Blotter updated: 06/17/12Show/Hide Show All

Image

Tag History
(edit info)
Rating

Prev | Index | Next

Comments

PonyRIG
#679496
8 months ago
again, be your own critic
Tacoworld501
#679505
8 months ago
>People getting butthurt over Infamous 2 getting 7.5 from Gamespot
>Nobody caring about Halo: CEA getting 8 from IGN

See, this is why I stick to the Bungie forums.
Zeren
#679507
8 months ago
Uhm... Since when is 7.5 bad? 5 is average so 7.5 must be pretty damn good.
SenatorSufficient
#679509
8 months ago
Cyanfunk
#679512
8 months ago
Who the fuck takes Gamespot, IGN, and the like seriously for reviews anyway.
HeinousActsZX
#679547
8 months ago
I haven't played a video game in three weeks.
Cursed ponies.
Anonymous
#679571
8 months ago
Yeah, but its not like Halo was all that fantastic anyway. There are better FPS games, even back in 2000.
For years you Halo loonies went on and on and never once mentioned the Grunts. Those lil bastards were hilarious, Y U NO MENTION THEM?
Tacoworld501
#679581
8 months ago
Cuz

Grunts don't need to be mentioned. We already know they're hilarious.
fonypag
#679606
8 months ago
@Zeren

That's kind of like saying C's are average. Each critic has their own way of scoring, but I generally find 7/10 to be the score for an "average" game.
Van_Horsing
#679621
8 months ago
Don't care. I usually find the scores Gamespot and its ilk pump out are woefully inaccurate anyway, on the rare occasions I visit their sites.
Shader
#679626
8 months ago
@#679606

That's why the scores from sites like this are absolutely meaningless.

10/10 should mean perfect. Nothing could be done better, no bugs/issues/glitches, gameplay is a perfect orgasm from start to finish.

0 is worst, 5 is average, 10 is perfect. Not 5 is the devil incarnate, 7 is average, 10 is great, 11 is greater.
Anonymous
#679706
8 months ago
I thought they were reacting to the pun...
WolfSeagull
#679993
8 months ago
I see nothing wrong with this.
inFAMOUS is better than inFAMOUS 2.