd the term "artistic nudity." |
| NightJack #687280 8 months ago |
^ There like, "OMG, there are genitals shown, it has to be explicit and nothing less," it's so dumb. |
| Anonymous #687477 8 months ago |
^ well, most people on this site probably aren't old enough to know the difference anyway. And if they aren't they shouldn't be here in the first place.
I was going somewhere with that, but i forgot. |
| Jackarunda #687697 8 months ago |
I'm upvoting this because it portrays Futashy in a bad light |
| Lupal_Fillyus #687843 8 months ago |
The whole point of it was to show this can not possibly be seen in a bad light :( |
| Anonymous #688082 8 months ago |
^^Jeez, Jack, at least hide yo hate. |
| Anonymous #688217 8 months ago |
@7477 and NJ
the system of "safe", "questionable" and "explicit" was put in place for the purpose of "if you don't want to see genitals, you don't have to". filtering tags works to an extent but ratings like these are more reliable. I say genitals belong in explicit, and I see no reason to claim immaturity on my part for it. |
| Anonymous #688219 8 months ago |
*inb4 any of you try to "explain" to me that that's not the ONLY reason for the system. |